Black grass bug damage to intermediate wheatgrass forage quality Sue L. Blodgett, Andrew W. Lenssen 1, S. Dennis Cash Department of Animal and Range Science,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Enhancing the Nutritive Value of Grass Seed Straw for Beef Cattle Carl Hunt Department of Animal and Veterinary Science University of Idaho Kristen Johnson.
Advertisements

Are “As Excreted Values” Valid in Phosphorus Budgets for Grazing Beef Cattle? Pete Deal, Rangeland Management Specialist, USDA Natural Resources Conservation.
Carbohydrates in Dairy Nutrition L.E. Chase and T.R. Overton Dept. of Animal Science Cornell University.
Responses of Sweet Cherry Productivity and Soil Quality to Alternate Groundcover and Irrigation Systems Xinhua Yin 1, Xiaolan Huang 1, and Lynn Long 2.
DALLES MOUNTAIN RANCH REHABILITATION PROJECT A cooperative partnership between Western SARE, Washington State University, Washington State Parks, and Native.
Sensory Evaluation of Hay Mylen Bohle Area Extension Agronomist Oregon State University Extension Service Crook County.
By C Kohn, Department of Agricultural Sciences Waterford, WI
By: A. Riasi (PhD in Animal Nutrition & Physiology) تغذیه دام در مرتع Animal nutrition on the rangeland (Part 4)
Energy Energy is the potential to do work. Energy can be converted from one form to another but can not be created or destroyed. Units (Nutrition) calorie.
why, where and when of Pasture Management Willie Lantz Extension Educator Ag and Natural Resources Garrett County, Maryland.
Optimum range beef production is achieved only by matching the animal’s genetic potential to the nutritional environment.
Hay Considerations Part of the Ruminant Livestock: Facing New Economic Realities Meetings.
ADAPTATION OF WARM SEASON ANNUAL LEGUMES FOR FORAGE IN SOUTHEASTERN NEW MEXICO By: Jim Armendariz in cooperation with: Dr. Calderon-Mendoza, A. Islas,
RELATING FORAGE COMPONENTS TO FORAGE QUALITY Shelby Filley, Douglas County David Bohnert, EOARC, Harney County Oregon State University Extension Service,
Basics to Small Farm Beef Cow Nutrition Adam Hady Agriculture Agent Richland County UWEX Basics to Beef Cow Nutrition.
1 Supplementation of Low Quality Forages Norman Suverly WSU Okanogan County Extension Educator.
Bermudagrass Pasture – 2011 Breakdown of Projected Costs per Acre $243.59/acre.
What is the difference? 1)Digestible energy 2)How much can be eaten 1)Digestible energy 2)How much can be eaten.
Carbon content of managed grasslands: implications for carbon sequestration Justine J. Owen * and Whendee L. Silver Dept. of Environmental Science, Policy.
USING A TEST HAY FOR FEEDING LIVESTOCK Shelby J. Filley Regional Livestock & Forage Specialist Proper nutrition at a lower cost.
Basic Beef Cow Nutrition Katherine Whitman, DVM, MS Great Plains Veterinary Educational Center.
Dennis Hancock, PhD. Extension Forage Specialist
Improved pasture Resources in the Madiama Commune of Mali, West Africa: Working with women groups at the village level Ozzie Abaye, Meriem El Hadj and.
Energy and protein allowances in diets for athletic horses used in western riding Department of Animal Science University of Padova
Abstract: This study was conducted to determine the effects of reducing rumen degradable protein (RDP) with constant rumen undegradable protein in mid-lactation.
Forage Quality I: Nutritional Quality Lawton Stewart SE Hay Convention March 29, 2011.
By: A. Riasi (PhD in Animal Nutrition & Physiology) تغذیه دام در مرتع Animal nutrition on the rangeland (Part 5)
Natural is best. A horse’s stomach can only hold 2-4 gallons of food at a time, and it takes about 30 minutes to get from there to the small intestine…
11 Livestock Forage Disaster Program (LFP) James B. Johnson Emeritus Professor MSU Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics Billings, MT January.
Training Lambs to be Weed-eaters Experiments on the efficiency of Ovis airies for use in the biological control of Brachypodium sylvaticum- a non-native.
Regeneration of Natural Pasture in Enclosures for Parthenium Weed Management in the Rangeland of Jigjiga, Somali Regional State, Ethiopia B Y Lisanework.
DGM:ISU:2013 Sheep and Pastures Dr. Dan “Grumpy” Morrical Sheep Extension Specialist Animal Science Department
Foraging Strategies K.Launchbaugh K.Launchbaugh BLM Photo
Mardiati Zain,J. Rahman, Khasrad Department of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Animal Science, Andalas University, Padang - Indonesia Effect Sacharomyces.
SUMMER SUPPLEMENTATION: PLANT AND ANIMAL RESPONSE – A KANSAS PERSPECTIVE Lyle Lomas and Joe Moyer KSU SE Agricultural Research Center Parsons.
Seasonal variation of feed values in arid mountain grasslands under grazing impact in Qilian Shan, NW China.
Meeting the Nutritional Needs of Livestock on Pasture Donna M. Amaral-Phillips University of Kentucky.
Diurnal Changes in Forage Quality Affects Animal Preference, Intake, Performance Hank Mayland, Dave Mertens and Bret Taylor USDA-ARS Kimberly, ID; Madison,
CHO Metabolism.
Interpreting a Hay Analysis Report. Date ReceivedLab #F 0001 Sample IDField 1Species #13 Species NameMixed Grass TypeHAY VarietyMixedAnalysis Date Chemical.
Lactation Number Effects on the Genetic Variability of the Stearoyl Coenzyme-A Desaturase 9 Activity Estimated by Test-Day Model V. M.-R. Arnould 1, N.
Sheep production fed on maize stover (Zea mays) based diet supplemented with varying levels and types of cassava leaves (Cassava esculenta L) in East Java,
By: A. Riasi (PhD in Animal Nutrition & Physiology) تغذیه دام در مرتع Animal nutrition on the rangeland (Part 4)
Unit 5 Forage quality New material, exam 2.
FORAGE PRODUCTION IN SOUTH GEORGIA. PASTURES CAN PROVIDE: INEXPENSIVE HIGH QUALITY FEED IN THE FORM OF GRAZING, HAY OR SILAGE PASTURES AND HAY CAN SUPPLY.
During the last 10 years (Italy)
Forage quality and methane production of the grazing portion of grass produced under elevated [CO 2 ] A.L. Abdalla 1 ; R. Ghini 2 ; A.S. Natel 1 ; A.L.
Supplementing Feed to Grazing Cattle Dallas Mount Platte County Extension Educator.
Module 3 Forage Value/Production. Source of Nutrients -Protein Prebud > Mature Legume > Grasses Quality (amino acid profile) can be hi -Energy Cell contents.
Phosphorus Management for Sustainable Dairy Production International Conference: Steps to Sustainable Livestock John Bailey Sustainable Agri-Food Sciences.
Dairy Cattle Production (95314)
Chris GardinerJCU , Carole WrightDAFF & Michele CoventryAgrimix
Annual vs. Perennial Warm-Season Grasses
Joe Vendramini Forage Specialist
Effects of foliar fungicide application on the growing corn plant
Alternative supplementation strategies for replacement beef heifers grazing dry California foothills annual range during summer. R. B. Monteiro1,2, G.
Potentials of some medicinal plant extracts on digestibility, in vitro gas and methane gas production of Eragrostis curvula forage A.M. Akanmu & A. Hassen.
Rumen bacteria population in Nellore steers
Interactions between the phosphorus content of animal manures
Lignin Effects on Intake and Ruminal Digestion
Niderkorn V., Martin C., Rochette Y., Julien S., Baumont R.
1Dept. of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, AL
Long-term crop rotations suppress soybean sudden death
Range Animal Nutrition
Analysis of corn silage for dairy cows
Animal Nutrition on the Rangeland
Matching Forage Supply with Animal Demand
What Grazing Animals Eat Is a Function of:
Forage for Horses As Fed/Sampled – moisture included and always smaller values Dry Matter – total solids once moisture removed Nutrients used on a dry.
Improving Silage Yield and Seasonal Distribution
Presentation transcript:

Black grass bug damage to intermediate wheatgrass forage quality Sue L. Blodgett, Andrew W. Lenssen 1, S. Dennis Cash Department of Animal and Range Science, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana USA USDA,ARS, Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory, Sidney, Montana USA Background: The black grass bug (Labops spp.) Hemiptera: Miridae, (BGB) is native to the western United States and has been reported damaging wheatgrasses coincident with the increase in seeded acreages of wheatgrasses in the western U.S. Black grass bug (BGB) feeding damage has been documented to reduce yield, plant height and seedhead production. Objective: Determine the relationship between black grass bug damage and forage quality. Materials and Methods: Five pastures, located near Townsend, MT, were predominantly intermediate wheatgrass with a few alfalfa plants (<1 m2). Since bugs were primarily adults stage and had done substantial damage, BGB damage was rated and leaf samples collected on July 6, 2002 for forage quality analysis. BGB feeding damage, called stippling, is caused when plant cells are pierced and contents are removed. BGB damage was rated on a scale of 0 to 5, (0 = no damage, 1=10-20%, 2=30-40%, 3=50-60%, 4=70- 80% and 5=80-100% of the leaf stippled). Leaf samples of each BGB damage category were held separately, dried at 55 o C for 72 hours and then ground to pass a 0.5mm mesh sieve. Percent crude protein, acid detergent fiber (ADF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), in vitro digestible dry matter (IVDDM), percent sulfur and percent phosphorus were determined using a NIRS System 4500 equipped with InfraTech 2 software. Regression analysis was used to determine relationships between black grass bug damage rating and forage quality parameters. Our study was conducted during a drought that had begun in the late 1990s and persisted through this study, conditions that increase the impact of black grass bug feeding (Todd and Kamm 1974). We report significant increases in concentrations of acid and neutral detergent fiber with increasing black grass bug damage, indicative of reduced forage digestibility and ruminant intake, consistent with the rancher’s observations of forage yield reduction and reduced intake by grazing cattle. Malecheck et al. (1977) stated that stockmen have observed that black grass bug infestations decrease forage palatability although they did not detect a significant depression in intake. We found no significant relationship between black grass bug damage and digestibility (IVDDM), in agreement with the sheep digestion-balance trial conducted by Malechek et al. (1977) in which differences in daily dry-matter digestibility and dry matter consumption (intake) were not significant. Acknowledgements: Authors wish to thank Mr. Nelson Wert who brought this situation to our attention and allowed us to collect samples from his ranch. Results: The maximum black grass bug damage recorded (rating = 5) resulted in a 42.4% reduction in crude protein compared with undamaged tissue (Fig 1A). Acid detergent fiber (ADF) and neutral detergent fiber were directly related to black grass bug damage (Fig 1B and 2A). Percent forage sulfur and phosphorus concentrations were inversely related to black grass bug damage ratings (Fig 2B). There was no significant relationship between black grass bug damage and IVDDM. Conclusions: Black grass bug feeding damage resulted in: Reduced crude protein Increased ADF and NDF Black grass bug damage significantly reduces forage quality Labops hesperius Irbisia elongata Labops hesperius (brachypterous) Discussion: Black grass bug damage ratings correlated with intermediate wheatgrass forage quality characteristics. There was a significant decrease in percent crude protein and increases in both ADF and NDF as black grass bug damage increased, indicating that black grass bug had an important impact on forage quality. Todd and Kamm (1974) noted similar reductions in forage quality, although adequate precipitation can mitigate damage. Impact of black grass bug feeding on rangeland productivity varied with rainfall and time of forage utilization, suggesting that greater losses may be expected in drought years. References: Todd JG, Kamm JA Biology and impact of a grass bug Labops hesperius Uhler in Oregon rangeland. J. Range Manage. 27: Malechek JC, Gray AM, Haws BA Yield and nutritional quality of intermediate wheatgrass infested by black grass bugs at low population densities. J. Range Manage. 30: