“Megaton” Cerenkov Detector - Excavation Kenneth Lande, Univ. of Pennsylvania 4200 mwe Depth.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 1 View from DOE LB DUSEL Meeting February 27, 2008 UC, Davis Jerry Blazey NIU/DOE.
Advertisements

TVI Resource Development (Phils), Inc. September Canatuan Tailings Management Completion of Stage 1 Tailings Management Facilties Gossan Dam and.
Proposed RISC 2014 Deliverables, Activities, and Calendar For Discussion Andy Rodriquez, Director of RRAC January 14, 2014.
LBNE Reconfiguration Jim Strait, LBNE Project Director Fermilab Community Advisory Board August 23, 2012.
Soil & Site Investigation
11/05/06GDR-Neutrino à Orsay (LAL)1 GDR-Neutrino (10-11 mai 2006) L. Mosca (CEA-Saclay) The MEMPHYS project (Laboratory excavation) MEgaton Mass PHYSics.
district development Tanzania – Lake Victoria Greenstone Belt.
Office of Mine Safety and Health Research OMSHR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Institute for.
Large Excavations in the US Lee Petersen, CNA Consulting Engineers Presented by Chang Kee Jung, SUNY Stony Brook NNN05 Conference.
PD Connection with National Underground Lab R. Rameika Fermilab October 8, 2004.
LAGUNA at Fréjus LAGUNA/LAGUNA-LBNO General Meeting March 3 th -5 th, 2011, CERN Eng. Francesco Amberg.
CSM/CNA UNO R&D Proposal Lee Petersen –CNA Consulting Engineers Mark Kuchta –Colorado School of Mines Requested budget: $200k/year for two years Cavern.
Tunnel Engineering for Indian Railways
General meeting LAGUNA LAGUNA – Fréjus site
Laughton 7/04 Long Baseline Neutrino Program Tunneling Chris Laughton, Fermilab.
NuMI NuMI Overview NBI 2002 S. Childress (FNAL) 14 March ‘02 NuMI / MINOS Overview.
September 4, 2003Jordan Goodman Ad Hoc Science Committee for the Proposed Laboratory for Science and Engineering at Homestake Who am I and what am I doing.
1 Alternative assembly option of ILD Y.Sugimoto 2010/10/18 ILD Integration
Rubin Pajoohan Fartak International Engineering co.
Mining. Mining Minerals are naturally occurring substances found in rocks, soils, or sediments. Minerals deposits that can be mined profitably are called.
Homestake Massive Detector & Long Range Neutrino Oscillation Program 1) Introduction – Ken Lande 2) Long Base Line Neutrino Oscillations – Milind Diwan.
DUSEL Experiment Development and Coordination (DEDC) Internal Design Review July 16-18, 2008 Steve Elliott, Derek Elsworth, Daniela Leitner, Larry Murdoch,
Physical Characteristics and Constructability Bill Roggenthen and Herb Wang Homestake DUSEL April 20, 2007.
Long Baseline Experiments at Fermilab Maury Goodman.
Pre-Excavation Rock Evaluation 1)Goal- Excavate the largest possible safe and stable detector chamber 2) Procedure a) measure characteristics of the rock.
DNAPL Recovery System July 2010 Progress Meeting McCormick & Baxter Superfund Site Portland, Oregon.
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF A MODULAR MASSIVE DETECTOR AT THE HOMESTAKE LAB Modular Mass – 100 Kilotons Modular Shape –Cylinder –50m dia x 50m high Depth.
Introduction to the “Cavities and vessels” session ( by L. Mosca) 9h 10’ Presentation of the Laboratoire Souterrain de Modane (15’+ 5’) G. Gerbier (Saclay)
Lecture 7 Mechanical Properties of Rocks
1 Homes take DUSEL NSF Preliminary Baseline Review - April 13-15, 2010 Bob Altes Engineer- ISE Water Shield Engineering Figure Courtesy PDG and LBNL Homestake.
Deep Underground Large Water Cerenkov Detectors Two types have been proposed. 1) Horizontal cylinders ~60 m diameter by 180 m long – UNO & HyperKamiokande.
1/26/2009 S. Pordes LAr R & D Briefing 1 Liquid Argon R & D work at Fermilab neutrinos WIMPS.
The Mining Cycle Exploration MiningReclamation Metals-6-1 Images: Martin Miller.
2011 Calendar Important Dates/Events/Homework. SunSatFriThursWedTuesMon January
Deep Underground Science and Engineering Laboratory at Homestake1 Richard DiGennaro, LBNL DUSEL Project Manager 20 June 2008 Facility Planning for DUSEL.
Deep Underground Large Water Cerenkov Detectors Two types have been proposed. 1) Horizontal cylinders ~60 m diameter by 180 m long – UNO & HyperKamiokande.
Candidate: Chhatra B. Basnet Main Supervisor: Dr. Krishna K. Panthi (Department of Geology and Mineral Resources Engineering) Applicability of Unlined/Shotcrete.
ANT11 Presentation, October, 10-13, 2011 David Vardiman Project Engineer Geotechnical Design and Excavation 1 Sanford Lab at Homestake, Lead, SD 4850L.
City of Woburn – City Council Committee on Water Update on Water and Sewer System Improvements Projects City Council ChambersJune 1, :00 pm City.
23/11/05BENE meeting at CERN1 (22-25 November 2005) L. Mosca (CEA-Saclay) The MEMPHYS project MEgaton Mass PHYSics in a Large International Underground.
University of Adelaide HSIS2
Mining.
Experimental Hall in Mountain Regions
FCC Underground Infrastructure
【New Draft】 France -Japan International Co-funding Joint call Schedule (revised version) APR. 11, 2017 Bpifrance / NEDO final meeting (week of 18/9) Announcement.
LBNF/DUNE Update Public Meeting Sanford Lab Update
Department of Environmental Quality
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
Province Geotechnical and Tunnels Manager
$150K Chicago/ANL seed funding for Braidwood site investigation
Soil & Site Investigation
Tom Lackowski Revised 10/12/2011
McDonald’s Kalender 2009.
McDonald’s Kalender 2009.
Mining.
Proposed RISC 2014 Deliverables, Activities, and Calendar
McDonald’s Kalender 2009.
Mining.
McDonald’s calendar 2007.
Mohammad K Shatnawi Mohammed. J Ahmed K. Mohammed Musthafa Kurian
The Transformation of A Small Company Into A Golden Legend
February 2007 Note: Source:.
Fermilab Proton Beams: Program Perspectives Greg Bock Fermilab Science and Engineering at Henderson-DUSEL Capstone Workshop Stony Brook May 5,
McDonald’s calendar 2007.
Undulator Alignment Plan
lectures Notes on: Soil Mechanics
Habitat Changes and Fish Migration
2015 January February March April May June July August September
Habitat Changes and Fish Migration
Presentation transcript:

“Megaton” Cerenkov Detector - Excavation Kenneth Lande, Univ. of Pennsylvania 4200 mwe Depth

Brief DUSEL History 1) September 2000 –Homestake Mining Co. announces cessation of gold mining-Planning for Underground Laboratory begins immediately. 2) December 2000 – Bahcall Committee meets- Homestake Underground Lab presentation & recommendation (March 2001) 3) September st DUSEL Experiment Conference- Lead, SD- Megaton water Cerenkov Detector Array proposed. 4) March Megaton detector proposal presented to SAGENAP Panel (NSF/DOE)

5) April Barrick Gold Corporation Donates Mine to State of South Dakota 6) June 2006-T. Denny Sanford donates $70M to Laboratory 7) July 2007 – Final NSF selection of Homestake as site of DUSEL 8) May P5 panel rates Long Base Line Neutrino Beam (FNAL  DUSEL) + “Megaton” Detector Array at DUSEL as high priority.

First Evaluation of 100 kton excavation stability – fall ) In September 2001, a first survey of potential sites in the Homestake Mine for an array of 100kton chambers is carried out. (Karl Zipf-NIOSH & Kathy Hart-Chief Homestake Mine Geologist) 2) Rock samples of possible sites are collected & analyzed at the Spokane Labs of NIOSH (Bureau of Mines). 3) These data are used to design excavations & determine wall support as well as appropriate chamber separations. (NIOSH = U.S. Bureau of Mines)

Generalized Rock Stresses in the Homestake Mine  (vertical) = 28.3 h kPa (h in meters)  (horizontal–high) = h kPa  (horizontal-low) = h kPa (W. Pariseau – Bureau of Mines Report-1985) Note the very large difference in the stresses in the two horizontal directions.

YATES LABORATORY PROPERTIES E = 14,500,000 psi Tensile Strength = 1890 psi UCS = 28,800 psi!

MATERIAL PROPERTY REDUCTION – Modulus reduced 25% –Strengths reduced 50% –Cohesion = 30 deg.

C  Chlorine Solar Neutrino Detector XXXXX X 4850 Level

Rock Removal Tunnel (note- chambers & top of water are below tunnel & shaft entry level) – water cannot flood tunnel or shaft in case of containment failure

Steps needed to verify that initially selected site is satisfactory 1) Core rock in proposed chamber locations. 2) Measure stress/strain characteristics of rock cores 3) Using these data, redo the excavation modeling and, if necessary, revise construction specifics. 4) If rock strength measurements are satisfactory, then construct a small tunnel directly into the top of the first chamber and verify local rock conditions (including short cores -25 meters- throughout top region).

Coring Plan into Locations of Chambers 1-3

USE OF BORE HOLES 1) Measure strength characteristics of extracted cores. 2) Do a 3-D sonogram of the rock volume by installing sound generators/detectors in the bore holes. 3) Install fiber strain gauges in the bored holes and measure strains before, during and after excavation.