Some Simulations for the Proposed Hard X-Ray Self- Seeding on LCLS J. Wu J. Wu et al. Feb. 25, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Schemes for generation of attosecond pulses in X-ray FELs E.L. Saldin, E.A. Schneidmiller, M.V. Yurkov The potential for the development of XFEL beyond.
Advertisements

Soft X-ray Self-Seeding
1 Optimal focusing lattice for XFEL undulators: Numerical simulations Vitali Khachatryan, Artur Tarloyan CANDLE, DESY/MPY
Sub-femtosecond bunch length diagnostic ATF Users Meeting April 26, 2012 Gerard Andonian, A. Murokh, J. Rosenzweig, P. Musumeci, E. Hemsing, D. Xiang,
Hard X-ray FELs (Overview) Zhirong Huang March 6, 2012 FLS2012 Workshop, Jefferson Lab.
Performance Analysis Using Genesis 1.3 Sven Reiche LCLS Undulator Parameter Workshop Argonne National Laboratory 10/24/03.
Z. Huang LCLS FAC April Effect of AC RW Wake on SASE - Analytical Treatment Z. Huang, G. Stupakov see SLAC-PUB-10863, to.
Spontaneous Radiation at LCLS Sven Reiche UCLA - 09/22/04 Sven Reiche UCLA - 09/22/04.
Latest Results on HXRSS at LCLS Franz-Josef Decker 4-Feb Seeding with 004, 220 and over-compression 2.Tuned beam with slotted foil cutting horns.
FEL Beam Dynami cs FEL Beam Dynamics T. Limberg FEL driver linac operation with very short electron bunches.
FEL simulation code FAST Free-Electron Laser at the TESLA Test Facility Generic name FAST stands for a set of codes for ``full physics'' analysis of FEL.
The impact of undulators in an ERL Jim Clarke ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory FLS 2012, March 2012.
W.S. Graves1 Seeding for Fully Coherent Beams William S. Graves MIT-Bates Presented at MIT x-ray laser user program review July 1, 2003.
TTF2 Start-to-End Simulations Jean-Paul Carneiro DESY Hamburg TESLA COLLABORATION MEETING DESY Zeuthen, 22 Jan 2004.
R&D Towards X-ray Free Electron Laser Li Hua Yu Brookhaven National Laboratory 1/23/2004.
S. Spampinati, J.Wu, T.Raubenhaimer Future light source March, 2012 Simulations for the HXRSS experiment with the 40 pC beam.
Soft X-ray Self-Seeding in LCLS-II J. Wu Jan. 13, 2010.
B. FaatzS2E workshop, August 18-22, XFEL simulations with GENESIS Outline: Undulator layout (real/simulated) Matching Genesis.
Beam Dynamics and FEL Simulations for FLASH Igor Zagorodnov and Martin Dohlus Beam Dynamics Meeting, DESY.
J. Wu In collaboration with Y. Jiao, W.M. Fawley, J. Frisch, Z. Huang, H.-D. Nuhn, C. Pellegrini, S. Reiche (PSI), Y. Cai, A.W. Chao, Y. Ding, X. Huang,
LCLS-II Capabilities & Overview LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop Tor Raubenheimer February 10 th, 2015.
Compact X-ray & Emittance Measurement by Laser Compton Scattering Zhi Zhao Jan. 31, 2014.
External Seeding Approaches: S2E studies for LCLS-II Gregg Penn, LBNL CBP Erik Hemsing, SLAC August 7, 2014.
Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee MeetingLCLS February 26, 2001 J. Hastings Brookhaven National Laboratory LCLS Scientific Program X-Ray Laser Physics:
Harmonic lasing in the LCLS-II (a work in progress…) G. Marcus, et al. 03/11/2014.
Self-Seeding Procedure and Development Jim Turner.
Fluctuations Study Update A. Lutman. Model description Undulator section I 1D FEL code Bunch shape: flat top Short Bunch Long Bunch length20 fs50 fs current2.
LCLS-II Design and FEL R&D
Design Considerations of table-top FELs laser-plasma accelerators principal possibility of table-top FELs possible VUV and X-ray scenarios new experimental.
UCLA Claudio Pellegrini UCLA Department of Physics and Astronomy X-ray Free-electron Lasers Ultra-fast Dynamic Imaging of Matter II Ischia, Italy, 4/30-5/3/
S2E (start-to-end) Simulations at DESY T. Limberg TESLA Collaboration Meeting in Frascati, May 2003.
Transverse Gradient Undulator and its applications to Plasma-Accelerator Based FELs Zhirong Huang (SLAC) Introduction TGU concept, theory, technology Soft.
LCLS-II: Accelerator Systems LCLS SAC Meeting P. Emma et al. April 23, 2010.
J. Wu March 06, 2012 ICFA-FLS 2012 Workshop Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA Tolerances for Seeded Free Electron Lasers FEL and Beam Phys. Dept. (ARD/SLAC),
E. Schneidmiller and M. Yurkov FEL Seminar, DESY April 26, 2016 Reverse undulator tapering for polarization control at X-ray FELs.
Simulations of X-ray production for different undulator options 19 th of March 2015 Juergen Pfingstner.
LCLS-II options: CuRF → SXR, VPU, HXR harmonics G. Marcus 5/13/2015.
E. Schneidmiller and M. Yurkov Harmonic Lasing Self-Seeded FEL FEL seminar, DESY Hamburg June 21, 2016.
Harmonic Generation in a Self-Seeded Soft X-Ray LCLS-II J. Wu Feb. 24, 2010.
SIMULATION FOR TW LCLS-II Tor’s question on the undulator length in the TW FEL senario SASE FEL undulator length 9, 10, and 11:  9 – m, 10.
LSC/CSR Instability Introduction (origin of the instability) CSR/LSC
Seeding in the presence of microbunching
Eduard Prat / Sven Reiche :: Paul Scherrer Institute
LCLS-II: An upgrade for the LINAC Coherent Light Source
LCLS efforts: Self-seeding -- status report
Tunable Electron Bunch Train Generation at Tsinghua University
Gu Qiang For the project team
HXRSS operation experiences at LCLS
Yuhui Li How to edit the title slide
LCLS Instrument Development
LCLS-II-HE FEL Facility Overview
Review of Application to SASE-FELs
F. Villa Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati - LNF On behalf of Sparc_lab
Not a Talk, just a contribution to the discussions.
ERL working modes Georg Hoffstaetter, Professor Cornell University / CLASSE / SRF group & ERL effort High Current mode High Coherence mode High Buch charge.
LCLS-II-HE FEL Facility Overview
Hard X-ray self-seeding for XFELs: towards coherent FEL pulses
Self-seeding for the soft x-ray line in LCLS upgrade
G. Marcus, Y. Ding, J. Qiang 02/06/2017
TW FEL “Death-Ray“ Studies
Z. Huang LCLS Lehman Review May 14, 2009
Two-bunch self-seeding for narrow-bandwidth hard x-ray FELs
SASE FEL PULSE DURATION ANALYSIS FROM SPECTRAL CORRELATION FUNCTION
Status of FEL Physics Research Worldwide  Claudio Pellegrini, UCLA April 23, 2002 Review of Basic FEL physical properties and definition of important.
Modified Beam Parameter Range
Gain Computation Sven Reiche, UCLA April 24, 2002
Transverse size and distribution of FEL x-ray radiation of the LCLS
LCLS FEL Parameters Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL April 23, 2002
Achieving Required Peak Spectral Brightness Relative Performance for Four Undulator Technologies Neil Thompson WP5 – 20/03/19.
Electron Optics & Bunch Compression
Presentation transcript:

Some Simulations for the Proposed Hard X-Ray Self- Seeding on LCLS J. Wu J. Wu et al. Feb. 25, 2011

Possible experiment at LCLS DESY’s scheme for 8 keV HXRSS –Low charge 20 pC, 0.4 mm-mrad emittance, slice energy spread 1.3 MeV –Plan to take the section 15 undulator out to implement the chicane and single crystal Numerical Simulation –with ideal electron bunch –with start-to-end electron bunch Additional details –Energy tuning –X-ray angular divergence

Ideal simulation SASE FEL performance , ,15-54

SASE FEL at exit of Und.13 Plan to take out the 15 th undualtor, SASE FEL from the exit of 13 undulator on the single crystal –We reserve the 14 th for safety consideration

Single crystal monochromator FEL spectrum after the single-crystal monochromator

Single crystal monochromator FEL after the single-crystal monochromator

Self-seeded FEL at exit of und 10 There are 18 undualtors after the monochromator –FEL at the exit of 10 undulator (no tapering) – minimum bandwidth 2.8E-5

Maximum power with taper Taper the 18 undualtors after the monochromator –Taper starts at 25 m, quadratic taper of 2 % –At the end of 18 undulator (60 m magnetic length), FEL power reach 100 GW (< 1 mJ for low charge 20 pC)

Self-seeded FEL at exit of Und 18 There are 18 undualtors after the monochromator –FEL at the exit of 18 undulator 1.0E-4

 Start-to-end e  bunch: und.-comp. t (s) z (  m)  (  m) Courtesy of Y. Ding

Start-to-end simulation SASE FEL performance –Taper starts at 25 m, quadratic taper of 2 % , ,15-60

S-2-E electron bunch Simulation with S-2-E electron bunch 132 m, blue: raw data, green, smoothed data (2%), red: Gaussian fit FWHM BW: 2.5E-3 FWHM BW: 3.3E-3

Start-to-end simulation Seeded FEL (5 MW seed) performance , 18-72

S-2-E electron bunch Simulation with S-2-E electron bunch –P seed = 5 15 m, blue: raw data, red: Gaussian fit FWHM BW: 2.5E-3 FWHM BW: 9.4E-4 FWHM BW: 1.1E-4 FWHM BW: 1.3E-4

S-2-E electron bunch Simulation with S-2-E electron bunch –P seed = 5 15 m

S-2-E electron bunch Simulation with S-2-E electron bunch –P seed = m, blue: raw data, green, smoothed data (0.25%), red: Gaussian fit FWHM BW: 2.5E-3 FWHM BW: 9.4E-4 FWHM BW: 1.1E-4 FWHM BW: 2.6E-4

S-2-E electron bunch Simulation with S-2-E electron bunch –P seed = m

S-2-E electron bunch Simulation with S-2-E electron bunch –P seed = 5 72 m, blue: raw data, green, smoothed data (0.1%), red: Gaussian fit FWHM BW: 2.5E-3 FWHM BW: 9.4E-4 FWHM BW: 1.1E-4 FWHM BW: 2.8E-4

S-2-E electron bunch Simulation with S-2-E electron bunch –P seed = 5 72 m

FEL Energy Tuning The plan is to have a tuning range from 1.4 Å to 1.6 Å Rocking curve: –The bandwidth in the rocking curve depends on |C = cos(2  B )| for  - polarization, and |C = 1| for  - polarization

 - polarization

 - polarization

8 keV energy-jitter case Spectrum on the left, temporal profile on the right –  =1.4 Å; Bragg angle: o –  - polarization

8 keV on-energy case Spectrum on the left, temporal profile on the right –  =1.5 Å; Bragg angle: o –  - polarization

8 keV energy-jitter case Spectrum on the left, temporal profile on the right –  =1.6 Å; Bragg angle: o –  - polarization

8 keV energy-jitter case Spectrum on the left, temporal profile on the right –  =1.4 Å; Bragg angle: o –  - polarization

8 keV on-energy case Spectrum on the left, temporal profile on the right –  =1.5 Å; Bragg angle: o –  - polarization

8 keV energy-jitter case Spectrum on the left, temporal profile on the right –  =1.6 Å; Bragg angle: o –  - polarization

Maximum power with taper Taper the 18 undualtors after the monochromator –Taper starts at 25 m, quadratic taper of 2 % –Divergence along the undulator

Self-seeded FEL at exit of 18 undulators There are 18 undulators after the monochromator –FEL at the exit of 18 undulator

Angular divergence To incorporate the x-ray beam divergence into dynamic theory of diffraction We take a phenomenological approach, we define the effective Darwin width as where  is the FWHM beam divergence Then we follow the derivation in dynamic theory of diffraction by introducing an effective deviation parameter

Angular divergence The transmitted intensity is then with and t being the crystal thickness.

Rocking curve Left plots for  - polarization, and right plots for  - polarization –The red curve is for ideal parallel incident beam, the blue is for rms  x’ = 2  rad, and the green is for rms  x’ = 4  rad.

On-going work Refine the S-2-E simulation for 20 pC Optimize the tapering Simulation for 40 pC case Find out the minimum seed power to dominate the SASE in the second undulator