Significance of Mobile Source Emissions for the Purposes of Section 309 of the Regional Haze Rule Patrick Cummins Western Governors’ Association WRAP Board.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Clean Smokestacks Act Benefits Update Division of Air Quality March 17, /17/2010.
Advertisements

Update on Regional Haze November 15, 2012 Michele Notarianni EPA Region 4 1.
WRAP Stationary Source (SS) NOx and PM Report Lee Alter Western Governors’ Association WRAP IOC NOx Issues Meeting Denver, CO July 28, 2003.
Transportation Conformity and Development of Emission Budgets.
Clean Air Corridor Section 309 Requirements Presentation to WRAP Board July 24, 2002.
Overview of Ozone and PM 2.5 in the Upper Midwest Regional Air Quality Workshop November 17, 2004.
Ozone in Colorado: Issues and Reduction Strategies Presentation to the Colorado Environmental Health Association October 2,
Air Quality 101: Clean Air Act Overview/ Update. 2 Origins of the Clean Air Act Historic air pollution Donora, Pennsylvania, – PSD, tribes.
Environmental Protection Division 1 AWMA Georgia Air Update August 10, 2007 Heather Abrams, Branch Chief.
Air Quality and Conformity Issues James M. Shrouds, Director Office of Natural and Human Environment Federal Highway Administration AASHTO SCOE Meeting.
1 WRAP Policy Fire Tracking Systems Draft December 9, 2002 FEJF Meeting December 10-11, 2002 Jackson, WY.
1 EPA’s Proposed Interstate Air Quality Rule Consideration of Issues Associated with Possible Expansion of IAQR to the West Patrick Cummins, WGA Background.
1 EPA’s Proposal for Nonroad Diesel Engines & Fuel May 2003 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Transportation and Air Quality Informal document.
The Western Regional Air Partnership (WRAP) WRAP formed in 1997 as the successor organization to Grand Canyon Visibility Transport Commission (GCVTC) –
Final Amendments to the Regional Haze Rule: BART Rule Making June 16, 2005.
WRAP Committee and Forum Updates WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT October 15, 2003.
1 Update on the STIP-II Project & Draft Model SIP Brian Finneran Oregon Department of Environmental Quality WRAP Meeting Portland, OR April 3, 2003.
Stationary Sources Joint Forum Update Eric Massey Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Lee Alter and Patrick Cummins Western Governors’ Association.
Diesel Risk Reduction Plan California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board.
Projects:/WRAP RMC/309_SIP/progress_sep02/Annex_MTF_Sep20.ppt Preliminary Mobile Source Significance Test Modeling Results WRAP Regional Modeling Center.
Clean Fuels and Vehicles: Importance for Urban Air Quality Katherine Buckley Air and Climate Program Manager U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
2015 INTERNATIONAL EMISSIONS INVENTORY CONFERENCE: APRIL 14, 2015 DEVELOPING CALIFORNIA EMISSION INVENTORIES: INNOVATION AND CHALLENGES.
California Environmental Protection Agency AIR RESOURCES BOARD Public Transit Bus Fleet Rule and Emission Standards for New Urban Buses California Air.
Section 309 Mobile Source Significance Test Modeling Results WRAP Regional Modeling Center (RMC) University of California at Riverside, CE-CERT ENVIRON.
1 Mississippi Air Quality Update Mississippi Dept. of Environmental Quality Air Division August 5, 2011.
2014 Program Priorities January 23, Outline Major 2014 Goals 2013 Accomplishments Major 2014 Activities Partnerships 2.
PUBLIC WORKSHOP STATEWIDE DIESEL ENGINE IDLE REDUCTION STANDARDS December 5, 2007 Department of Environmental Protection Division of Air Resource Management.
WRAP Update Patrick Cummins WESTAR Meeting September 23, 2005.
Potential Control Strategies for Mobile Sources Dave Shaw, NY DEC 2004 OTC Annual Meeting Red Bank, NJ.
1 MAPS. Counties With Monitors Violating Alternate 8-hour Ozone Standards of and parts per million 398 counties violate.075 ppm 135 additional.
California’s Efforts to Address Air Quality Impacts Related to Goods Movement Activities.
EPA – Regional Haze Issues IWG Meeting April 17 th Keith Rose and Laurel Dygowski.
Recommendations from Regional Haze Workgroup Core Issue 1: 5- Year Progress Reports The RHR requires Comprehensive SIP revision every 10 years (first in.
WRAP 2003 Work Plan: Overview and IOC Elements WRAP 2003 Work Plan: Overview and IOC Elements WRAP Board Meeting November 12, 2003 Tempe, AZ Rick Sprott.
Summary of June 15, 2005 Revisions to RH BART and BART Guidelines.
July 21, Today’s Proposed Action Approve ozone SIP revisions for South Coast and San Joaquin Valley Reasonable Further Progress Transportation.
VISIBILITY SIPS The Regional Haze Rule Requirements for Fire The Role of the RPOs Opportunities for Participation US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Dennis Haddow.
Diesel Retrofit Projects: An Introduction National Tribal Forum on Air Quality April 19, 2007 Ken Cronin.
1 South Coast AQMD Staff Comments on Proposed Regulation for In-Use Off-Road Diesel Vehicles South Coast Air Quality Management District Agenda Item No.
2018 Emission Reductions from the Base 18b Emission Inventory Lee Gribovicz Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting San Diego, California February 22-23, 2007.
Emission Trends and SIP Scenarios for SO2 and NOx Patrick Cummins WRAP Meeting December 14, 2005.
Reasonable Further Progress Policy and Mid-Course Reviews John Summerhays EPA Region 5 June 20, 2007.
Regional Haze Rule SIP Template Clean Air Corridors Section (d)(3) Brian Finneran - Oregon DEQ WESTAR 2002 Fall Technical Conference.
Summary of WRAP Stationary Source (SS) NOx and PM Report Lee Alter Western Governors’ Association WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT October 15, 2003.
Nonattainment New Source Review (NA NSR) Program Raj Rao US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards ,
Work Items for §309 SIPs WESTAR Fall Technical Conference September 19, 2002 Tom Moore & Brian Finneran.
308 Outline (a) Purpose (b) When are 1st plans due (c) Options for regional planning (d) Core requirements (e) BART requirements (f) Comprehensive periodic.
1 Mobile Sources Work Group Final Report - PM 2.5 SIP Brian Newbacher Dir. of Public Affairs, AAA Chair, Mobile Sources Work Group June 12, 2007 NOACA.
Regional Haze SIP Template: Mobile Sources Edie Chang California Air Resources Board WESTAR Fall Technical Conference September 2002.
1 Long Range Transport of Air Pollution Air pollution can travel hundreds of miles and cause multiple health and environmental problems on regional or.
Incorporating Smoke Management Plans into Regional Haze SIPs (Arizona Perspective) Smoke Management Planning Workshop WRAP 308 Planning Committee & Fire.
Environmental Quality Board May 16, 2007
Overview of WRAP Emissions Projections
Nonroad Diesel Engine and Fuel Standards
WRAP Update Patrick Cummins WESTAR Meeting September 23, 2005
Arizona Regional Haze State Implementation Plan
CAIR Replacement Rule and Regional Haze
BART Overview Lee Alter Western Governors’ Association
Major New Source Review (NSR) Part 2
Visibility Coordinator’s Report
Status of Regional Haze Rule
EPA Clarification on Regional Haze SIP Issues
Initiatives Oversight Committee Update on Other Activities
Status Report: “Significant Impact” from Mobile Sources and Road Dust
Stationary Source NOx and PM Report: An Update Lee Alter Western Governors’ Association WRAP Market Trading Forum Meeting September 19-20, 2002 Snowbird,
Workshop Technical and Policy Studies to Support the Annex
Defining “Significant Impact” from Mobile Sources and Road Dust
Presented to WRAP November 15, 2001 John Kowalczyk & Bob Neufeld
Status of Preliminary Reasonable Progress Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Significance of Mobile Source Emissions for the Purposes of Section 309 of the Regional Haze Rule Patrick Cummins Western Governors’ Association WRAP Board Meeting Portland, OR April 2, 2003

Section 309 Requires: “A determination whether mobile source emissions in any areas of the state contribute significantly to visibility impairment in any of the 16 Class I areas, based on the statewide inventory of current and projected mobile source emissions.” [§309(d)(5)(ii)]

309 Requirements If mobile source emissions contribute significantly, state must establish an emissions budget that restricts emissions to their projected lowest level and implement measures to achieve the budget. [§309(d)(5)(iii)] These mobile source provisions of Section 309 are based on GCVTC recommendations.  GCVTC modeling showed mobile emissions reaching a low point in 2005, then increasing.

Since the GCVTC Final Report... New engine standards for cars, trucks, and buses New fuel sulfur standards for gasoline and on-road diesel fuel New engine standards for some non-road sources  All the above recommended by the GCVTC and/or WRAP New emission models

Current Projections ( ) Future stds for non-road engines may reduce NOx & PM by 90% and SO2 by 99% Without such standards, emissions from non-road sources will continue to be an issue

Update 309 Mobile Source Provisions? Current situation very different from when GCVTC made its recommendations EPA has indicated willingness to update 309 on an expedited basis Approach may be to eliminate 309(d)(5)(ii) and (iii) and instead require a showing of continuous emission reductions for the period 2003 – 2018.

Update 309 Mobile Source Provisions? If total emissions (on-road + non-road) of any pollutant do not continuously decline:  State would submit SIP by 12/31/08 containing long-term strategy to achieve continuous decline to the extent practicable, considering economic and technological reasonableness and applicable state authority.

Arizona Statute – May 2002 Arizona may submit a 309 plan only if the plan contains a determination that mobile source emissions do not contribute significantly to visibility impairment at any of the 16 Class I areas.

SO2 An approach other than “continuous reduction” needed for SO2. Current regulations will dramatically reduce sulfur in on-road gasoline and diesel (15 ppm) EPA’s forthcoming proposal for heavy-duty non-road mobile sources is expected to include a 15 ppm standard. Once 15 ppm is reached (approx. 2008), growth leads to a small increase.

SO 2 Emissions (tpy)

Current Projections (2018) Non-Road 15 ppm S Non-Road Planes, Trains, and Ships On-Road Total Non-Road

Options for SO2 Option #1  Require a demonstration that 2018 mobile source SO2 emissions are at least 75% lower than 2003  On-road plus non-road, excluding planes, trains & ships  Non-road diesel must come down to 15 ppm  EPA’s proposed rule will indicate direction, but will not be finalized by the time 309 plans are due  If EPA’s final rule (2004) does not significantly reduce non-road, states would have to address in plan revision (also as part of 308)

Options for SO2 (cont.) Objections to Option #1  State and industry objections to including a requirement that relies on proposed federal rule  Concern that lack of federal action could lead to “boutique” fuels  Environmental groups concerned that language re “applicable state authority” could lead to inaction at state level if federal standard is not adopted

Options for SO2 (cont.) Option #2  Require a demonstration that 2018 mobile source SO2 emissions are no higher than 2003  Can be shown with current regulations

Other Options Do not pursue updates to Section 309 States use WRAP’s technical information and analysis to address mobile source provisions as they exist today. Other ideas??