NESIS estimates for the SOC case ATM 419 Spring 2016 Fovell 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Simulating cloud-microphysical processes in CRCM5 Ping Du, Éric Girard, Jean-Pierre Blanchet.
Advertisements

Predicting lightning density in Mediterranean storms based on the WRF model dynamic and microphysical fields Yoav Yair 1, Barry Lynn 1, Colin Price 2,
Outline Background, climatology & variability Role of snow in the global climate system Indicators of climate change Future projections & implications.
MODELING OF COLD SEASON PROCESSES Snow Ablation and Accumulation Frozen Ground Processes.
1. Meteorology Chapter 1 Introduction to the Atmosphere Meteorology \ Dr. Mazin sherzad.
In this work we present results of cloud electrification obtained with the RAMS model that includes the process of charge separation between ice particles.
Thompson Runs Precipitation Comparison John D. McMillen.
Prediction of Atlantic Tropical Cyclones with the Advanced Hurricane WRF (AHW) Model Jimy Dudhia Wei Wang James Done Chris Davis MMM Division, NCAR Jimy.
Use of sea level observations in DMIs storm surge model Jacob L. Høyer, Weiwei Fu, Kristine S. Madsen & Lars Jonasson Center for Ocean and Ice, Danish.
DYMECS: Dynamical and Microphysical Evolution of Convective Storms (NERC Standard Grant) University of Reading: Robin Hogan, Bob Plant, Thorwald Stein,
The three-dimensional structure of convective storms Robin Hogan John Nicol Robert Plant Peter Clark Kirsty Hanley Carol Halliwell Humphrey Lean Thorwald.
Imposed versus Dynamically Modeled Sea Ice: A ROMS study of the effects on polynyas and waters masses in the Ross Sea John M. Klinck, Y. Sinan Hüsrevoglu.
Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications: Introduction to NASA’s Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications:
Weather Chapter 21 1.
TOPIC 7. What is weather? Weather is the state or condition of the variables of the atmosphere at any given location for a short period of time.
Dual-Aircraft Investigation of the inner Core of Hurricane Norbert. Part Ⅲ : Water Budget Gamache, J. F., R. A. Houze, Jr., and F. D. Marks, Jr., 1993:
Investigation of Mixed Layer Depth in the Southern Ocean by using a 1-D mixed layer model Chin-Ying Chien & Kevin Speer Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Institute,
1 National HIC/RH/HQ Meeting ● January 27, 2006 version: FOCUSFOCUS FOCUSFOCUS FOCUS FOCUSFOCUS FOCUSFOCUS FOCUSFOCUS FOCUSFOCUS FOCUSFOCUS FOCUSFOCUS.
High-Resolution Simulation of Hurricane Bonnie (1998). Part II: Water Budget SCOTT A. BRAUN J. Atmos. Sci., 63,
WRF Modelling Aim:  18 th -19 th April Cyclone taking dust SW as opposed to SE  15 th – 16 th North Scotland hit  Cyclone has moved north dragging.
Simulations of MAP IOPs with Lokal Modell: impact of nudging on forecast precipitation Francesco Boccanera, Andrea Montani ARPA – Servizio Idro-Meteorologico.
Control Run Precipitation Comparison John D. McMillen.
SnowSTAR 2002 Transect Reconstruction Using SNTHERM Model July 19, 2006 Xiaogang Shi and Dennis P. Lettenmaier.
An advanced snow parameterization for the models of atmospheric circulation Ekaterina E. Machul’skaya¹, Vasily N. Lykosov ¹Hydrometeorological Centre of.
Forecasting smoke and dust using HYSPLIT. Experimental testing phase began March 28, 2006 Run daily at NCEP using the 6Z cycle to produce a 24- hr analysis.
DEW. What is dew? Dew is moisture condensed upon the surfaces of cool objects especially at night. As the exposed surface cools by radiating its heat,
The 2 nd phase of the Global Land-Atmosphere Coupling Experiment Randal Koster GMAO, NASA/GSFC
Coupling ROMS and CSIM in the Okhotsk Sea Rebecca Zanzig University of Washington November 7, 2006.
MODELING CLIMATE CHANGE EFFECTS ON LAKES USING DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING
Supercell storms: In-class demo and Experiment 3
Does nudging squelch the extremes in regional climate modeling?
Introduction to Off Design Simulations
Real-data WRF: Verification with MET package
Influences of Particle Bulk Density of Snow and Graupel in Microphysics-Consistent Microwave Brightness Temperature Simulations Research Group Meeting.
Advisors: Fuqing Zhang and Eugene Clothiaux
Chapter 16 Earth Science WEATHER.
Basic Hydrology & Hydraulics: DES 601
Verification of dynamically downscaled results around Japan Islands
Module development was supported by NSF DEB and ACI
D. Odstrcil1,2, V.J. Pizzo2, C.N. Arge3, B.V.Jackson4, P.P. Hick4
MELODIST – An open-source MEteoroLOgical observation time series DISaggregation Tool Kristian Förster, Florian Hanzer, Benjamin Winter, Thomas Marke,
IMPROVING HURRICANE INTENSITY FORECASTS IN A MESOSCALE MODEL VIA MICROPHYSICAL PARAMETERIZATION METHODS By Cerese Albers & Dr. TN Krishnamurti- FSU Dept.
Snowmelt runoff generation Snowmelt modeling
Inna M. Gubenko and Konstantin G
Hydrologic response of Pacific Northwest Rivers to climate change
Impact of GOES Enhanced WRF Fields on Air Quality Model Performance
Convective and orographically-induced precipitation study
ECV definitions Mapping of ECV product with OSCAR variables
Weather.com – Weather Maps
Ensemble hindcasting of “Superstorm ‘93”
REGIONAL AND LOCAL-SCALE EVALUATION OF 2002 MM5 METEOROLOGICAL FIELDS FOR VARIOUS AIR QUALITY MODELING APPLICATIONS Pat Dolwick*, U.S. EPA, RTP, NC, USA.
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
TFMM – Trends Available Meteorological Forcing
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Tony Lee, NASA JPL/CalTech
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Clouds, Fog, and Precipitation
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Presentation transcript:

NESIS estimates for the SOC case ATM 419 Spring 2016 Fovell 1

RIP (Read-Interpolate-Plot) package RIP v. 4 home page The RIP package can read WRF model output (WRF-ARW, WRF-NMM and HWRF) and compute a vast array of diagnostics However, the package is apparently no longer being updated We’ll use it as a black box to compute NESIS values for our SOC simulations

RIP package RIP analyses proceed in two steps (1) Use ripdp_wrfarw program to unpack wrfout* files into RIP format data files (one file per field per time) (2) Use rip program and rip plot description files to compute diagnostics and display fields I modified RIP to compute a NESIS statistic, based on three-hourly inputs I have tried to make this as transparent as possible by providing a batch script

RIP plot description file header &userin idotitle=1,titlecolor='def.foreground', ptimes=0,-60,3, ptimeunits='h',tacc=120,timezone=-8,iusdaylightrule=1, iinittime=1,ivalidtime=1,inearesth=0, flmin=.09, frmax=.92, fbmin=.10, ftmax=.85, ntextq=0,ntextcd=0,fcoffset=0.0, idescriptive=1,icgmsplit=0,maxfld=10,itrajcalc=0,imakev5d=0 &end &trajcalc rtim=15,ctim=6,dtfile=3600.,dttraj=600.,vctraj='s', xjtraj=95,90,85,80,75,70,65,80.6,80.6,80.6,80.6,80.6,80.6, yitraj=50,55,60,65,70,75,80,77,77,77,77,77,77, zktraj=.9,.9,.9,.9,.9,.9,.9,.99,.9,.8,.7,.6,.5, ihydrometeor=0 &end

RIP plot description file body ================================================================== feld=ter; ptyp=hc; cint=100; colr=red feld=map; ptyp=hb feld=tic; ptyp=hb time=0 ================================================================== feld=GRAUPELNC; ptyp=hc; vcor=s; levs=1fb; addf=1; feld=SNOWNC; ptyp=hc; vcor=s; levs=1fb; feld=map; ptyp=hb feld=tic; ptyp=hb ================================================================== feld=nesis; ptyp=hc; vcor=s; levs=1fb; cmth=fill; cosq=0,light.gray,> 2,light.gray,> 4,white,6,white,8,white,10,white,12,light.blue,14,light.blue,> 16,light.blue,18,light.blue,20,dark.blue,22,dark.blue,24,dark.blue,> 26,dark.blue,28,dark.blue,30,red; cint=2; xwin=48,72; ywin=15,45; feld=map; ptyp=hb feld=tic; ptyp=hb ================================================================== (feld=nesis is a field I added to RIP)

#!/bin/bash # Job name: #SBATCH --job-name=rip #SBATCH -n 1 #SBATCH -N 1 #SBATCH --mem-per-cpu=7G #SBATCH -p snow #SBATCH -o sbatch.out #SBATCH -e sbatch.err.out source /network/rit/home/atm419/.bash_profile \rm -rf RIPD* \rm census* rip.*in OUT *.cgm \cp /network/rit/home/atm419/NESIS/rip.nesis.in. \cp /network/rit/home/atm419/NESIS/census2000_gridded_atm419.txt census2000_gridded.txt mkdir RIPD1 st_tm="$(date +%s)" echo "running ripdp" srun -N 1 -n 1 -o ripdp.srun.out ripdp_wrfarw RIPD1/crapd1 all wrfout_d01* echo "running rip" srun -N 1 -n 1 -o rip.srun.out rip RIPD1/crapd1 rip.nesis.in \rm -rf RIPD1 en_tm_real="$(date +%s)" dt_real="$(($en_tm_real - st_tm))" echo "rip is done, elapsed time: $dt_real sec" submit_nesis

Animation of SLP field (ECMWF reanalysis) Storm Track 03/13/93 06Z 03/14/93 06Z 7

North East Storm Impact Scale (NESIS) Kocin and Uccellini (2004) Snow exceeding 4” 10” 20” 30” area-integrated AND population-weighted 8

9

Computing snow depth The models provide liquid water equivalent precipitation. How to compute snow depth? WRF field is SNOWNC : snow liquid water equivalent mass received at surface from the microphysics scheme (units are mm): – Snow mixing ratio q s is kg snow /kg air – Snow terminal velocity “through” model ground is V s in m/s – Flux of snow “through” model surface is  V s q s, with units kg snow /m 2 /s, where  = air density – Multiply this by the time step (∆t) = units now kg snow /m 2 – Divide by density of liquid (1000; it’s liquid equivalent) and convert to mm (mult by 1000) Some different ways of converting SNOWNC to snow depth (not exhaustive): – Just assume the classic 10:1 ratio – Based on event observations directly relating snow depth to water content (as in Lott 1993) – Based on dew points recorded during snowfall (also from Lott 1993) – Utilize climatological values in some fashion, such as those provided by Baxter et al. (2005) – Based on 3-hourly snow precipitation rate (Byun et al for Korean observations) – Based on neutral network analysis of multiple meteorological factors [including solar radiation, temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, etc..] (Roebber et al. 2003) Most microphysics schemes also produce graupel mass at surface (also in mm), called GRAUPELNC. Many schemes produce a LOT of graupel. How to factor this into “snow”?

Baxter et al. (2005) Climatological average snow-to-liquid ratio

Byun et al. (2008)

Computing NESIS Copy /network/rit/lab/atm419lab/SOC/submit_nesis into your workspace sbatch –p snow submit_nesis … from directory containing your wrfout files This will create rip.srun.out and rip.nesis.cgm (among other files) tail rip.srun.out (see next slide) Use ictrans to view snow footprint (see slide after next)

tail rip.srun.out NESIS = uses Korean snow depth formula Accum frozen pcp (inches) map background tic marks ==================================== We're outta here like Vladimir !! ====================================

Using ictrans $ ictrans -d X11 rip.nesis.cgm Building CGM table of contents Read 43 frames 43 frames ictrans> 43 plot ictrans> skip 1 ictrans> 11,43 p (see next slide for example plot) (this will display plots 23 to 43, skipping every other plot. Use this to see how footprint evolves with time)

NESIS = (Only part of D1 is shown)

NESIS =

NESIS =