Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund Third phase of deWELopment project Scope of the work Warsaw, 1st Feb. 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund Estimation of uncertainty in status class assessment for Wel waterbodies Jannicke.
Advertisements

Development and validation of methods for integrated assessment of ecological status of rivers and lakes to support RBMP Lake macrophytes Warsaw, 9-10.
Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund PALEOLIMNOLOGICAL STUDIES IN THE WEL LAKES Sigrid Haande, NIVA DeWELopment workshop,
Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund DIATOM EPIPHYTON as a tool for assessment of ecological status of lakes in the.
Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund Revised Project Implementation Plan after prolongation of the Project Hanna Soszka,
Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund Integration of different metrics to a whole water body classification for all.
Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund Uncertainty studies for hydroacoustic estimate of fish DeWelopment workshop, Warsaw,
Development and validation of methods for integrated assessment of ecological status of rivers and lakes to support RBMP Lake macrophytes Oslo, June.
Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund WBs assessment AFTER DISCUSSION Expert views Warsaw,
Comparable Biological Assessments from Different Methods and Analyses David B. Herbst 1 and Erik L. Silldorff 2 1 Sierra Nevada Aquatic Research Laboratory,
1 Accounting for Spatial Dependence in Bayesian Belief Networks Alix I Gitelman Statistics Department Oregon State University August 2003 JSM, San Francisco.
Knowledge Engineering a Bayesian Network for an Ecological Risk Assessment (KEBN-ERA) Owen Woodberry Supervisors: Ann Nicholson Kevin Korb Carmel Pollino.
Beyond Opportunity; Enterprise Miner Ronalda Koster, Data Analyst.
Phytoplankton – element in ecological status assessment for lakes of the Wel river catchment area - published 2009 A. Krzebietke, A. Pasztaleniec, A. Hutorowicz.
Site Classification for Re-calibration of the Alabama Index of Stream Macroinvertebrate Condition Ben Jessup and Jen Stamp Tetra Tech, Inc. SWPBA November.
Anne Lyche Solheim, Norwegian Institute for Water Research, Oslo, Norway Workshop on ”In situ trialing for ecological and chemical studies in support of.
ARROW: system for the evaluation of the status of waters in the Czech Republic Jiří Jarkovský 1) Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University,
Development and validation of models to assess the threat to freshwater fishes from environmental change and invasive species PIs: Craig Paukert Joanna.
EPA’s Bioassessment Performance and Comparability “Guidance”
Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund Benthic invertebrates in lakes Małgorzata Gołub (IOŚ) Jacek Koszałka (UWM) Paweł.
Eurostat – Unit D5 Key indicators for European policies Third International Seminar on Early Warning and Business Cycle Indicators Annotated outline of.
Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund POST-INSPECTION INFORMATION FOLLOWING INSPECTION CARRIED OUT BY FUND OPERATOR.
Water Bodies in Europe: Integrated Systems to assess Ecological Status and Recovery Funded under FP7, Theme 6: Environment (including Climate Change) Contract.
Intercalibration Guidance: update Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Course: Research in Biomedicine and Health III Seminar 5: Critical assessment of evidence.
Finnish Environment Institute Seppo Rekolainen REBECCA News in March 2005.
Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund Pragmatic combination of BQE results into final WB assessment in Norway Anne Lyche.
Framework for the intercalibration process  Must be simple  Aiming to identify and resolve big inconsistencies with the normative definitions and big.
Intercalibration Option 3 results: what is acceptable and what is not ? Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund Paweł Prus Inland Fisheries Institute BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES IN LAKES: PROFUNDAL.
WISER Water bodies in Europe: Integrative Systems to assess Ecological status and Recovery.
N Engl J Med Jun 29;376(26): doi: 10
Task on Harmonisation of Freshwater Biological Methods
Principles and Key Issues
Multiple Imputation Using Stata
Intercalibration progress: Central - Baltic GIG Rivers
Techniques of Auditing
Alan Hildrew Martin Pusch Klement Tockner
GEP vs. GES.
Results of breakout group
Development of a protocol for identification of reference conditions, and boundaries between high, good and moderate status in lakes and watercourses (REFCOND)
Philippe QUEVAUVILLER
Intercalibration of Opportunistic Algae Blooms
Intercalibration : a “WFD compliant” boundary comparing procedure
EAF - GW The EU Water Framework Directive: Statistical aspects of the identification of groundwater pollution trends, and aggregation of.
Lake Macroinvertebrate IC EC-GIG
Project 2.7 Guidance on Monitoring
CLASSIFICATION TOOLS FOR BENTHIC INVERTEBRATE FAUNA IN COASTAL WATERS
Saltmarsh Intercalibration CW
Umweltbundesamt, Austria
confidence in classification
EU Water Framework Directive
3rd meeting, 8 March 2006 EEA Copenhagen
FITTING THE ITALIAN METHOD FOR EVALUATING LAKE ECOLOGICAL QUALITY FROM BENTHIC DIATOMS (EPI-L) IN THE “PHYTOBENTHOS CROSS-GIG” INTERCALIBRATION EXERCISE.
Guidelines to translate the intercalibration results into the national classification systems and to derive reference conditions Presented by Wouter.
ASSIGNING WATER BODY TYPES IN THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION Wouter van de Bund EC Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and sustainability,
Spatial Signal Processing with Emphasis on Emitter Localization
Angel Borja Coordinator of the Group
WG A ECOSTAT Draft Mandate
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Inland.
Typology and Intercalibration Typology System
Defining Reference Conditions Setting Class Boundaries
Working Group on Reference Conditions
Summary – Day 1 Martyn Kelly.
Validation and alternative approaches
Guidance on establishing nutrient concentrations to support good ecological status Introduction and overview Martyn Kelly.
Classification systems
Relationships for Broad & Intercalibration Types Geoff Phillips
Joint REFCOND and Intercalibration Meeting
Why are we reviewing reference conditions in intercalibration?
Presentation transcript:

Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund Third phase of deWELopment project Scope of the work Warsaw, 1st Feb. 2010

Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund The third phase of the project will include all statistical analyses to validate existing metrics and assessment methods for the different biological elements. Datasets generated from the field sampling, as well as other existing data from the same sites, will be explored, using the series of statistical and modelling techniques (regression, multivariate analyses such as ordination, and Bayesian network models) to identify and validate the pressure-sensitivity and the precision of metrics, taking the error estimation results into account. Different types of metrics will be tested, both structural (taxonomic composition, diversity), and functional metrics based on common species traits. The metrics developed in the international projects and in the Pan-European intercalibration exercise will be tested as well. The first phase – kick-off meeting The second phase – sampling campaign

Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund The transferability (robustness) of metrics/multimetrics to other lake types and ecoregions will also be addressed. Error estimation for different indicator metrics will be done using the data generated from the field sampling of the study sites. Spatial, temporal and analytical uncertainty will be examined for different metrics along the pressure gradients, as a basis for the identification of good indicators (sensitive to pressure and of high precision) from the wrong indicators (not so sensitive and of low precision). The uncertainty in the pressure and hydromorphological data as such will also be quantified using among others STURBUGS software developed within STAR Project. Altogether these uncertainty analyses will be used to assess the risk of misclassification at different levels of sampling frequency (temporal variability), and number of sites/habitats (spatial variability).

Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund The fourth phase of the project will include testing combination rules to obtain one final assessment result. There are several options for combination of single metrics (sensitive to pressure and of high precision) into one assessment result for each biological quality element (BQE): arithmetic mean of all single metrics, weighted mean of all single metrics, in which lower weight is given to single metrics with lower precision, constructing a multimetric index from all the single metrics or using the one-out-all-out principle in which the metric with the lowest value decides the BQE final result. Also the different ways of combining the assessment results for different BQE into one final result for the whole water body will be tested. Here the recommended by Water Framework Directive (WFD) one-out-all-out rule will be compared to other alternative methods. The risk of misclassification will be estimated using the same statistical methods as in previous paragraph.

Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund Thank you for your attention !