Kayla Locklear- Behavioral Specialist Leon Maynor – Behavioral Specialist SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT: DISCIPLINE & BEYOND.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Responsiveness to Intervention & School-wide Positive Behavior Support George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Advertisements

Schoolwide Positive Behavior Interventions and Support -SWPBIS- Mitchell L. Yell, Ph.D. University of South Carolina
SWPBS: Preventing & Reducing Effectiveness of Bullying Behavior George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Optional PBIS Coaches Meeting November 15, 2010 Tier 2 and Tier 3 Interventions and Supports.
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Follow-up #2 (Cohort 2)
CT PBS Coaches’ Meeting Coaching SWPBS Basics December 9, 2008 Brandi Simonsen, Kari Sassu, & George Sugai.
Preventing & Responding to Problem Behavior: Review of Best Practice
SWPBS: Reducing Effectiveness of Bullying Behavior George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
CT PBS Coaches’ Meeting Coaching SWPBS Basics December 9, 2008 Brandi Simonsen, Kari Sassu, & George Sugai.
IL PBIS 2008: Leadership Lucille, Holly, Kelly, Diane, Brandi, Seth, Rob & George OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University.
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership George Sugai & Susan Barrettt OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut February 14,
School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Outcomes, Data, Practices, & Systems George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports University.
Preparing for End & Beginning SWPBS Year: Evaluation & Action Planning George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
SWPBS: Implementing with Accuracy & Durability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut May.
SWPBS (aka EBS) 10 Year Perspective George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Oregon Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Year One RI PBIS Team & George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of.
SW-PBS & RtI: Lessons Being Learned George Sugai Rob Horner OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut & Oregon August 1,
Sustaining Change: RtI & SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut March 10,
Supporting and Evaluating Broad Scale Implementation of Positive Behavior Support Teri Lewis-Palmer University of Oregon.
V 2.1 Tier II Critical Features Building the Infrastructure to Support Tier 2.
RTI: Reasons, Practices, Systems, & Considerations George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut December 6,
Review of School-wide Positive Behavior Support Maryland PBIS Summer Institute July 13,2004 Teri Lewis-Palmer.
Quincy School District Positive Behavior Intervention and Support
Positive Behavior Intervention and Support: RtI for Behavior Jim Artesani, Ed.D. University of Maine College of Education & Human Development
SWPBS: Leadership Team Guidelines George Sugai University of Connecticut Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports October 31,
SWPBS: Sustainability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Oregon Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut March.
Bridging Primary & Secondary/Tertiary Tier Practices & Systems: Responding to Unresponsive Behavior Brandi Simonsen & George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral.
Is PBIS Evidence-based? George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Oregon Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut August.
Understanding & Planning for Non- Responsive Behavior (Secondary/Tertiary Tier) George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports University.
School-Wide PBIS: Action Planning George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut August 11, 2008.
Systems Logic for Sustained Large Scale Implementation George Sugai National Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports UConn Center for Behavioral.
Responsiveness-to-Intervention: What is It? George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut October.
SWPBS: Sustainability, Classroom Management, Interventions for Individual Students Celeste Dickey & George Sugai University of Oregon & Connecticut Center.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Discipline & Beyond George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of.
SWPBS: Leadership Team Follow-up Jon Dyson, Lavonne Nkomo, George Sugai Center on Disabilities University of Connecticut Center on Positive Behavioral.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support for All Lou DeLoreto E.O. Smith High School George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research.
“Sustaining & Expanding Effective Practices: Lessons Learned from Implementation of School-wide Positive Behavior Supports” Susan Barrett Cyndi Boezio,
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 SRIP – Cohort 9 August 2014.
SWPBS: Where Did the Triangle Come From? George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut May 17, 2006
SWPBS: Reducing Effectiveness of Bullying Behavior George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
SWPBS Fidelity & Sustainability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Oregon Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
SW-PBS & RtI: Lessons Being Learned George Sugai & Rob Horner OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut & Oregon November 16,
Sustaining Change: RtI & SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut May 9,
Plants, Camps, Special Education, & Prevention Science George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut.
Preventing & Responding to Problem Behavior: Review of Best Practice Gene Thompson, Martha Wally, Brandi Simonsen, George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral.
Introduction to PBIS Forum George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut October
Systems, Data, & Practices to Move PBIS Forward in Ravenswood City School District Sheldon Loman, Ph.D.
Review & Re-establish School-Wide PBIS: Tier 1 Cohort 10 August 2015 *
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 Continuum of Support *
Evolution of RtI & SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut January 23,
SWPBS & RtI for All George Sugai University of Connecticut OSEP Center on PBIS September 24, 2008
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Rationale, Readiness, Features George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
SWPBS: Establishing District & Community Capacity (Beyond Classroom Management) Carl Cole & George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut.
W. M. Anderson Primary: School- Wide Positive Behavior Support Plan James Carraway, Chairperson Macie Davis Debra Fulmore Pam Lee Lerlisa McKnight Gail.
RTI: Linking Academic and Behavior Support Wesley Temple Dawn Davis.
SWPBS: Implementation Fidelity & Durability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut Apr 7,
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Getting Started George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut April 6,
Systematic Support for Students
IL PBIS 2008: Leadership Lucille, Holly, Kelly, Diane, Brandi, Seth, Rob & George OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University.
SWPBS: Sustainability
SWPBS Overview: Establishing Continuum of Support for All
PBIS PRACTICES.
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership
Reaching All Students: RtI & SWPBS
Evidence-Based Intervention Practices
Sustainability & Scaling & Failure of Friday In-service Day
Adapted from Brandi Simonsen, Kari Sassu,& George Sugai, 2008
DW Leadership: Sustainable & Scalable SWPBS
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership
MN SW Positive Behavior Support Initiative
Presentation transcript:

Kayla Locklear- Behavioral Specialist Leon Maynor – Behavioral Specialist SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT: DISCIPLINE & BEYOND

Purpose Describe rationale, features, & outcomes Prevention Continuum of Evidence-based Practices Academic-Behavior Link Systems Capacity

4 Challenges Negative school-wide disciplinary climate “Get Tough” discipline “Train-n-Hope” professional development Lack of effective minutes

PBIS Logic! Successful individual student behavior support is linked to host environments or school climates that are effective, efficient, relevant, & durable (Zins & Ponti, 1990)

Non-responsive problem behavior….”Get Tough!” Disciplinary RtI Clamp down & increase monitoring Re-re-re-review rules Extend continuum & consistency of consequences Establish “bottom line”

When behavior doesn’t improve, we “Get Tougher!” Zero tolerance policies Increased surveillance Increased suspension & expulsion In-service training by expert Alternative programming …..Predictable systems response !

But….false sense of safety/security! Fosters environments of control Triggers & reinforces antisocial behavior Shifts accountability away from school Devalues child-adult relationship Weakens relationship between academic & social behavior programming

Science of behavior has taught us that students…. Are NOT born with “bad behaviors” Do NOT learn when presented contingent aversive consequences …….. Do learn better ways of behaving by being taught directly & receiving positive feedback

Prevention

PSRC is about…. Improving classroom & school climate Decreasing reactive management Maximizing academic achievement Improving support for students w/ BIPs Integrating academic & behavior initiatives

WHAT DO WE KNOW ABOUT PREVENTING VIOLENCE? Surgeon General’s Report on Youth Violence (2001) Coordinated Social Emotional & Learning (Greenberg et al., 2003) Center for Study & Prevention of Violence (2006) White House Conference on School Violence (2006) Positive, predictable school-wide climate High rates of academic & social success Formal social skills instruction Positive active supervision & reinforcement Positive adult role models Multi-component, multi-year school-family- community effort

What is RtI? PSRC detour

Need for better Data-based decision making Early & timely decision making Comprehensive screening Support for non- responders Implementation Fidelity Instructional accountability & justification Assessment- instruction alignment Resource & time use

IMPLEMENTATION W/ FIDELITY CONTINUUM OF EVIDENCE-BASED INTERVENTIONS STUDENT PERFORMANCE CONTINUOUS PROGRESS MONITORING DATA-BASED DECISION MAKING & PROBLEM SOLVING UNIVERSAL SCREENING RtI

RtI: Good “IDEA” Policy Approach or framework for redesigning & establishing teaching & learning environments that are effective, efficient, relevant, & durable for all students, families & educators NOT program, curriculum, strategy, intervention NOT limited to special education NOT new

Quotable Fixsen “Policy is Allocation of limited resources for unlimited needs” Opportunity, not guarantee, for good action” “Training does not predict action” “Manualized treatments have created overly rigid & rapid applications”

EARLY INFLUENCES CBM Early Screening & Intervention Prereferral Interventions Teacher Assistance Teaming Diagnostic Prescriptive Teaching Behavioral & Instructional Consultation Applied Behavior Analysis Precision Teaching

Where’d “triangle” come from….a PBIS perspective?

“Triangle” ?’s Why triangle? Why not pyramid or octagon? Why not 12 tiers? 2 tiers? What’s it got to do w/ education? Where’d those %’s come from?

Public Health & Disease Prevention Kutash et al., 2006; Larson, 1994 Tertiary (FEW) Reduce complications, intensity, severity of current cases Secondary (SOME) Reduce current cases of problem behavior Primary (ALL) Reduce new cases of problem behavior

Prevention Logic for All Walker et al., 1996 Decrease development of new problem behaviors Prevent worsening of existing problem behaviors Redesign learning & teaching environments to eliminate triggers & maintainers of problem behaviors Teach, monitor, & acknowledge prosocial behavior

Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior ~80% of Students ~15% ~5% CONTINUUM OF SCHOOL-WIDE INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT

1-5% 5-10% 80-90% Intensive, Individual Interventions Individual Students Assessment-based High Intensity Intensive, Individual Interventions Individual Students Assessment-based Intense, durable procedures Targeted Group Interventions Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response Targeted Group Interventions Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response Universal Interventions All students Preventive, proactive Universal Interventions All settings, all students Preventive, proactive Designing School-Wide Systems for Student Success Academic SystemsBehavioral Systems

RtI Application Examples EARLY READING/LITERACYSOCIAL BEHAVIOR TEAM General educator, special educator, reading specialist, Title I, school psychologist, etc. General educator, special educator, behavior specialist, Title I, school psychologist, etc. UNIVERSAL SCREENING Curriculum based measurementSSBD, record review, gating PROGRESS MONITORING Curriculum based measurement ODR, suspensions, behavior incidents, precision teaching EFFECTIVE INTERVENTIONS 5-specific reading skills: phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, comprehension Direct social skills instruction, positive reinforcement, token economy, active supervision, behavioral contracting, group contingency management, function-based support, self- management DECISION MAKING RULES Core, strategic, intensivePrimary, secondary, tertiary tiers

Responsiveness to Intervention Academic + Social Behavior

Universal Targeted Intensive All Some Few RTI Continuum of Support for ALL

SOUNDS SIMPLE, BUT IMPLICATIONS FOR…. Curricular & instructional decisions Special education functioning General education functioning Measurement, assessment, & evaluation Implementation accountability Families & community interactions

PSRC Features

Implementation Levels Student Classroom School State District

PSRC Conceptual Foundations Behaviorism ABA PBIS CIP

SYSTEMS PRACTICES DATA Supporting Staff Behavior Supporting Student Behavior OUTCOMES Supporting Social Competence & Academic Achievement Supporting Decision Making Basics: 4 PBIS Elements

~80% of Students ~15% ~5% CONTINUUM of PSRC SECONDARY PREVENTION Check in/out Targeted social skills instruction Peer-based supports Social skills club TERTIARY PREVENTION Function-based support Wraparound/PCP Special Education PRIMARY PREVENTION Teach & encourage positive SW expectations Proactive SW discipline Effective instruction Parent engagement Audit 1.Identify existing practices by tier 2.Specify outcome for each effort 3.Evaluate implementation accuracy & outcome effectiveness 4.Eliminate/integrate based on outcomes 5.Establish decision rules (RtI)

“Train & Hope” REACT to Problem Behavior Select & ADD Practice Hire EXPERT to Train Practice Expect, But HOPE for Implementation WAIT for New Problem

Funding Visibility Political Support Training Coaching Evaluation Local School Teams/Demonstrations PBIS Systems Implementation Logic Leadership Team Active & Integrated Coordination

Agreements Team Data-based Action Plan ImplementationEvaluation GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS: “Getting Started”

Classroom PSRC Subsystems Non-classroom Family Student School-wide

1.Common purpose & approach to discipline 2.Clear set of positive expectations & behaviors 3. Procedures for teaching expected behavior 4.Continuum of procedures for encouraging expected behavior 5. Continuum of procedures for discouraging inappropriate behavior 6. Procedures for on-going monitoring & evaluation School-wide

Positive expectations & routines taught & encouraged Active supervision by all staff Scan, move, interact Precorrections & reminders Positive reinforcement Non-classroom

Classroom-wide positive expectations taught & encouraged Teaching classroom routines & cues taught & encouraged Ratio of 6-8 positive to 1 negative adult-student interaction Active supervision Redirections for minor, infrequent behavior errors Frequent precorrections for chronic errors Effective academic instruction & curriculum Classroom

Behavioral competence at school & district levels Function-based behavior support planning Team- & data-based decision making Comprehensive person-centered planning & wraparound processes Targeted social skills & self-management instruction Individualized instructional & curricular accommodations Individual Student

Continuum of positive behavior support for all families Frequent, regular positive contacts, communications, & acknowledgements Formal & active participation & involvement as equal partner Access to system of integrated school & community resources Family

PSRC investments in Prevention Continuum of Evidence-based Behavioral Interventions Systems Capacity for Accurate & Sustainable Implementation