Evaluating the UK Breast Screening Programme Study design and practicalities Louise Johns, Sue Moss, Tony Swerdlow Department of Health Cancer Screening.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mortality and causes of death among women living with HIV in the UK in the era of highly-active antiretroviral therapy Sara Croxford, A Kitching, M Kall,
Advertisements

Public Health Perspective on Radon Control in Ireland Dr. Ina Kelly Specialist Registrar in Public Health Medicine Health Service Executive Department.
Purposes and uses of cancer registration E.E.U. Akang Department of Pathology University College Hospital Ibadan, Nigeria.
HIV and STI Department - Centre for Infections Predictors of non-AIDS related death in a national cohort of HIV-diagnosed adults Meaghan Kall, Ruth Smith,
Breast Cancer screening in the NHS Dr D J Rohan Subasinghe.
Cervical screening Tim Wright Sept 07. Introduction What who when What who when Benefits (evidence) Benefits (evidence) Cost Cost Does it fit wilson’s.
HSB examples from Finland Nea Malila Mass Screening Registry, Cancer Society of Finland and University of Tampere, Tampere School of Public Health.
Evaluation of Primary Versus Secondary Prevention of Cervical Cancer: an evidence based literature review Jennifer Vestle, PA-S, John Carter, PhD Department.
Epidemiology The Basics Only… Adapted with permission from a class presentation developed by Dr. Charles Lynch – University of Iowa, Iowa City.
Applied Epidemiology Sharla Smith. Discussion Assignments How to complete a discussion assignment –Read the chapters –Evaluate the question –Be very specific.
A role for lipids and statins in breast cancer risk and prevention? Dr. Mieke Van Hemelrijck Senior Lecturer in Cancer Epidemiology 3 August 2015.
Bias Defined as any systematic error in a study that results in an incorrect estimate of association between exposure and risk of disease. To err is human.
Dr Andrea Micheli Descriptive Epidemiology and Health Planning Unit Fondazione IRCCS “Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori” Milan Public Health Programme EUROPEAN.
Background Appropriate time to start HAART is still debatable 1995: “Time to hit HIV, early and hard” Eradication thought to be possible Early regimens.
Colorectal Cancer Screening Implementation of a public health programme An Expert Group on Colorectal Cancer Screening Cancer Society of Finland, Finnish.
BREAST CANCER BY STAGE OF DISEASE AT DIAGNOSIS, CENTRAL OKLAHOMA Arthur Owora, MPH; Aaron Wendelboe, PhD; David Thompson, PhD; Janis Campbell, PhD The.
Results Introduction There are social inequalities in breast cancer survival with those in more deprived and Black ethnic groups having lower survival.
Contact: Patrick Phillips,
UK Hospitalizations due to Stroke in Prostate Cancer Patients
Implementation of a lung health clinic in high-risk individuals in South East London: a prospective feasibility cohort study Background In 2013, lung cancer.
Some epidemiological principles and methods
Population-Based Breast Cancer Screening With Risk-Based and Universal Mammography Screening Compared With Clinical Breast Examination A Propensity Score.
THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN HAVING A LONG-TERM CONDITION AND UPTAKE OF POPULATION-BASED SCREENING FOR COLORECTAL CANCER Benjamin Kearns, The University of.
Comparison of three Observational Analytical strategies
Biostatistics Case Studies 2016
Lancet. 2017 Aug 5;390(10094): doi: /S (17) Epub 2017 May 25.
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Donald E. Cutlip, MD Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
(95% confidence interval)
Liver Cancer (C22): 2014 Number of Deaths, Crude and European Age-Standardised (AS) Mortality Rates per 100,000 Population, UK Northern England Wales Scotland.
Breast Cancer (C50): Five-Year Relative Survival (%) by Stage, Adults Aged 15-99, Former Anglia Cancer Network Please include the citation provided.
Copyright © 2003 Delmar Learning, a Thomson Learning company
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی بوشهر دانشکده بهداشت
Kathleen England Neville Calleja 20th October 2017
S1316 analysis details Garnet Anderson Katie Arnold
Dr. Hannah Jordan Lecturer in Public Health ScHARR
Access and utilisation of cervical cancer screening services among four African immigrant communities in Finland: A qualitative study MERH, May 2018,
Uterine Cancer (C54-C55): 2014 Number of Deaths, Crude and European Age-Standardised (AS) Mortality Rates per 100,000 Population, Females, UK Northern.
Review – First Exam Chapters 1 through 5
Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer (C44): 2014
Research benefits of NHS IT Programmes
Lung Cancer (C33-C34): 2014 Number of Deaths, Crude and European Age-Standardised (AS) Mortality Rates per 100,000 Population, UK Northern England Wales.
Kidney Cancer (C64-C66,C68): 2014 Number of Deaths, Crude and European Age-Standardised (AS) Mortality Rates per 100,000 Population, UK Northern England.
Bone Sarcoma (C40-C41): 2014 Number of Deaths, Crude and European Age-Standardised (AS) Mortality Rates per 100,000 Population, UK Northern England Wales.
per 100,000 Population, Females, UK
(95% confidence interval)
Malignant Melanoma (C43): 2014
Oral Cancer (C00-C06,C09-C10,C12-C14): 2014
Hodgkin Lymphoma (C81): 2014 Number of Deaths, Crude and European Age-Standardised (AS) Mortality Rates per 100,000 Population, UK Northern England Wales.
Bowel Cancer (C18-C20): 2014 Number of Deaths, Crude and European Age-Standardised (AS) Mortality Rates per 100,000 Population, UK Northern England Wales.
Oesophageal Cancer (C15): 2014
Myeloma (C90): 2014 Number of Deaths, Crude and European Age-Standardised (AS) Mortality Rates per 100,000 Population, UK Northern England Wales Scotland.
Penile Cancer (C60): 2014 Number of Deaths, Crude and European Age-Standardised (AS) Mortality Rates per 100,000 Population, Males, UK Northern England.
Bladder Cancer (C67): 2014 Number of Deaths, Crude and European Age-Standardised (AS) Mortality Rates per 100,000 Population, UK Northern England Wales.
Anal Cancer (C21): 2014 Number of Deaths, Crude and European Age-Standardised (AS) Mortality Rates per 100,000 Population, UK Northern England Wales Scotland.
Pancreatic Cancer (C25): 2014
per 100,000 Population, Females, UK
Eye Cancer (C69): 2014 Number of Deaths, Crude and European Age-Standardised (AS) Mortality Rates per 100,000 Population, UK Northern England Wales Scotland.
Challenges in Evaluating Screening & Prevention Interventions
Leukaemia (C91-C95): 2014 Number of Deaths, Crude and European Age-Standardised (AS) Mortality Rates per 100,000 Population, UK Northern England Wales.
HEC508 Applied Epidemiology
Prostate Cancer (C61): 2014 Number of Deaths, Crude and European Age-Standardised (AS) Mortality Rates per 100,000 Population, Males, UK Northern England.
Gallbladder Cancer (C23): 2014
Cancer of Unknown Primary (C77-C80): 2014
Ovarian Cancer (C56-C57.4): 2014 Number of Deaths, Crude and European Age-Standardised (AS) Mortality Rates per 100,000 Population, Females, UK Northern.
Breast Cancer (C50): 2014 Numbers of Deaths, Crude and European Age-Standardised (AS) Mortality Rates per 100,000 Population, UK Northern England Scotland.
Stomach Cancer (C16): 2014 Number of Deaths, Crude and European Age-Standardised (AS) Mortality Rates per 100,000 Population, UK Northern England Wales.
Thyroid Cancer (C73): 2014 Number of Deaths, Crude and European Age-Standardised (AS) Mortality Rates per 100,000 Population, UK Northern England Wales.
Laryngeal Cancer (C32): 2014 Number of Deaths, Crude and European Age-Standardised (AS) Mortality Rates per 100,000 Population, UK Northern England Wales.
Basic statistics.
Presentation transcript:

Evaluating the UK Breast Screening Programme Study design and practicalities Louise Johns, Sue Moss, Tony Swerdlow Department of Health Cancer Screening Evaluation Unit Section of Epidemiology

Background UK breast screening programme started in 1987 Decrease in breast cancer mortality rates since 1990 Debate over relative contribution of screening and treatment changes Requirement to evaluate effectiveness

Difficulties of evaluating population screening programmes Lack of control group in most programmes Dilution Self-selection bias Confounding Small size of effect

UK evaluation study aims Primary Estimate effectiveness of the NHS breast screening programme in reducing breast cancer mortality Secondary Estimate effect of programme on death from all causes and all cancers Estimate effect of screening policy changes on effectiveness of the programme

Study design Cohort study Retrospective and prospective Exposure Screening data from national call/recall system Outcome Death registrations from UK Office for National Statistics Predicted breast cancer mortality

Control group Staggered start to UK programme allows identification of contemporary comparison group Start date No. of screening areas Early starting areas Late starting areas

Dilution, bias, confounding & size of effect Dilution Individual-level data Self-selection bias Analyse by intention to treat Confounding Socio-economic status Treatment data Size of effect Powered for 15% mortality difference after 7 years

Study area Participating health areas 38% of screening population of England & Wales (33% of UK) Choice of area: Feasibility of data collection Screening start date Representative of UK Cohort size: 4M

Health area re-organisation and data protection Climate of increased data protection 2002: major re-organisation of health areas in England and Wales 18 months to obtain permission to collect data

Obtaining individual mortality data Standard methods are impractical Cost Time Exploration of alternative data sources and linkage methods

Progress Collection of cohort 2.7M women of eligible screening age up to 1995 Collection of exposure data for these women 7.3M screening episodes up to end 2004 Method for collection of mortality data developed and piloted

Next stages Collection of mortality data Data validation Preliminary analyses Effect of screening programme

Concluding remarks Evaluation of population screening is technically and practically challenging Major hurdles can be overcome