Fast Intra Coding Based on Reference Samples Similarity in HEVC Presented By Advising Professor: Dr. K. R. Rao Nikita Thakur (1001102923) 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Time Optimization of HEVC Encoder over X86 Processors using SIMD
Advertisements

MULTIMEDIA PROCESSING STUDY AND IMPLEMENTATION OF POPULAR PARALLELING TECHNIQUES APPLIED TO HEVC Under the guidance of Dr. K. R. Rao By: Karthik Suresh.
FAST MODE DECISION ALGORITHM FOR INTRA PREDICTION IN HEVC
MULTIMEDIA PROCESSING
Efficient Bit Allocation and CTU level Rate Control for HEVC Picture Coding Symposium, 2013, IEEE Junjun Si, Siwei Ma, Wen Gao Insitute of Digital Media,
Overview of the H.264/AVC Video Coding Standard
Final Report – Spring 2014 Course: EE5359 – Multimedia Processing
BY AMRUTA KULKARNI STUDENT ID : UNDER SUPERVISION OF DR. K.R. RAO Complexity Reduction Algorithm for Intra Mode Selection in H.264/AVC Video.
Topics in Signal Processing Project Proposal
Optimizing Baseline Profile in H
PERFORMANCE COMAPRISON OF HEVC,H.264 and VP9
HARDEEPSINH JADEJA UTA ID: What is Transcoding The operation of converting video in one format to another format. It is the ability to take.
Liquan Shen Zhi Liu Xinpeng Zhang Wenqiang Zhao Zhaoyang Zhang An Effective CU Size Decision Method for HEVC Encoders IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MULTIMEDIA,
PROJECT PROPOSAL HEVC DEBLOCKING FILTER AND ITS IMPLIMENTATION RAKESH SAI SRIRAMBHATLA UTA ID: EE 5359 Under the guidance of DR. K. R. RAO.
PROJECT INTERIM REPORT HEVC DEBLOCKING FILTER AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION RAKESH SAI SRIRAMBHATLA UTA ID:
PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF HEVC AND H
ADAPTIVE INTERPOLATION FILTER FOR H.264/AVC Bhavana Prabhakar Student Id: Department of Electrical Engineering.
Reducing/Eliminating visual artifacts in HEVC by Deblocking filter By: Harshal Shah Under the guidance of: Dr. K. R. Rao.
By Abhishek Hassan Thungaraj Supervisor- Dr. K. R. Rao.
Analysis of Motion Estimation Algorithm (HEVC), using Multi-core processing Shiba Kuanar
Comparative study of Intra Frame Coding efficiency in HEVC and VP9
PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF HEVC AND H.264 DECODER INTERIM PRESENTATION SPRING 2014 ADVISOR: Dr. K.R.Rao VASAVEE VIJAYARAGHAVAN
Directional DCT Presented by, -Shreyanka Subbarayappa, Sadaf Ahamed, Tejas Sathe, Priyadarshini Anjanappa K. R. RAO 1.
Rate-GOP Based Rate Control for HEVC SHANSHE WANG, SIWEI MA, SHIQI WANG, DEBIN ZHAO, AND WEN GAO IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN SIGNAL PROCESSING,
FAST MODE DECISION ALGORITHM FOR INTRA PREDICTION IN HEVC FINAL REPORT Lanka Naga Venkata Sai Surya Teja Student ID Mail ID
- By Naveen Siddaraju - Under the guidance of Dr K R Rao Study and comparison between H.264.
EE5359 Multimedia Processing Interim Presentation SPRING 2015 ADVISOR: Dr. K.R.Rao EE5359 Multimedia Processing1 BY: BHARGAV VELLALAM SRIKANTESWAR
Figure 1.a AVS China encoder [3] Video Bit stream.
INTERIM Presentation on Topic: Advanced Video Coding (Comparison of HEVC with H.264 and H.264 with MPEG-2) A PROJECT UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF DR. K. R. RAO.
IMPLEMENTATION OF H.264/AVC, AVS China Part 7 and Dirac VIDEO CODING STANDARDS Under the guidance of Dr. K R. Rao Electrical Engineering Department The.
-BY KUSHAL KUNIGAL UNDER GUIDANCE OF DR. K.R.RAO. SPRING 2011, ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON FPGA Implementation.
Optimizing Baseline Profile in H.264/AVC Video Coding by Parallel Programming and Fast Intra and Inter Predictions BY Under the Guidance of VINOOTHNA GAJULA.
Reducing the Complexity of inter-prediction mode decision for High Efficiency Video Codec Kushal Shah Department of Electrical Engineering University of.
Study and Optimization of the Deblocking Filter in H.265 and its Advantages over H.264 By: Valay Shah Under the guidance of: Dr. K. R. Rao.
High-efficiency video coding: tools and complexity Oct
ADAPTIVE INTERPOLATION FILTER FOR H.264/AVC Bhavana Prabhakar Student Id: Department of Electrical Engineering.
IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, Vol. 58, No. 2, May 2012 Kyungmin Lim, Seongwan Kim, Jaeho Lee, Daehyun Pak and Sangyoun Lee, Member, IEEE 報告者:劉冠宇.
A HIGH PERFORMANCE DEBLOCKING FILTER IMPLEMENTAION FOR HEVC
Reducing/Eliminating visual artifacts in HEVC by Deblocking filter Submitted By: Harshal Shah Under the guidance of Dr. K. R. Rao.
Porting of Fast Intra Prediction in HM7.0 to HM9.2
Transcoding from H.264/AVC to HEVC
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF HEVC and H.264 INTRA FRAME CODING AND JPEG2000 BY Under the Guidance of Harshdeep Brahmasury Jain Dr. K. R. RAO ID MS Electrical.
Time Optimization of HEVC Encoder over X86 Processors using SIMD
EE5359 Multimedia Processing Final Presentation SPRING 2015 ADVISOR: Dr. K.R.Rao EE5359 Multimedia Processing1 BY: BHARGAV VELLALAM SRIKANTESWAR
Time Optimization of HEVC Encoder over X86 Processors using SIMD Kushal Shah Advisor: Dr. K. R. Rao Spring 2013 Multimedia.
FAST MODE DECISION ALGORITHM FOR INTRA PREDICTION IN HEVC Lanka Naga Venkata Sai Surya Teja Student ID Mail ID
PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF DAALA AND HEVC By Rohith Reddy Etikala
Performance and Computational Complexity Assessment of High- Efficiency Video Encoders Interim Presentation on: Presented by: MANU RAJENDRA SHEELVANT Under.
Performance and Computational Complexity Assessment of High- Efficiency Video Encoders Proposal on: Presented by: MANU RAJENDRA SHEELVANT Under the guidance.
PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF DAALA AND HEVC By Rohith Reddy Etikala
Interim Report – Spring 2014 Course: EE5359 – Multimedia Processing Performance Comparison of HEVC & H.264 using various test sequences Under the guidance.
Implementation and comparison study of H.264 and AVS china EE 5359 Multimedia Processing Spring 2012 Guidance : Prof K R Rao Pavan Kumar Reddy Gajjala.
PREDICTION TECHNIQUES FOR PALETTE CODING IN SCREEN CONTENT Presented By: Rakhee Barkur ( ) 1 Advisor: Dr. K. R. Rao.
PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF DAALA AND HEVC By Rohith Reddy Etikala
EE 5359 MULTIMEDIA PROCESSING PROJECT PROPOSAL SPRING 2016 STUDY AND PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF HEVC, H.264/AVC AND DIRAC By ASHRITA MANDALAPU
E ARLY TERMINATION FOR TZ SEARCH IN HEVC MOTION ESTIMATION PRESENTED BY: Rajath Shivananda ( ) 1 EE 5359 Multimedia Processing Individual Project.
Objective Video quality assessment of Dirac and H.265 SPRING 2016 INSTRUCTOR: Dr.K.R Rao. Satya sai krishna kumar Avasarala
prediction techniques for palette coding in screen content
HEVC INTER PREDICTION PRESENTERS: Divya Nityanand ( ) Rajath Shivananda ( ) Rakhee Barkur ( ) 1 EE 5359 Multimedia Processing.
EE 5359 MULTIMEDIA PROCESSING INTERIM PRESENTATION SPRING 2016 STUDY AND PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF HEVC, H.264/AVC AND DIRAC By ASHRITA MANDALAPU
Adaptive Block Coding Order for Intra Prediction in HEVC
Fast Intra Coding Based on Reference Samples Similarity in HEVC
Early termination for tz search in hevc motion estimation
Porting of Fast Intra Prediction in HM7.0 to HM9.2
Submitted By: Harshal Shah Under the guidance of Dr. K. R. Rao
Study and Optimization of the Deblocking Filter in H
PROJECT PROPOSAL HEVC DEBLOCKING FILTER AND ITS IMPLIMENTATION RAKESH SAI SRIRAMBHATLA UTA ID: EE 5359 Under the guidance of DR. K. R. RAO.
Fast Decision of Block size, Prediction Mode and Intra Block for H
/ Fast block partitioning method in HEVC Intra coding for UHD video /
Fast Intra Coding Based on Reference Samples Similarity in HEVC
Presentation transcript:

Fast Intra Coding Based on Reference Samples Similarity in HEVC Presented By Advising Professor: Dr. K. R. Rao Nikita Thakur ( ) 1

Outline 1.HEVC 2.Picture Partitioning 3.Intra Mode Coding 4.Angular Intra Prediction 5.Proposed Algorithm 6.Test sequences 7.Future Work 8.Implementation of Test sequences in HEVC 9.References 2

List of Acronyms and Abbreviations AVC: Advanced Video Coding BD-PSNR: Bjøntegaard Delta Peak Signal to Noise Ratio BD-bitrate: Bjøntegaard Delta bit rate CABAC: Context Adaptive Binary Arithmetic Coding CTU: Coding Tree Unit CU: Coding Unit VCIP: Visual Communications and Image Processing DVD: Digital Video Disk EUSIPCO: European Signal Processing Conference HD: High Definition HDR: High Dynamic Range HEVC: High Efficiency Video Coding HM: HEVC Test Model ICICS: International Conference on Information, Communications and Signal Processing JCT: Joint Collaborative Team 3

JCT-VC: Joint Collaborative Team on Video Coding JPEG: Joint Photographic Experts Group MPEG: Moving Picture Experts Group PB: Prediction Block PU: Prediction Unit RD: Rate Distortion RDO: Rate-distortion Optimization SATD: Sum of Absolute Transformed Differences TB: Transform Block TU: Transform Unit UHD: Ultra High Definition 4

Overview of HEVC HEVC is latest video standard developed by Joint Collaborative Team on Video Coding (JCT-VC) in January, 2013 [1][2][3][4]. HEVC has been designed to address essentially all existing applications of H.264/MPEG-4 AVC [14] and to particularly focus on two key issues: increased video resolution and increased use of parallel processing architectures. The major achievements of the HEVC standard in comparison with the H.264 [1] standard are flexible prediction modes, larger transform block sizes, better partitioning options, improved interpolation and deblocking filters, prediction, signaling of modes and motion vectors and support efficient parallel processing [1]. 5

6 Fig 1:Typical video coding

Picture Partitioning HEVC supports highly flexible partitioning of a video sequence. Each frame of the sequence is split up into rectangular or square regions (units or blocks) [12], each of which is predicted from previously coded data. After prediction, any residual information is transformed and entropy encoded. Each coded video frame, or picture, is partitioned into tiles and/or slices, which are further partitioned into coding tree units (CTUs). A coding tree unit can be subdivided into square regions known as coding units (CUs) using a quad-tree structure. Each CU is predicted using inter or intra prediction and transformed using one or more transform units. Figure 1.1: Picture, Slice, Coding Tree Unit (CTU), Coding Unit (CU) [12] 7

Intra mode coding Intra coding can be depicted in Fig. 2. In the rough mode decision (RMD) stage, the current block is predicted with mode 0 firstly. Then the differences between the original block and the prediction are obtained. Afterward Hadamard transform is applied to the difference block, and finally the sum of the absolute transformed difference (SATD) is calculated. After the process is repeated for all the 35 intra modes, the N modes with the minimum SATD are selected to be candidates for RDO. N is determined according to PU sizes as eight for PUs of size 4×4 and 8×8, and three for PUs of other sizes. The MPM will also be added in the N modes if they are not included yet. 8

Intra mode coding 9 Fig 2:Process of Intra coding

Reference Samples Generation and Substitution Intra sample prediction is performed by extrapolating sample values from the reconstructed reference samples depending on the prediction mode Figure 2.1:An example of reference sample substitution process. Non-available reference samples are marked as grey: (a) reference samples before the substitution process (b) reference samples after the substitution process

Contd... There are three cases in which reference samples may not be available. The first case is when the reference samples at picture or slice boundaries are unavailable; in this case a nominal average sample value is used as a replacement for the reference samples depending on the sample bit-depth; for an 8-bit data, this is 128. The second case is when just the left boundary references are missing; these reference samples are generated copying the samples from the closest available reference samples above. The third case is when just the top boundary references are missing; these reference samples are generated copying the samples from the closest available reference samples on the left [10].

Angular Intra Prediction Figure 3: Angle definitions of angular intra prediction in HEVC numbered from 2 to 34 and the associated displacement parameters. H and V are used to indicate the horizontal and vertical directionalities, respectively, while the numeric part of the identifier refers to the sample position displacements in 1/32 fractions of sample grid positions[11]

Figure 3.1: Example of diagonal orientation [13]

Contd... Two arrays of reference samples are used: - the row of samples lying above the current PU to be predicted - the column of samples lying to the left of the same PU One of the reference arrays is defined to be the main array and the other array the side array: - vertical prediction: the reference row above the PU is called the main array and the reference column to the left of the same PU is called the side array. - horizontal prediction: the reference column to the left of the PU is called the main array and the reference row above the PU is called the side array. Predicted pixels are computed by using the linear interpolation of the reference top or left samples. Only the main array samples are used for prediction when the intra prediction angle is positive.

Contd... The prediction process when the angle value is negative, - The main array is extended by projecting samples from the side array onto it according to the prediction direction. - This projection entails copying a subset of the samples in the side array into the main array. -Only the extended main array is used for the prediction thus

Sample Prediction for Angular Prediction Mode Predicted sample values p[x][y] are obtained by projecting the location of the sample p[x][y] to the reference sample array applying the selected prediction direction and interpolating a value for the sample at 1/32 sample position accuracy[8]. Prediction for horizontal modes (modes 2-17) is given by: And Sample Prediction for vertical modes (modes 18–34) is given by: where i is the projected integer displacement on row y (for vertical modes) or column x (for horizontal modes) and calculated as a function of angular parameter A as follows: f represents the fractional part of the projected displacement on the same row or column and is calculated as:

Proposed Algorithm[33] 17 Fig 4:An example of sample prediction for angular prediction Modes[33].

It can be seen from Fig. 5 that not all the samples in the reference array are needed for the prediction. The array of needed reference samples (ANRS) varies with different angular prediction modes. If the ANRS are similar, then they would generate similar predictions. So, we don’t have to apply the RMD and RDO to all the modes which havesimilar ANRSs. Only one of them is needed. Even though other modes are discarded, it will not result in too much degradation of quality and BD-rate. Fig. 4.1 shows an original block and the reference samples. Fig. 4.2 shows the ANRSs for the block. It can be seen that the ANRSs in the red rectangle are similar. These similar ANRSs would generate similar prediction. Only one of the angular modes needs to be evaluated in the RMD stage. In the proposed algorithm, only the first one (intra prediction mode 25) is remained and other are discarded. 18

19 Fig A block and the reference samples[33] Fig.4.2. The ANRSs of one block. The numbers indicates the corresponding intra modes in HEVC[33].

Mean and variance are used to judge whether two ANRSs are similar. If the means of two ANRSs are close enough and the variances of both ANRSs are small enough, the two ANRSs are similar. The condition is defined as follows[33]: Mean(ANRS[i]) – Mean(ANRS[j])| < MeanThreshold && Variance(ANRS[i]) < VarianceThreshold (11) && Variance(ANRS[i]) < VarianceThreshold where ANRS[i] means the ANRS for intra mode i (i > 1and i < 35). 20

21 Fig The samples used in DC mode[33] Fig The samples used in planar mode[33]. DC and Planar Prediction[33] The cases of DC and planar mode are different from angular modes. For DC mode, the ANRS used in prediction is shown in the red rectangles in Fig Only the samples which are on the left and above of the block are calculated for mean value. The variance always equals 0 in this case, since the prediction is determined by mean only. For the planar mode, the ANRS used in prediction is shown in the red rectangles in Fig The samples in the bottom row are copies of the bottom-left reference sample and the samples in the right column are copies of top-right reference sample. The mean and variance are calculated for the samples in the red rectangles.

The Process of Skipping Intra Modes[33] As is shown in Fig. 4.5, the proposed algorithm is based on rough mode decision (RMD). The algorithm processes each mode from mode 0 to mode 34. Before predicting a block using a certain mode, the mean and variance of the ANRS are calculated. If the ANRS of the current mode is similar to that of a preceding mode, the current mode is discarded. So, the Hadamard cost is calculated only for a subset of all the intra modes. The encoding time is there by reduced. 22 Fig The flowchart of the proposed algorithm[33]

Future Work Similar algorithms can be developed for fast inter-prediction in which the RD cost of the different modes in inter-prediction are explored, and depending upon the adaptive threshold [34], mode decision can be terminated resulting in less encoding time and reduced complexity combining with the above proposed algorithm. There are a numerous number of Algorithms been developed for fast intra mode coding [14][15[16[17[18][19].We can compare the Performance of each of these algorithms and compare them based on experimental results. 23

Test sequences BasketBallDrillText 24

Racehorses 25

Kimono 26

Implementation of test sequences on HEVC 27

28

29

30

31

32

References [1] G. J. Sullivan et al, “Overview of the high efficiency video coding (HEVC) standard”, IEEE Transactions on circuits and systems for video technology, vol. 22, no.12, pp – 1668, Dec [2] K. R. Rao, D. N. Kim and J. J. Hwang, “Video Coding Standards: AVS China, H.264/MPEG-4 Part10, HEVC, VP6, DIRAC and VC-1”, Springer, [3] V. Sze, M. Budagavi, and G. J. Sullivan, "High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC): Algorithms and Architectures", Springer, [4] M. Wien, "High Efficiency Video Coding: Coding Tools and Specification”, Springer, [5] JVT Draft ITU-T recommendation and final draft international standard of joint video specification (ITU-T Rec. H.264-ISO/IEC AVC), March 2003, JVT-G050 available on [6] I.E.G.Richardson, “H.264 and MPEG-4 Video Compression Video Coding for Next generation Multimedia”, New York, Wiley, 2003 [7] G.J. Sullivan and T.Wiegand, “Rate-Distortion Optimization for Video Compression”. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 15, pp.74-90, Nov [8] J.-R. Ohm et al, “Comparison of the coding efficiency of video coding standards – including high efficiency video coding (HEVC)”, IEEE Transactions on circuits and systems for video technology, vol. 22, pp , Dec Software and data for reproducing selected results can be found at ftp://ftp.hhi.de/ieee-tcsvt/

[9] C. Fogg, “Suggested figures for the HEVC specification”, ITU-T & ISO/IEC JCTVC J0292r1, July [10] I. E. G. Richardson, “The H.264 Advanced Video Compression Standard,” II Edition, Wiley,2010. [11] J. Lainema et al, “Intra coding of the HEVC standard”, IEEE Transactions on circuits and systems for video technology, vol. 22, pp , Dec [12] P. Helle et al, “Block merging for quadtree-based partitioning in HEVC”, IEEE Transactions on circuits and systems for video technology, vol. 22, pp , Dec [13] G. Van Wallendael et al, "3D video compression based on high efficiency video coding," IEEE Trans. Consumer Electronics, vol. 58, no.1, pp , Feb [14] Y. Piao, J. Min and J. Chen, "Encoder improvement of unified intra prediction," Joint Collaborative Team on Video Coding (JCT-VC) of ITU-T SG16 WP3 and ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11, Document: JCTVCC207,Guangzhou, Oct [15] L. Zhao et al, "Fast Mode Decision Algorithm for Intra Prediction in HEVC," IEEE Visual Communications and Image Processing (VCIP), pp. 1-4, Nov [16] J. Kim, J. Yang,H. Lee and B. Jeon, "Fast intra mode decision of HEVC based on hierarchical structure," 8th International Conference on Information, Communications and Signal Processing (ICICS), pp. 1-4, Dec

[ 17] T. L. da Silva, L. V. Agostini and L. A. da Silva Cruz, "Fast HEVC intra prediction mode decision based on EDGE direction information," Proceedings of the 20th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), pp , Aug [18] W. Jiang and H. Ma, Y. Chen, "Gradient based fast mode decision algorithm for intra predicion in HEVC," 2nd International Conference on Consumer Electronics, Communications and Networks (CECNet), pp , Apr [19]L. Shen, Z. Zhang and P. An, “Fast CU size decision and mode decision algorithm for HEVC intra coding’, IEEE Trans. on consumer electronics, vol.59, pp , Feb [20]G J. Sullivan et al, “Standardized Extensions of HEVC”, IEEE Journal of Selected topics in Signal Processing, Vol.7, No.6, pp , Dec [21] HM C++ Code: [22] HM software manual: [23] H. Zhang and Z. Ma, “Fast intra mode decision for high-efficiency video coding”, IEEE Transactions on circuits and systems for video technology, Vol.24, pp , Apr [24]JCT-VC documents can be accessed.Available: nt_number [25] VCEG & JCT documents available from in the video-site and jvt-site folders [26] HEVC tutorial by I.E.G. Richardson: 35

[27]R. Li et al, ”A new three-step search algorithm for block motion estimation”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol.4, pp , Aug [28]X. Li et al, “Rate-Complexity-Distortion evaluation for hybrid video coding”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 21, pp , July [29] P. Helle et al, “Block merging for quadtree-based partitioning in HEVC”, IEEE Trans. CSVT, vol. 22, pp , Dec [30] Information on developments in HEVC NGVC- Next generation video coding [31]M. Wien, “High Efficiency Video Coding: Coding Tools and Specification”, Springer, [32]I.E. Richardson, “Coding video: A practical guide to HEVC and beyond”, Wiley, 11 April [33] Q.Jiang and J.Jeong,. "Fast Intra Coding Based on Reference Samples Similarity in HEVC”, International Conference on Signal-Image Technology & Internet-Based Systems,September 2015 [34] Video test sequences - [35]Tutorials: Tut1. N. Ling, “High efficiency video coding and its 3D extension: A research perspective,” Keynote Speech, ICIEA, Singapore, July Tut2. X. Wang et al, “Paralleling variable block size motion estimation of HEVC on CPU plus GPU platform”, IEEE ICME workshop, Tut3. H.R. Tohidpour, M.T. Pourazad and P. Nasiopoulos, “Content adaptive complexity reduction scheme for quality/fidelity scalable HEVC”, IEEE ICASSP 2013, pp , June Tut4. M. Wien, “HEVC – coding tools and specifications”, Tutorial, IEEE ICME, San Jose, CA, July

Tut5. D. Grois, B. Bross and D. Marpe, “HEVC/H.265 Video Coding Standard (Version 2) including the Range Extensions, Scalable Extensions, and Multiview Extensions,” (Tutorial) Monday 29 June am-3:00pm, IEEE ICME 2015, Torino, Italy, 29 June – 3 July, Tut6. D. Grois, B. Bross and D. Marpe, “HEVC/H.265 Video Coding Standard including the Range Extensions, Scalable Extensions, and Multiview Extensions,” (Tutorial), IEEE ICCE, Berlin, Germany, 6 – 9 Sept Tut7. D. Grois, B. Bross and D. Marpe, “HEVC/H.265 Video Coding Standard (Version 2) including the Range Extensions, Scalable Extensions, and Multiview Extensions,” (Tutorial) Sunday 27 Sept 2015, 9:00 am to 12:30 pm), IEEE ICIP, Quebec City, Canada, 27 – 30 Sept The tutorial below is for personal use only. Password: a2FazmgNK Tut8. Please find the links to YouTube videos on the tutorial - HEVC/H.265 Video Coding Standard including the Range Extensions Scalable Extensions and Multiview Extensions below: 37

Thank You! 38