State of Alaska Assumption of Section 404 program Michelle Bonnet Hale, Director, Division of Water Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation Steven.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mission: Mission: To protect human health and the environment Primary services: Expertise DEC brings to the ACMP Primary services: Expertise DEC brings.
Advertisements

US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Restoration and Regulation Discussion Joseph P. DaVia US Army Corps of Engineers-Baltimore Chief, Maryland.
Managing Development in the Coastal Zone: Federal Policy Session Name: Managing Development in the Coastal Zone: Federal Policy Coastal Hazards Management.
Clean Water Act SAFE 210. History/Amendments Recent major amendments were enacted in 1972, 1977, and – Established the National Pollutant Discharge.
Restoring and protecting Louisiana’s coast January 18, 2011 CPRA Meeting David Peterson Asst. Attorney General and AG Designee to CPRA Civil Division Lands.
Unified Carrier Registration (UCR) Update August 24, 2006.
1 Role of Local, State and Federal Agencies in E&SC Issued May 2009 Level IB: Advanced Fundamentals Seminar Education and Training Requirements for Individuals.
Utah Watershed Coordinating Council Conservation Planning Workshop Navigating the Corps’ Permitting Process July 20, 2011 Jason Gipson Chief, Utah/Nevada.
Deborah M. Smith United States Magistrate Judge District of Alaska LAWS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT RELATED TO FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS Second Asian Judges Symposium.
“Insert” then choose “Picture” – select your picture. Right click your picture and “Send to back”. The world’s leading sustainability consultancy Legislation.
1 Wetland Regulatory Programs Department of Natural Resources Legislative Audit Bureau July 2007.
Water Allocation and Protection of the Environment: Is a Collaborative Approach Possible? William E. Cox Professor of Civil Engineering Virginia Tech.
Clean Water Act Section 404 Basics Clean Water Act Section 404  Regulates discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the U.S., including.
What options do states have? What is Georgia planning to do? What are some of the other states doing? What are the possible implications to permit fees?
AMTAC April 12 th, 2011 Meredith Kurpius EPA R9 1.
Governor’s Executive Order: Supporting and Strengthening the State’s Wetland Policy 6 th Annual Wetlands Conference January 30, 2013 Dave Weirens,
California Wetlands: Update on new state definition and policy development California Native Plant Society Fall Conservation Symposium September 10, 2011.
Wetlands Mitigation Policy Sudbury Wetlands Administration Bylaw April 27, 2015.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 Chapter 43 Administrative Law Chapter 43 Administrative Law.
SCOPING MEETING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT REQUIRED BY PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 3161 (b)(3) AND (4) (SENATE BILL 4) (PAVLEY) C ALIFORNIA D EPARTMENT.
Carrin Williams.  Purity of Waters Act  To assure supplies of clean drinking water  Clean Streams Law  To protect the streams from pollution.
Colorado’s Groundwater Protection Program Monitoring and Protecting Groundwater During Oil and Gas Development Natural Resources Law Center Intermountain.
 Why are we here?  Without regulations, rivers used to catch fire. Rules and Regulation.
Kensington Mine Tailings Impoundment Litigation
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
Clean Water Act Section 404 How it affects your airport during project implementation.
Inland Waterways: The National Perspective Amy Larson Executive Director National Waterways Conference, Inc PNWA Annual Meeting.
August 2,  404 Assumption Review  Project Schedule Review  Summary of Stakeholder Outreach Meetings  Status of Assumption Effort  Statutory.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services Implementing the Affordable Care Act in Massachusetts 2012 Legislative Changes.
MS4 Remand Rule Intergovernmental Associations Briefing September 15, 2015.
INTRODUCTION TO SECTION 4(f) Presented by Ian Chidister Environmental Program Manager FHWA – Wisconsin Division December 4, 2013.
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Decision Authority l All permit decisions, scope of analysis, 404(b)(1), mitigation, alternatives, jurisdiction -- Corps.
The Clean Water Act © Dr. B. C. Paul (Jan. 2000).
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Carrie Bond Project Manager ODOT Liaison Portland, Oregon April 21, 2015 Understanding the Corps Permitting.
Overview of the 401 WQC Process. Main Topics Relationship between Clean Water Act Sections 404 and 401 State permitting processes Specifics of Kentucky’s.
Options for Tribes to Manage Air Quality in Indian Country Rich McAllister Hobbs, Straus, Dean & Walker Laura McKelvey EPA Office of Air Quality.
Revisions to Primacy State Underground Injection Control Programs Primacy State Implementation of the New Class V Rule.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Lisa Mangione Regulatory Division Los Angeles District January 14, 2016 USACE Regulatory Program Emergency.
S.B Municipality Fees. S.B – Environment Budget Reconciliation Bill Enacted during the 2011 regular legislative session and becomes effective.
REVISIONS TO THE FEDERAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS RULE JILL CSEKITZ, TECHNICAL SPECIALIST TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
©2001 West Legal Studies in Business. All Rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 6: Administrative Law.
AGENCY ROLES Level 1B: Advanced Fundamentals July 2016 LOCAL, STATE, FEDERAL 1.
Climate: ANPR, SIPs and Section 821 WESTAR October 2, 2008.
Surface Transportation System Funding Alternatives Program Overview 1 Bob Arnold, Director Office of Transportation Management, FHWA.
Legislative History. First enacted in 1934  Enacted due to concerns over the loss of commercial and sport fisheries from water resource developments.
Minnesota Laws 2015 Special Session Chapter 4, Section 137.
Oregon Statistics million ac. wetlands/62 million ac. total land area 2% of land area is wetland/population 4 million.
Restoration and Regulation Discussion
Lions, Tigers, Coast Guard Permits – Oh My!
Chapter 6 Administrative Law
La Mesa Climate Action Plan Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Scoping Meeting May 31, 2017.
Environmental Protection Agency
State of Minnesota Section 404 Assumption Feasibility Study
Business environment in the EU Prepared by Dr. Endre Domonkos (PhD)
May 7, 2018 Milton Boyd, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers*
IMPACT OF EPA’S REGULATORY REFORM AGENDA ON STATE PROGRAMS
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
Environmental Law Fall 2018
John Tinger U.S. EPA Region IX
Clean Water Act (CWA) Purpose
Tribal Authority Rule (TAR) Overview
Linda M. Chatwin, Esq. RAC Business Manager, UL LLC
Waters of the U.S. Updates and Changes
Level 1B: Advanced Fundamentals Effective August 2018
Pipeline Planning and Construction: Environmental Considerations
Restoration and Regulation Discussion
Proposed Mitigation Rule Amendment Rulemaking Pre-Proposal State and Local Government Outreach June 20, 2019.
Chapter 45 Environmental Protection and Global Warming
Presentation transcript:

State of Alaska Assumption of Section 404 program Michelle Bonnet Hale, Director, Division of Water Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation Steven G. Ross, Esq., Assistant Attorney General, Environmental Law Section Alaska Department of Law Copyright © The contents, opinions, or points of view expressed in this presentation are those of the presenters and do not necessarily represent or reflect the official position of the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, the Alaska Department of Law, or the State of Alaska.

Overview Background 2013 Legislation – Senate Bill 27 Current Section 404 permit program Process of State Assumption under Clean Water Act Benefits and Barriers to Assumption Alternatives & Next Steps

Background Section 404 of the Clean Water Act Regulates discharges of dredge or fill material into waters of the US Not just a wetlands program Applies to all waters of the US Permit required from US Army Corps before discharge

Background Alaska is unique among the 50 states 65% of nation’s wetlands are in Alaska Wetlands cover 174 million acres, or about 43% of the surface area in Alaska Wetlands in Alaska include tundra, permafrost areas, marshes, and bogs

Senate Bill 27 January 16, Gov. Parnell’s State of State called for state to assume primacy for dredge and fill permitting under 404 program January 17, 2013 – Gov. Parnell transmitted two bills to the legislature – SB 27 and HB 80 – that would establish state authority to develop and implement a state-run 404 program May 21, 2013 – SB 27 enacted into law

Senate Bill 27 “An Act establishing authority for the state to evaluate and seek primacy for administering the regulatory program for dredge and fill activities allowed to individual states under federal law and relating to the authority; and providing an effective date.”

Senate Bill 27 SB 27 does several things Provides DEC and DNR with statutory authority to develop and implement a state-run 404 program Provides DEC and DNR the resources to begin capacity building Provides DEC with authority to apply to EPA for assumption

Current 404 program in Alaska Administered by Corps with EPA oversight Regulated activities requiring a 404 permit Large projects – mines, oil & gas Breakwaters, levees, dams, dikes, and weirs Placement of riprap for roads, airports, bldgs But also: fill for residential, commercial, and recreational development

State’s Role in 404 Permitting - Today Applicant required to obtain a “Certificate of Reasonable Assurance” that the activity meets Alaska’s water quality standards also known as a “401 certification” State currently certifies some projects waives certification on smaller projects

Authority for Assumption Clean Water Act 1977 amendments provide a mechanism for state to assume 404 program Section 404(g)(1) provide states the ability to assume permitting authority of certain waters of the US

Section 404(g)(1) provides in pertinent part: The Governor of any State desiring to administer its own individual and general permit program for the discharge of dredged or fill material into the navigable waters (other than those waters which are presently used, or are susceptible to use in their natural condition or by reasonable improvement as a means to transport interstate or foreign commerce shoreward to their ordinary high water mark, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide shoreward to their mean high water mark, or mean higher high water mark on the west coast, including wetlands adjacent thereto) within its jurisdiction may submit to the [EPA] Administrator a full and complete description of the program it proposes to establish and administer under State law or under an interstate compact….

Authority for Assumption Under 404(g)(1), Corps retains permitting authority over the following waters of the US Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide (e.g., coastal waters) Waters currently used for interstate/foreign commerce Waters susceptible to use for interstate/foreign commerce Wetlands adjacent to the above waters

State Assumption 46 States have assumed primacy of NPDES Program under section 402 Only two states have assumed the 404 program

State Assumption Primary requirement is that the state program may not adopt requirements that are less stringent than the requirements of the CWA and accompanying regulations “Any approved State Program shall, at all times, be conducted in accordance with the requirements of the [Clean Water] Act and of this Part. While States may impose more stringent requirements, they may not impose any less stringent requirements for any purpose”. (40 CFR §233.1 (d))

State Assumption State must also demonstrate that State has equivalent scope of jurisdiction over those waters it assumes Regulates at least same activities as CWA State program is consistent with CWA 404(b)(1) guidelines (e.g., environmental criteria used by Corps and EPA) State has adequate enforcement authority

State Assumption Specific material which state must submit for approval Letter from Governor requesting program approval Complete program description Atty Gen statement certifying state has adequate legal authority to carry out program MOA with the Regional Administrator of EPA MOA with the Secretary of the Army

EPA’s Role in Assumption Approves state-run 404 program Provides overall program oversight to ensure compliance with federal standards Receives copies of all 404 permits submitted to state, and retains ability to file objections and veto permits

Why 404 Assumption is Important to State Gives Alaska, not Corps or EPA, the leadership role in evaluating and issuing 404 permits in “assumable waters” of state Two agencies – DEC & DNR – will run program, not four (DEC, DNR, Corps, EPA) States are more accountable to population

Benefits of 404 Assumption Regulatory integration Increased efficiency, consistency, and flexibility Timeliness Improved resource protection No NEPA review

Potential Barriers to 404 Assumption Difficulty in meeting 404 program requirements Need to demonstrate jurisdiction over all assumable waters Potential uncertainty regarding percentage of assumable waters Lack of federal funding No partial 404 assumption - “all or nothing”

State Programmatic General Permits Alternative/addition to assumption of 404 program SPGPs are general permits for dredge and fill activities that are similar in nature and have minimal effects Existing law and SB27 provide authority to explore and pursue this option Does not require EPA approval

Next Steps Build program capacity Continue work on program package Work cooperatively with EPA and Corps to pursue 404 assumption Work cooperatively with Corps on SPGPs or assumption of RGPs Decide by FY 2016 whether to advance the primacy effort toward filing application with EPA

Questions? Contact Information Michelle Bonnet Hale Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation Director, Division of Water 555 Cordova St. Anchorage, AK Tel: Steven G. Ross Assistant Attorney General Alaska Department of Law Environmental Section 1031 W. 4th Avenue, Suite 200 Anchorage, Alaska Tel: