Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools Michigan Department of Education August 16, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Susan K. Burr, Deputy Executive Director
Advertisements

Restructuring Plans Glenbrook Middle School Bel Air Elementary School Rio Vista Elementary School Shore Acres Elementary School Mt. Diablo Unified School.
1 Reappointment, Promotion & Continuous Appointment (Tenure) Process and Issues.
School Performance Framework Preliminary Ratings Colorado Department of Education.
Title I A Requirements under NCLB Public Law Office of Federal Programs September 2014 Oklahoma State Department of Education.
The Preschool Blueprint. How will PFA work? Act becomes effective upon passage of the initiative on the June 2006 ballot and will provide a constitutional.
Chapter 56 Workgroup Orientation Session The Road to Chapter 60 June 30, 2007.
Deficit District Roles & Responsibilities. MCL A district or intermediate district receiving money under this act shall not adopt or operate.
Northern Michigan SBO March 16, 2011 Jeff Kolb Michigan Department of Education Jeff Kolb Michigan Department of Education.
Update: Proposal to Reset MEAP Cut Scores Report to the Superintendent Roundtable February 23, 2011.
Reconstitution Planning and Guidance Overview
Support for the Change, Challenge, and Commitment All Maryland Students College and Career Ready.
Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools Webinar Michigan Department of Education August 26, 2011.
School Improvement Grant (SIG) Cohort 6 Informational Webinar June 10, 2015.
Statewide System of Support 9/11/20151 ESEA Flexibility Waiver March 22, 2012.
The Federal Stimulus: An Overview
“An Act Relative to the Achievement Gap” Report of the Superintendent Melinda J. Boone, Ed.D. March 4, 2010.
1 Michigan and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 August 11, 2009 State Board of Education.
Mississippi Department of Education Office of School Recovery November 18, :30-4:30 Committee of Practitioners Meeting School Improvement Grant 1003(g)
Rewarding Excellence in the Classroom Idaho’s Pay for Performance Plan
Race to the Top (RTTT) Overview of Grant Competition Goals and Requirements 1.
Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools – Technical Assistance Michigan Department of Education September 8, 2011.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Field Services Consolidated Application Schedule.
Mechanisms for Determining Progress and Grant Renewals Mechanisms for Determining Progress and Grant Renewals National Network of State School Improvement.
Mississippi Department of Education Office of Innovative Support February 17, 2010 Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting.
QUESTIONS MAY BE ED DURING THIS SESSION, OR AFTERWARD TO: Welcome to the SIG Cohort III Webinar Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
MARYLAND’S REFORM PLAN RACE TO THE TOP.  Maryland’s initiatives are about reform, not simply the money.  Reform efforts will continue with or without.
November 21,  Ramona Coats:  Introduction  Bo Merritt:  GMS updates  Daniel Fryar  Allocation updates  Kay Townsend:  Fiscal report  Melissa.
MI-SAAS: Michigan School Accreditation and Accountability System Overview of Key Features School Year.
1 Michigan School Accreditation and Accountability System pending legislative approval Venessa A. Keesler, Ph.D. March 16, 2011.
MAS/FPS Fall Directors’ Workshop MDE OFS Updates October 2014 Office of Field Services.
EXPECTATIONS FOR MICHIGAN’S FOCUS SCHOOLS 11/12/20151 FOCUS SCHOOL WEBINAR Office of Education Improvement and Innovation School Support Unit August 27,
Title I Updates Donna Brown, Director North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Federal Program Monitoring and Support September 29,
Priority Schools September 25, Support Team Ms. Annette Barnes, Assistant Commissioner for Public School Accountability Mr. Elbert Harvey, Coordinator.
Improving the Craft of Teaching: Training & Implementation of Idaho’s Teacher Evaluation Framework Nick Smith, Deputy Superintendent School Support Services.
Comprehensive Equity Plan
Priority & Focus School Title I, Part A, Set-Asides and Choice/Transfer Option Requirements Under ESEA Waiver District Coordinators/Administrators Priority.
Overview of The Legislation’s Purpose and Requirements CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION School Governance Councils.
AB Miller High School Community Meeting April 13, 2010.
Top to Bottom and Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools Lists Federally Approved Requirements for Identifying Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools August.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
What just happened and what’s next? Presenters: Steve Dibb, MDE Debra Landvik, MDE AYP 2011.
School Improvement Grant (SIG) Title I Section, 1003g Renewal Requirements March 2012.
February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.
The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Partnering for Educator Impact April 19, 2016 Donna Brown Director, Division of Federal Program Monitoring & Support.
School Improvement Grant (SIG) Planning and Reporting Cohorts 2, 3, and 4 SIG Schools Rita Fentress, Director of School Improvement, Consolidated Planning.
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
Federal and state updates Maase membership meeting
Dependent Eligibility Audit CEWW Health Insurance Consortium
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015: Highlights and
TTIPS Model Overview.
ESEA Flexibility: An overview
Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting
West Virginia Department of Education
Federal Accountability/ AYP Update
SCHOOL COMMUNITY COUNCILS Waivers and Exceptions
We’re going to follow the chronological order of the process.
School Accreditation and Requests to Reconsider
District of Innovation
Community Aids Reporting System (CARS): Federal Reporting Requirements
North Carolina State Board of Education Update
Monitoring LEA Implementation of SIG Interventions:
Recap of Amendments N.J.S.A. 18A: (P.L c.231) was passed in January The law requires districts to continue to enroll and transport.
Summary of Final Regulations: Accountability and State Plans
Michigan School Improvement Grant
Update on the TEA Sped corrective action plan
Presented by: Susan K. Burr Executive Director
ESEA Flexibility: An overview
Current Education Legislation Update
Budget and Legislative Request
Presentation transcript:

Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools Michigan Department of Education August 16, 2010

2 State law requires identification of lowest achieving schools by September 1 of each year beginning in 2010 List of Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools is developed following federal guidelines approved by the United States Department of Education as required in state law Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools

3 Schools on the list must submit a redesign plan to the state and implement the plan Plans must be approved by the state school reform/redesign officer (SRRO) Schools without approved plans or those not making progress under their plan are subject to further action

4 Some elements of the collective bargaining agreements in PLA schools may be modified to implement the redesign plan Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools

5 Plans may take effect immediately, but no later than the beginning the school year after approval Per statute, plans must use 1 of 4 intervention models –Transformation –Turnaround –Restart –Closure Plans must include any collective bargaining agreement amendments needed to implement Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools

6 If the SRRO disapproves a plan, or if the school does not achieve satisfactory results, the SRRO will: –Place the school into the State School Reform/Redesign District (SRRD) –Impose one of the four approved intervention models –Amend collective bargaining agreement to implement plan –SRRO may appoint a chief executive officer (CEO) (for one school or multiple schools) Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools

7 SRRO must approve a redesign plan if it contains all of the required elements of the intervention. If SRRO disapproves a redesign plan, the LEA may appeal the disapproval to the Superintendent of Public Instruction. SPI decision is final.

8 Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools PLA schools are eligible to apply for a competitive School Improvement Grant PLA schools can find the application in the MEGS system as “ARRA” SIG If a school does not want to apply for SIG, the same MEGS system must be used to submit a redesign plan

9 Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools Timeline –Department notification – August 16, 2010 –Deadline for submission of redesign plan – November 16, 2010 –Approval, disapproval, or change – December 18, 2010 –Changes submitted – 30 days –December 19-September 5 – plan and/or implement redesign model –September 6, 2011 – Implementation of redesign model must be started –By September 1, 2011 – MDE notifies identified school communities regarding schools on the PLA list

10 The SRRO is the superintendent of the SRRD SRRO must report annually to the Legislature on progress of PLA schools The SRRD is: –A statewide public school district –Made up of those schools assigned to it by the SRRO Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools

11 Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools Contact Information: –Mary Alice Galloway Interim State School Reform/Redesign Officer –Jean Shane Senior Policy Advisory

12 Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools Contact Information: –For data questions: Venessa Keesler Manager of Accountability –For School Improvement Grant questions Linda Forward Director, Office of Education Improvement and Innovation