BUILDING TEAMS: A TOBACCO EVALUATION AND MONITORING SYSTEM Leah Ranney, PhD: Tobacco Prevention Evaluation Program, UNC School of Medicine Leigh Welper.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Template: Making Effective Presentation about Your Evidence-based Health Promotion Program This template is intended for you to adapt to your own program.
Advertisements

Empowering tobacco-free coalitions to collect local data on worksite and restaurant smoking policies Mary Michaud, MPP University of Wisconsin-Cooperative.
Strategy Maps for Structuring Program Operating Plans: Tobacco Examples Public Health Foundation Paul Epstein, Results That Matter Team Kentucky Public.
Board Goals. Goals for Presentation Restate Board Goals (short) Why Long-Range Planning is Essential Nancy et al on details of planning (processes, resources,
Online Communications NC Health and Wellness Trust Fund TRU Listserv TRU Toolkit The Tobacco Free Zone Additional Online Resources Important Dates.
Presented by: Jennifer Cofer – American Lung Association (ALA) Claudia Flores Rodas – The Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids (CTFK)
Lessons Learned from Mass Media Campaigns to Reduce Exposure to Secondhand Smoke: Work in Progress Karen Gutierrez Elizabeth Schar Rebecca Murphy Dave.
Natasha M. Jamison, MPH, CHES Health Scientist, Epidemiology Branch Office on Smoking and Health TM Utility of Key Outcome Indicators: Future Directions.
August 2009 The TRU Movement in North Carolina: An Overview André Stanley HWTF Phase IV Regional Grantee Orientation Workshop TRU.
Office of Health Promotion Tobacco Use Prevention Program The Kansas Tobacco Use Prevention Program provides resources, technical assistance and education.
Program Evaluation in Public Health California’s Efforts to Reduce Tobacco Use David Hopkins Terry Pechacek.
N.C.’s TRU Media Campaign The Good, The Bad and the …… ………Future Adam O. Goldstein, MD, MPH Director, UNC Tobacco Prevention & Evaluation Program.
The Sparrow Project Presented by: the Robeson County Health Department, a Member of the South Central Public Health Partnership Niakeya Jones, Health Education.
Coordinating Center Overview November 18, 2010 SPECIAL DIABETES PROGRAM FOR INDIANS Healthy Heart Project Initiative: Year 1 Meeting 1.
The Use of Commercial Tobacco Among Minority Populations Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Office on Smoking and Health Sydney Lee.
Kansas Tobacco-Related Data Resources and Performance Measures Harlen Hays, MPH Office of Health Promotion, KDHE.
Infant Safe Sleep Resources North Carolina Carolinas Medical Center Charlotte, NC September 5, 2007 Christine O’Meara, MA, MPH.
Higher Education Meets Public Health: Successful Collaborative Efforts to Change Tobacco Policies on Campus Maine Tobacco Free College Network Emily Rines,
Think Health. Act Now!. CITY OF MILWAUKEE HEALTH DEPARTMENT A Community-Based Approach for Health Education City of Milwaukee Tobacco-Free Sports Program.
Peel Health Using Research Evidence to Develop a Comprehensive Tobacco Control Strategy in the Region of Peel Aimee Hindle Supervisor, Chronic Disease.
Washington Communities for Tobacco Prevention Spokane Regional Health District Board of Health September 27, 2012.
Edward Anselm, MD Medical Director Public Health Perspectives of Accountable Care: Opportunities for Alignment.
Presentation to: Presented by: Date: Burden of Tobacco Use in Georgia: Surveillance Update Tobacco Advisory & Coalition Board Alina Chung, MPH, Epidemiologist.
Regulating Smoking in Multi-Unit Housing in North Carolina Anna Stein, JD Tobacco Prevention and Control Branch NC Division of Public Health April 26,
CDC’s Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs Jerelyn Jordan Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Office on Smoking and Health.
SPF SIG State-Level Evaluation COMMUNITY LEVEL INSTRUMENT (CLI): PART 2.
TOBACCO PREVENTION AND CONTROL PROGRAM Mike Maples, Assistant Commissioner Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services.
Working to Create Comprehensive Tobacco-Related Policies at Hospitals in New York City and Boston Marie P. Bresnahan, MPH 1 ; Jenna Mandel-Ricci, MPA,
Kansas Tobacco Prevention Workgroup for Specific Populations May 17 and 18, 2007 Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs Becky Tuttle,
Tobacco Use In Kansas Healthy Kansans 2010 Steering Committee Meeting May 12, 2005.
Kansas Tobacco Prevention for Specific Populations.
Evaluating Local Tobacco Control Organizations. David Ahrens, Research Program Manager Research conducted by: Barbara.
Why Indicators Matter Using Outcome Indicators to Plan and Evaluate Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs Todd Rogers, PhD California Tobacco Control.
Tobacco Use Reduction as a National and Regional Priority Tobacco-free College Campuses: Promoting a Culture of Health Patrick O’Carroll, MD, MPH Assistant.
Citizens of Harvestland Against Tobacco (CHAT) Coalition Harvestland, Missouri Teaming Up To End Tobacco Use.
Tobacco 101. Evolution of Tobacco Evolution of Tobacco.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
Utilizing Community Indicators To Link Process Measures To Program Outcomes T.M. Hinman, M.P.H., H.R. Juster, Ph.D., A.M. Beigel, M.F.A. New York State.
CDC Recommendations for Comprehensive Programs. Comprehensive Programs CDC, Office on Smoking and Health.
The Tobacco Technical Assistance Consortium What is TTAC? What Does It Do?
Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research and Smoke-Free Families National Dissemination Office University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North.
NIKOLE LOBB DOUGHERTY, MA JESSI LAROSE, MPH OCTOBER 2011 H&AC Promising Strategies: Evaluation & Technical Assistance.
Comprehensive Tobacco Action Group Summary December 16, 2005.
Is for Epi Epidemiology basics for non-epidemiologists.
Changing Clinical Norms: Tobacco Intervention in Pediatric Care Settings Shann Hauck Wyoming Department of Health Substance Abuse Division 2003 National.
Tobacco Disparities: Issues of Inequity & Social Injustice
I removed the quit attempt variable from the adjusted model. I removed the quit attempt variable from the adjusted model.e Sarah Kowitt, MPH 1 ; Tanha.
Development of a Statewide Media Campaign to Promote TFS Policies in a Tobacco State: What We Feared and What Actually Happened Shelley Summerlin-Long,
Eliminate Quitline Iowa About 87,800 fewer tobacco users who would successfully quit At least $1.2 BILLION in excess future healthcare costs – At least.
A Program of the Health Education Council Ayanna L. Kiburi, MPH Consultant.
Clare Meernik, MPH 1 ; Anna McCullough, MSW, MSPH, CTTS 1 ; Leah Ranney, PhD 1 ; Barbara Walsh 2 ; Adam O. Goldstein, MD, MPH 1 Predictors of Quit for.
Barbara Silver, MA, CTTS, Carol Ripley-Moffitt, MDiv, CTTS, Jillian E. Harris, BASW, Mark Gwynne, MD, Adam Goldstein, MD, MPH Nicotine Dependence Program.
Leah Ranney, PhD, and Adam Goldstein, MD, MPH: University of North Carolina Tobacco Prevention & Evaluation Program, Department of Family Medicine Jason.
Janet Heitgerd, PhD Program Evaluation Branch, Associate Chief for Science American Evaluation Association Annual Meeting November 2010 Improving the Design,
Full Circle: A Holistic Cessation Intervention Serving American Indians in Oklahoma Sally Carter, MSW, Oklahoma State Department of Health; Cynthia Tainpeah,
1 Sustaining and Replicating Obesity Prevention Projects: North Carolina’s Fit Together Initiative Lori Carter-Edwards, PhD Claudia J. Graham, MBA Heidi.
National Partnership to Help Pregnant Smokers Quit Impact Evaluation Leah M. Ranney, PhD University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Managing a Marketing Department of 1
Data sharing practices in the region
Collaboration Using a Performance Partnership Model To Address Tobacco Use in Behavioral Health Populations: Breathe Easy NC Coalition.
Youth at Disproportionate Risk for Substance Use: A look at Delaware Data Presented by The SEOW Funding for this project has been provided by the Department.
National Coordinator Tackling Indigenous Smoking
Active Community Risk Reduction through Smoke-Free Multi-Unit Housing
APHA Annual Meeting, Washington D.C., November 5, 2007
Tobacco Use Prevention Funding
The Arizona Chronic Disease Plan:
Target Tobacco Coalition
Including People with Disabilities: Public Health Workforce Competencies Module 3 Competency 2: Discuss methods used to assess health issues for people.
Goal Area 2: Eliminating Nonsmokers’ Exposure to Secondhand Smoke
Importance of Data Quality for National HIV Prevention Program Monitoring and Evaluation Presented by: Guoshen Wang, MS Shubha Rao, MPH; Hui Zhao, MS;
Presentation transcript:

BUILDING TEAMS: A TOBACCO EVALUATION AND MONITORING SYSTEM Leah Ranney, PhD: Tobacco Prevention Evaluation Program, UNC School of Medicine Leigh Welper BA: Independent Contractor Adam Goldstein, MD, MPH: Tobacco Prevention Evaluation Program, UNC School of Medicine Tom Brown, M.Ed: NC Department of Health and Human Services, Tobacco Prevention and Control Branch

Agenda  NC Tobacco Initiatives  Teen Tobacco Use Prevention and Cessation Initiative  Tobacco Evaluation and Management System (TEAMS)  How are program activities monitored?  What type of outcome data is produced for evaluation?  Utility of TEAMS for program managers, evaluators, and Technical Assistance providers  Benefits of TEAMS

Impact of Tobacco Use  Approximately 400,000 people die each year from their own cigarette smoke  Over 6,000,000+ youth under 18 years old alive today will ultimately die from smoking – unless smoking rates decline Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids (June 13, 2012) / /

NC Tobacco Initiatives  Master Settlement funds used to establish Health and Wellness Trust Fund (HWTF):  Four primary components:  Teen Initiative: 2003  TRU Media Campaign: 2004  Quitline: 2005  Colleges Initiatives: 2006

Teen Tobacco Use Prevention and Cessation Initiative  Funds 43 School and Community Based Grantees  Prevent Youth Initiation of Tobacco Use  Promote Tobacco Use Cessation Among Youth  Eliminate Youth Exposure to Secondhand Smoke  Reduce Tobacco Related Disparities Among Priority Populations

Example of Program Indicators  Tobacco Prevention  # of tobacco use prevention education media messages aired or disseminated  # of youth led prevention activities  Tobacco Cessation  # of presentations promoting tobacco cessation resources  # of printed materials distributed with QuitlineNC Logo

Continued  Reduce Secondhand Smoke Exposure  # of improved smoke-free policies (increase from smoke-free to tobacco-free)  # of new smoke-free policies (i.e. Parks)  Reduce tobacco-Related Disparities  # of culturally tailored activities conducted targeting an identified high risk group  # of activities conducted where materials from the Heritage Toolkit (culturally tailored products and activities) were disseminated

TOBACCO EVALUATION AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (TEAMS)

TA Provider Services

HOW ARE PROGRAM ACTIVITIES MONITORED? Status Reports Indicator Reports Qualitative Data

TEAMS Status Report

TEAMS Quantitative Report

TEAMS Qualitative Report

Monthly Raw Data Spreadsheet

TA Provider Services Report

WHAT TYPE OF OUTCOME DATA IS PRODUCED FOR EVALUATION? Quantitative Qualitative

Events Conducted by Grantees by Goal Area Fiscal Year ( )

Comparison of AAP with Actual Performance

# of Active Youth Groups by Semi- Annual Period ( )

100% Smoke Free Policy Adoptions Fiscal Year ( )

UTILITY OF TEAMS Evaluators Program Managers Technical Assistance Providers

Benefits for Evaluators  Quickly check status of data submission for monthly and semi-annual reporting  Easily access grantee contact information  Use indicator report to review data monthly, quarterly and yearly  Download data in spreadsheet and conduct further analysis using statistical software  Use TEAMS reports to view qualitative data synopses to support or clarify quantitative data issues

Benefits for Managers  Easily access grantee/TA profile information  View grantee Annual Action Plans online  Monitor grantee progress individually or by Region  Monitor grantee progress monthly, quarterly, or yearly  Check grantee status of monthly and semi-annual data entry

Benefits for TA Providers  Scope of Work  Calendar view  Pending, Scheduled, and completed TA request  Tracking Services and materials via Spreadsheet

Highlights  TEAMS is a customized, flexible, web-based tracking system  TEAMS collects data related to performance indicators in accordance with the Teen Initiative Annual Action Plans  Evaluators and Program Managers can use TEAMS to monitor programmatic changes and evaluate program progress  Improved technology allows for the ability to make rapid program improvements

Leah M. Ranney, PhD Tobacco Prevention and Evaluation Program University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Phone: Website: