WATER USE PROGRAM HOW IT HAS CHANGED WHY IT IS IMPORTANT! Eric K. Klotz, P.E. Utah Water Resources Frank Quintana, P.E. Utah Water Rights Tammy North,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WATER RIGHTS 101: OVERVIEW OF UTAH WATER LAW Legislative Water Task Force June 15, 2004.
Advertisements

Filing Proofs or Affidavits 2010 Utah Water Users Workshop March 16, 2010 Jared Manning Division of Water Rights.
Washington State Department of Health Division of Environmental HealthOffice of Drinking Water Mike Dexel Water Resources Policy Lead Municipal Water Law.
Salt Lake Valley Groundwater Management Plan State of Utah Department of Natural Resources Division of Water Rights.
Educational Facilities Developer Fee Information October /5/2015.
December 2, 2014 Goshen Valley Appropriation Policy and Current Conditions Goshen Valley, Utah County.
Spring 2015 TELPAS Holistic Rating Training System
An Overview of Our Regulatory Proposal
Utah Division of Water Rights
Utah State Engineer Where Do We Go From Here? (and how are we going to get there?) Kent L. Jones, P.E.
Governor’s Tax Simplification Task Force Overview and Impact on City of Phoenix Presentation to Phoenix Chamber of Commerce January 15, 2013.
“Keeping your money in your pocket, where it belongs.” Chart of Accounts Update Florida Court Clerks & Comptrollers - New Clerk Academy March 13, 2014.
1 Presentation to OG6 Canberra, Australia May 2011 Statistical Uses of Administrative Data in Canada.
Presented by: Meg Boyd The Blue Mountains Drinking Water System: DWQMS Overview.
National Petroleum Council Study Balancing Natural Gas Policy: Fueling the Demands of a Growing Economy September 2003.
Utah Water User’s Workshop Efficiency & Water Rights Enforcement Jerry Olds State Engineer March 2005.
Division of Water Rights WaterRights.utah.gov. Proof of Beneficial Use of Water (proof) Frank Quintana, P.E. Thursday, April 25 th, 2013.
City of Renton, WA Water Use Efficiency Margaret Ales PNWS – AWWA CONFERENCE MAY 1, 2008 Copyright © 2008 by R. W. Beck, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Opportunities,
Washington’s Water Use Efficiency Rule May Require Increased Coordination for Many Utilities Dan Sander, P.E. Senior Engineer.
Rural Water Association of Utah Water Rights Certification Gary Brimley April 10, 2014.
STATE OF OREGON WATER EFFICIENCY STANDARDS PNWS-AWWA Conference Eugene, Oregon May 2014 Lisa Jaramillo Water Right Services Division Oregon Water Resources.
1 Conveying Water Rights Division of Water Rights By Randy Tarantino Title Program Specialist Telephone: (801) April 2013.
Department of Environmental Quality Water Infrastructure November 17, 2015 Water Infrastructure Funding to Financing.
UTAH WATER USERS WORKSHOP March 15, 2011 HOW FAR CAN I STRETCH MY CFS? Kent L. Jones P.E. Utah State Engineer Utah Division of Water Rights.
1 Conveying Water Rights Division of Water Rights By Randy Tarantino Title Program Specialist Telephone: (801) March 2012.
Oakdale Irrigation District Agricultural Water Management Plan Briefing on 2015 Update January 5, /5/2016 OID AWMP Update Briefing.
Landscape Transformation “ Millions of Lessons Learned ” Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Bill McDonnell January 25, 2016.
Municipal Water Rights…… Water Law & Policy Seminars March 12, 2012 Kent L. Jones, P.E. State Engineer.
Ground-Water Management Plan Beryl Enterprise Area August 6, 2007 Sign up sheet.
Water Users’ Workshop Change Applications Utah Division of Water Rights John Mann, P.E. March 17, 2010.
Council of Economic Advisors Water Rights Overview Utah Division of Water Rights Jerry Olds.
Upper Colorado River Basin Current Policy and Issues Utah Division of Water Rights September 2009.
Tax & Business Licenses: A Case for City Business Licensing Prepared for GFOA – February 2016 Business and Financial Decisions.
Mountain Regional Water Rules & Regulations Overview.
Wyoming Association of Rural Water Systems Harry LaBonde Jr, P.E. Director Wyoming Water Development Office April 19, 2016.
Climate Change Threat Reduced Snowpack 1. Potential Impacts Related to Reduced Snowpack How might our community be impacted by reduced snowpack? 2.
PURCHASING 101 SECTION 1 - How to Begin. Is the purchase available from your agency or from other state agencies? ⋆ State Surplus Property ⋆ State Fleet.
An exposure to COMPLIANCE AUDIT By- Vishal Chawre DAG(A/c & VLC) O/o AG(A&E), Nagpur.
California Avocado Commission Workshop Fallbrook, California May 17, 2016.
Stuart Forrest, Network Planning Manager, Scotia Gas Networks 19 th October 2010 MOD Review of Industry Charging & Contractual Arrangements in Relation.
Water Conservation in the San Joaquin Valley Mary Lou Cotton, C.C.P.
Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District DRAFT Water Resource Management Plan Review
Everything Electronic
Interagency Coordination in Long Range Transportation Planning
Configuration Management
Cannabis Cultivation: A Growing Threat to California’s Water Quality
Measuring the Effects of an Irrigation and Land Tenure Security Initiative in the Senegal River Valley Baseline findings and evaluation challenges March.
Utah Water Conservation Forum – 5/12/2017
The International Plant Protection Convention
“Whiskey is for drinking, water is for fighting over.”
Utah Division of Water Rights
City of Sioux Falls Water Conservation Plan and its Effect on Current Water Usage November 2017 Tim Stefanich – Environmental Engineer Darin Freese – Water.
CITY OF MARSHALL CHLORIDE ISSUES September 26, 2017
Vibration Measurement, Analysis, Control and Condition Based Maintenance 14 Predictive maintenance Dr. Michiel Heyns Pr.Eng. T: C: +27.
Unit 3: Leading and Managing Recovery
Kentucky Lead Workgroup Recommendations
Non-Residential Customer Non- Residential - Capacity Evaluation Borough of Conshohocken Authority Customer Informational Meeting June 20, East.
Request for Approval of Cape Fear / Neuse River Basin Hydrologic Model
Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources
Georgia Agricultural Metering Program
Water Statistics and Water Account in Jordan
Water Statistics and Water Account in Jordan
Contents subject to change.
Continuity of Operations Planning
Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources
Water Rate Modification – Public Hearing
Draft revision of ISPM 6: National surveillance systems ( )
Lesson 3.2 Product Planning
Indiana Finance Authority (IFA)
Presentation transcript:

WATER USE PROGRAM HOW IT HAS CHANGED WHY IT IS IMPORTANT! Eric K. Klotz, P.E. Utah Water Resources Frank Quintana, P.E. Utah Water Rights Tammy North, P.E. Utah Drinking Water

WHAT IS THE WATER USE PROGRAM? FOR THE PURPOSE TO COLLECT AND COMPILE WATER SUPPLY WITHDRAWAL AND DIVERSION DATA, AS WELL AS CUSTOMER LEVEL WATER USE DATA FROM PUBLIC WATER SUPPLIERS, INDUSTRIAL AND GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN USERS THROUGHOUT UTAH.  USGS  Utah Division of Water Rights  Utah Division of Water Resources  Utah Division of Drinking Water Cooperative effort with the:

THE LAW GOVERNING THE PROGRAM FALLS UNDER: Reports by users to engineer. Every person using water from any river system or water source, when requested by the state engineer, shall within 30 days after such request report to the state engineer in writing: (1) the nature of the use of any such water; (2) the area on which used; (3) the kind of crops to be grown; and (4) water elevations on wells or tunnels and quantity of underground water used.

PARTICIPATION IS MANDATORY IF:  REQUIRED BY AN ORDER OF THE STATE ENGINEER (OSE)  CONDITION OF WATER RIGHT APPROVAL OR PROOF OF BENEFICIAL USE.  REQUESTED BY THE STATE ENGINEER  TO OBTAIN STATE LOANS  STATUTE SUGGEST THAT REPORTING IS MANDATORY

WATER USE DATA IS USED FOR:  USGS STUDIES  WATER RESOURCES PLANNING PROGRAMS AND EFFORTS  WATER RIGHTS WATER MANAGEMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT  STATE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS  ASSESSMENT OF WATER SUPPLY AND WATER USE.  WATER RIGHTS PROOF PROCESSING  SYSTEMS TO EVALUATE THE EFFICIENCY OF THEIR OWN SYSTEMS

HOW IS THE WATER USE DATA COLLECTED?  The survey form is either ed or a paper form is mailed during the first week of January.  The survey form is for the previous years reporting.  Survey is due by March 1 st.  A postcard reminder is mailed.  Then a late letter is mailed.

LEGISLATIVE AUDIT OVERVIEW

PUBLISHED IN MAY 2015 RECOMMENDATIONS INCLUDED IMPROVEMENTS TO: ACCOUNTABILITY EDUCATION AND ACCURACY EFFICIENCY FREQUENCY

ALONG WITH THE SURVEY FORMS, DETAILED INSTRUCTIONS ARE ALSO MAILED. THE LAST PART OF BOTH THE PAPER AND E-FORM PERTAIN TO REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES – THIS INFORMATION IS COLLECTED BY THE DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER. THEY ARE SEEKING FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND FUTURE PROJECTED NEEDS OF YOUR SYSTEM.

1.What to report 2.What challenges the program faces 3.How to report wholesale water

Distribution System Well Spring Source DataWater Use Data InOut

CHALLENGES 1.Delegation 2.Units of Measure

Source Inventory Retail Water Use Breakdown Wholesale Water SoldBought Cemetery WellResidentialMurray CityJordan Valley WCD Liberty Park WellCommercialSandy CitySalt Lake City Jordan RiverInstitutionalWest Jordan City Cold Water SpringIndustrialWhite City

Where can I find the Water Use Data? 1. 2.

Or…

40 DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER DATA COLLECTION

41 I.WATER USE DATA FORM II.R MINIMUM SIZING REQUIREMENTS III.LEGISLATIVE AUDIT IV.RECENT CHANGES TO R V.WATER USE STUDY VI.SO WHAT? PRESENTATION TOPICS Division of Drinking Water

42 I.WATER USE DATA FORM II.R MINIMUM SIZING REQUIREMENTS III.LEGISLATIVE AUDIT IV.RECENT CHANGES TO R V.WATER USE STUDY VI.SO WHAT? PRESENTATION TOPICS Division of Drinking Water

43 WATER USE DATA Division of Drinking Water

44 WATER USE DATA Division of Drinking Water REVENUE AND EXPENSES- STATE AUDITORS OFF ICE RATE STRUCTURE- NO LONGER COLLECTING FIRE FIGHTING CAPABILITIES- SANITARY SURVEYS ANTICIPATED PROJECTS IN THE FUTURE- REPLACED WITH NEEDS SURVEY USING A SUBSET OF SYSTEMS. MAY BE SUPPLEMENTED BY ADDITIONAL DATA GATHERING AS NEEDED

45 I.WATER USE DATA FORM II.R MINIMUM SIZING REQUIREMENTS III.LEGISLATIVE AUDIT IV.RECENT CHANGES TO R V.WATER USE STUDY VI.SO WHAT? PRESENTATION TOPICS Division of Drinking Water

46 R MINIMUM SOURCE SIZING Division of Drinking Water SOURCE SIZING “Sources shall legally and physically meet water demands under two separate conditions. First, they shall meet the anticipated water demand on the day of highest water consumption. This is referred to as the peak day demand. Second, they shall also be able to provide one year’s supply of water, the average yearly demand.”

47 R MINIMUM SOURCE SIZING Division of Drinking Water Indoor Water Use= 800 gpd/connection Irrigation Use is dependent on the number of acres and irrigation zone

48 IRRIGATION ZONE MAP Division of Drinking Water

49 R MINIMUM SIZING REQUIREMENTS Division of Drinking Water R Source Capacity R Storage Volume R Distribution System

50 I.WATER USE DATA FORM II.R MINIMUM SIZING REQUIREMENTS III.LEGISLATIVE AUDIT IV.RECENT CHANGES TO R V.WATER USE STUDY VI.SO WHAT? PRESENTATION TOPICS Division of Drinking Water

51 LEGISLATIVE AUDIT Division of Drinking Water

52 LEGISLATIVE AUDIT Division of Drinking Water Summary of Report : A Performance Review of the Division of Drinking Water’s Minimum Source Sizing Requirements We reviewed the Division of Drinking Water’s (DDW) minimum source sizing requirements, which are designed to ensure safe and reliable public drinking water systems. Individuals from the residential development community have criticized the source sizing as excessive resulting in unnecessary water-related costs. Although we found that the indoor requirements appear too high, the state’s outdoor requirements appear too low. We also found several sections in the rule where clarification is needed. In particular, the steps for receiving a reduction to the source sizing requirements needs additional clarification. A review of and update to the state source sizing requirements is recommended to ensure that water systems are able to optimize resources as well as the adequacy of their water supply.

53 LEGISLATIVE AUDIT Division of Drinking Water Re-evaluate indoor use requirements Re-evaluate outdoor use requirement Provide clarification and protocols for those wishing to seek a reduction.

54 I.WATER USE DATA FORM II.R MINIMUM SIZING REQUIREMENTS III.LEGISLATIVE AUDIT IV.RECENT CHANGES TO R V.WATER USE STUDY VI.SO WHAT? PRESENTATION TOPICS Division of Drinking Water

55 RECENT CHANGES TO R Division of Drinking Water

56 Local authorities may impose more stringent requirements than the minimum sizing requirements of R Clarify definition of “Recreational Home Development” include limitations on fixture units and square footage. Note that the irrigation requirement is based on direct application of water and that a safety factor should be considered to account for losses such as evaporation, leaks, irrigation method, etc. OTHER CLARIFICATIONS OTHER CHANGES TO R Division of Drinking Water

57 I.WATER USE DATA FORM II.R MINIMUM SIZING REQUIREMENTS III.LEGISLATIVE AUDIT IV.RECENT CHANGES TO R V.WATER USE STUDY VI.SO WHAT? PRESENTATION TOPICS Division of Drinking Water

58 WATER USE STUDY Division of Drinking Water

59 WATER USE STUDY Division of Drinking Water Lack of existing information Peak Day Factoring out non-residential uses. Storage and source usage Losses through the system Separating out irrigation/indoor use from dual systems Data collection, storage, and transfer Reliability of existing equipment Statistically valid sample- a State-wide requirement

60 I.WATER USE DATA FORM II.R MINIMUM SIZING REQUIREMENTS III.LEGISLATIVE AUDIT IV.RECENT CHANGES TO R V.WATER USE STUDY VI.SO WHAT? PRESENTATION TOPICS Division of Drinking Water

61 SO WHAT? Division of Drinking Water AWARENESS OF POTENTIAL CHANGES AND HOW IT MIGHT IMPACT YOU. IMPORTANCE OF KEEPING RECORDS BE INVOLVED IN THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS DO YOU HAVE THE ABILITY TO PROVIDE DATA? DIFFERENT AGENCIES ARE COLLECTING DIFFERENT DATA FOR DIFFERENT PURPOSES.