HVDC process discussion IPTF 11/05/2015. Agenda 1.Summary of Stakeholder comments received so far 2.MISO’s comments 3.Next Steps.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NAESB OASIS 1A Subcommittee Wendy Weathers, Chair ESS Meeting May 2005 Resale Recommendation.
Advertisements

Revised Draft1 Distributed Generation Interconnections - Group Study Process Option: Voluntary Rolling Window Presented to Massachusetts Distributed.
1 RTWG Tariff update to the BOD, MOPC, SPC, and RSC January 4, 2005.
WELCOME Western Area Power Administration1. Where did the journey begin? Western Area Power Administration2.
Queue Reform at the Midwest ISO NARUC February, 2008.
Citizens League Electrical Energy: Affordability and Competitive Pricing Working Team Electric Transmission.
Highway-Byway Cost Allocation: What it Offers MISO January 2010 Presented to the Organization of MISO States CARP and the Midwest ISO RECB Task Force Meeting.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Proposed Rule on Small Generator Interconnection RM July 23, 2003.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Large Generator Interconnection Final Rule RM July 23, 2003.
Despite Order No Planning Gaps for (Certain) Merchants OPSI Annual Meeting 2013.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N 1 Network Operating Committee (NOC) June 12 th, 2014.
1 Transmission Development at Ameren and in the Midwest ISO Mid-America Regulatory Conference Maureen A. Borkowski June 8, 2010.
PacifiCorp Participation in the California ISO. 2 Full participation provides significant benefits beyond those of the Energy Imbalance Market EIM BenefitsFull.
2014 Attachment O True-Up Customer Meeting August 25, 2015.
Southwest Renewable Energy Transmission Conference May 21, 2010 Jeff Mechenbier Director Transmission & Distribution Planning and Contracts.
WINDPOWER 2003 Austin, TX May 18-21, 2003 Session 4A: Regulatory Issues Monday May 19, :40-5:00 pm Wind Generation Interconnection to Transmission.
Large Generator Interconnection Procedures Reform Stakeholder Meeting February 19, 2009.
OSC Meeting April 27, Transmission Cost Allocation Overview.
Discussion of Market Participant Choice for Transmission Connections Stakeholder Session October 14, 2011.
1 Interconnection Update Jay Zimmerman Manager, Transmission Policy Entergy Transmission Planning Summit New Orleans, LA July 8, 2004.
Iowa State University Ames, IA July 5, 2011 Wind on the Wires – Wind and Transmission Issues Beth Soholt Wind on the Wires
New Jersey Community RE / Solar Programs* New Jersey Board of Public Utilities Net Metering & Interconnection Rules Stakeholder Meeting July 23, 2008 *FOR.
2011 Transmission Customer Meeting October 12, 2011.
Large Generator Interconnection Procedures Reform 2 nd Stakeholder Meeting May 5, 2009.
Entergy AFC Stakeholder Meeting February 16, 2005 Houston, TX.
October 6, 2006 Public Stakeholder Review Portland, Oregon Conditional Firm.
Cost Allocation Proposals associated with MISO Transmission Expansion WIEG Board Meeting May 6, 2010 WIEG Board Meeting May 6, 2010 Presented by: Kavita.
Reliable Power Reliable Markets Reliable People RAS Guideline Initiative March 23, 2009.
1 Benefits of Transmission Ownership Bob Johnston CEO of MEAG Power.
Midwest ISO Discussion February 5, 2009 Greg Levesque Manager – Regional Relations & Policy.
2006 SPP RTO Expansion Plan Carl A. Monroe July 30, 2006.
Order 1000 Implementation in PJM – Challenges and Opportunities Jodi L. Moskowitz Senior Director – Transmission Development & Strategy October 13, 2015.
ESI/SPP Seams Agreement Implementation Update Transmission Planning Summit August 11, 2010.
ERCOT – MISO DC Tie Study Regional Planning Group November 20, 2015.
RTO WEST Summary of RTO West 9/18/02 Declaratory Order Presentation to The Committee on Regional Electrical Power Cooperation (CREPC) by John Carr 10/1/02.
DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY © 2013 New York Independent System Operator, Inc. All Rights Reserved. EIPC Roll-Up Powerflow Model Zach Smith Director,
2013 Attachment O True-Up Customer Meeting August 13, 2014.
Generation Interconnection Overview 2007 Transmission Summit July 31, 2007 New Orleans, Louisiana.
Northern Tier Transmission Group Report to Columbia Grid Planning Committee February 9, 2012 “To ensure efficient, effective, coordinated use & expansion.
Open Access Transmission Tariff Amendment No. 9 Greg Broeking, Chief Financial Officer March 7, 2012.
Mountain West Transmission Group
OASIS II Stage 1 Requirements Joint OASISII Implementation Task Force Paul R. Sorenson November 17, 2004.
NERC vs. RTOs July 16, 2001.
Consolidated EIM Initiatives from 2017 Roadmap Issue Paper
Capacity Allocation and Congestion Management for Electricity Network Code ROME, 15th May 2012.
2014 Attachment O True-Up Customer Meeting August 25, 2015
Why PJM? Presentation to Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Location, Location, Location
Generation Interconnection Summary
OASIS II Stage 1 Requirements Joint OASISII Implementation Task Force Paul R. Sorenson November 17, 2004.
Capacity Allocation and Congestion Management for Electricity Network Code ROME, 15th May 2012.
Massachusetts Electric Restructuring Roundtable
Pseudo-tie business procedure
Proposal for Distribution Group Studies
T.O. Highway/Byway Recommendations
MISO Contacts for GI IPTF December 18, 2017.
IID Generating Facility Interconnection Process
Add/Terminate NITS DNR
Karen Bartleson, President, IEEE Standards Association
File service architecture
Westar Formula Rate and your bill
The Need for Compensatory Standby Rates
2016 Attachment O True-Up Customer Meeting August 22, 2017
FERC Guidance – Long Term Competition
Excelsior Energy’s Mesaba Energy Project
Duke Energy Carolinas Stakeholder Meeting
MA DG Collaborative – Year 1
2017 Attachment O True-Up Customer Meeting August 23, 2018
Pseudo-tie business procedure
Offshore Wind Transmission:
Presentation transcript:

HVDC process discussion IPTF 11/05/2015

Agenda 1.Summary of Stakeholder comments received so far 2.MISO’s comments 3.Next Steps

Stakeholder comments 1.ERIS and NRIS are generator specific Interconnection Service products and do not apply to HVDC Interconnections. Opposing view contend that ER/NR can be extended to HVDC Interconnections as well, because these rights would be transferred over to the generator that uses the HVDC to serve load in MISO 2.Service agreement for HVDC should be a combination of Transmission and Generator Interconnection Agreement 3.Existing GIA can be modified for HVDC Interconnections 4.All cost emanating from reliability studies, for HVDC interconnections, should be borne by the requesting Customer 5.MISO should use the existing Generator Interconnection cost allocation rules for HVDC Interconnections

Stakeholder comments 6.Separate process for HVDC Interconnections – Yes, there should be a separate process – No, injection should be treated as a generator and should follow the GI Interconnection Process. Withdrawal can have a separate process 7.MISO should have a separate call to vet the HVDC Interconnections 8.MISO should have a first come first service process for HVDC 9.Benefits of HVDC Controllability should be factored while designing a new process 10.MISO should have a collaborative process with other RTOs when HVDC crosses the SEAM 11.Cost allocation of Network Upgrades will depend on whether it is an injection or withdrawal 12.“However, given the unique development cycle of a long-distance transmission line, regulatory uncertainty should be considered in the development of milestones so that projects can move through the interconnection study process and show progress and proof- of-concept to the various regulatory bodies while also not being subjected to re-starting the study process when regulatory hurdles slow development.”

Next Steps 1.MISO is going to develop a separate process for HVDC Interconnections for all future HVDC Interconnections. – MISO will add this task to the IPTF Management Plan 2. For HVDC requests already in the queue, MISO will process them through the current Generator Interconnection process (Withdrawal and Injection) – Modify the GIA pro forma to create a Service Agreement for existing HVDC requests – Discuss challenges related to stripping ERIS/NRIS from the Service Agreement – Can HVDC Transmission Service, available through Module B of the MISO tariff, be potentially be combined with a Service Agreement in lieu of ERIS/NRIS?

Contact Vikram Godbole Tim Aliff Brett Furuness Amanda Jones