Student Achievement Data A first look at MPC’s institution-set standards Rosaleen Ryan, Institutional Researcher Catherine Webb, Accreditation Liaison.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ACCJC’s Annual Report Institution-Set Standards REVISED March 19, 2014 PaRC Presentation E. Kuo Foothill IR&P.
Advertisements

Creating Meaningful Educational Goal Groups Carolyn Arnold, Ph.D. Chabot College Office of Institutional Research Planning, Review, and Budget Council.
STUDENT EQUITY PLAN PROGRESS PRESENTATION TO BOARD FEBRUARY 28, 2012.
DONNA SHEA, PROGRAM COORDINATOR/ADVISER BACHELOR OF ARTS CAREER AND TECHNICAL STUIDES.
 Student Success: What Is It, and How Can We Measure It? Kim Harrell, Folsom Lake College Carolyn Holcroft, Foothill College David Morse, ASCCC Executive.
Monitoring Report 2015 – 01 Global Ends Statement.
Fall/Spring Enrollment GROSSMONT COLLEGE Number of Students* (Based on End-of-Term Data) Fall and Spring Semesters: * Excludes students taking.
ACCJC’s Annual Report Institution-Set Standards March 5, 2015 PaRC Meeting E. Kuo Foothill IR&P.
Dr. Marybeth Buechner Dean of Planning, Research & Institutional Effectiveness Sacramento City College Los Rios Community College District.
A Comprehensive Analysis of a PrOF Instructional Data Packet To illustrate the data analysis process CRC Research Office 2009.
Educational Master Plan Institutional Effectiveness WSCH Projections April 20, Cambridge West Partnership, LLC.
Kilgore College Balanced Scorecard FY 2013 Update.
Peralta Community College District Open Forum 2015 Strategic Plan January 21, 2015.
1. ACCJC INSTITUTION-SET STANDARDS DISCUSSION 2 A “standard” is the level of performance set by the institution to meet educational quality and institutional.
Accomplishing the Mission Mission and institutional effectiveness expectations in the revised Accreditation Standards Prepared for MPC Academic Senate.
Merritt College’s plan based on the principles Improve student access to college programs and services. Increase and balance student equity and diversity.
Student Success and Basic Skills An Introduction.
Student Success Scorecard De Anza College 2015 Mallory Newell Office of Research and Planning.
Coastal Bend College Strategic Plan Update of Key Performance Indicators (KPI) Spring 2013.
Institutional Effectiveness at CPCC DENISE H WELLS.
Revisiting Our Institution-Set Standards: Part II Bri Hays Campus-Based Researcher Presented to the Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Committee.
IS GCC MEETING ITS MISSION AND GOALS? MASTER PLANNING COMMITTEE (TEAM A) MAY 8, 2015.
Palomar College Presentation to Palomar College Board of Trustees March 11, 2008.
Glendale Community College: Statewide Accountability Reporting 2010 Data Edward Karpp Dean of Research, Planning, and Grants November 15, 2010.
Facilitate the Future: Educational Master Planning Event April 28, 2016.
HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
"Once You Go Here, You Can Go Anywhere" ™ Data Into Action West Hills Community College Pedro Avila –
1 Foothill College, El Monte Road, Los Altos Hills, CA | foothill.edu El Monte Road Los Altos Hills, CA foothill.edu Institutional-Set.
AQIP Categories Category One: Helping Students Learn focuses on the design, deployment, and effectiveness of teaching-learning processes (and on the processes.
Rationale In examining completion outcomes, student-level characteristics are key. Disaggregation of data by student groups are important for both intervention.
Chancellor’s Office Data Resources for Student Success October 7, 2015
Student Success Scorecard and Institution-Set Standards 2014
Program Review Training
THE PATH FORWARD KCTCS Strategic Plan
Edward Karpp Dean of Research, Planning, and Grants November 15, 2010
January 23, 2017 Academic Senate Meeting
October 9, 2015 Daniel Wanner, Los Angeles City College
Dean, Research, Planning & Institutional Effectiveness
Dean, Research, Planning & Institutional Effectiveness
“Nuts and Bolts” of the Student Centered Funding Formula
Indicators Four areas of institutional effectiveness
California Community College Basic Skills Initiative
Board of Trustees Review
Student Success Scorecard & Other Institutional Effectiveness Metrics
Dean, Research, Planning & Institutional Effectiveness
Dr. Brian Lofman, Dean April 18, 2017 Student Success Scorecard 2017:
Dr. Brian Lofman, Dean April 18, 2017 Student Success Scorecard 2017:
Student Success Data.
Dean, Research, Planning & Institutional Effectiveness
Chairs and Managers Retreat 1 February 2016, SSA 219
Dean, Research, Planning & Institutional Effectiveness
Dean, Research, Planning & Institutional Effectiveness
Presentation to the Mt. San Jacinto College Board of Trustees
Student Success Metrics
Consideration of Core Outcomes for Strategic Plan
Eligibility Requirements and Commission Policies
Master Plan Update A Presentation to College Council November 14, 2013
Student Success Metrics
Dr. Bridget Herrin Associate Dean, Research & Planning
Student Centered Funding Formula (SCFF) AB 1809
Student Success Metrics
VISION FOR SUCCESS GOALS
CUNY ASAP National Replication Institute April 15th, 2019
Process for Local District Goal Setting
Disproportionate Impact Study
Datamart
Local Goal Setting & SEA Plan Introduction & Overview
Vision for Success Local Goal Setting April 2019.
Dean, Research, Planning & Institutional Effectiveness
Vision for Success Local Goal Setting Part 1
Presentation transcript:

Student Achievement Data A first look at MPC’s institution-set standards Rosaleen Ryan, Institutional Researcher Catherine Webb, Accreditation Liaison Officer 23 September 2014

What are Institution-set Standards? Internal baselines for student achievement Early indicators of areas that may need closer attention from the institution One method for determining whether we are accomplishing our mission US Department of Education requirements

What are the requirements for institutions? US Dept. of Education requires institutions to: Set internal standards (i.e., baselines) for student achievement Assess institutional performance against these baselines Use this assessment to set goals for improvement when baselines aren’t met

What are the requirements for accreditors? US Dept. of Education requires accreditors to: Ensure compliance with USDE requirements Evaluate the reasonableness of the internal standards (i.e., baselines) set by an institution Evaluate the effectiveness of the institution’s use of its baselines in its planning

What data must be included? Institutions must set baselines for: Course completion rate Degree awards Certificate awards Transfers Licensure pass rates (if applicable)

What other data should be considered? Institutions should also set baselines for: Other areas of student achievement relevant to institutional mission For example: ◦ Job placement rates for CTE programs, if applicable ◦ Retention (i.e., Fall to Fall persistence) ◦ DE success rates, if applicable

Principles for setting our baselines Institution-set standards should be: Baselines, not aspirational goals Reasonable and reflective of our “normal” range Flexible enough to account for any unforeseen circumstances Easy to calculate and understand

Methodology for setting our baselines In Spring 2014, we decided to: Start with a five-year average for each metric Look at the variability around the average to find the “range of normal” (i.e., the standard deviation) for the five-year span Set the standard at the lower edge of the range

Example: setting a baseline for dog height Green line = Average height of our five dogs Purple area = standard deviation from the average Baseline for dog height = lower blue line

Today we’ll look at: Course completion rate Degree awards Certificate awards Transfers

Course Completion Rate Defined as: Course success count ÷ Course enrollment count Data Source: CCCCO DataMart, Retention/Success Rate Report Five-Year Mean:71.5% less Standard Deviation:- 2.1% Current standard:69.4% F09F10F11F12F13 Overall Credit Success Rate:69.4%69.1%72.9%73.0%

Degree Completion, Part 1 Defined as: Number of degrees awarded Data Source: CCCCO DataMart, Program Awards Report (Degrees); MIS Referential Files (Students) Five-Year Mean:384.0 less Standard Deviation: Current standard: Degrees awarded:

Degree Completion, Part 2 Defined as: Number of students (unduplicated) receiving a degree Data Source: CCCCO DataMart, Program Awards Report (Degrees); MIS Referential Files (Students) Five-Year Mean:356.6 less Standard Deviation: Current standard: Number of students receiving a degree:

Certificate Completion, Part 1 Defined as: Number of certificates awarded Data Source: CCCCO DataMart, Program Awards Report (Degrees); MIS Referential Files (Students) Five-Year Mean:68.8 less Standard Deviation: Current standard: Certificates awarded:

Certificate Completion, Part 2 Defined as: Number of students (unduplicated) receiving a certificate Data Source: CCCCO DataMart, Program Awards Report (Degrees); MIS Referential Files (Students) Five-Year Mean:65.0 less Standard Deviation: Current standard: Number of students receiving a certificate:

Transfer to 4-year College or University Defined as: Number of students who successfully transfer to a 4-year Data Sources: CCCCO DataMart Transfer Volume (ISP, OOS); CSU Analytic Studies (CSU), CCCCO Student Services Transfer and Articulation (UC) Five-Year Mean:493.2 less Standard Deviation: Current standard: In-State Private: Out of State CSU UC TOTAL

Next steps 1. Calculate current standards for remaining categories ( e.g., retention, licensure pass rate, job placement rates for CTE programs, DE success rates, etc.) 2. Identify any other internal areas for which a baseline would be helpful (and calculate those) (e.g., FTES, Success rates in GE and/or CTE, % of students assessing into Basic Skills courses that complete Basic Skills courses) 3. Disaggregate the data to examine trends a)By student population group (in order to identify any performance gaps) b)By program (to aid in Program Review) c)By instructional modality (to provide information about online learning)