1 1 Perception of Online Advertising - France Comparison of 13 different forms of online advertising Report Study:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
3.04 Understand the use of direct marketing to attract attention and to build a brand.
Advertisements

Connect Nevada Residential Technology Assessment Results.
1 NEW YORK CHIGAGO DETROIT SAN FRANCISCO LONDON PARIS HAMBURG.
Nielsen Research Group Examining Moviegoer Behavior 2012 Study.
Kids and Family Reading Report™ Harry Potter: The Power of One Book
University as Entrepreneur A POPULATION IN THIRDS Arizona and National Data.
The popularity of the social networks. The most popular social networks.
Third Party Advertising Evaluation: American Express eStatement Topline July 2008.
Ophea 2013 Online Parent Consultation Survey May 2013.
How America Shops & Spends 2014
The Unique Value of Advertising in Local TV Broadcast News
The European Trade Association of the digital and interactive marketing industry representing the National trade associations and Corporate members European.
LEE, JEONGHWAN Korea Internet & Security Agency ICT Use Statistics of Households and Individuals in Korea August 2014.
MEASURING INCOME AND POVERTY AT A NATIONAL LEVEL Sian Rasdale Social Justice Analysis, Scottish Government.
2010 Holiday Shopping Research A Silicon Valley Research Insights™ Report December 2010 S R G V TM Silicon Valley Research Group Inc. Creating Markets.
Student Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
Teens, Online Stranger Contact and Cyberbullying What the research is telling us… Amanda Lenhart Internet Safety Task Force April 30, 2008 Washington,
Responsible Electricity Transmission for Albertans (RETA) November 2, 2009 Responsible Electricity Transmission for Albertans (RETA)
Guilford County Schools Parent and Community Surveys Presentation January 24, 2015 Prepared By Nancy Burnap, Ph.D Research Strategies, Inc. Presented By.
1 © Ipsos MRBI /TAM Ireland Viewing Habits © Ipsos MRBI TAM Ireland Viewing Habits 13 th March 2013.
Panel Study of Entrepreneurial Dynamics Richard Curtin University of Michigan.
The social impacts of IT: Spending more time on the computer, laptop, phone, tab etc. than going outside. Negative effect on health. Negative effect on.
1 1 Perception of Online Advertising - Germany Comparison of 13 different forms of online advertising Report Study:
1© GfK 2016 | Concerns about safety and security Concerns about safety and security Global GfK survey July 2016.
1 1 Perception of Online Advertising - USA Comparison of 13 different forms of online advertising Report Study:
Yarborough Academy E-Safety
Voter Funnel 2016.
Holiday season e-commerce in the U.S. - Statista Dossier
The Mobile Difference Educause - Webinar July 14, 2011
Device Effects on behaviour and participation in mobile-optimised online diaries Christian Holdt, Head of Online Market Research Europe Annika Heeck,
Media Comparisons 2016.
Extreme Poverty, Poverty, and Near Poverty Rates for Children Under Age 5, by Living Arrangement: 2015 The data for Extreme Poverty, Poverty, and Near.
Conversely Mixed Mode in the Swedish Crime Survey Sanna Wallin, researcher The Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention Thank you! It’s very nice.
National Consumer Agency Market Research Conducted by
2016 School Climate Survey: Northgate Crossing Elementary School
A Shift is Here Embracing a World Filled with Digital Natives.
Assessments Attitudes of UK Teachers & Parents
GAMING INDUSTRY An Evolve Marketing Insights Special Report
HELENA ŠTIMAC, PhD, Associate Professor
Video game Research Final Results Collated from a panel of 281 people. Survey was conducted through personal and international means – Reddit for mass.
Client Release Date – October 2005
Targeted Video Advertising
2017/10/01 The Asahi Shimbun Development and Co-ordination Office.
Participants & Procedure
World Issues Survey Conducted by Ipsos MORI on behalf of the Geographical Association February 2009.
28 November - 1 December 2016, Amman, Jordan
Newspapers 24/ This is the 6th Newspapers 24/7 study released since This study was designed to explore how Canadians.
Representative inhabitants survey in USA
28 November - 1 December 2016, Amman, Jordan
MEDIA HABITS RESEARCH T O P L I N E R E P O R T | September 2018
Innovation and the online payment realm A market study
Islington Residents’ Survey 2018 March 2018
BoConcept Customer Survey
Digital Shopping Report
Extreme Poverty, Poverty, and
Extreme Poverty, Poverty, and
Kathleen Head and Sasha Wee
Community Needs Assessment for United Way of Lamar County
Thomas Korth, Robert Girvin, Jennifer Nikkel, Allan Terry, Ryan Murphy
Be Screen Smart project
Introduction Methods Results Discussion Methods
11th Annual Parents, kids & money survey
Extreme Poverty, Poverty, and
The Vermont Young Adult Survey: Methods and Some Initial Findings
Bob Flewelling Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation
Envision Comanche Employment Focus Group March 14, 2019
Welcome Reporting: Individual Student Report (ISR), Student Roster Report, and District Summary of Schools Report Welcome to the Reporting: Individual.
Extreme Poverty, Poverty, and
Nursing Implications/Conclusion
E-safety Presentation
Presentation transcript:

1 1 Perception of Online Advertising - France Comparison of 13 different forms of online advertising Report Study:

2 Contents 01 Methodology - Overview 02 Advertising Form under Examination 03 Online behavior 04 Level of Disruption – Direct Questions 05 Level of Disruption – Calculation 06 Demography

Methodology - Overview 3 01

4 The survey was carried out as an online ad hoc study based upon a quota sample representing the online population. Interviews were conducted by self-completion questionnaires. A representative sample based on age, gender and region was drawn from the basic population. Field time: 13 to 24 November 2015 A total of 2,000 French- speaking residents (aged 16 to 75) of France who are contactable by Internet were interviewed. Methodology - Overview Eyeo’s aim is to evaluate the perception of 13 different kind of online advertising formats from the internet users point of view. Method Background and Objectives Target GroupSample

Advertising Form under Examination 5 02

6 Advertising Forms under Examination: Ad Banner Ad Banner Conservative Ad Banner Attention Grabbing Ad Banner Animated Banner Ad Banner All Around

7 Advertising Forms under Examination: Pop-up and Video Ad Pop-up Video Ad Unskippable Video

8 Advertising Forms under Examination: Text Ad Text Ad - Below Text Ad - Between Text Ad - Next To

9 Advertising Forms under Examination: Native Ad and Search Ad Native Ad subtle Native Tweets Search Ad High Quantity Search Ad Low Quantity

10 Online behavior 10 03

11 Online Usage and Usage of Devices In France almost all respondents are at least once a in the internet and about more than a third of this all day long. The most used device is a laptop or a smartphone Base: All respondents n=2.000, Results in % Question OA1: How ofen do you go on the Internet? Question OA2: Some devices that you can use to access the Internet are on the list. Which of these devices do you use to access the Internet - regardless if for work or private purposes? Question OA3: What is the device that you use the most to access the Internet, regardless if for work or private purposes? Laptop Internet-capable phone or smartphone Desktop PC (with separate screen) Tablet Internet-capable television, receiver or blu-ray player Game console (e.g. xBox, Playstation) Hybrid devices such as laptop and tablet in one device With none of the listed devices Usage of Devices 2-3 devices on average Online Usage Main Device Used

12 Level of Disruption – Direct Questions 12 04

13 Overall Assessment of Online Advertising Significantly more than half of the respondents surveyed found this online advertising dispruptive or very disruptive. Only almost one respondent in ten is hardly disturbed Top-2-Boxes 8.8% Bottom-2-Boxes 56.4% Base: All respondents n=2.000, Results in % Question R1: Please take a moment to think of online advertising and the different types of online advertising that you come across on the Internet. How would you rate online advertising in general in comparison to advertising on television, in the movie theater, and in newspapers? On this scale 1 means for me online advertising isn't disruptive at all" and 6 means "for me online advertising is very disruptive".

14 Level of Disruption - Ranking of all Forms - Overview isn't' disruptive at all is very disruptive Base: All respondents n=2.000, Results in % Question R2: Next you will be shown different pictures of a website. The content of the website is the same in each picture. On each page, however, you will see different types of advertising. For each type of advertising shown, please indicate the level of disruption. Data: Bottom-2-Boxes Pop-up Ad Banner - All Around Ad Banner Animated Banner Hidden Native Ad Banner Attention Grabbing subtle Native Tweets Search Ad - High Quantity Search Ad - High Quantity Text Ad - Next To Video Ad - Unskippable video Text Ad - Between Text Ad - Below Search Ad - Low Quantity Ad Banner - Conservartive

15 Level of Disruption in Detail Bottom-2-Boxes (1/3) Most disruptive are Pop-up, Ad Banner (all around/ animated) and Video Ad (unskippable) Base: All respondents n=2.000, Results in % Question R2: Next you will be shown different pictures of a website. The content of the website is the same in each picture. On each page, however, you will see different types of advertising. For each type of advertising shown, please indicate the level of disruption. Data: Bottom-2-Boxes Ad Banner - All Around Pop-up 1000 isn't' disruptive at all is very disruptive 81.3 Ad Banner - Animated Banner Video Ad - Unskippable video 1000 isn't' disruptive at all is very disruptive isn't' disruptive at all is very disruptive isn't' disruptive at all is very disruptive 55.9

16 Level of Disruption in Detail Bottom-2-Boxes (2/3) Mean values were reached by native ads, Text Ad (between) and Ad Banner (Attent. Grab.) Base: All respondents n=2.000, Results in % Question R2: Next you will be shown different pictures of a website. The content of the website is the same in each picture. On each page, however, you will see different types of advertising. For each type of advertising shown, please indicate the level of disruption. Data: Bottom-2-Boxes Native Ad Ad Banner – Attention Grabbing Ad Banner – Attention Grabbing Text Ad - Between subtle Native Tweets 1000 isn't' disruptive at all is very disruptive isn't' disruptive at all is very disruptive isn't' disruptive at all is very disruptive isn't' disruptive at all is very disruptive 31.0

17 Level of Disruption in Detail Bottom-2-Boxes (3/3) Comparatively low is the level of disruption for Text Ad, Ad Banner Conservative and Search Ad Base: All respondents n=2.000, Results in % Question R2: Next you will be shown different pictures of a website. The content of the website is the same in each picture. On each page, however, you will see different types of advertising. For each type of advertising shown, please indicate the level of disruption. Data: Bottom-2-Boxes Text Ad - Below Search Ad High Quantity Ad Banner Conservative Text Ad - Next To Search Ad - Low Quantity isn't' disruptive at all is very disruptive isn't' disruptive at all is very disruptive isn't' disruptive at all is very disruptive isn't' disruptive at all is very disruptive isn't' disruptive at all is very disruptive

18 Level of Disruption – Bottom-2-Boxes The bottom-2-box indicates the level of disruption Base: All respondents n=2.000, Results in % Question R2: Next you will be shown different pictures of a website. The content of the website is the same in each picture. On each page, however, you will see different types of advertising. For each type of advertising shown, please indicate the level of disruption. Data: Bottom-2-Boxes Pop-up AdAd-Banner - All Around Ad-Banner - Animated Banner Video Ad - Unskippable video Hidden Native Ad Text Ad - Between Ad-Banner - Attention Grabbing subtle TweetsText Ad - Next To Text Ad - Below Ad-Banner - Conservative Search Ad - High Quantity Search Ad - Low Quantity

19 Level of Disruption - Calculation 19 04

20 The calculation is based on different scaled questions as follows: Question R1: Overall assessment of online advertising Question R2: Level of disturbance (All advertising forms successively) Question R3: Ranking of the advertising forms (Comparatively testing of the advertising forms) Question R4: Level of Disturbance (Test of selected advertising forms depending on response behavior in question R3) The score indicates the level of disruption. Possible is a value area from 0 (=isn't‘ disruptive at all) to 100 (=very disruptive). Level of Disruption -Calculation A score per respondent and advertising forms was calculated isn't' disruptive at all is very disruptive 1000

21 Level of Disruption - Ranking of all Forms - Overview isn't' disruptive at all is very disruptive Base: All respondents n=2.000, Results in % Question R1: Overall Assessment of Online Advertising; Question R2: Level of Disturbance (All Advertising Forms) Question R3: Ranking of the Advertising Forms; Question R4: Level of Disturbance (Selected Advertising Forms) Scores: Average of the individual scores per advertising form calculated from Questions R01 to R04, value area from 0 (irrelevant) to 100 (=very disruptive) possible Pop-up Ad Banner - All Around Ad Banner Animated Banner Hidden Native subtle Native Tweets Ad Banner Attention Grabbing Search Ad - High Quantity Search Ad - High Quantity Text Ad - Next To Video Ad - Unskippable video Text Ad - Between Text Ad - Below Ad Banner - Conservartive Search Ad - Low Quantity

22 Level of Disruption in Detail (1/3) Most disruptive are Pop-up, Ad Banner (all around/ animated) and Video Ad (unskippable) Base: All respondents n=2.000, Results in % Question R1: Overall Assessment of Online Advertising; Question R2: Level of Disturbance (All Advertising Forms) Question R3: Ranking of the Advertising Forms; Question R4: Level of Disturbance (Selected Advertising Forms) Scores: Average of the individual scores per advertising form calculated from Questions R01 to R04, value area from 0 (irrelevant) to 100 (=very disruptive) possible Pop-up 1000 isn't' disruptive at all is very disruptive 63.6 Ad Banner - All Around 1000 isn't' disruptive at all is very disruptive 58.3 Ad Banner - Animated Banner 1000 isn't' disruptive at all is very disruptive 51.1 Video Ad - Unskippable video 1000 isn't' disruptive at all is very disruptive 42.8

23 Level of Disruption in Detail (2/3) Mean values were reached by native ads, Text Ad (between) and Ad Banner (Attent. Grab.) Base: All respondents n=2.000, Results in % Question R1: Overall Assessment of Online Advertising; Question R2: Level of Disturbance (All Advertising Forms) Question R3: Ranking of the Advertising Forms; Question R4: Level of Disturbance (Selected Advertising Forms) Scores: Average of the individual scores per advertising form calculated from Questions R01 to R04, value area from 0 (irrelevant) to 100 (=very disruptive) possible Native Ad 1000 isn't' disruptive at all is very disruptive 37.3 subtle Native Tweets 1000 isn't' disruptive at all is very disruptive 32.3 Text Ad - Between 1000 isn't' disruptive at all is very disruptive 28.5 Ad Banner – Attention Grabbing Ad Banner – Attention Grabbing 1000 isn't' disruptive at all is very disruptive 26.6

24 Level of Disruption in Detail (3/3) Comparatively low is the level of disruption for Text Ad, Ad Banner Conservative and Search Ad Base: All respondents n=2.000, Results in % Question R1: Overall Assessment of Online Advertising; Question R2: Level of Disturbance (All Advertising Forms) Question R3: Ranking of the Advertising Forms; Question R4: Level of Disturbance (Selected Advertising Forms) Scores: Average of the individual scores per advertising form calculated from Questions R01 to R04, value area from 0 (irrelevant) to 100 (=very disruptive) possible Text Ad - Below 1000 isn't' disruptive at all is very disruptive 21.6 Search Ad High Quantity Ad Banner Conservative Text Ad - Next To Search Ad - Low Quantity isn't' disruptive at all is very disruptive isn't' disruptive at all is very disruptive isn't' disruptive at all is very disruptive isn't' disruptive at all is very disruptive

25 Level of Disruption – Average Values of the Score The score indicates the level of disruption Base: All respondents n=2.000, Results in % Question R1: Overall Assessment of Online Advertising; Question R2: Level of Disturbance (All Advertising Forms) Question R3: Ranking of the Advertising Forms; Question R4: Level of Disturbance (Selected Advertising Forms) Scores: Average of the individual scores per advertising form calculated from Questions R01 to R04, value area from 0 (irrelevant) to 100 (=very disruptive) possible Pop-upAd-Banner - All Around Ad-Banner - Animated Banner Video Ad - Unskippable video Hidden Native Ad Text Ad - Between subtle Native Tweets Ad-Banner - Attention Grabbing Text Ad - Below Text Ad - Next To Ad-Banner - Conservative Search Ad - High Quantity Search Ad - Low Quantity

26 Level of Disruption – Median of the Score The score indicates the level of disruption Base: All respondents n=2.000, Results in % Question R1: Overall Assessment of Online Advertising; Question R2: Level of Disturbance (All Advertising Forms) Question R3: Ranking of the Advertising Forms; Question R4: Level of Disturbance (Selected Advertising Forms) Scores: Average of the individual scores per advertising form calculated from Questions R01 to R04, value area from 0 (irrelevant) to 100 (=very disruptive) possible Pop-upAd-Banner - All Around Ad-Banner - Animated Banner Video Ad - Unskippable video Hidden Native Ad Text Ad - Between subtle Native Tweets Ad-Banner - Attention Grabbing Text Ad - Below Ad-Banner - Conservative Text Ad - Next To Search Ad - High Quantity Search Ad - Low Quantity

27 Top Ad Top-Ad: Percentage share of advertising forms that disrupt most in the individual case Base: All respondents n=2.000, Results in % Question R1: Overall Assessment of Online Advertising; Question R2: Level of Disturbance (All Advertising Forms) Question R3: Ranking of the Advertising Forms; Question R4: Level of Disturbance (Selected Advertising Forms) Scores: Average of the individual scores per advertising form calculated from Questions R01 to R04, value area from 0 (irrelevant) to 100 (=very disruptive) possible Pop-up AdAd-Banner - All Around Ad-Banner - Animated Banner Video Ad - Unskippable video Hidden Native Ad subtle TweetsSearch Ad - High Quantity Text Ad - Between Text Ad - Next To Search Ad - Low Quantity Ad-Banner - Attention Grabbing Text Ad - Below Ad-Banner - Conservative

28 Very disruptive disruptive impact: Frequency of each of advertising form with a score greater than 90 in the individual case Base: All respondents n=2.000, Results in % Question R1: Overall Assessment of Online Advertising; Question R2: Level of Disturbance (All Advertising Forms) Question R3: Ranking of the Advertising Forms; Question R4: Level of Disturbance (Selected Advertising Forms) Scores: Average of the individual scores per advertising form calculated from Questions R01 to R04, value area from 0 (irrelevant) to 100 (=very disruptive) possible Pop-up AdAd-Banner - All Around Ad-Banner - Animated Banner Video Ad - Unskippable video Hidden Native Ad subtle TweetsText Ad - Between Ad-Banner - Attention Grabbing Text Ad - Next To Text Ad - Below Search Ad - High Quantity Ad-Banner - Conservative Search Ad - Low Quantity

29 Not disruptive at all Irrelevant: Frequency of each of advertising form with a score less than 5 in the individual case Base: All respondents n=2.000, Results in % Question R1: Overall Assessment of Online Advertising; Question R2: Level of Disturbance (All Advertising Forms) Question R3: Ranking of the Advertising Forms; Question R4: Level of Disturbance (Selected Advertising Forms) Scores: Average of the individual scores per advertising form calculated from Questions R01 to R04, value area from 0 (irrelevant) to 100 (=very disruptive) possible Search Ad - Low Quantity Search Ad - High Quantity Text Ad - Next To Ad-Banner - Conservative Text Ad - Below Ad-Banner - Attention Grabbing subtle TweetsText Ad - Between Hidden Native Ad Video Ad - Unskippable video Ad-Banner - Animated Banner Pop-up AdAd-Banner - All Around

30 Demography 30 06

31 Demography Gender (S1) Male51 Female49 Total Age (S2) years years37 55 and older31 Educational Level (D2) Life stages (D1) Living alone/ own household18 Living with partner/ one household 32 Living with family (partner and child/children) 35 Living with child/ children (single parent) 6 Sharing a household with friends/ roommates 1 Living with parents/ not have own household 9 Total Elementary school and below5 High school diploma or GED16 High school diploma with SAT/ACT score 27 University degree (bachelor, master, PhD) 52 Total bis zu € 4992 € € € € € € € No answer13 Monthly Net Household Income (D3) Total Online Usage (OA1) Total All day 38 Several times/ half a day 52 Once a day 8 Less 3 Values in percent