Planning for Restoration at the Landscape Scale: Desert LCC Case Study National Forest Foundation Collaborative Restoration Workshop April 26-27, 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Roundtable on Sustainable Forests. Forests cover about 750 million acres -- more than a quarter of the entire United States -- and sustainable management.
Advertisements

A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal watershed and salmon monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring.
Great Basin Restoration Initiative GBRI Field Office to On-the Ground Project.
PROPOSED PRIORITIES FOR SCIENCE AND COLLABORATION OCTOBER 2012.
Landscape Conservation Cooperatives Integration and Prioritization of Science Support Needs.
Blueprint Implementation. Ensuring effective implementation of the Blueprint “How do we link Blueprint products with organizational policies and activities?”
USDA Forest Service Southwestern Region. Overview  Why Landscapes?  Other Landscape Efforts  Strategic Action Plan Summary  Region-wide Landscape.
Climate Adaptation: the Power of Conservation Across Boundaries Steven Fuller, NALCC The Wildlife Management Institute.
Setting a Course for a Sustainable Landscape December 2013 Steering Committee Call code:
The Fundamentals of Conservation Design Image by Rex Johnson.
C3C3 1 Bryan Horsburgh Bureau of Reclamation Regional Deputy Manager, Resource & Technical Services Lief Horwitz USGS Northwest Area Science Program Officer.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Tom Armstrong Senior Advisor for Global Change Programs U.S. Geological Survey
Opportunities for increasing conservation effectiveness and research collaborations through a developing Conservation Remote Sensing Working Group Robert.
JOINT VENTURES Celebrating 25 Years of Bird Conservation.
Forest Plan Revision Using the 2012 Planning Rule Process Overview Steps and Expectations (I don’t know….but I’ve been told…if the horse don’t pull….you.
Problem Definition Exercise. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service General Summary Responses from ½ of those surveyed (n=14/31) Broad and narrow in scope Narrow.
Climate-Smart Landscape Conservation Planning & Design.
LCC National Workshop Denver, CO March 28-29, 2012 Defining a Future Conservation Landscape in the Southeastern United States.
Working to improve availability of plant materials for partner organizations Shannon Hatch DEVELOPMENT OF NATIVE PLANT MATERIALS FOR RIPARIAN RESTORATION.
US FOREST SERVICE REGIONAL ROUNDTABLE Planning Rule Revision Photographer: Bill Lea.
Inventory, Monitoring, and Assessments A Strategy to Improve the IM&A System Update and Feedback Session with Employees and Partners December 5, 2011.
 Secretarial Order No establishes Landscape Conservation Cooperatives, which focus on on-the-ground strategic conservation efforts at the landscape.
Landscape Conservation Cooperatives The Right Science in the Right Places.
The Southern Rockies LCC John Rice Science Coordinator December 18, 2013.
Convening Partners to Define the Landscape of the Future: Steps toward multi-partner Landscape Conservation Design June 2015 Steering Committee Workshop.
A NOAA Cooperative Institute David R. Shaw, Director Northern Gulf Institute.
Human Services Integration Building More Effective Responses to Peoples’ Needs.
PRESENTATION FOR TAMARISK COALITION WEBINAR 18 DECEMBER 2013.
CHESAPEAKE BAY PROGRAM PARTNERSHIP MANAGEMENT BOARD MEETING MAY 9, 2012 ANNAPOLIS, MD Social Science Action Team: Incorporating Social Science into the.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey History of the Southwest Biological Science Center A Short Overview.
The NCATE Journey Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University AACTE/NCATE Orientation - Spring 2008.
California Department of Fish and Wildlife: Incorporating Climate Change into Department Activities Panel Presentation North Pacific LCC Steering Committee.
The South Atlantic Landscape Conservation Cooperative’s Third Thursday Web Forum The SALCC Strategic Plan and What It Means Thursday, April 19, 2012.
1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.
CALIFORNIA'S STATE WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN 2015 UPDATE A Conservation Legacy for Californians Armand Gonzales, Project Lead.
Sara Vickerman May 10, 2012 Defenders of Wildlife Proposed Habitat/Biodiversity Metric Framework Agreement.
 Four Main Sections:  (a) Plan (Unit Level) Monitoring Program  (b) Broader Scale Monitoring Strategies  (c) Timing & Process  (d) Biennial Evaluation.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N.
Designing Sustainable Landscapes in the Northeast A Potential Application for Vernal Pool Results Scott Schwenk, Ph.D. Science Coordinator North Atlantic.
Collaborative Decision Making: What, When, Why, How?
Managing the Human Footprint. Planning, Policy, and Management  Key elements in the process of identifying problems and their possible solutions  Essential.
North Atlantic LCC Science Needs and Projects Background Vision and Mission 2010 Projects (review, status, next steps) 2011 Science Needs Assessment, Workshop.
Unit Webex Meetings Step 1: Targets, Threats, and Stresses.
Strengthening the Science-Management Bond in the Wildlife Profession Eric Hellgren Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation University of Florida.
Michaela Foster 1, Dr. Fred Cubbage 1, Dr. Nils Peterson 1, and Dr. Jerry McMahon 2 North Carolina State University 1, DOI Southeast Climate Science Center.
1 Connecting The Dots The Importance of Collaboration May 24, 2016 Nancy Schultz Family Living Educator.
Progress Relative to the Northeast Conservation Framework and Strategic Plan Setting the Stage for Conservation Design and Delivery Andrew Milliken North.
Options and Starting Points for Developing for Multi-Species ESA Conservation Programs Specifically for Threats Resulting in Habitat Loss Sean Kyle WAFWA.
Landscape Conservation Design:
Legend Cascadia Boundary
CBP Strategic Communications Plan
LCC Role in Conservation Science and Science Delivery
Programme Board 6th Meeting May 2017 Craig Larlee
The Biodiversity and Protected Areas Management (BIOPAMA) Programme
Regional Restoration Planning for the Delaware Estuary
Landscape Conservation Cooperatives
Landscape Approach to Resource Management
WATER POLICY And Management in AlabamA
The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and What’s Next
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
Department of the Interior Northeast Climate Science Center
An initiative that makes a difference
Delivering Conservation
LGAC Input on Outcomes.
Native Fish Conservation Areas Partnership Proposal
North Shore Streamkeepers February 23, 2019
Abby Kinchy Presentation for the Teach-In on Disappearing Data
The Biodiversity and Protected Areas Management (BIOPAMA) Programme
Monitoring Biodiversity in Protected and
Shifting Organizational Culture
Presentation transcript:

Planning for Restoration at the Landscape Scale: Desert LCC Case Study National Forest Foundation Collaborative Restoration Workshop April 26-27, 2016

What’s the issue and why do I care? Resource managers at many levels have successfully responded to major challenges in the past.

Restoration issues: lack of a guiding vision or ecological endpoint to guide efforts over-focus on creating habitat for single species without enough knowledge of the natural systems lack of routine monitoring and assessment at a timescale that allows for project outcomes to develop problem of setting goals for an isolated locations without linking entire watersheds or regions complexity of natural resource management, agencies, laws, regulations, and mandates Implicit goal of using the best science available “Despite the legal mandates, massive expenditures, and the burgeoning industry of aquatic and riparian restoration, riverine ecosystems continue to deteriorate as a result of human influences” (Karr & Chu, 1999).

Collective Impact: Changing paradigms What can we do to build success? "Organization of people around a common, needed conservation idea is the most important good out of this entire process...because it is a shift of paradigms." (Desert LCC NGO partner in Mexico)

“…Interior bureaus and agencies must work together, and with other federal, state, tribal and local governments, and private landowner partners, to develop landscape-level strategies for understanding and responding to climate change impacts.” (2009: Secretarial Order 3289) DOI Climate Science Centers Landscape Conservation Cooperatives Need dedicated infrastructure 1

Infrastructure Partnership Community Entities with resource management interests in the Desert LCC Communicate interests and needs to the LCC Contribute resources (staff) for LCC Use LCC products in decision-making Share information & resources Steering Committee Provides direction Staff Coordinator (BOR) Science Coordinator (FWS) Provide support & coordination Science 5 Critical Management Question Teams Local Governments TribalInternational AdministrativeData & GIS Working Groups Information & Products Management Questions

I don’t get excited every often, and this is one of the most exciting things I’ve been a part of in a long time. To have the opportunity to share information across boundaries, brainstorm at different scales and across resources, learn from other experts in the room – I’m very grateful that this has finally happened.” (Desert LCC Workshop Participant) Find a shared focus 2 Landscape Conservation Planning & Design

 Collaborative process to identify common goals and objectives for managing resources across jurisdictional boundaries  Maps & assesses current & projected landscape patterns  Identifies a commonly-held desired future condition  Integrates human and ecological needs  Produces a suite of agreed-upon actions that respond to climatic variability  Maps specific places to develop collaborative actions that are useful and implementable by partners  Provides science to meet management goals

“The Desert LCC can define itself as the interest, enthusiasm, and connection to people that becomes vital in answering hard questions about resource management decisions.” (Desert LCC federal partner) It’s people not institutions that matter 3

Emphasize communication between groups that develop science, discuss science, and those who use it

It’s not always the exciting stuff 4 “The Fluffy” vs. “The Product” “Input” vs. “Collaboration” Define expectations & success Talk about decision space Developing and applying scientific information, monitoring and evaluating through data collection and disseminating your findings and educating the public, land owners and stewards in a transparent way. Collaboration and good will are the best tools that we have.” (Desert LCC State partner) Provide a repeatable, meaningful process

Provide the right tools for the job 5  Map baseline condition assessments or inventories  Map on-going or completed conservation actions: who is doing what where?  Understand where conservation actions are most needed  Understand where the greatest opportunities for collaboration are

You guessed it…. TIME 6 We talk … A LOT I’m going to take all this knowledge back home, and this communication is great but we still need products.” (Desert LCC Workshop Participant)

"You not only bring people together from agencies and academia, you also bring people together across disciplines and across institutions in ways that would not have happened without your facilitation. When you bring people together, great things can happen. You are also working hard at getting information moving quickly between the researchers and the managers. This takes time to have a measurable impact, but it is happening. The pathways you are building will be very important conduits of information for managers. (e.g. your webinars and efforts to make other web resources accessible and easy for managers to use)." (Desert LCC Academic partner) Celebrate Success! 7 Genevieve Johnson, Coordinator Aimee Roberson, Science Coordinator