Project Development seminar Katerina Staneva Kring 1 - 2 February 2010 | Prague.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DOs and DONTs Joan-Anton Carbonell Kingston University EC External Expert TEMPUS Modernising Higher Education TEMPUS INFORMATION DAY.
Advertisements

Seminar on community-led local development Keeping it simple Brussels, 6 February
EU Wetland conservation policy. Communication on the Wise Use and Conservation of Wetlands (1995) => first European document dedicated exclusively.
CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME SUCCESS FACTORS FOR PROJECT DEVELOPMENT: focus on activities and partnership JTS CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME.
Improvement Service / Scottish Centre for Regeneration Project: Embedding an Outcomes Approach in Community Regeneration & Tackling Poverty Effectively.
Partners and cross-border cooperation. Why a partnership? Address common challenges jointly (e.g. cross-border pollution) Jointly develop opportunities.
1 Danube Transnational Programme Zsuzsanna Drahos Ministry for National Economy Department of Territorial Development Planning 17 April 2015.
Lessons Learned for Strong Project Delivery & Reporting Sheelagh O’Reilly, Kristin Olsen IODPARC Independent Assessors for the Scottish Government IDF.
Application Form – Part C Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Secretariat How to Apply Seminar 4th February 2015, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Project Implementation Monika Balode Joint Technical Secretariat Lead Partner Seminar 16 October 2009, Šiauliai.
1 Framework Programme 7 Guide for Applicants
CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME SUCCESS FACTORS FOR PROJECT DEVELOPMENT: focus on finances Partner Search Forum Poznań, Poland 16 – 17 December 2008.
Results Focus Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat How to Apply Seminar 4th February 2015, Copenhagen, Denmark.
THE ROLE OF STOP TB GHANA PARTNERSHIP Chief Austin A. Obiefuna National Coordinator SECRETARIAT CO-HOSTED BY AFRO GLOBAL ALLIANCE (GH) & GHANA SOCIETY.
Application Form Part 1, Sections 4-9 How to Apply Seminar 16 th September 2010 – Copenhagen Kirsti Mijnhijmer.
IPA Funds Programme Management sept Bölgesel Rekabet Edebilirlik Operasyonel Programı’nın Uygulanması için Kurumsal Kapasitenin Oluşturulmasına.
Strategic Priorities of the NWE INTERREG IVB Programme Harry Knottley, UK representative in the International Working Party Lille, 5th March 2007.
EU Funding opportunities : Rights, Equality and Citizenship Programme Justice Programme Jose Ortega European Commission DG Justice.
Financial reporting Linda Wormö, MA Per Dahlström, MA 1st October,2015 Kuopio, Finland.
Regional Policy Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy International Monitoring Conference Budapest 11 th November 2011 Budapest 26 th September2013.
Project preparation workshop “Bringing a transnational project to life” Project idea “Challenges and chances from Climate Change for regional and local.
Results Focus Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat 20th October 2015, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Developing Transnational Project Indicators. The purpose of indicators > Indicators are useful tools that allow programme and project managers to monitor:
Project Management Birutė Markevičiūtė Joint Technical Secretariat Lead Partner Seminar 13 October 2008, Riga.
Application procedure From theory to practice Dieter H. Henzler, Steinbeis-Transfercenter Cultural Resources Management, Berlin.
1 EUROPEAN FUNDS IN HALF-TIME NEW CHALLENGES Jack Engwegen Head of the Czech Unit European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy Prague,
Financing Natura 2000 WORKSHOPS 2nd meeting of the Steering Group, 2 March 2006.
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION The contribution of EU Regional/Cohesion programmes Corinne Hermant-de Callataÿ European Commission,
Results Focus & Partnership Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Secretariat How to Apply Seminar 1st October 2014, Strathpeffer, Scotland.
ESPON Info Day on New Calls and Partner Café 18 May 2010 in Bruxelles Call for Proposals on Transnational Networking Activities (Projects carried through.
Action 12:Internal Monitoring BMW Regional Assembly.
"The challenge for Territorial Cohesion 2014 – 2020: delivering results for EU citizens" Veronica Gaffey Acting Director EUROPEAN COMMISSION, DG for Regional.
Leader+ Observatory Seminar ‘The Legacy of Leader+ at local level: Building the future of rural areas’ April 2007 Cap Corse, Nebbiù è Custera, Corse,
Interreg IIIB Trans-national cooperation: Budget comparison : 440 million EURO 420 m EURO (Interreg IIC prog.) + 20 m EURO (Pilot Actions)
04/2007 THE EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENT POLICY & ITS INSTRUMENTS OF IMPLEMENTATION Preparation & Draft of environmental projects THE EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENT POLICY.
CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME PROJECT DEVELOPMENT FINANCIAL ISSUES Project development seminar Prague, 1 st February 2010 Luca FERRARESE JTS CENTRAL.
CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME Workshop B Preparation of an application: FOCUS ON BUDGET Project development seminar Prague, 2 nd February 2010 Luca.
Project design – Activities and partnership CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME Project development seminar Prague, 1-2 February 2010 Monika Schönerklee-Grasser.
Project Planning and Management Gail Campbell and Tom Broadhurst.
Transnational Working & Reporting Procedures. LP Seminar January 2013 Transnational Cooperation & Reporting Procedures I) Transnational cooperation: Definition.
CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME WORKSHOP A: Preparing an application – focus on activities and partnership Project development seminar Prague, 1-2 February.
Leader Axis Rural Development Policy by Jean-Michel Courades AGRI-F3.
Filippo Compagni - UK Contact Point – Atlantic Area
Transnational Working & Reporting Procedures What project promoters cannot ignore about INTERREG IVB NWE project monitoring.
Interreg Vb Atlantic Area Call 1 - Applicants support workshop
Small Charities Challenge Fund (SCCF) Guidance Webinar
Spending Reviews in Ireland
PRIORITIES FOR THE FUTURE
Leader ECA audit findings and possible simplification
Introduction - Final activity reporting
Part 2: How to ensure good project management?
PROJECT MANUAL Galina Georgieva Project Officer
Results Focus Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat
Application Form Sections 4-9 Christopher Parker & Kirsti Mijnhijmer 28 January 2009 – Copenhagen, Denmark European Union European Regional Development.
Small Charities Challenge Fund (SCCF) Guidance Webinar
Reporting 25 April 2018.
CLOE: A successful pilot project
Innovation in ESF-programming
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
ENI CBC Joint Operational Programme Black Sea Basin
An overview The EU Strategy for the Danube Region -
Dr. Katja Šnuderl, Contract manager
Territorial Cooperation and Territorial Cohesion Results of the consultation on the consultation Input to TCUM seminar 25 September 2009 | Brussels.
GSF Results and Financial Monitoring Workshop
NDPHS Work Plan for 2012 NDPHS 8th Partnership Annual Conference
Civil Society Facility and Media Programme Call for proposals: EuropeAid/162473/DH/ACT/Multi Webinar no. 3: Preparing effective Concept Note.
Project intervention logic
INFORMATION SEMINAR Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania programme
Project intervention logic
Presentation transcript:

Project Development seminar Katerina Staneva Kring February 2010 | Prague

How? Operational Programme (OP) Overview of programme area + most important strengths and weaknesses Relevant European, national and regional policies Defines objectives – the targets for change Sets priorities and gives examples of the types of actions that will be funded 1.Contribute to change in Europe

2. Need for transnational cooperation Transnational cooperation is essential where Obstacles posed by national borders, natural or institutional/organisational barriers hinder meeting our common goals. The complexity of the problem favours solutions that involve different levels of government, different levels of decision- making, management, implementation and financing, and different sectors

Transnational added value Developing a joint learning and implementation environment. Can you promote complementarity of activities, policies and programmes? Could your actions support the delivery of concrete strategic actions and improve regional performance? Undertaking actions at the greater scale that transnational working enables - could this provide subsequent economies of scale or allow the development of a critical mass?

3. Building the right partnership – who should be involved?  Which categories and / or organisations need to be involved?  Who are the most relevant people within the organisations? (field of expertise, position)  What is our aim in involving them? (political backing, end-users, etc.)  What are their needs? What is their interest in the project?  How do we want to involve them? (conferences, Steering Group, piloting)  Do they have any other conflicting interests that might cause risks to the project?

Partnership complementarity Lead PartnerPartner 1Partner 2 Activity 1 Significant experienceFor example... Some experience, for example... Particularly interested in learning about... Activity 2 No experience Particularly interested in learning about Activity 3... Activity 4...

Being a Lead Partner Development & application Coordinates partner input Drafts and submits the application Co-financing Secures Lead Partner co-financing Ensures that partners have letters of commitment for co- financing Contracts Signs contract between with the programme Draws up Partnership Agreement incl. provisions for sound financial management and recovery of amounts unduly paid Implementation Overall responsibility for ensuring implementation Finance & reporting Checks that partner spending has been validated by approved controllers Ensures that spending has been incurred on agreed activities only Payments Generally, receives programme payments and transfers them to partners Irregularities Pays back the programme immediately for any irregularity detected in partner expenditure. Recovers funds directly from the project partner concerned

Tips  Project management takes time and money – Discuss it and include resources in the budget  Perhaps the most important task of the LP is to ensure that information reaches the partners. Don ‘ t leave this to chance  The best LPs are presidents – not dictators

4. Cooperation in your daily work 1. Idea generation & partnership development Partner search, elaboration of the idea, needs analysis 2. Project development & application Strategy & content, responsibilities, application requirements 4. Implementation Coordination of activities, reporting, monitoring, adjustments, financial management 5. Closure 3. Contracting & start-up Kick-off, detailed planning, contracts & agreements Post-project activities, use of results, follow-up

Joint work Joint development: All partners should be involved from an early stage and jointly agree on who will be the LP. LP is the coordinator. Joint implementation: All partners should contribute to the project objectives. Clear links between activities and regular contacts are necessary. Joint financing: The project budget is one pot of money. Balanced allocation among partners according to activities. One project account. Joint staffing: No duplication of functions, e.g. one project manager Joint Development Joint Implementation Joint Staffing Joint Budgeting

5. A good project = good application? Objectives (quantitative + qualitative) Resources (budget, staff) Time Project

A good application  Make sure that objectives, activities, results and budget are presented clearly and logically.  Make sure they are realistic – input from all partners  Programme decision is based on what is included in the application. Make sure to include all relevant information.  Make sure you understand what is wanted in each section – ask the programme.  Check the programme selection criteria – have you provided the information needed?  Writing the application is not a big job. Preparing it is!

6. Clarity of work planned is essential Global objective Operational objective1:Operational objective2: Work package 1: WP coordinator: Outputs: Time frame: total costs: Task 1.1: Responsible: Time: costs: Activity 2.2.1: Activity 2.2.2: Activity 1.2.1: Activity 1.2.2: Activity 1.2.3: Work package 2: WP coordinator: Outputs: Time frame: total costs: Work package 3: WP coordinator: Outputs: Time frame: total costs: Task 1.2: Responsible: Time: costs: Task 2.2: Responsible: Time: costs: Task 2.1: Responsible: Time: costs: Operational objective n: Work package n: WP coordinator: Outputs: Time frame: total costs: Activity 3.1.1: Activity 3.1.2: Task 3.1: Responsible: Time: costs:

7. Monitoring should allow you to assess project progress and whether the project has been a success

Indicators = Quantified targets for project performance OutputsWhat has actually been produced? Products and services financed, e.g. number of conferences, km of riverbed cleaned, number of innovation centres opened ResultsWhat is the benefit of the outputs? Immediate advantages of carrying out the activities e.g. number of regional policy changes, reduction of pollutants in a river system, number of business start-ups ImpactsHave the results caused the desired long-term improvement? Sustainable long-term benefits of an activity e.g. more effective policies, increase in biodiversity, % increase in regional GDP

Indicator tips Specific: is it directly related to the project? Measurable: can it be defined in terms of quality and quantity that can be assessed? Achievable: is it within the scope of the project (relationship between resources, time and quality)? Relevant: does the indicator really relate to what the project is trying to achieve? Time-related: how long will it take and when will it be completed?

Indicator tips  Focus on the logical links between outputs and results  Results are particularly important – they are the best way of showing what the programme gets for its money  Ensure all partners can and will collect indicator information  Use indicators to demonstrate your project‘s quality  Big is not always beautiful!

8. Thinking about what happens after the project end Vision for projects in this period:  “…they should make a real and measurable change to the way regions work. Even the remotest regions of Europe should be at the cutting edge of development and cooperation projects should play a vital role in this process.” (Elisabeth Helander) Requires strategic thinking from the start!

Promotion of project results  Main-streaming  Kick-starting additional actions (‘leverage’)  Awareness raising  Making a lasting change  Promotion of results will fail if it is only planned at the end of the project

Thank you very much for your attention. Please don´t hesitate to contact us for further information or visit