Eating disorders
2-3% women men Binge eating the most common disorder Similar prevalence rates in Japan (5.8%) and Norway Symptoms reported in up to 40% of college women in USA Iran, Tehran, reports rates of 3.2%
Repeated episodes of binge eating with compensatory behaviours ◦ Preoccupation with eating ◦ Idealization of thinness ◦ Fear of becoming fat ◦ Onset- late teens, early twenties ◦ BUT will usually have a normal BMI
Vomiting Misusing laxative Fasting Excessive exercise Use of drugs (legal and illegal) for weight control
Self-esteem depends on maintaining a certain weight ◦ Highly dissatisfied with their weight (cognitive) ◦ Distorted sense of their own body (cognitive) ◦ Negative self-image (cognitive) ◦ Feel guilt and shame about wasting food (affective)
◦ May lead to depression (affective) ◦ Use of vomiting, laxatives, exercise or dieting (behavioural) ◦ Swollen salivary glands, erosion of teeth, stomach or intestinal problems (somatic) ◦ Eating in private (behavioural) ◦ Self-harm, substance abuse or suicide (behavioural)
Eat large amounts in short time (2 hrs) ◦ Feeling a sense of loss of control while eating (can’t stop) ◦ Feeling of guilt and disgust (ego-dystonic)
Twin studies (Kendler et al,1991) ◦ 2000 female twins Concordance of 23% in MZ twins and 9% in DZ twins Other study rates vary from 23% to 83%- what could cause this difference in results? ◦ Strobber (2000) found first degree relatives 10% more likely to develop disorder ◦ Serotonin levels. Increase levels decrease food intake Carraso (2000) found lower levels in bulimics Smith et al (1990) lowered levels in recovered bulimics and they reported cognitive symptoms “feeling fat”
Body Image Distortion Theory (Bruch, 1962) ◦ Delusion that they are fat ◦ Overestimate their body size Patients uncertain about size and shape and report a judgment that is higher than the truth Gender Difference (Fallon and Rozin, 1985 ◦ women chose thinner body shapes for “ideal, attractive, and current” compared to men (p.163)
Cognitive disinhibition ◦ Dichotomous thinking All-or-nothing approach to judging body-image ◦ Strict regimes Bulimics following strict diets to reach their “ideal weight”- when they break the rules then binge and purge to regain control ◦ Thoughts about eating (cognitive) act to release all dietary restrictions (disinhibition)
Polivy and Herman (1985) ◦ Compared dieters and non-dieters When given a choice to eat ice cream dieters ate more than non-dieters 3 out of 4 women diet at some point in their lives but only 1 in 33 suffer from bulimia ???? There is no cause and effect “Distorted eating is the result of distorted thinking” “Distorted thinking results in distorted eating”
We compare ourselves to others Media role in “beautiful people” “Perfect body” figure for women has changed over last 50 years in the West Current medial ideal is only achievable by 5% of women
Body size is culturally- incidences of eating disorders is cultural Rise in incidence of eating disorders in USA, Japan and Europe ◦ Attributed to media images and messages that we need to be thin ◦ Girls- dolls distort female figure ◦ Boys- beginning to come under pressure to “bulk up” and body build
Biomedical, individual and group Biopsychosocial approach (eclectic) ◦ Drugs may be used to correct brain chemical imbalances that could the cause or be caused by disorder (very individual) ◦ Cognitive therapy -individual Therapist role is more authoritarian Confidential meetings
◦ Group therapy- support network is established- role playing increase social skills “you are not alone” Therapist role diminished Issues with confidentiality Issues with groups in general “not being heard” Issues with culture (strict gender roles, deference to members due to age or tribal status)
Indigenous healing practices ◦ Traditional, spiritual and religious beliefs Chinese Taoist cognitive psychotherapy Community psychologists ◦ Analysis psychology health as community level Ecological model (Miller 2000)- connects the relationship between people and the settings they live in Resources within the community affect its health
What criteria do we use for measuring improvement ◦ Length of time of decreased symptoms ◦ Total absence of symptoms ◦ Observable behavioural changes ◦ Quantitative data? Qualitative data? ◦ Who decides, the patient, their family, the doctor, the community?
◦ Subjective ◦ Disorders symptoms are individualistic ◦ Therapy is individualised and personalised ◦ Most therapeutic approaches produce improvement but non-specific factors may play a role ◦ The placebo effect can be useful ◦ Some treatments work better than others for specific problems ◦ Best indicator of success was how well the clients rated their therapist during the initial session
For symptoms of depressant ◦ Tricyclic antidepressants ◦ SSRI (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) (prozac, zoloft) Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy (CBT) ◦ Most widely used treatment ◦ Focuses on obsession with body image and negative thinking ◦ Focuses on behavioural components (vomiting and binge eating)
Record what they eat- how they feel Feedback therapy- identify triggers Cognitive techniques to improve self image and avoid damaging thought patterns Not 100%- only 50% stop binging and purging
Highly used, relatively effective Long term Looking at the family (Minuchin) ◦ Restructure the family-family group therapy ◦ Just as successful as CBT but CBT was slightly faster
May get negative ideas from group Group might switch to being pessimistic Could reinforce negative behaviours Competition Group members may be co-therapists Feeling of judgement or pressure
If psychologists were able to show that Barbie produces a distorted body image for young girls, should society ban the production of the doll? How could social learning theory be used to explain the etiology of bulimia? Read Jaeger et al. (2002) on p. 165 ◦ Identify the aim ◦ Describe the method ◦ Evaluate the research