Contents:  Lattices and TWISS Parameters  Tune Calculations and Corrections  Dispersion  Momentum Compaction  Chromaticity  Sextupole Magnets 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We will tackle accelerator physics the way we tackle most problems in classical physics – ie, with 18 th and 19 th century mathematics!
Advertisements

1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Synchrotron Radiation What is it ? Rate of energy loss Longitudinal damping Transverse damping Quantum fluctuations Wigglers Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP)
Transverse optics 2: Hill’s equation Phase Space Emittance & Acceptance Matrix formalism Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP) 17 January 2012 Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP)
M. LindroosNUFACT06 School Accelerator Physics Transverse motion Mats Lindroos.
Longitudinal motion: The basic synchrotron equations. What is Transition ? RF systems. Motion of low & high energy particles. Acceleration. What are Adiabatic.
Longitudinal instabilities: Single bunch longitudinal instabilities Multi bunch longitudinal instabilities Different modes Bunch lengthening Rende Steerenberg.
Wilson Lab Tour Guide Orientation 11 December 2006 CLASSE 1 Focusing and Bending Wilson Lab Tour Guide Orientation M. Forster Mike Forster 11 December.
Review of basic mathematics: Vectors & Matrices Differential equations Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP) 16 January 2012 Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP) 16 January 2012.
Lattice calculations: Lattices Tune Calculations Dispersion Momentum Compaction Chromaticity Sextupoles Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP) 17 January 2012 Rende.
Lecture 5: Beam optics and imperfections
Introduction to particle accelerators Walter Scandale CERN - AT department Roma, marzo 2006.
Basic Mathematics Rende Steerenberg BE/OP CERN Accelerator School Basic Accelerator Science & Technology at CERN 3 – 7 February 2014 – Chavannes de Bogis.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  Our previous discussion implicitly assumed that all particles were at the same momentum  Each quad has a constant focal length 
Basic Mathematics for Accelerators
Proton beams for the East Area The beams and their slow extraction By : Rende Steerenberg PS/OP.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  Let’s look at the Hill’ equation again…  We can write the general solution as a linear combination of a “sine-like” and “cosine-like”
Matching recipe and tracking for the final focus T. Asaka †, J. Resta López ‡ and F. Zimmermann † CERN, Geneve / SPring-8, Japan ‡ CERN, Geneve / University.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.
Lecture 5 Damping Ring Basics Susanna Guiducci (INFN-LNF) May 21, 2006 ILC Accelerator school.
Zeuten 19 - E. Wilson - 1/18/ Slide 1 Recap. of Transverse Dynamics E. Wilson – 15 th September 2003  Transverse Coordinates  Relativistic definitions.
Tuesday, 02 September 2008FFAG08, Manchester Stephan I. Tzenov1 Modeling the EMMA Lattice Stephan I. Tzenov and Bruno D. Muratori STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
HST 2009 Introduction to AcceleratorsD. Brandt 1 The LHC: Physics without mathematics ! D. Brandt, CERN.
ILC luminosity optimization in the presence of the detector solenoid and anti-DID Reine Versteegen PhD Student CEA Saclay, Irfu/SACM International Workshop.
Daniel Dobos Seminar: Chaos, Prof. Markus
Linear Imperfections equations of motion with imperfections: smooth approximation orbit correction for the un-coupled case transfer matrices with coupling:
Lecture 7 - E. Wilson - 2/16/ Slide 1 Lecture 7 - Circulating Beams and Imperfections ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2009 E. J. N. Wilson.
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
Accelerator Fundamentals Brief history of accelerator Accelerator building blocks Transverse beam dynamics coordinate system Mei Bai BND School, Sept.
Zeuten 2 - E. Wilson - 2/26/ Slide 1 Transverse Dynamics – E. Wilson – CERN – 16 th September 2003  The lattice calculated  Solution of Hill 
Lecture 4 - E. Wilson - 23 Oct 2014 –- Slide 1 Lecture 4 - Transverse Optics II ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2014 E. J. N. Wilson.
Off-momentum DA of RCS 3D_BM & QFF & CC AP meeting / December 8, 2004 Alexander Molodozhentsev Etienne Forest KEK.
E. Todesco, Milano Bicocca January-February 2016 Appendix A: A digression on mathematical methods in beam optics Ezio Todesco European Organization for.
Lattice design for FCC-ee Bastian Haerer (CERN BE-ABP-LAT, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)) 1 8 th Gentner Day, 28 October 2015.
Lecture 4 - E. Wilson –- Slide 1 Lecture 4 - Transverse Optics II ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2009 E. J. N. Wilson.
E.Wildner NUFACT09 School 1 Accelerator Physics Transverse motion Elena Wildner.
Lecture 4 Longitudinal Dynamics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
Contents:  Overview of the Lectures  A Brief History on Particle Accelerators  The Mathematics we Need  Overview of the CERN Accelerator Complex 
Lecture 3 Transverse Optics II
Professor Philip Burrows John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science Oxford University ACAS School for Accelerator Physics January 2014 Longitudinal Dynamics.
Lecture 2 Transverse Optics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
Numerical Simulations for IOTA Dmitry Shatilov BINP & FNAL IOTA Meeting, FNAL, 23 February 2012.
Lecture 5 - E. Wilson - 6/29/ Slide 1 Lecture 5 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2014 E. J. N. Wilson.
R. Bartolini, John Adams Institute, 27 January 20161/23 HT Lecture on Nonlinear beam dynamics (I) Motivations: nonlinear magnetic multipoles Phenomenology.
AXEL-2017 Introduction to Particle Accelerators
Lecture 8 - Circulating Beams and Imperfections
Lecture 9 Beams and Imperfections
AXEL-2017 Introduction to Particle Accelerators
HT Lecture on Nonlinear beam dynamics (I)
Academic Training Lecture 2 : Beam Dynamics
Lecture 4 - Transverse Optics II
Multi-Turn Extraction studies and PTC
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Review of Accelerator Physics Concepts
Lecture 4 - Transverse Optics II
Lecture 7 - Circulating Beams and Imperfections
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
ICFA Mini-Workshop, IHEP, 2017
Lecture 4 - Transverse Optics II
PEPX-type BAPS Lattice Design and Beam Dynamics Optimization
AXEL-2011 Introduction to Particle Accelerators
AXEL-2011 Introduction to Particle Accelerators
Lecture 5 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2009 E. J. N. Wilson.
Lecture 2 - Transverse motion
Lecture 5 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2015 E. J. N. Wilson.
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
Lecture 8 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS HT E. J. N. Wilson.
Presentation transcript:

Contents:  Lattices and TWISS Parameters  Tune Calculations and Corrections  Dispersion  Momentum Compaction  Chromaticity  Sextupole Magnets  Normalized Phase Space  Dipolar, Quadrupolar and Sextupolar errors  Coupling  Tune Diagram XV Mexican School on Particle and Fields Puebla, Mexico, 6 September 2012 Rende Steerenberg, CERN Switzerland 2 Lattices & Resonances

Matrices and Hill’s equation XV Mexican School on Particle and Fields Puebla, Mexico, 6 September 2012 Rende Steerenberg, CERN Switzerland 3  We can multiply the matrices of our drift spaces and quadrupoles together to form a transport matrix that describes a larger section of our accelerator or even a complete turn around the accelerator.  The results of this matrix calculation should then be identical to the result obtain from Hill’s equation. Lattices & Resonances

Matrices and Hill’s equation XV Mexican School on Particle and Fields Puebla, Mexico, 6 September 2012 Rende Steerenberg, CERN Switzerland 4  Assume that our transport matrix describes a complete turn around the machine.  Therefore :  (s 2 ) =  (s 1 )  Let μ be the change in betatron phase over one complete turn.  Then we get for x(s 2 ): Lattices & Resonances

Matrices and Hill’s equation XV Mexican School on Particle and Fields Puebla, Mexico, 6 September 2012 Rende Steerenberg, CERN Switzerland 5  So, for the position x at s2 we have…  Equating the sine terms gives:  Equating the cosine terms gives:  Resulting in:  These resulting in:  Repeat this for c and d and use the parameters we previously defined, which are called TWISS parameters. and Lattices & Resonances

Lattice parameters XV Mexican School on Particle and Fields Puebla, Mexico, 6 September 2012 Rende Steerenberg, CERN Switzerland 6  This matrix describes one complete turn around our machine and will vary depending on the starting point (s).  If we start at any point and multiply all of the matrices representing each element all around the machine we can calculate α, β, γ and μ for that specific point, which then will give us β (s) and Q  Where:  If we repeat this many times for many different initial positions (s) we can calculate our Lattice Parameters for all points around the machine. Number of betatron oscillations per turn Lattices & Resonances

Matrices and Hill’s equation XV Mexican School on Particle and Fields Puebla, Mexico, 6 September 2012 Rende Steerenberg, CERN Switzerland 7  Obviously μ (or Q) is not dependent on the initial position “s”, but we can calculate the change in betatron phase, d μ, from one element to the next.  Computer codes like “MAD” or “Transport” vary lengths, positions and strengths of the individual elements to obtain the desired beam dimensions or envelope β(s) and the desired Q.  Often a machine is made of many individual and identical sections (FODO cells). In that case we only calculate a single cell and not the whole machine, as the the functions β (s) and dμ will repeat themselves for each identical section.  The insertion sections have to be calculated separately Lattices & Resonances

The relationship between Q and  (s) XV Mexican School on Particle and Fields Puebla, Mexico, 6 September 2012 Rende Steerenberg, CERN Switzerland 8  We also found: , where μ = Δ  over a complete turn.  This leads to: Integrate over one complete turn  From this we can deduce:  Increasing the focusing strength decreases the size of the beam envelope  and increases the betatron tune Q.  Decreasing the focusing strength increases the size of the beam envelope  and decreases the betatron tune Q.  In practice we change de currents in the different focusing and defocusing quadrupole families to obtain the tune required. Think about the mechanical gutter Lattices & Resonances

Tune Corrections XV Mexican School on Particle and Fields Puebla, Mexico, 6 September 2012 Rende Steerenberg, CERN Switzerland 9  What happens if we change the focusing strength slightly?  The Twiss matrix for our FODO cell is given by: Lattices & Resonances  Add a small QF quadrupole, with strength dK and length ds.  This will modify the FODO lattice, and add a horizontal focusing term:  The new Twiss matrix of the modified lattice with the extra focusing is:

Tune Corrections XV Mexican School on Particle and Fields Puebla, Mexico, 6 September 2012 Rende Steerenberg, CERN Switzerland 10  Provided d  is small, we can ignore the changes in β Lattices & Resonances  This extra quadrupole will modify the phase advance  for the FODO cell.  Therefore the new Twiss matrix is just:  1 =  + d  New phase advance Change in phase advance

Tune Corrections XV Mexican School on Particle and Fields Puebla, Mexico, 6 September 2012 Rende Steerenberg, CERN Switzerland 11  Should be be equal to: Lattices & Resonances  Therefore:  Combining and comparing the first and the fourth terms of these two matrices gives: Only valid for change in  <<  1 =  + d  and dμ is small  Therefore:

Tune Corrections XV Mexican School on Particle and Fields Puebla, Mexico, 6 September 2012 Rende Steerenberg, CERN Switzerland 12 Lattices & Resonances  If we follow the same reasoning for both transverse planes for both QF and QD quadrupoles we get:  Let dk F = dk for QF and dk D = dk for QD   hF,  vF =  at QF and  hD,  vD =  at QD QF QD  We get:  This matrix relates the change in the tune to the change in strength of the quadrupoles.  We can invert this matrix to calculate change in quadrupole field needed for a given change in tune

Dispersion XV Mexican School on Particle and Fields Puebla, Mexico, 6 September 2012 Rende Steerenberg, CERN Switzerland 13  Until now we have assumed that our beam has no energy or momentum spread: and  Different energy or momentum particles have different radii of curvature ( ρ ) in the main dipoles.  These particles no longer pass through the quadrupoles at the same radial position.  Quadrupoles act as dipoles for different momentum particles.  Closed orbits for different momentum particles are different.  This horizontal displacement is expressed as the dispersion function D(s)  D(s) is a function of s exactly as β(s) is a function of s Lattices & Resonances

Dispersion XV Mexican School on Particle and Fields Puebla, Mexico, 6 September 2012 Rende Steerenberg, CERN Switzerland 14  The displacement due to the change in momentum at any position (s) is given by:  D(s) the dispersion function, is calculated from the lattice, and has the unit of meters.  The beam will have a finite horizontal size due to it’s momentum spread.  In the majority of the cases we have no vertical dipoles, and so D(s)=0 in the vertical plane. Local radial displacement due to momentum spread Dispersion function Lattices & Resonances

Momentum Compaction Factor XV Mexican School on Particle and Fields Puebla, Mexico, 6 September 2012 Rende Steerenberg, CERN Switzerland 15  The change in orbit with the changing momentum means that the average length of the orbit will also depend on the beam momentum.  This is expressed as the momentum compaction factor, α p, where:  α p tells us about the change in the length of radius of the closed orbit for a change in momentum. Lattices & Resonances

Chromaticity XV Mexican School on Particle and Fields Puebla, Mexico, 6 September 2012 Rende Steerenberg, CERN Switzerland 16  The focusing strength of our quadrupoles depends on the beam momentum, p.  Therefore a spread in momentum causes a spread in focusing strength  Q depends on the k of the quadrupoles p  The constant here is called Chromaticity Lattices & Resonances

Chromaticity Visiualized XV Mexican School on Particle and Fields Puebla, Mexico, 6 September 2012 Rende Steerenberg, CERN Switzerland 17  The chromaticity relates the tune spread of the transverse motion with the momentum spread in the beam. p0p0 A particle with a higher momentum as the central momentum will be deviated less in the quadrupole and will have a lower betatron tune A particle with a lower momentum as the central momentum will be deviated more in the quadrupole and will have a higher betatron tune Focusing quadrupole in horizontal plane p > p 0 p < p 0 QF Lattices & Resonances

Chromaticity Calculated XV Mexican School on Particle and Fields Puebla, Mexico, 6 September 2012 Rende Steerenberg, CERN Switzerland 18  Remember and The gradient seen by the particle depends on its momentum  Therefore  This term is the Chromaticity ξ  To correct this tune spread we need to increase the quadrupole focusing strength for higher momentum particles, and decrease it for lower momentum particles.  This we will obtain using a sextupole magnet Lattices & Resonances

Sextupole Magnets XV Mexican School on Particle and Fields Puebla, Mexico, 6 September 2012 Rende Steerenberg, CERN Switzerland 19  Conventional Sextupole from LEP, but looks similar for other “warm” machines.  ~ 1 meter long and a few hundreds of kg.  Correction Sextupole of the LHC  11cm, 10 kg, 500A at 2K for a field of 1630 T/m 2 Lattices & Resonances

Chromaticity Correction XV Mexican School on Particle and Fields Puebla, Mexico, 6 September 2012 Rende Steerenberg, CERN Switzerland 20  The effect of the sextupole field is to increase the magnetic field of the quadrupoles for the positive x particles and decrease the field for the negative x particles.  However, the dispersion function, D(s), describes how the radial position of the particles change with momentum.  Therefore the sextupoles will alter the focusing field seen by the particles as a function of their momentum.  This we can use to compensate the natural chromaticity of the machine. x By Final “corrected” By By = Kq.x (Quadrupole ) By = Ks.x 2 (Sextupole) Lattices & Resonances

Sextupoles & Chromaticity XV Mexican School on Particle and Fields Puebla, Mexico, 6 September 2012 Rende Steerenberg, CERN Switzerland 21  In a sextupole for y = 0 we have a field By = C.x 2  Now calculate k the focusing gradient as we did for a quadrupole:  Usingwhich after differentiating gives  For k we write now  We conclude that k is no longer constant, as it depends on x.  For k we write now and we know that  Therefore Lattices & Resonances

Chromaticity Correction XV Mexican School on Particle and Fields Puebla, Mexico, 6 September 2012 Rende Steerenberg, CERN Switzerland 22  We know that the tune changes with :  Where: and  Remember with  If we can make this term exactly balance the natural chromaticity then we will have solved our problem.  The effect of a sextupole with length l on the particle tune Q as a function of Δp/p is given by: Lattices & Resonances

Where to put Sextupoles ? XV Mexican School on Particle and Fields Puebla, Mexico, 6 September 2012 Rende Steerenberg, CERN Switzerland 23  There are two chromaticities:  horizontal  ξ h  vertical  ξ v  However, the effect of a sextupole depends on β(s), which varies around the machine  Two types of sextupoles are used to correct the chromaticity.  One (SF) is placed near QF quadrupoles where β h is large and β v is small, this will have a large effect on ξ h  Another (SD) placed near QD quadrupoles, where β v is large and β h is small, will correct ξ v Lattices & Resonances QF QD SF SD  Also sextupoles should be placed where D(s) is large, in order to increase their effect, since Δk is proportional to D(s)

Different Magnets and Imperfections XV Mexican School on Particle and Fields Puebla, Mexico, 6 September 2012 Rende Steerenberg, CERN Switzerland 24  (Unfortunately) It is not possible to construct a perfect machine.  Magnets can have imperfections  The alignment in the de machine has non zero tolerance.  Etc…  So, we have to ask ourselves:  What will happen to the betatron oscillations due to the different field errors.  Therefore we need to consider errors in dipoles, quadrupoles, sextupoles, etc…  We will have a look at the beam behaviour as a function of the tune Q  How is it influenced by these resonant conditions? Lattices & Resonances

Normalized Phase Space XV Mexican School on Particle and Fields Puebla, Mexico, 6 September 2012 Rende Steerenberg, CERN Switzerland 25  By multiplying the y-axis by β the transverse phase space is normalized and the ellipse turns into a circle.  This is useful to visualize who resonances work under the influence of magnet imperfections. Lattices & Resonances x’x’ x Circle of radius x’x’ x Phase Space Normalized Phase Space

Normalized Phase Space & Betatron Tune XV Mexican School on Particle and Fields Puebla, Mexico, 6 September 2012 Rende Steerenberg, CERN Switzerland 26  If we unfold a trajectory of a particle that makes one turn in our machine with a tune of Q = 3.333, we get: Lattices & Resonances 0 22 x y’y’ y 2πq2πq  This is the same as going time around on the circle in phase space  The net result is times around the circular trajectory in the normalized phase space  q is the fractional part of Q  So here Q= and q = 0.333

Classifying Resonances XV Mexican School on Particle and Fields Puebla, Mexico, 6 September 2012 Rende Steerenberg, CERN Switzerland 27  After a certain number of turns around the accelerator the phase advance of the betatron oscillation is such that the oscillation repeats itself. Lattices & Resonances  For example:  If the phase advance per turn is 120º (2  /3) then the betatron oscillation will repeat itself after 3 turns.  This could correspond to Q = or 3Q = 10  But also Q = or 3Q = 7  The order of a resonance is defined as: n × Q = integer 1st turn 2nd turn 3rd turn 2πq = 2π/3  Let’s take a look at some illustrative cases and later add the mathematics.

A Dipole kick XV Mexican School on Particle and Fields Puebla, Mexico, 6 September 2012 Rende Steerenberg, CERN Switzerland 28  For a dipole, the deflection is independent of the position in the magnet. Lattices & Resonances y’y’ y Q = st turn 2 nd turn 3 rd turn y’y’ y Q = 2.50  For Q = 2.00: Oscillation induced by the dipole kick grows on each turn and the particle is lost (1 st order resonance Q = 2).  For Q = 2.50: Oscillation is cancelled out every second turn, and therefore the particle motion is stable.

A Quadrupolar kick XV Mexican School on Particle and Fields Puebla, Mexico, 6 September 2012 Rende Steerenberg, CERN Switzerland 29  For a Quadrupole, the deflection is proportional to de displacement from the centre (deflection  position). Lattices & Resonances  For Q = 2.50: Oscillation induced by the quadrupole kick grows on each turn and the particle is lost (2 nd order resonance 2Q = 5)  For Q = 2.33: Oscillation is cancelled out every third turn, and therefore the particle motion is stable. Q = st turn 2 nd turn 3 rd turn 4 th turn Q = 2.33

A Sextupolar kick XV Mexican School on Particle and Fields Puebla, Mexico, 6 September 2012 Rende Steerenberg, CERN Switzerland 30  For a Sextupole, the deflection is proportional to de displacement from the centre squared (deflection  position 2 ). Lattices & Resonances  For Q = 2.33: Oscillation induced by the sextupole kick grows on each turn and the particle is lost (3 rd order resonance 3Q = 7)  For Q = 2.25: Oscillation is cancelled out every fourth turn, and therefore the particle motion is stable. 1 st turn 2 nd turn 3 rd turn 4 th turn Q = 2.33 Q = th turn

Amplitude Growth, a More Rigorous Approach XV Mexican School on Particle and Fields Puebla, Mexico, 6 September 2012 Rende Steerenberg, CERN Switzerland 31  Let us try to find a mathematical expression for the amplitude growth in the case of a quadrupole error: Lattices & Resonances 2πQ = phase angle over 1 turn = θ Δβy’ = kick a = old amplitude Δa = change in amplitude 2πΔQ = change in phase y does not change at the kick y = a cos(θ) In a quadrupole Δ y’ = lky So we have: Δa = βΔy’ sin(θ) = l β sin(θ) a k cos(θ) Only if 2πΔQ is small y’y’ y a  y’ aa 2πQ2πQ θ θ

Amplitude Growth XV Mexican School on Particle and Fields Puebla, Mexico, 6 September 2012 Rende Steerenberg, CERN Switzerland 32 Lattices & Resonances  So we have:  a = l·  ·sin(  ) a·k·cos(  )  Each turn θ advances by 2πQ  On the n th turn θ = θ + 2nπQ  So, for q = 0.5 the phase term, 2(θ + 2nπQ) is constant:  Over many turns: and thus: Sin(θ)Cos(θ) = 1/2 Sin (2θ) This term will be ‘zero’ as it decomposes in Sin and Cos terms and will give a series of + and – that cancel out in all cases where the fractional tune q ≠ 0.5

Amplitude Growth for Quadrupoles XV Mexican School on Particle and Fields Puebla, Mexico, 6 September 2012 Rende Steerenberg, CERN Switzerland 33  In this case the amplitude will grow continuously until the particles are lost.  Therefore we conclude as before that: quadrupoles excite 2 nd order resonances for q=0.5  Thus for Q = 0.5, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5,…etc…… Lattices & Resonances

Phase, A more Rigorous Approach XV Mexican School on Particle and Fields Puebla, Mexico, 6 September 2012 Rende Steerenberg, CERN Switzerland 34 Lattices & Resonances  Each turn θ advances by 2πQ  On the n th turn θ = θ + 2nπQ  Over many turns: zero  If we follow the same approach, but then concentrating on the phase we will find:, which is correct for the 1 st turn  Averaging over many turns:  Since: we can rewrite this as:

Stopband XV Mexican School on Particle and Fields Puebla, Mexico, 6 September 2012 Rende Steerenberg, CERN Switzerland 35 Lattices & Resonances  This width is called the stopband of the resonance , which is the expression for the change in Q due to a quadrupole.  But note that Q changes slightly on each turn Related to Q Max variation 0 to 2  Q has a range of values varying by:  So even if q is not exactly 0.5, it must not be too close, or at some point it will find itself at exactly 0.5 and lock on to the resonant condition.

Sextupole, A more Rigorous Approach XV Mexican School on Particle and Fields Puebla, Mexico, 6 September 2012 Rende Steerenberg, CERN Switzerland 36 Lattices & Resonances  We can apply the same arguments for a sextupole: and thus  For a sextupole  We get :  Summing over many turns gives: 3 rd order resonance term 1 st order resonance term  Sextupole excite 1 st and 3 rd order resonance q = 0 q = 0.33

Octupole, A more Rigorous Approach XV Mexican School on Particle and Fields Puebla, Mexico, 6 September 2012 Rende Steerenberg, CERN Switzerland 37 Lattices & Resonances  We can apply the same arguments for an octupole: and thus  For an octupole  Octupolar errors excite 2 nd and 4 th order resonance and are very important for larger amplitude particles. q = 0.5 q = 0.25  We get :  Summing over many turns gives:  a 2 (cos 4(  +2  nQ) + cos 2(  +2  nQ)) Amplitude squared 4 th order resonance term 2 nd order resonance term Can restrict dynamic aperture

Resonances, a Summary XV Mexican School on Particle and Fields Puebla, Mexico, 6 September 2012 Rende Steerenberg, CERN Switzerland 38  Quadrupoles excite 2 nd order resonances  Sextupoles excite 1 st and 3 rd order resonances  Octupoles excite 2 nd and 4 th order resonances  This is true for small amplitude particles and low strength excitations  However, for stronger excitations sextupoles will excite higher order resonances (non-linear) Lattices & Resonances

Coupling XV Mexican School on Particle and Fields Puebla, Mexico, 6 September 2012 Rende Steerenberg, CERN Switzerland 39  Coupling converts betatron motion from one plane (horizontal or vertical) into motion in the other plane.  Fields that will excite coupling are:  Skew quadrupoles, which are normal quadrupoles, but tilted by 45º about it’s longitudinal axis.  Solenoidal (longitudinal magnetic field) Lattices & Resonances N S N S Magnetic field Like a normal quadrupole, but then tilted by 45º

Coupling & Resonances XV Mexican School on Particle and Fields Puebla, Mexico, 6 September 2012 Rende Steerenberg, CERN Switzerland 40  This coupling means that one can transfer oscillation energy from one transverse plane to the other.  Exactly as for linear resonances there are resonant conditions.  If we meet one of these conditions the transverse oscillation amplitude will again grow in an uncontrolled way. Lattices & Resonances

General Tune Diagram XV Mexican School on Particle and Fields Puebla, Mexico, 6 September 2012 Rende Steerenberg, CERN Switzerland 41 Lattices & Resonances QhQh QvQv Q h - Q v = 0 4Q h =11 2Q v =5 During acceleration we change the horizontal and vertical tune to a place where the beam is the least influenced by resonances.

The Tune Diagram Measured XV Mexican School on Particle and Fields Puebla, Mexico, 6 September 2012 Rende Steerenberg, CERN Switzerland 42 Lattices & Resonances  Move a large emittance beam around in this tune diagram and measure the beam losses, caused by resonances  Quantity of losses proportional to resonance strength  Not all resonance lines are harmful.  The challenge is to reduce and compensate these effects as much as possible and then find some point in the tune diagram where the beam is stable.

XV Mexican School on Particle and Fields Puebla, Mexico, 6 September 2012 Rende Steerenberg, CERN Switzerland 43 Lattices & Resonances