T.Ishida 1. Contents 1. Neutrino experimental facility at J-PARC 2. Status of the facility since NBI2012 3. Physics reach of T2K / J-PARC to Hyper-K 4.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam direction and flux measured by MUMON K. Matsuoka (Kyoto) for the MUMON group Contents: 1.Beam stability (direction/flux) 2.Absolute  beam flux.
Advertisements

Sinergia strategy meeting of Swiss neutrino groups Mark A. Rayner – Université de Genève 10 th July 2014, Bern Hyper-Kamiokande 1 – 2 km detector Hyper-Kamiokande.
T2K Target & Secondary Beamline - progress towards a neutrino Superbeam? Chris Densham.
The JPARC Neutrino Target
T2K experiment at J-PARC Epiphany 2010D. Kiełczewska1 For T2K Collaboration Danuta Kiełczewska Warsaw University & Sołtan Institute for Nuclear Studies.
JHF2K neutrino beam line A. K. Ichikawa KEK 2002/7/2 Overview Primary Proton beamline Target Decay Volume Strategy to change peak energy.
Vacuum windows at JPARC Contents Introduction Vacuum windows at hadron beam line Helium gas cooling Vacuum windows at neutrino beam line primitive discussion.
Target system for hadron & neutrino beam lines at J-PARC Contents Introduction of J-PARC Target and Target system for hadron beam line Target system for.
J-PARC upgrade T. Nakadaira (KEK / J-PARC). Outline J-PARC overview & on-going program Motivation of future experiment in J-PARC Overview of future experiment.
1 T2K Beam Operation Summary (earthquake recovery and beamline survey) NBI 2012 T. Ishii (KEK) for the T2K beam group.
NUMI NuMI Review of the Infrastructure – W, G & V 20 July 2001 WBS Page 1 1 Infrastructure Review - W.B.S Water Systems Water Systems –Upstream.
NuMI NuMI Overview NBI 2002 S. Childress (FNAL) 14 March ‘02 NuMI / MINOS Overview.
T2K Secondary Beamline – Status of RAL Contributions Chris Densham, Mike Fitton, Vishal Francis, Matt Rooney, Mike Woodward, Martin Baldwin, Dave Wark.
1 18 July 2005 “Mini-Review” on CNGS Horns Introduction by K. Elsener 1 “Mini-Review” - Introduction Function of focusing horns “History” of CNGS horns.
NuMI NBI2006 September 6, 2006 NuMI Target Experience Jim Hylen / FNAL Page 1 Experience with the NuMI Target Max. Proton/spill Max. Beam Power Integrated.
WP2 Superbeam Work Breakdown Structure Version 2 Chris Densham (after Marco Zito version 1 )
JPARC- Decay Volume M.Sakuda (KEK) 11 November Decay Volume Requirements Design 2. Construction Status 3. Summary and schedule In collaboration.
Q&A on T2K construction of beam line near detectors budget collaboration (contribution from each) T2KK.
Future upgrade of the neutrino beam-line for multi-MW beam 5 th Hyper-Kamiokande open Vancouver July Yuichi Oyama (KEK) (for T2K neutrino.
11 Status of Neutrino Beamline Construction T.Kobayashi IPNS, KEK Jan.8, 2008 J-PARC PAC.
Dec. 13, 2001Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Neutrino and Anti-Neutrino Cross Sections and CP Phase Measurement Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK-IPNS) NuInt01,
J-PARC Accelerators Masahito Tomizawa KEK Acc. Lab. Outline, Status, Schedule of J-PARC accelerator MR Beam Power Upgrade.
NuMI NuMI Target Hall Air System Review Introduction July 30, 2003 Jim Hylen / FNAL Page 1 NuMI Target Hall Air System Review Introduction Air system for.
Current Status and Possible Items around ‘neutrino beam’ Horn Target Remote maintenance tools Decay volume window and collimator muon monitor Many items.
1 Status of Neutrino Beamline Construction K. Nishikawa IPNS, KEK 2006 . 12 . 4.
JHF-Kamioka Neutrino Oscillation Experiment using JHF 50 GeV PS Y.Itow ICRR,Univ.of Tokyo Jul27,2002 Jul27,2002 ICHEP02 Amsterdam Introduction Facility.
1 Target Station Design Dan Wilcox High Power Targets Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory EuroNu Annual Meeting 2012.
Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Oct. Neutrino Oscillation Experiment between JHF – Super-Kamiokande Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (Kamioka Observatory, ICRR)
Overview of the KEK Neutrino Beam Facility and its Operation Summary after September 2000 FNAL) K.H. Tanaka for the KEK-PS Beam Channel Group.
F NuMI Beamline Accelerator Advisory Committee Presentation May 10, 2006 Mike Martens Fermilab Beams Division.
1 Target Station Design for Neutrino Superbeams Dan Wilcox High Power Targets Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory NBI 2012, CERN.
7 November 2003 Status of CNGS NBI presented by K. Elsener 1 Status of CNGS Konrad Elsener CERN – Accelerators+Beams Division.
1 Question to the 50GeV group 3GeV からの 54π と 81π 、 6.1π の関係 fast extraction 部の acceptance (81π?) Comments on neutrino beamline optics?
Muon absolute flux measurement in anti-neutrino mode A.Ariga 1, C. Pistillo 1, S. Aoki 2 1 University of Bern, 2 Kobe University.
Neutrino Oscillations at Super-Kamiokande Soo-Bong Kim (Seoul National University)
CNGS Operation Summary Edda Gschwendtner, CERN. Outline Introduction CNGS Performance Highlights since last NBI 2010 in Japan Issues Summary 2E. Gschwendtner,
6 April 2006Malika Meddahi 1 CNGS Project: primary beam 1.Project Overview 2. Proton beam line overview and status 3. Target status 4. Commissioning preparation.
Radiation Protection in J-PARC neutrino beam line Sep Yuichi Oyama (KEK) for T2K neutrino beam line construction group Happy birthday.
1 Status of the T2K long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment Atsuko K. Ichikawa (Kyoto univeristy) For the T2K Collaboration.
T2K Status Report. The Accelerator Complex a Beamline Performance 3 First T2K run completed January to June x protons accumulated.
T2K radioactive drainage treatment Nov Geneva Yuichi Oyama (KEK)
T2K Remote Handling T. Sekiguchi (KEK) on behalf of Tada (KEK) 2012/11/10.
High Power Target Experience with T2K Chris Densham T2K Beamline Collaboration including RAL / KEK / Kyoto.
HB2008 – WG F: 27 Aug. S. Childress – Diagnostics_2MW 1 NuMI Beam Diagnostics and Control Steps to 2 MW S. Childress Fermilab.
T2K Experiment Results & Prospects Alfons Weber University of Oxford & STFC/RAL For the T2K Collaboration.
Beamline for the LBNE Project Heidi Schellman for the LBNE collaboration.
1 Target Introduction Chris Densham STFC/RAL Mu2e Target, Remote Handling, and Heat & Radiation Shield Review Nov
J-Parc Neutrino Facility Primary Proton Beam Design A. K. Ichikawa(KEK), Y.Iwamoto(KEK) and K.Tanabe(Tokyo) et.al. 7 th Nov. 2003,
T2K Target status PASI Meeting Fermilab 11 th November Chris Densham STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory On behalf of the T2K beam collaboration.
J-PARC Site Visit Summary – 03/09 S. Childress (Accelerator, T2K Primary) J. Hylen (T2K Target Hall, Decay, Absorber & Near Detector)
Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility LBNF News and brief overview of Beamline plans for the next few months Vaia Papadimitriou Beamline Technical Board Meeting.
KEK Radiation Related Topics neutrino beam construction subgroup Yuichi Oyama (KEK) and target monitor subgroup for.
Future Neutrino Beam in J-PARC Tetsuro Sekiguchi IPNS, KEK 2013/11/12NNN2013, Kavli IPMU1.
T2K Oscillation Strategies Kevin McFarland (University of Rochester) on behalf of the T2K Collaboration Neutrino Factories 2010 October 24 th 2010.
Operation Status of the RF Systems and Taiwan Photon Source
Muon Facility at J-PARC Proton Driver Efficiency WS 29/Feb/2016
Irradiated T2K Ti alloy materials test plans
ATF2 Status N.Terunuma, KEK
Areal RF Station A. Vardanyan
News and brief overview of Beamline plans for the next few months
Target and Horn status report
M. Calviani, A. Ferrari (EN/STI), P. Sala (INFN)
SNS Fundamental Power Coupler History
Status of ATF/ATF2 and machine schedule in this fall
Current Status of the T2K Experiment
T2K water drainage / exhaust air
CNGS Project Overview Konrad Elsener.
Lithium lens and window tests
T2K Run8 MUMON Summary.
Presentation transcript:

T.Ishida 1

Contents 1. Neutrino experimental facility at J-PARC 2. Status of the facility since NBI Physics reach of T2K / J-PARC to Hyper-K 4. Summary 2

T.Ishida Conventional (horn-focused) beam-line, designed/constructed for T2K long base- line neutrino oscillation experiment & for its future upgrade to Hyper-Kamiokande 3 BeamDump PrimaryBeam-line ExtractionPoint MuonMonitors 110m 280m 295km To Kamioka Main Ring TargetHorns P  DecayVolume Near Neutrino Detectors MLF RCS N J-PARC, Tokai

T.Ishida Conventional “horn-magnet-focused” beam 30GeV Protons on a graphite target daughter  +   + +  First application of Off-Axis(OA) beam: 2.0~2.5 o wrt. the far detector direction Low-energy narrow-band beam peak tuned to oscillation maximum Small high-energy tail: reduce backgrounds Schematic overview: Tunable off-axis beam 4 p  120m0m280m 295 km on-axis off-axis 2.0~2.5 o  -monitor Near detectors Decay volume Oscillation Maximum

T.Ishida Primary beam-line 5 CTs/21 ESMs/19 SSEMs/ 1 OTR / 50 BLMs 5 Preparation section 11 normal conducting magnets Final focusing (FF) section 10 normal conducting magnets Arc section 28 Super-conducting Combined Function Magnets (SCFM) Beam Monitors ⇒ M. Friend/M.Hartz

T.Ishida 6 1.0m Concreteblocks Water-cooled iron cast blocks SupportModule 2.3m Remote disconnection 15.0m Baffle Horn-1 Horn-2 Horn-3 Beam window OTR Target Decay Volume Beam Dump Helium Vessel L=110m, V=1,300m 3 OA 2 o 2.5 o Beam Transport From RCS to MLF [3 o ] Target Station Secondary beam-line/Target Station Hadron Absorber

T.Ishida Cooling Nozzle Outer Conductor Electromagnetic horns 7 Sep., st (installed) Horn-3 In TS He vessel Aluminum alloy A6061-T6 Inner conductor: t3mm, outer: t10mm. 320kA pulsed current (250kA in use so far) Max field: ~2.1T, pulse width: 2~3ms Spraying water to inner conductor 15kJ (beam) + 10kJ (Joule)=25kJ Keep <80 ℃: cooling capacity ~2MW Alignment : 0.3mm(x), 1mm(y,z) ⇒ T. Sekiguchi / E.Zimmerman Inner Conductor Water spray holes Water drain tank 1400 Horn-1Horn-2Horn-3 Target

T.Ishida Target / beam window 8 Ti-6Al-4V (0.3mmT) 2 mm gap Designed for old parameters of MR 750kW beam: cycle: 2.1s, PPP: 3.3x10 14 Present expected parameters: Doubled rep-rate, MR cycle: 1.3 s, PPP: 2.0x % reduction ⇒ C.J.Densham / T.Nakadaira He-gas cooling ( 26mmx 910mm ) Ti-6Al-4V (0.3mmT) Graphite IG-430U Ti-6Al-4V shell (0.3mmT) Graphite core IG-430U 26mmx ~90cm Graphite sleeve

T.Ishida DV Decay volume / hadron absorber 94m-long tunnel with rectangular cross section (1.4m w ×1.7m h  3.0m w ×5.1m h ), filled with He (1atm) Covered off-axis region : 2.5±0.5°(2.0~3.0°) No access possible: designed for 3~4MW beam 9 Steel plates(16mmT) cooled by water circuits 7 extruded large graphite blocks Aluminum cast water cooling plate Slide support frame ⇒ NBI2010 SGP 10K-25A Plate Coil Same off-axis angle to SK and to Hyper-K

T.Ishida Until Run-4: Accumulated pot: 6.57x10 20 # of pulses for the 1 st set of horns and target : 1.2x10 7 Long shutdown after R4 (Hadron hall accident) is devoted to replace all 3 horns Until Run-5: Accumulated pot : 7.39x10 20, including 0.51x10 20 of anti-ν mode operation. 10 Accumulated # of Protons Beam Power 1.43x10 20 pot Mar.11,’ x10 20 pot Jun.9,’12 Rep=3.52s  50kW [6 bunches] 3.2s  3.04s  145kW 2.56s  190kW Mar.8’12 Run-1 Run-2Run s  235kWRun x [kW] x10 20 pot May.8,’ Recovery from the earthquake 2.48s 235kWRun x10 20 pot incl. 0.51x10 20 anti-ν until Jun.26,’ May.26’14 Hadron Hall accident (May 23) Oct.17 NBI2012 T2K reported electron neutrino appearance with > 7 significance Jul.19’13

T.Ishida MR Fx beam delivery status [Run-4] Original schedule for R#4: Oct ~ end of July 2013 Requested: >8x10 20 POT ⇒ Allocated FX user time: 3624hours (151days) Expected POT = 7.54x10 20 [assume 206kW x 80% running time efficiency ] Stable operation at 230kW running time efficciency: 83% >1.2x10 14 ppp : the world record of extracted protons per pulse for synchrotrons As of May 16, delivered POT : ~6.7x10 20 > expected : ~6.5x Delivered POT/day x Oct14Dec31Mar19Jun06 Hadron hall accident (May 23)

T.Ishida Run time usage [Run-4] From Oct. ʼ 12 to May ʼ 13, overall running time efficiency was ~82.6% Physics run: 2,326 hours over 2,816 hours of MR user beam Troubles at the neutrino facility was 3% (84 hours) Prefilters of degassing system of He vessel cooling water were clogged (Nov,2013, ~8 h x 2 ) Vacuum leak at primary beam-line due to beam hit (Dec.12,’13 ~35 h) Network trouble (~2.5hours) [min.] Oct17Dec16 Apr15 Jun14 Feb14

T.Ishida Accidental beam hit & vacuum leak [Dec.12, 2012] Final Focusing Section: 4xQ / 1x(H+Steering) / 2x(V+Steering) Trouble happened during beam tuning to increase power (210  217kW) Unexpected turning-off of 1 bending magnet (FVD1, 25mrad bend) without alarm Beam hit the beam duct and beam monitors (SSEM/ESM). The vacuum leak at a feed-through of ESM. ESM SSEM Bellows FVD1 FVD2 FQ4

T.Ishida The feed-through causing vacuum leak The problematic feed- through was on top of ESM. No damage can be identified with eyes. 14 Fixing work was completed during new-year holidays of 2013: Replace the broken ESM by spare

T.Ishida MPS interlock improvements Change MPS logic to use always all interlock, except for beam loss monitor Doubling of NC magnet power supply interlock In addition to the existing interlock of current fluctuation, implement an interlock for the absolute current of bending magnets 15 ※ masked for beam tuning/study DCCT PS Control System Old Interlock Current indicator Shunt output New Interlock For PD1,PD2, FVD1, FVD2, & FH1

T.Ishida Horn water leak and drainage from He vessel Since October 2012, water leak occurred at Horn CW system. ~10L/day (~5L/day w/o beam) due to temperature or vibration(?) On Jan.2013 the drain port of the vessel at TS B2F was opened. Water comes out. Transparent, with tiny yellow color. possibly no corrosion at the vessel. In total only 55L. pH: 8~9 3 H: ~4kBq/cc, 7 Be, 22 Na Dew condensation continuously comes out to a drain tank, installed at the outlet of He compressor. ~120L / 2 weeks, ~10L/day Comparable to the leak rate. We decided to continue R#4 with periodically draining water. 16 Drain port of He Vessel View port Drain tank Temporarily kept at B1F floor in many 20L plastic containers

T.Ishida Hydrogen Production in Horns After beam power reaches to >200kW, hydrogen production in horn cover gas became biggest problem. Cover gas is circulating through H 2 -O 2 recombine system. For the 1 st set of horns, only one port available for charging He gas. Forced flushing was only possible with water port, when beam is off. 17 On Feb.~Mar.2013 gas chromatograph was installed to TS 1F. H 2 after 1 week of 220kW beam: 1.6% ⇔ explosion limit >4% ) After a few times of forced flushing, it reduces to ~0.4%. We decided to flush horn cover gas in every week basis, on accelerator maintenance day, during R#4 This limits maximum acceptable beam power to ~300kW gas chromatograph at TS-1F Coolant Helium gas for target, beam window, and He vessel Cover gas of horn cooling water

T.Ishida 18 ⇒ Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, (2014) 28 events 4.92±0.55 BG Appearance signal 7.3σSignificance 6.57×10 20 pot EXCLUDED at 90%CL ! ⇒ arXiv: [hep-ex] PRELIMINARY

T.Ishida Replacement of horns (2013 shutdown) 19 Horn dock Storage area Service pit Manipulator Lift table Originally we scheduled to replace Horn-2/-3 in 2013 summer shutdown. Hadron hall accident ⇒ we encountered unexpectedly long shutdown Many reasons to replace all horns: Water leak somewhere of horns H 2 production from horn conductor-cooling water (limit beam up to 300kW) Stripline cooling capacity (up to 400kW ) We decided to replace all horns to improved spares for higher power operation Control room Maintenance area Every process managed remotely at control room 34m Beam

T.Ishida Replacement of Horns (cont.) Tremendous amount of works started from Jun 2013: Test at KEK ⇒ transport to Tokai ⇒ assemble to support module ⇒ test He vessel evacuation/dry air flushing ⇒ open vessel Cooling water dilution/drainage ⇒ disassemble pipes/bus-bars Remove old horn ⇒ inetall new horn ⇒ dispose old horn Reassemble pipes/bus-bars ⇒ test ⇒ close vessel ⇒ evacuation/fill He 20 Very aggressive (crazy?) schedule as of October 2013

T.Ishida Remote maintenance Scheme worked in perfect manner It only took a few hours to take out each old horn to maintenance area Started from Sep. ⇒ completed on April Only one month of delay Residual dose of Horn-1: ~150mSv/h 6.7x10 20 pot after 1year cooling Radiation level at border of control area ~2.5μSv, (4μSv/h max) [ Horn-2 ] 21 Take out old horn 3 (Nov.26) Insert new horn 3 (Nov.29) Insert new horn 2 (Feb.10) ⇒

T.Ishida Works at primary line The bombarded final bend (FVD2) was rolled out from beamline [Oct. 2013] ⇒ no damage was found. For bends (PD1, PV2, FVD1, FVD2 ), stainless steel ducts were replaced with titanium alloy ones (Oct.~Nov. 2013) 4 ESMs downstream of the bends were rotated by 45 deg (Nov.~Dec. 2013) 22

T.Ishida T2K Run-5 Beam commissioning started from May16,2014 Very careful beam studies Beam-based-alignment of secondary line w/ horn off (Beam scan) MUMON measurement guaranteed relative alignment of new set of horns wrt the baffle collimator is < 2mm ⇒ T.Hiraki Physics run with anti-neutrino mode operation was started on June 4, 2014 On June 8, 1 st beam-induced candidate event was observed at Super-Kamiokande 0.51x10 20 of anti-ν mode operation by June Beam Tuning, 2014/05/18 CCR

T.Ishida Expected  2 for  CP =0 hypothesis as func. of POT 24 ⇒ a paper for T2K(+NOvA) future sensitivity studies to be appeared on arXiv very soon 100%nu50%/50%100% nu50%/50% (90°,IH) (-90°,NH) J-PARC PAC May.2014 (C.K.Jung)

T.Ishida Sensitivities in combination with NOVA Based on NOVA’s TDR: 1.8×10 21 POT for and 1.8×10 21 POT for anti- modes. Dashed (solid) curves: normalization systematics (not) considered 25 Rejecting  CP =0 Rejecting incorrect MH True NH True IH T2K 50%/50%

T.Ishida LBL experiment from J-PARC to Hyper-Kamiokande 26

T.Ishida Hyper-Kamiokande Project P58: A Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiment Using J-PARC Neutrino Beam and Hyper-Kamiokande was presented at 18 th J-PARC PAC (May 2014) with many updates on sensitivities to  CP based on the recent progress With integrated beam power of 7.5MW×10 7 s (1.56x10 22 POT), CP violation will be established (>3σ) for 76% of δ CP space. ⇒ LoI can be found at J-PARC PAC page. You can find further information on 5 th Hyper-Kamiokande Open Meeting at Vancouver (July 2014) ⇒ fId=34 27

T.Ishida Operational status of the neutrino experimental facility: ~230kW continuous operation for the T2K experiment has been realized since Oct to May 2013 (Run-4) With this much of beam power, we encountered many serious troubles: Vacuum leak at primary beam-line due to accidental beam hit Horn water leak Hydrogen production in horn cover gas ……… e appearance Thanks to the struggles we observed e appearance with7.3  significance. We highly appreciate strong supports from NBI community ! Many works during shutdown 2013 ~ 2014 Replacing all horns / improve MPS / replace beam ducts… Anti-neutrino mode running was started from Run-5 (end of May~June 2014). Accumulated pot : 7.39x10 20, with 0.51x10 20 of anti-ν We are expecting much more outputs T2K+NOVA has good opportunity to observe CPV / MH with 2~3  significance For the next period Oct – Jun (Run 6),T2K requests 4.4 x POT [4.0 x anti nu-mode] Hyper-K project requests 7.5MW×10 7 s for the neutrino facility to establish CPV 28