Sustainability in the County of Marin. CWP Definition of Sustainability:  Aligning our built environment and socioeconomic activities w/ the natural.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Item #16 California Measure SB375: Linking Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions to Metropolitan Transportation Planning Presentation to the National Capital.
Advertisements

Community Choice Aggregation Renewable Energy for your Home and Business July 16, 2013.
Community Choice Aggregation In San Mateo County San Mateo County Board of Supervisors February 24, 2015.
JOINT LEGISLATIVE AUDIT COMMITTEE HEARING SENATE BUDGET and FISCAL REVIEW COMMITTEE Delivering Energy Savings for California AMERICAN RECOVERY & Karen.
Markham Centre TDM and Land Development Case Study ACT Canada – TDM Summit October 21, 2008.
Office of San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom 1 San Francisco’s Climate Protection Strategy Johanna Partin Director of Climate Protection Initiatives Office.
Community Choice Energy A Local Energy Model to Green the Grid, Provide Customer Choice and Boost Local Economies April 26, 2015 Presented by: Jim Eggemeyer.
Greening The Grid Through Community Choice Aggregation US EPA Webinar March 6, 2012.
Sonoma County CCA Feasibility Study Summary Cordel Stillman Deputy Chief Engineer.
California's Global Warming Act Presented by: Jila Priebe Statewide Transit Planning & Research Branch Division of Mass Transportation California Department.
Partnership for Urban South Hampshire Sustainable Growth.
National Capital Region Climate Change Report OVERVIEW Joan Rohlfs, Chief, Air Quality Planning Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments October.
Potential EESE Board GHG Emission Targets for the NH Climate Action Plan NH EESE Board Goal Team Sub-Committee Friday, October 16, 2009.
National Capital Region Climate Change Report Presentation for the Bowie City Council Stuart A. Freudberg Director, Environmental Programs Metropolitan.
COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATION: TECHNICAL STUDY RESULTS Peninsula Clean Energy September 24,2015.
Climate Change Steering Committee’s Draft Climate Change Report September 5, 2008 Joan Rohlfs Chief, Air Quality Planning Metropolitan Washington Council.
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona Business as Usual: Cost-Saving Activities that Green the Federal Government Solution ShowcaseGreening the Federal.
California Measure SB375: Linking Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions to Metropolitan Transportation Planning Presentation to the National Capital Region.
Implementing AB 32: California’s Approach to Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions National Association of Clean Air Agencies Spring Membership Meeting May.
Department of the Environment Reducing Maryland’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A State’s Perspective Renee Fizer, Climate Change Division-MDE.
EPA’s Development, Community and Environment Division: T ools for Evaluating Smart Growth and Climate Change February 28, 2002 Ilana Preuss.
1. Sustainable Development. International commitment. COORDINATION. A LONG-TERM VISSION. Policies Enhance the economic growth. Certainty and Economic.
JUNE 27, 2013 ARB INFORMATIONAL UPDATE: ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS’/ METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION’S DRAFT SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY.
June 26, Background of Federal GHG Regulation Supreme Court determines greenhouse gases (GHGs) are “air pollutants” under the Clean Air Act U.S.
1 Climate & Transportation: Change is Coming Steve Heminger Executive Director Metropolitan Transportation Commission December 2010.
Overview of Recent Developments Gregory B. Greenwood Science Advisor Resources Agency.
Overview of San Diego Climate Action Plan Nicole Capretz Director of Environmental Policy iMayor’s Office.
Item #11 Alternative Approaches for Linking Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions to Metropolitan Transportation Planning Presentation to the National Capital.
California Energy Commission Draft 2015 Integrated Energy Policy Report October 20, 2015 Presented by Heather Raitt Assistant Executive Director for Policy.
Findings from the Multi-Sector Working Group Future Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategies in the Metropolitan Washington Region Presentation to the WRTC.
Guide to Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund Program Designs, Expenditures, and Benefits December 2, 2015 Kelsey Jessup Project Manager.
Joint Agency Energy Action Plan Meeting December 15, 2009 San Francisco, California American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: Delivering Energy Savings for.
Proposed MMWD Rate Restructure MCOE District Business Officials November 4, 2015.
What Part Does Transportation and Land Use Play in Tackling Climate Change & Greenhouse Gas Emissions? Gordon Garry Director of Research and Analysis,
Marin Clean Energy Choice and Competition - Driving Innovation towards Environmental Goals May 2015.
AB 32 Update December 6, Outline Cap and Trade Program 2013 Update to Scoping Plan Looking ahead to
1 Summary of Phase I – Phase III Progress and Accomplishments and Phase IV Work plan April 27, 2004.
Community Choice Energy In California May 24 and June 9, 2016.
Los Angeles County Community Choice Aggregation Regional CCA Task Force Meeting October 28, 2015.
SAUSALITO COMMUNITY GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY Years 2005 and 2010.
3. Background Resolution No Adopted February 26, 2008 Sausalito joins ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability.  City pledged to take a leadership.
California Energy Efficiency Policy and Goals Beena Morar Southern California Edison June 14, 2016.
Butte County Climate Action Plan Contract for Services December 11, 2012 Butte County Department of Development Services Tim Snellings, Director.
Sausalito City Council May 7, 2013 Plan Bay Area Draft EIR.
Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change
2017 Annual Report sustainability team For Discussion.
Capital Region Clean Energy Communities Program
Sustainable Communities Planning Grant and Incentive Program
Finance Committee & City Council October 10, 2016
San Francisco’s Community Choice Program
Reducing GHG emissions from Transportation using Smart Growth
La Mesa Climate Action Plan Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Scoping Meeting May 31, 2017.
A local, not-for-profit electricity provider
Transit-Oriented Affordable Housing
City-wide LED Street Light Conversion Program
State GHG.
Land Use Planning - Goals
What is Sea-Tac Doing To Create a Green Curb Airport Ground Transportation Association Conference Introduction of Sea-Tac and Elizabeth/Paul September.
Cañada College Sustainability Plan Past… Process/Structure…Goals..
Tajiguas Resource Recovery Project Doing More with Our Waste
City of Richmond 2005 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory
Integrated Bilateral Agreement (IBA) 2018 to 2028
Bay Area Commuter Benefits Program
Cañada College Sustainability Plan Past… Process/Structure…Goals..
6/27/2018 Staff Presentation June 27, 2018.
Newton Citizens Climate Action Plan
Mayors’ Commission on Climate Change
Mayors’ Commission on Climate Change
Sustainable Agricultural Lands Conservation Program
Arizona League of Cities Sustainability
Presentation transcript:

Sustainability in the County of Marin

CWP Definition of Sustainability:  Aligning our built environment and socioeconomic activities w/ the natural systems that support life  Adapting human activities to the constraints and opportunities of nature  Meeting the needs of both the present and the future “Planning Sustainable Communities” Overarching Theme of Marin Countywide Plan 2007

Ecological Footprint Comparison

2005 Countywide GHG Emissions: Tons CO2e & Percent by Sector

Environmental Corridors Established in 1973 Countywide Plan  Since 1973 land use has been guided by three environmental corridors: City-Centered Inland Rural Coastal Corridor  In the Baylands Corridor was added

Policies for reducing GHG Emissions:  Increase Renewable Energy  Conserve Electricity  Change Commuting & Driving Patterns  Divert Solid Waste  Increase Biocapacity of Open Space & Agriculture  Increase Local Food & Sustainable Agriculture Climate Change – How will results be achieved?

Adaptive Climate Change policies:  Plan for sea level rise  Seek levee assistance  Consider future threat of sea level rise  Establish a climate change planning process  Revise and implement floodplain ordinance Climate Change – How will results be achieved?

One Meter Sea Level Rise in Marin

Indicator Benchmark Targets Amount of GHG Emissions Countywide Reduce 15-20% by ,634,000 tons CO2 in 1990 Set Target to Reduce Emissions Climate Change – How will success be measured?

Greening our Built Environment  Limit sprawl by restricting development in environmentally sensitive areas  Require mixed-use in commercial areas  Housing Overlay Designation – Focus affordable & workforce housing near jobs, transit & services  Require Green Building  Retrofit existing buildings

Marinwood Shopping Center Before: After:

GREENING Transportation How will results be achieved?  Reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)  Reduce Single Occupancy Automobile Trips  Support regional rail initiatives, such as SMART

Marin County Employee Commute Alternatives Program First Quarter Results: 19% employee participation Total CO 2 reduction = 305 tons = 12,000 fewer cars Avg. CO 2 reduction per commute day = 5.3 tons  One year pilot program initiated in September 2007  $4 daily incentive for employees who commute via walking, bicycling, carpool, vanpool and public transit

GREENING Transportation  Switch to zero-emission or other low-emission vehicles  Support infrastructure necessary for alternative fuel vehicles, including fueling and charging stations  Broaden the use of traffic-mitigation fees to include alternative-mode projects to mitigate travel demand and congestion  Consider imposing tolls, congestion pricing, parking fees, gas taxes, and residential perking permit limits to encourage alternatives to single-occupancy vehicle

Green Building Results  New homes exceeded State energy standards by an average of 20%  Remodels exceeded State standards by 10%  Woodsmoke rebates awarded  75,000 tons of diverted waste reduced GHG emissions by 150,000 tons

Promoting Green Business Green business standards include:  Reduce energy use, water use, waste and pollution generation. Sustainable Partner Business standards include:  Design for zero waste.  Commit to volunteerism and/or philanthropy.  Conduct education about environmental and sustainability issues.  Voluntarily comply with Marin’s minimum wage ordinance.

Indicator Benchmark Targets Number of certified “green” businesses Increase to 250 by 2010, and 400 by in 2000 Socioeconomic Element

Promoting Renewable Energy

2020 GHG Reduction Sample Measures for Marin GHG Reduction Goal: 797,130 tons CO2e Marin GHG Reduction Target

2121 Why was Marin Energy Authority Formed? MEA was formed in 2008 to address climate change by reducing energy related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and securing energy supply, price stability, energy efficiencies and local economic and workforce benefits. MEA aims to help Marin County communities meet their AB32 mandates. MEA was formed in 2008 to address climate change by reducing energy related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and securing energy supply, price stability, energy efficiencies and local economic and workforce benefits. MEA aims to help Marin County communities meet their AB32 mandates.

2222 Estimated AB 32 Compliance Cost by Community Community Compliance Costs without MCE Compliance Costs with MCE Marin County $108,099,199$36,033,066 San Rafael $89,293,097$29,764,361 Novato$78,935,073$26,311,691 Mill Valley $21,355,818$7,118,606 San Anselmo $19,325,720$6,441,907 Larkspur$18,746,807$6,248,936 Corte Madera $14,633,557$4,877,852 Tiburon$13,687,946$4,562,648 Sausalito$11,506,488$3,835,496 Fairfax$11,405,062$3,801,688 Ross$3,665,411$1,221,804 Belvedere$3,326,801$1,108,933 Total Marin $393,980,979$131,326,988

2323 MEA Programs MEA Programs  Marin Clean Energy (MCE) Energy procurement through Community Choice Aggregation (CCA) to “green up” the energy supply in Marin County at a low cost Energy procurement through Community Choice Aggregation (CCA) to “green up” the energy supply in Marin County at a low cost  Solar and Energy Efficiency District (SEED) Program Based on AB 811, a land-based financing program to implement rooftop solar and energy efficiency improvements Based on AB 811, a land-based financing program to implement rooftop solar and energy efficiency improvements  Other Grant Proposals and Projects Solar car ports, smart grid integration, others Solar car ports, smart grid integration, others

2424 MCE Objectives  High Renewable Content Light Green Option: 25-50% renewable content Light Green Option: 25-50% renewable content Deep Green Option: 100% renewable content Deep Green Option: 100% renewable content  Low Cost Cost at or below PG&E projections for initial contract Cost at or below PG&E projections for initial contract Improved economics after Year 5 through ownership of renewable generation assets Improved economics after Year 5 through ownership of renewable generation assets  Result: Customer Choice Light Green, Deep Green or PG&E Light Green, Deep Green or PG&E

2525 Comparative Energy Costs in Year 1 Deep Green includes 100% renewable energy content.Deep Green includes 100% renewable energy content. Light Green includes 25% - 50% qualifying renewable energy content.Light Green includes 25% - 50% qualifying renewable energy content. Energy costs include estimated MEA administrative costs.Energy costs include estimated MEA administrative costs. PG&E cost is the pending PUC rate requested.PG&E cost is the pending PUC rate requested.

26 What Is the Impact to MEA Customers? MEA customers continue to pay PG&E Bill. Generation charge will be remitted to MEA.

27 Long Term Objective: Owned Renewable Assets  MEA will negotiate future contracts prior to initial contract expiration and substitute in new assets, ensuring seamless energy delivery  MW CA certified renewables projected to be on line by  MEA will invest in local and regional renewable projects targeting 100% renewable content by 2016

28 Contract Pricing Note: This assumes a 3.4% rate increase for PG&E, their average rate increase over the last 10 years. It assumes a 3% rate increase for MEA through Year 6 and a 2% increase for MEA after Year 6

2929 Renewable Energy Content PG&E Compared to MCE Light Green Source for PG&E data: California Public Utilities Commission

3030 Projected Schedule October June 2010 Draft contract approved by MEA Board and released to member agencies and the public October 1 Loop-out to each city/town council and BOS to solicit feedback on draft contract October 2 – 30 MEA Board approved final draft contractNovember 5 90-day review period of MEA approved final draft contract; Final loop-out to each city/town council and final “off-ramp” for cities and towns November 5 – February 4 MEA Board executes final contract February 4, 2010 Service to Phase 1 customers beginsJune 1, 2010

New See-it Viewer: allows the public to follow progress of key indicators

For more information contact the Marin County Community Development Agency: Countywide Plan website: Or Marin Energy Authority: