THECB – 24 June 2011 Lumina Deliverables Tuning Texas.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Our Commitment to Student Completion & Success Elizabeth L. Bringsjord Interim Provost and Vice Chancellor University Faculty Senate October 25, 2013.
Advertisements

Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology ABET 1Advisory committee of
Southeastern Louisiana University College of Education & Human Development Conceptual Framework: Setting the Standard for Excellence through Best Practice.
1 General Education Senate discussion scheduled for April 11 and 25 1.Proposal to base General Education on outcomes that can be assessed 2.Proposal for.
Jeffrey S. Russell, P.E., Ph.D., F.ASCE Chair, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering University of Wisconsin - Madison Preparing the Professional.
Assessing Student Learning in EPICS
NMU Towards the 21 st Century Mitchell Klett Alan Willis Ruth Watry Laura Reissner Gary Brunswick.
Mohammad Alshayeb 19 May Agenda Update on Computer Science Program Assessment/Accreditation Work Update on Software Engineering Program Assessment/Accreditation.
The Current Refocusing of General Education. Objectives for the Workshop Proposing and/or Renewing a Course Assessing the general education aspect of.
Program Improvement Committee Report Larry Caretto College Faculty Meeting December 3, 2004.
CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting June 3 rd, 2012.
Assessment at UW-Platteville What we are doing to assess student learning? What improvements we have made as a result?
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
Application of the Tuning Approach in the Georgian Higher Education System Tbilisi 28 February 2009 Degree Programmes in Physics Applying the Tuning methodology.
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PROGRAM CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting May 21, 2013.
CSE ACCREDITATION REVIEW BY CAC & EAC UC Irvine October 2, 2013.
Outcome-based Education – From Curriculum to Classroom practices
Bachelor’s Program in CIVIL ENGINEERING Duration of Studies: 8 terms Academic Degree to be Awarded Bachelor of Civil Engineering.
Venue: M038 Date: Monday March 28,2011 Time: 10:00 AM JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.2 Guidelines on: IMapping of PEOs to Mission Statement IIMapping of SOs to PEOs.
Convocation Opening Address College of Sequoias Welcome&Introductions.
ABET 2000 Preparation: the Final Stretch Carnegie Institute of Technology Department Heads Retreat July 29, 1999.
Revision of the Mathematics Curriculum
A Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Process at the Academic Program Level Christina Horne, Nita Paris, & Valerie Whittlesey Kennesaw State University-
1 International Education Standards for Professional Accountants Mark Allison, Executive Director Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland and Technical.
First College-Level Course Guidelines Webinar Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board February 5, 2014.
The “Tuning Texas” Initiative Facilitating the Preparedness and Transfer of Students from 2-Year to 4-Year Institutions in High-Need and High-Demand Disciplines:
THECB - 15 December 2010 Tuning Engineering Education for Civil Engineers.
1 Teaching Teachers Mathematics May 30 - June 1, 2007 Mathematical Sciences Research Institute Workshop sponsored by Mathematical Sciences Research Institute,
Agenda for Breakout Sessions 2/25/ Texas Tuning Oversight Council for Engineering and Science.
ALTERNATIVE APPROACH FOR DESIGNING CURRICULA IN GENERAL DEGREE STUDY PROGRAMS: A LESSON FROM SRI LANKA Prof. Lal Mervin Dharmasiri, University of Kelaniya,
4/16/07 Assessment of the Core – Quantitative Reasoning Charlyne L. Walker Director of Educational Research and Evaluation, Arts and Sciences.
Texas’s Higher Education Productivity Work (inferred from revised implementation grant proposal) (03/25/2010) CHALLENGE/OPPORTUNITY 1.Large # of critical.
The Assessment Imperative: A Work in Progress
Using core competencies in curriculum design
Principles of Good Governance
Report from Curriculum Committee 4/3/2017
Introduction to Curriculum Mapping
Day 1 Session 2/ Programme Objectives
Course Level Assessment in the Context of ABET
Presenting Today Katharine V. Macy Business Librarian
Curriculum Model Policy (7.18)
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Reporting the Course level RWR Assessment data
Rebecca Jackson Iowa State University June 17, 2005
QEP topic Undergraduate Creative Inquiry. QEP topic Undergraduate Creative Inquiry.
C-ID IT Model Curriculum Update
The Assessment Toolbox: Capstone Courses & Portfolios
Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5
General Education Assessment Subcommittee Report
Presenting Today Katharine V. Macy Business Librarian
Legal Research Group (LRG)
Program Review 2.0 Training: SLO Assessment Participation Module
General Education Program Modification
Building College-Ready Culture
Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas
Strategic Planning Open House
Workforce Development Council January 15, 2008
The process of self-certification The Romanian Experience
Assessment and Accreditation
CE 220 Professionalism A pupil from whom nothing is ever demanded which he cannot do, never does all he can. John Stuart Mill.
AAC&U Members on Trends in Learning Outcomes Assessment
Program Review Teaching and learning committee Santa ana college
Randy Beach, South Representative Marie Boyd, Chaffey College
Computer Science Section
GER Forum 3: Interstate Passport Lower-Division Gen Ed Block Transfer
Applied Psychology Program School of Business and Liberal Arts Fall 2016 Assessment Report
District discipline lead spring meeting agenda
Core Concepts of the Standards 2019
Program Modification “Academic Year 2019” Assumption University
Killeen ISD Mission and Vision Statement
Presentation transcript:

THECB – 24 June 2011 Lumina Deliverables Tuning Texas

THECB – 24 June 2011 Tuning and Fine-Tuning 1. Tuning:Competencies Gained Through Education  Knowledge  Skills  Attitudes 2. Fine-Tuning:Alignment of courses within a prerequisite chain  Course learning outcomes  Course sequence

Tuning: Setting Expectations Competencies Discipline specific a.Knowledge b.Skills c.Attitudes StakeholdersDiscipline’s 1.Constituencies 2.Educators 3.Students 4.Parents, Guardians 5.Counselors, Advisors THECB – 24 June 2011

Tuning: The Big Picture Committee Work 1.What are the discipline’s topics? 2.What needs to be mastered? 3.Who employs? Surveys Inform Student surveys Employer surveys Faculty surveys THECB – 24 June 2011

What Are the Discipline’s Topics? 1. Discipline Profile for a.Expertise b.Employment 2. Discipline’s Competency Table a.Descriptive, by academic achievement level b.Schematic, by competency level 3. One-page Descriptions of Outcome Titles

Civil Engineering Expertise Profile THECB – 24 June 2011

Who employs? 1. Discipline Profile for a.Expertise b.Employment 2. Discipline’s Competency Table a.Descriptive, by academic achievement level b.Schematic, by competency level 3. One-page Descriptions of Outcome Titles

Civil Engineering Employment Profile THECB – 24 June 2011

What needs to be mastered? 1. Discipline Profile for a.Expertise b.Employment 2. Discipline’s Competency Table a.Descriptive, by academic achievement level b.Schematic, by competency level 3. One-page Descriptions of Outcome Titles

Civil Engineering Competency Table Outcome Titles: A. Mathematics B. Natural Sciences C. Materials Science D. Mechanics E. Experiments F. Design G. Teamwork H. Problem Solving I. Ethics J. Communication K. Contemporary Issues and Historical Perspectives THECB – 24 June 2011

Descriptions of Outcome Titles  Written for students, counselors, and advisors  Need to strike a balance with fluid boundaries:  What is desired ?  What is required ?  What is common practice ? Footnote: It is not a set of minimum legal standards It is a framework for students’ achievements

Civil Engineering Competency Table THECB – 24 June 2011

What needs to be mastered? 1. Discipline Profile for a.Expertise b.Employment 2. Discipline’s Competency Table a.Descriptive, by academic achievement level b.Schematic, by competency level 3. One-page Descriptions of Outcome Titles

One-page Discipline Specific Descriptions of Outcome Titles setting presenting expectations opportunities THECB – 24 June 2011

Tuning and Fine-Tuning 1. Tuning:Competencies Gained Through Education  Knowledge  Skills  Attitudes 2. Fine-Tuning:Alignment of courses within a prerequisite chain  Course learning outcomes  Course sequence

Fine Tuning 1. Identify common and uncommon lower-division courses in a discipline  define lower-division course foundation 2. Align institutions’ syllabi  course descriptions  learning outcomes  pre-/co-requisites 3. Establish discipline’s prerequisite chain THECB – 24 June 2011

Lower-Division Course Foundation THECB – 24 June 2011

Fine Tuning 1. Identify common and uncommon lower-division courses in a discipline  define lower-division course foundation 2. Align institutions’ syllabi  course descriptions  learning outcomes  pre-/co-requisites 3. Establish discipline’s prerequisite chain THECB – 24 June 2011

Align Institutions’ Syllabi THECB – 24 June 2011

Fine Tuning 1. Identify common and uncommon lower-division courses in a discipline  define lower-division course foundation 2. Align institutions’ syllabi  course descriptions  learning outcomes  pre-/co-requisites 3. Establish discipline’s prerequisite chain THECB – 24 June 2011

Discipline’s Prerequisite Chain THECB – 24 June 2011

Tuning Deliverables Time Table 1. Tuning  Mid-September 2011: Committees draft competency tables, outcome descriptions, and discipline profiles.  Surveys: Committees edit final draft informed by survey results during face-to-face meeting. 2. Fine-Tuning  October 2011 to January 2012: Committee will draft course descriptions, learning outcomes, and prerequisite chain.  May 2012: Academic Course Guideline Manual (ACGM) Committee discusses discipline courses after public feedback.

THECB – 24 June 2011 Making Opportunity Affordable in Texas: A Student Centered Approach 24 June 2011 Tuning Oversight Council for Engineering and Science