Department of Human Services Evaluating Effectiveness of Participation Projects Learning Session Why evaluate the effectiveness of consumer, care and community.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality assurance for community-based service provision Bojana Rozman, API ASSOCIATION FOR PROMOTING INCLUSION.
Advertisements

Campaspe PCP Chronic Disease Management Introduction
Alan Jones V Humankind: The case for consumer participation Nicky Barry Senior Project Worker & Consumer Support Coordinator.
Encouraging shared decision-making in Victorian health services 13 October 2014 Cath Harmer A/Manager Policy and Projects, Rural Health
Patient Public Involvement (PPI) Policy What is PPI? PPI means putting patients and public at the centre of all that we do. It encourages the active participation.
Angliss Box Hill Healesville & Maroondah Peter James Wantirna Yarra Ranges Yarra Valley Turning Spectrum Hospital Hospital District Hospital Hospital Centre.
EXTENDING THE REACH OF THE RADIATION THERAPIST BEYOND THE TREATMENT FLOOR: QUALITY ASSURANCE COORDINATOR Brian Liszewski, M.R.T.(T.), BSc., Odette Cancer.
The impact of public involvement Sarah Buckland Director INVOLVE
EPHA EGM 2/12/2002 A definition of health A state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.
A new Mental Health Act for Victoria Summary of proposed reforms Pier De Carlo Project Director Mental Health Act Implementation.
The National Healthy Schools Programme Update presentation September 2009.
Workshop 18 th May 2010, Brussels Applying the Value+ model on patient involvement in HTA processes.
Department of Health The Australian Charter of Healthcare Rights in Victoria Your role in realising the Australian Charter of Healthcare Rights in Victoria.
Evaluating Effectiveness of Participation projects Evaluation design; learning from EEP project EOI submissions Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review.
Identifying evidence and maintaining a specialised register of studies Dr Alison Weightman Director, Support Unit for Research Evidence (SURE), Cardiff.
Indonesia Country Office “Global Framework and Experiences on Patient, Family and Community Engagement to Improve Quality of Care” Dewi Indriani.
Sue Shapland, General Manager, Member Services, MS Society WA (Inc) & Louise Durack, Assistant Director, CSPD, Department of Health Keeping the Community.
MEMBERSHIP GROWTH & RETENTION
Drug Utilization Review & Drug Utilization Evaluation: An Overview
Approach to Overcapacity
Renee Markus Hodin, JD Director, Integrated Care Advocacy Project
Phil Walters and Debs Taylor
Monitoring and evaluation of disability-inclusive development
Health Technology Assessment
Self Assessment for Pastoral Care
Navigating the Science: An Evidence Based Methodology to Bridge the Gap Between Clinical and Environmental Health Sciences Tracey J Woodruff, PhD, MPH.
Health Care Conference Aruba June 2nd – 4th, 2017
Partners in Promoting Community Inclusion
NHS Education for Scotland Effective Practitioner Funded Project Implementing Caseload Supervision in a Nurse-Led Community Service.
Achieving World-Class Cancer Outcomes: Taking the strategy forward May 2016 “People affected by cancer – those living with it and those supporting relatives.
Administration on Aging
SCOPE OF PRACTICE FOR NURSES
AspireMN Member Meeting
Designing Research that Improves Health and Wellbeing for All How the NIHR Research Design Service North East can help.
On the CUSP: Stop CAUTI Patient and Family Engagement in the ED
Why Information Matters
Workforce Planning Framework
Working with Co-Design Whakakotahi Learning Session One 23 May 2017
Making planning better – the challenges facing
Diversity and Reform of the aged care system
Facilitating access to ACP and AD evidence in palliative care
Data for Decision-Making: Databases for Evidence-Based Planning
After School Programs: What Works and What Doesn’t
Mental Health Connection Strategic Plan
Stroke Early Supported Discharge Team Service Evaluation
Implications Rural health disparities are present in a variety of ways: educationally, socially, economically, etc. With attention to these obstacles.
A review of the literature
Engaging Patients and Families as Partners
NICE and the What Works Network
Why focus on building community capacity?
Envisioning Consumer Participation
Social prescribing: Less rhetoric and more reality
Alison Raw Allied Health Professional Officer March 2014
Drug Utilization Review & Drug Utilization Evaluation: An Overview
Improving the Evidence Base to Advance Health Equity
community mental health drug and alcohol research network
The Public Sector Equality Duty
Community Outreach The activity of providing services to persons who might otherwise find it difficult to access such.
NHS Education for Scotland Effective Practitioner Funded Project Implementing Caseload Supervision in a Nurse-Led Community Service.
ABOUT US.
Slides for Module 2 Topic: Community Planning
Carers (Recognition) Act 2010
Tracie Wills Senior Commissioning Officer
My Intelligent Home (Mii-Home) Project
Planning for an Increasing and Ageing Population
and the Primary Care Networks
By: Andi Indahwaty Sidin A Critical Review of The Role of Clinical Governance in Health Care and its Potential Application in Indonesia.
Centers of Excellence for Childhood Obesity
SCOHTS Strategic Plan Goal 3: Promoting Key Safety Legislation
Thriving at Barker Staff Wellbeing
Presentation transcript:

Department of Human Services Evaluating Effectiveness of Participation Projects Learning Session Why evaluate the effectiveness of consumer, care and community participation? Alison McMillan Director, Quality and Safety Branch

What is participation? The Department’s definition of participation includes: ‘when consumers, carers and community members are meaningfully involved in decision making about health policy and planning, care and treatment and the wellbeing of themselves and their community.’ (Doing it with us not for us, 2006)

Why evaluate participation? ‘the importance to health of people having control over their lives and meaningful participation in decision making processes’. (Fran Baum, Prof. Public Health Flinders University, The Age, 7/08/2007)

Why evaluate participation? Participation is a key part of improving the quality and safety of health care. By reporting systematically on the evidence of the effect of participation we can encourage participation to become a part of everyday practice.

Evaluation opportunities By promoting the use of a Controlled Before and After study design the Evaluating Effectiveness of Participation projects can be considered for inclusion in systemic reviews coordinated through the Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group (CCCRG). Provide a well resourced environment for the projects through the CCCRG involvement.

Why evaluate participation? In conclusion we are evaluating participation because: We value consumer, carer and community participation in decision making about health care and planning We need to build the evidence and put it into practice at the local level Using a Controlled Before and After methodology advances reporting and helps build an internationally accessible body of evidence.