Texas Nodal Electrical Buses and Outage Scheduling.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Outage Coordination Process and New Equipment 1. Introduction This presentation is intended to increase knowledge of outage coordination and NOMCR submittal.
Advertisements

TPTF Presentation Registration of PUN Facilities December 19, 2007.
A Partial Interim Report To WMS Guidance on Implementing Protocol Implementation Plan (PIP) 102 Reactive Power Task Force.
11/08/2005 Ken Donohoo How Does NMMS meet the Nodal Protocol Requirements John Adams 3/23/2006.
1Texas Nodal Texas Nodal CRR Annual Model Discussion DRAFT By John Moseley, ERCOT.
1 TSP Nodal Engagement Market Participant Call ERCOT August 04, 2010.
June 12, 2008 ROS SEM Go-Live procedure Linda Clarke.
QSE/RE Transmission Facilities Outage Coordination Workshop.
2015 RTP – Study Scope of Short Circuit Analysis RPG Meeting May 19,
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Resource Entity Owned Transmission Asset Data Collection Feb 27, 2009 Kick Off Meeting.
ROS Feb 2006 The Model Curtis Crews Network Model Engineering Supervisor
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 External Web Services Update Nodal Implementation Team Presentation July 7, 2009.
SPS policy – Information Presentation Presentation to ROS June 16, 2004.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Energy Management System Requirement Documents December 5, 2006 Jay Dondeti EMS Project.
EDS 2 Early Delivery Systems Review and Request for Approval May 2007 John Webb.
SIMPLE TRANSMISSION OUTAGE. Nodal Protocol Definition 2.26 Simple Transmission Outage A Planned Outage or Maintenance Outage of any Transmission Element.
Texas Nodal 1 Nodal Operations Model Posting Confirmation TAC May 7, 2009 Matt Mereness, ERCOT.
1 ERCOT Nodal Protocols Telemetry Requirements. 2 Protocol References Telemetry TAC will establish TASK force and approve a telemetry criteria.
MIG TF Voting Items Market Participant Notification Period (Transmission outage) – =1 Year Interconnection Date for Protocol Considerations – First Interconnection.
Transmission Outage Process April Purpose In compliance with the Protocols and the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) Operating Guides,
– 1Texas Nodal Texas Nodal Electrical Buses – 2Texas Nodal Electrical Bus Definition as Proposed in NPRR 63 Electrical Bus A physical transmission element.
1Texas Nodal Texas Nodal NMMS/RARF Data Discussion By John Moseley, ERCOT, Network Modeling Group.
Nodal Formatting of Zonal Protocols Sections Currently Not Part of the Nodal Protocols 11/28/06 TPTF Diana Zake, Market Rules.
Operating Guide and Planning Guide Revision Requests Blake Williams, ROS Chair September 13, 2012.
NDSWG Report June 16, NDSWG Report Regular meeting held May 16 in Taylor Telemetry / State Estimator Update Naming Convention Electrical Bus Designation.
CMWG NATF 11/02/2010- CCT/DME update + Outages in the CRR Model follow-up Steve Reedy – Market Design and Analysis 1.
ERCOT Guideline for Interim Updates to the Network Operations Model Excerpted from the “Modeling Expectations” whitepaper D.W. Rickerson.
October 29, 2012 RARF Workshop 2 Introduction to ERCOT Modeling Process Jay Teixeira Manager, Model Administration.
February 3, 2011 TAC ERCOT Planning Go-Live Update Jay Teixeira Manager, Model Administration.
Scheduling and Operating Transmission Devices in the Nodal Environment.
State Estimator Redaction Task Force Progress Report to WMS/ROS 5/11/2011.
Reliability and Operations Subcommittee Report 2/2/2012.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee October 1, 2009.
Texas Nodal 1 Nodal Operations Model Posting NATF Sep 29, 2009 Matt Mereness, ERCOT.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Verifiable Costs for Nodal WMS Meeting.
Capacity, Demand and Reserves Report Bill Bojorquez Board of Directors Meeting May 16, 2007.
Transition Plan Network Operations Model Change Requests 5/26/2010.
Current Nodal OS Design 1.The NMMS database will have an OWNER and an OPERATOR designation for each piece of equipment in the model. The OWNER and OPERATOR.
October 29, 2012 RARF Workshop 2 ERCOT RARF Data Request Issues Jay Teixeira Manager, Model Administration.
Network Operations Model Go-Live Decision Kenneth Ragsdale TAC July 1, 2010.
CRR Network Model One-Line Diagram Beth Garza TPTF April 22, 2008.
Technical Advisory Committee Presentation to the ERCOT Board of Directors July 15, 2008.
PRR 503 Coordination of Resources Due to TSP Section Management of Transmission Forced Outage or Maintenance Outages.
TPTF Update Trip Doggett TAC March 9, TPTF Update Meetings February 6 & 7, February 20 Attendance approximately 40 Completed review of ERCOT’s clarification.
TAC Update Kyle Patrick. 2 Nodal ERCOT Program Update –Nodal Market Go-Live (Vote)- vote passed in which TAC certified full nodal systems for Dec 1, 2010.
Nodal Planning Go Live Austin, TX February 3, 2011
Current Nodal OS Design 1.The NMMS database will have an OWNER and an OPERATOR designation for each piece of equipment in the model. The OWNER and OPERATOR.
GIC System Model Workshop
Panhandle Bus Definition
Freeport Area Master Plan Project -
Outage Scheduler Matt Carter & Victor Vaughn Garland Power & Light
Protocol Revision Subcommittee
NPRR833 Workshop: Contingency Processing in CRR, DAM and SCED
Nodal COMS Additional Items Update
NOGRR-169 OWG discussion Bill Blevins June 28, 2017.
PLWG Review 6.9 and the Interconnection process
Initial ERCOT Parking Deck Prioritization Recommendation
John Dumas Director, Wholesale Market Operations
Phase Angle Limitations
Texas Nodal EMS Forced Outage Detection Business Requirements Document Carlos Gonzalez-Perez – August 21st,
Load Distribution Factor Calculation for Market Applications and Studies a Presentation for NATF 9/21/ NATF 1 Texas Nodal.
OCITF/OCWG Project Update
Reactive Power Task Force
Initial ERCOT Parking Deck Prioritization Recommendation
NPRRs NPRR654 Discontinue Ancillary Service Requirement Methodology Assessment Report. This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) proposes the discontinuation.
Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC
Energy Storage Settlements Consistent with PUCT Project & NPRR461
ECEN 460 Power System Operation and Control
Reliability and Operations Subcommittee Report
System Review Work Group Update to TSS
Presentation transcript:

Texas Nodal Electrical Buses and Outage Scheduling

Electrical Bus Definition as Proposed in NPRR 63 Electrical Bus A physical transmission element defined in the Network Operations Model that connects, using breakers and switches, one or more Loads, lines, transformers, generators, capacitors, reactors, and phase shifters to the ERCOT Transmission Grid where there is negligible impedance between the connected transmission elements. All Electrical Buses are designated by ERCOT and TSPs for modeling the electrical topology of the ERCOT Transmission Grid.

Electrical Buses and the Outage Scheduler Section ERCOT Evaluation of Planned Outage and Maintenance Outage of Transmission Facilities 1. A TSP shall request a Planned Outage or Maintenance Outage for any Transmission Element in the Network Operations Model that requires the Transmission Element to be removed from its normal service. Proposed Transmission Planned Outage or Maintenance Outage information submitted by a TSP in accordance with this Section constitutes a request for ERCOT’s approval of the Outage schedule associated with the Planned Outage or Maintenance Outage. ERCOT is not deemed to have approved the Outage schedule associated with the Planned Outage or Maintenance Outage until ERCOT notifies the TSP of its approval under procedures adopted by ERCOT. ERCOT shall evaluate requests under Section , Evaluation of Transmission Facilities Planned Outage or Maintenance Section 2 - Definitions and Acronyms Transmission Element: A physical transmission facility that is either a Electrical Bus, line, transformer, generator, load, breaker, switch, capacitor, reactor, phase shifter, or other similar device that is part of the ERCOT Transmission Grid and defined in the ERCOT Network Operations Model.

Electrical Buses in the Network Model as presented at the 6/25 TPTF meeting Approximately 18,000  Generator buses  Load buses  Settlement Points  Operational buses Electrical Buses and the Outage Scheduler In this example none of the 5 potential Electrical Buses would be included in the Network Model or be available for outage scheduling unless it was a settlement point or requested by a TO subset

Electrical Buses and the Outage Scheduler ERCOT proposes no changes to the Nodal Protocols ERCOT interprets to mean that every outaged element (including the new subset of electrical buses) will be a separate entry in the Outage Scheduler 1.Avoids conflict with the Forced Outage Detector 2.Enhances Situational Awareness 1.Operational 2.MIS 3.Allows accurate reporting 1.Nodal Metrics 2.NERC TADS 3.Internal Operational Reports 4.Insures consistent outage submission by all TOs Tracer Program will treat electrical buses like lines and transformers

Electrical Buses and the Outage Scheduler Options Option 1 – “ERCOT’s Proposed Option  No Protocol Change  No O.S. Modification  No Extra Cost  No Time Delay  Requires TOs to enter all elements including new subset of E.B’s. Option 2 – “No Electrical Bus Option”  Protocol Change  No O.S. Modification  No Extra Cost  Time Delay  Requires TOs to enter all Elements except E.B. Insert “except Electrical Buses” Into section of Nodal Protocols Option 3 – “Topology Processor Option”  No Protocol Change  O.S. Modification  Extra Cost  Large Time Delay  TOs could enter only elements necessary to interrupt powerflow. A topology processor would have to be added to the O.S. design

The End? Questions?