CNR experience within CIOP: porting the SBAS-InSAR software into the cloud F. Casu, I. Zinno, S. Elefante, P. Imperatore, M. Manunta CNR-IREA Via Diocleziano.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ESA Data Integration Application Open Grid Services for Earth Observation Luigi Fusco, Pedro Gonçalves.
Advertisements

Cloud computing in spatial data processing for the Integrated Geographically Distributed Information System of Earth Remote Sensing (IGDIS ERS) Open Joint-Stock.
LIBRA: Lightweight Data Skew Mitigation in MapReduce
Authors: Thilina Gunarathne, Tak-Lon Wu, Judy Qiu, Geoffrey Fox Publish: HPDC'10, June 20–25, 2010, Chicago, Illinois, USA ACM Speaker: Jia Bao Lin.
07/14/08. 2 Points Introduction. Cluster and Supercomputers. Cluster Types and Advantages. Our Cluster. Cluster Performance. Cluster Computer for Basic.
UNIVERSITY of MARYLAND GLOBAL LAND COVER FACILITY High Performance Computing in Support of Geospatial Information Discovery and Mining Joseph JaJa Institute.
EU 2nd Year Review – Jan – WP9 WP9 Earth Observation Applications Demonstration Pedro Goncalves :
Green Space Services for Local Monitoring Aratos Technologies S.A.
Page 1 Jordi Farres Models for scientific exploitation of EO Data ESRIN, Oct 2012 A Web of EO Processing Services ESA UNCLASSIED - For Offical Use.
A.V. Bogdanov Private cloud vs personal supercomputer.
USING HADOOP & HBASE TO BUILD CONTENT RELEVANCE & PERSONALIZATION Tools to build your big data application Ameya Kanitkar.
1 An SLA-Oriented Capacity Planning Tool for Streaming Media Services Lucy Cherkasova, Wenting Tang, and Sharad Singhal HPLabs,USA.
1 The Terabyte Analysis Machine Jim Annis, Gabriele Garzoglio, Jun 2001 Introduction The Cluster Environment The Distance Machine Framework Scales The.
Geohazard Supersites and Natural Laboratories Report to DLR Falk Amelung, GEO task leader September 2011.
(C) 2008 Clusterpoint(C) 2008 ClusterPoint Ltd. Empowering You to Manage and Drive Down Database Costs April 17, 2009 Gints Ernestsons, CEO © 2009 Clusterpoint.
INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE ES applications in EGEEII – M. Petitdidier –11 February 2008 Earth Science session Wrap up.
CRISP & SKA WP19 Status. Overview Staffing SKA Preconstruction phase Tiered Data Delivery Infrastructure Prototype deployment.
Challenges of Large-scale Vehicular & Mobile Ad hoc Network Simulation Thomas D. Hewer, Maziar Nekovee, Radhika S. Saksena and Peter V. Coveney
A public-private partnership building a multidisciplinary cloud platform for data intensive science Bob Jones Head of openlab IT dept CERN This document.
I hope its ok to do these InSAR exercises as the lab
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use Supersites entry portal Presented by Francesco Casu (CNR/IREA) on behalf of Wolfgang Lengert (ERS and ADM Aeolus Mission.
Co-Registration of SAR Image Pairs for Interferometry
AN ORGANISATION FOR A NATIONAL EARTH SCIENCE INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM Virtual Geophysics Laboratory (VGL): Scientific workflows Exploiting the Cloud Josh.
GISMO Simulation Status Objective Radar and geometry parameters Airborne platform upgrade Surface and base DEMs Ice mass reflection and refraction modeling.
GENESI-DR: Ground European Network for Earth Science Interoperations - Digital Repositories Grant agreement no: EGEE 4 th.
InSAR Processing and Applications
Students: Aiman Md Uslim, Jin Bai, Sam Yellin, Laolu Peters Professors: Dr. Yung-Hsiang Lu CAM 2 Continuous Analysis of Many CAMeras The Problem Currently.
User Scenarios in VENUS-C Focus on Structural Analysis Ignacio Blanquer I3M - UPV.
European Grid Initiative Data Services and Solutions Part 2: Data in the cloud Enol Fernández Data Services.
Open Grid Services for Earth Observation Pedro Gonçalves.
Francesco Casu IREA - CNR, Napoli, Italy
Page 1 Jordi Farres Grid and Cloud activities 15/3/2011.
Claudio Grandi INFN Bologna Virtual Pools for Interactive Analysis and Software Development through an Integrated Cloud Environment Claudio Grandi (INFN.
Research and Service Support Resources for EO data exploitation RSS Team, ESRIN, 23/01/2013 Requirements for a Federated Infrastructure.
DataGrid France 12 Feb – WP9 – n° 1 WP9 Earth Observation Applications.
EGI-Engage is co-funded by the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme of the European Union under grant number Federated Cloud Update.
EGI-InSPIRE RI An Introduction to European Grid Infrastructure (EGI) March An Introduction to the European Grid Infrastructure.
Onedata Eventually Consistent Virtual Filesystem for Multi-Cloud Infrastructures Michał Orzechowski (CYFRONET AGH)
Jordi Farres HMA-WG Meeting ESRIN, 23 Jan 2013
Accessing the VI-SEEM infrastructure
Grid and Cloud Computing
Aerosols, Clouds and Trace gases Research Infrastructure
Alessandro Spinuso, Andreas Rietbrock, Andrè Gemuend,
WInSAR Operations Update
ICOS on-demand atmospheric transport computation A use case for interoperability of EGI and EUDAT services Ute Karstens, André Bjärby, Oleg Mirzov, Roger.
Amazon Storage- S3 and Glacier
EUMEDCONNECT3-ASREN, 27 June 2014
GWE Core Grid Wizard Enterprise (
StratusLab Final Periodic Review
StratusLab Final Periodic Review
Ideas for an ICOS Competence Centre Implementation of an on-demand computation service Ute Karstens, André Bjärby, Oleg Mirzov, Roger Groth, Mitch Selander,
DI4R, 30th September 2016, Krakow
Presentation on Copernicus Dissemination
Work Package 2 Interactions with Targeted Communities
G.Manduchi1, T.Fredian2⁾, J.Stillerman2⁾, A. Neto3), F. Sartori3)
Harry Xu University of California, Irvine & Microsoft Research
Recap: introduction to e-science
Study course: “Computing clusters, grids and clouds” Andrey Y. Shevel
Exploitation of ISS Scientific data - sustainability
Hierarchical Architecture
Hadoop Clusters Tess Fulkerson.
Panagiota DIGKOGLOU Jason PAPATHANASIOU
Cluster Resource Management: A Scalable Approach
ELIXIR Competence Center
WIS Strategy – WIS 2.0 Submitted by: Matteo Dell’Acqua(CBS) (Doc 5b)
Funded by the European Union
Hybrid Programming with OpenMP and MPI
Overview of Workflows: Why Use Them?
Reportnet 3.0 Database Feasibility Study – Approach
OpenAIRE Open Science Publishing for Research Infrastructures: the EPOS use-case Paolo Manghi, Michele Manunta, Miriam Baglioni, Alessia Bardi, Francesco.
Presentation transcript:

CNR experience within CIOP: porting the SBAS-InSAR software into the cloud F. Casu, I. Zinno, S. Elefante, P. Imperatore, M. Manunta CNR-IREA Via Diocleziano 328, 80124, Napoli

CNR experience within CIOP: porting the SBAS-InSAR software into the Outlook The SBAS-InSAR algorithm: – scope and main application Why the cloud? Porting SBAS-InSAR into cloud environment – Sequential algorithm – Barely parallel solution – CIOP adaptation – Performances Lesson learnt and future expectation

CNR experience within CIOP: porting the SBAS-InSAR software into the SBAS-InSAR Processing ~150 Satellite raw (L0) data per scene: 40GB Sequential Processing Time: 300h CNR Earthquakes Volcanoes Oil & Gas Water Resources

CNR experience within CIOP: porting the SBAS-InSAR software into the SBAS-InSAR Application L’Aquila earthquake Civil Protection Risk Management Insurances

CNR experience within CIOP: porting the SBAS-InSAR software into the SBAS-InSAR Application Mt. Etna volcano ERS-1/2 and ENVISAT data ( ) Eruption Civil Protection Risk Management Natural Hazards

CNR experience within CIOP: porting the SBAS-InSAR software into the SBAS-InSAR Application ERS-1/2 Descending data ( ) Los Angeles >1<- 1 cm/year 0 Oil & Gas Field Oil extraction

CNR experience within CIOP: porting the SBAS-InSAR software into the SBAS-InSAR Application ERS-1/2 Descending data ( ) Los Angeles >1<- 1 cm/year 0 Agriculture Sustainable and social development Water Resources SBAS-InSAR Application

CNR experience within CIOP: porting the SBAS-InSAR software into the Building and infrastructures analysis >1<- 1 cm/year 0 Damage assessment Insurances ESA - ESRIN YOU ARE HERE (and safe)! SBAS-InSAR Application Rome

CNR experience within CIOP: porting the SBAS-InSAR software into the Past, present and future SAR Satellite Constellations Time

CNR experience within CIOP: porting the SBAS-InSAR software into the Too many data Too many users Why the cloud?

CNR experience within CIOP: porting the SBAS-InSAR software into the Why the cloud? Wide application scenarios Process large archived (ERS, ENVISAT, …) or forthcoming (CSK, TSX, Sentinel-1) amount of SAR data High resource demand during emergency phases Processing time must be “reasonable” Make the processed data/achieved results/processing tools available to the community: implement the Supersites concept

CNR experience within CIOP: porting the SBAS-InSAR software into the CIOP Application Platform Data & Catalogue User (CNR) Cloud Controller API OCCI Web Interface Sandbox private public

CNR experience within CIOP: porting the SBAS-InSAR software into the User (CNR) Web Interface Sandbox CIOP Application Platform

CNR experience within CIOP: porting the SBAS-InSAR software into the Sequential SBAS Flow Diagram SLC Scaling selection SLC cut DEM to SAR conversion Range File computation DEM Focusing Master Focusing Parameters Computation Data Deformatting OrbitsSAR Data Shift Computation Common Area 2nd step Registration Registration RefinementSLC Scaling SLC Registration Interferometric Pairs Selection DEM Shift Calculation Interferogram Computation Displacement time series

CNR experience within CIOP: porting the SBAS-InSAR software into the Sequential test case 7 ASAR-ENVISAT acquisitions 1 core 8 GB RAM 500GB of storage (NFS)

CNR experience within CIOP: porting the SBAS-InSAR software into the Sequential SBAS Flow Diagram SLC Scaling selection SLC cut DEM to SAR conversion Range File computation DEM Focusing Master Focusing Parameters Computation Data Deformatting OrbitsSAR Data Shift Computation Common Area 2nd step Registration Registration RefinementSLC Scaling SLC Registration Interferometric Pairs Selection DEM Shift Calculation Interferogram Computation Displacement time series 5 min 33 min 190 min 3 min 0.3 min N/A Negligible 75 min 70 min 66 min 5 min 111 min 7.3 min 24 min 56 min N/A ~14.8 hours 247 min

CNR experience within CIOP: porting the SBAS-InSAR software into the Sequential SBAS Flow Diagram SLC Scaling selection SLC cut DEM to SAR conversion Range File computation DEM Focusing Master Focusing Parameters Computation Data Deformatting OrbitsSAR Data Shift Computation Common Area 2nd step Registration Registration RefinementSLC Scaling SLC Registration Interferometric Pairs Selection DEM Shift Calculation Interferogram Computation Displacement time series Orbits 33 min 190 min 3 min 0.3 min N/A Negligible N/A 75 min 70 min 66 min 5 min 111 min 7.3 min 24 min 56 min 5 min 247 min ~14.8 hours

CNR experience within CIOP: porting the SBAS-InSAR software into the Barely parallel test case 7 ASAR-ENVISAT acquisitions 2 cores 8 GB RAM per core 500GB of storage (NFS)

CNR experience within CIOP: porting the SBAS-InSAR software into the Sequential SBAS Flow Diagram SLC Scaling selection SLC cut DEM to SAR conversion Range File computation DEM Focusing Master Focusing Parameters Computation Data Deformatting OrbitsSAR Data Shift Computation Common Area 2nd step Registration Registration Refinement SLC Scaling SLC Registration Interferometric Pairs Selection DEM Shift Calculation Interferogram Computation Displacement time series Orbits 33 min 190 min 3 min 0.3 min N/A Negligible N/A 75 min 70 min 66 min 5 min 111 min 7.3 min 24 min 56 min 5 min 247 min ~14.8 hours

CNR experience within CIOP: porting the SBAS-InSAR software into the ~10 hours Parallel SBAS Flow Diagram SLC Scaling selection SLC cut DEM to SAR conversion Range File computation DEM Focusing Master Focusing Parameters Computation Data Deformatting OrbitsSAR Data Shift Computation Common Area 2nd step Registration Registration Refinement SLC Scaling SLC Registration Interferometric Pairs Selection DEM Shift Calculation Interferogram Computation Displacement time series Orbits 33 min 190 min 3 min 0.3 min N/A Negligible N/A 5 min75 min 70 min 66 min 5 min 111 min 7.3 min 24 min 56 min 247 min 2.5 min 100 min 1.8 min 39 min 34 min 56 min 3.8 min 30 min 177 min

CNR experience within CIOP: porting the SBAS-InSAR software into the Pros and Cons Scalable (on Images & Interferograms) Easy to implement and debug No job scheduling and balancing Not fully portable

CNR experience within CIOP: porting the SBAS-InSAR software into the SBAS Flow Diagram within CIOP SLC cutDEM to SAR conversion Range File computation DEM Focusing Master Focusing Parameters Computation Data Deformatting OrbitsSAR Data Shift Computation Common Area 2nd step Registration Registration Refinement SLC Scaling SLC RegistrationInterferometric Pairs Selection Collec t

CNR experience within CIOP: porting the SBAS-InSAR software into the Interferogram Selection Coherent point Selection Tie Point Refinement Unwrapping Time Series Generation Residual Phase Computation Orbital Ramp Estimation Filtered Interferograms Unwrapping Tie Point Refinement Time Series Generation Residual Phase Computation Atmospheric Filtering Orbit Correction DEM Shift Calculation Interferogram Computation Collec t SBAS Flow Diagram within CIOP Collec t yes no End

CNR experience within CIOP: porting the SBAS-InSAR software into the IREA cluster vs. CIOP Sandbox comparison 7 ASAR-ENVISAT acquisitions 2 cores 8 GB RAM per core 500GB of storage IREACIOP ~10 hours~13 hours

CNR experience within CIOP: porting the SBAS-InSAR software into the IREACIOP Negligible Focusing Master Focusing Parameters Computation Data Deformatting OrbitsSAR Data Shift Computation Common Area SLC Scaling Collec t IREA vs. CIOP Sandbox Comparison

CNR experience within CIOP: porting the SBAS-InSAR software into the Focusing Master Focusing Parameters Computation Data Deformatting OrbitsSAR Data Shift Computation Common Area SLC Scaling Collec t SLC cutDEM to SAR conversion Range File computation DEM 2nd step Registration Registration Refinement SLC RegistrationInterferometric Pairs Selection Collec t IREA vs. CIOP Sandbox Comparison

CNR experience within CIOP: porting the SBAS-InSAR software into the SLC cutDEM to SAR conversion Range File computation DEM 2nd step Registration Registration Refinement SLC RegistrationInterferometric Pairs Selection Collec t IREA vs. CIOP Sandbox Comparison IREACIOP

CNR experience within CIOP: porting the SBAS-InSAR software into the Unwrapping Preparation Unwrapping Time Series Generation Orbital Ramp Estimation Final processing and Atmospheric Filtering Orbit Correction DEM Shift Calculation Interferogram Computation Collec t SBAS Flow Diagram within CIOP Collec t yes no Collec t IREACIOP

CNR experience within CIOP: porting the SBAS-InSAR software into the >1<-1 cm/year Analyzed time interval: Real case study (Benchmark) IREACIOP ~24 hours~48 hours 55 ASAR-ENVISAT 8 cores 8 GB RAM per core 1TB of storage Napoli Bay area

CNR experience within CIOP: porting the SBAS-InSAR software into the CIOP Pros & Cons Scalable (on Images & Interferograms) Relatively easy to port scientific algorithms, after a preparatory learning phase on the environment Collect steps represent a bottle neck! (large data transfer overhead) Portable, but built on Open Nebula which could be not supported by the cloud provider (need of additional driver)

CNR experience within CIOP: porting the SBAS-InSAR software into the Final considerations CIOP has been conceived to be the most general and portable as possible but, at the present stage/configuration, seems to be not the optimal solution for an application which is not characterized by independent jobs For SBAS purposes, different environment solution (cloud resources as grid computing, single virtual workstation on the cloud) could be explored

CNR experience within CIOP: porting the SBAS-InSAR software into the Final considerations The presented activities have been carried out within the Helix Nebula framework, which aims at providing a federated European science cloud The ESA SSEP flagship, aimed at creating a common scientific ecosystem for sharing data, querying tools, processors, and added value results, depicts an ambitious goal, which found in Helix Nebula its natural growth environment The large debate within Helix Nebula for the generation of a unified driver for federated cloud implementation should be carefully taken into account by ESA