Redefining Leadership for Improved Instructional Practice and Student Performance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ohio Improvement Process - OIP
Advertisements

Ohios Educator Standards. Ohios Standards for the Teaching Profession.
Regional Work & The Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Sharing with ESC Providers September 22 nd, 2008.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Your Local School District District Team Orientation Date Time.
1 9/14/12. Core Principles of OIP (SPDG)  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership Team (district & building)
Learning Walk High Levels of Learning for All Students Quality Instruction in Every Classroom Skillful Leadership Throughout the School and District.
Ingham RtI District Leadership Team November 4, 2009.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
OIP Resources and Training Documents Used in This PowerPoint
New York State Professional Development Standards S/CDN 2010.
Leadership for Student Achievement National School Boards Association.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
EDAS 735 Week 4 Lecture Ohio’s Leadership Development Framework & It’s Connection to the Ohio Improvement Process.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person of the following resources found on any OIP Stage 0 Module.
Utilizing the School Restructuring Resources Lauren Morando Rhim & Bryan C. Hassel Public Impact For Center on Innovation and Improvement.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person, regardless of audience, of the following resources found on.
The Olmsted Falls Continuous Improvement Process From District Leadership to Building Leadership.
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
Presented to:Bellefontaine City Schools RECOGNIZING TEACHING EXCELLENCE [insert district logo]
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
A HANDBOOK FOR PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES AT WORK CHAPTERS 1-3 Learning by Doing.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Office of Service Quality
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District Accreditation Team Chair Training October 20, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
School Improvement Needs Assessment – © Iowa Association of School Boards Assessment Conducted by the Iowa Association of School Boards.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
DPI Javits Grant: Expanding Excellence Initiative State Leadership Cadre March 2016.
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
1. Decide what district we want to be.
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Teacher Based Teams Facilitating School Improvement in
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
RECOGNIZING educator EXCELLENCE
Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)
Compact Goals Improved capacity of Ohio teacher, administrator, and related services personnel preparation programs to better prepare professional educators.
What’s the connection to Ohio’s other initiatives?
OLAC Beliefs/Assumptions
Introduction to Promoting Positive Behavior in Schools:
Discussion and Vote to Amend the Regulations
Closing the Loop with Student Data
Licensure Overview and Master Teacher Program
ENDS Report Priority #3 Create Spaces of Optimism
Introductions Introduction
Introduction Introduction
Building a Unified and Coherent Statewide System of Support
Introductions Introduction
February 21-22, 2018.
Introductions Introduction
An Overview April 2012.
Introduction Introduction
Introductions Introduction
Effective Schools Effective Superintendents:
Presentation transcript:

Redefining Leadership for Improved Instructional Practice and Student Performance

OLAC Beliefs/Assumptions The purpose of leadership is the improvement of instructional practice and student performance, regardless of role; Ohio’s leadership system must be anchored in teaching and learning, focused on building community, and directed to ensuring the success of all children; and A common and collective understanding of essential practices or behaviors is needed to create a coherent leadership development system. A collaborative effort between the Buckeye Association of School Administrators and the Ohio Department of Education

OLAC Goals Identify essential leadership skills/practices for superintendents, DLTs, BLTs Identify types of PD/support needed to help them acquire these skills, and how such PD could be deployed for universal access Identify tools or products needed to facilitate their development A collaborative effort between the Buckeye Association of School Administrators and the Ohio Department of Education

Accomplishments Ohio’s Leadership Development Framework published OLAC web site restructured On-line performance assessment developed and available to all districts/schools at no cost Initial set of 9 modules developed and available to all districts/schools at no cost A collaborative effort between the Buckeye Association of School Administrators and the Ohio Department of Education

Superintendent Standards & Evaluation System Delineates standards and research-based indicators for use in evaluating superintendent performance Provides opportunity for boards of education to re- examine roles and responsibilities of superintendents and facilitates clear communication about expectations Provides tool for continuous growth of superintendents Helps focus boards on what’s important in the performance of superintendents A collaborative effort between the Buckeye Association of School Administrators and the Ohio Department of Education

Board Members Play Critical Role in: Developing and approving district goals Ensuring district goals for achievement and instruction remain primary focus of district efforts Engaging multiple constituencies to gain support for needed improvements and to sustain a focus on district goals Maintaining a student-centered focus and ensuring that improvement efforts are designed to ensure the success of every child

Iowa Association of School Boards Research Study Shows School Boards Make a Difference in Student Achievement School boards in high-achieving districts are significantly different in their knowledge, beliefs and actions than school boards in low-achieving districts.

The results show that school boards in districts with high student achievement: 1.Set a few clear goals. 2.Held themselves and district staff accountable for meeting the established goals. 3.Consistently expressed the belief that all students can learn and that the schools could teach all students.

The results show that school boards in districts with high student achievement: 4.Were far more knowledgeable about teaching and learning issues. 5.Used data regarding student needs to make decisions. 6.Created a supportive workplace for staff. 7.Involved their communities.

OLAC Supports the Use of Collaborative Leadership Team Structures for … A collaborative effort between the Buckeye Association of School Administrators and the Ohio Department of Education Promoting shared learning and shared accountability Shifting focus from a single individual to a team that can function as purposeful communities Aligning and focusing work across the system using few district goals Designing system planning and focused improvement strategies, structures, and processes;

The OLAC-OIP Connection Ohio’s Leadership Development Framework provides a foundation for Ohio’s improvement process OIP is strategy for enacting the Ohio Leadership Development Framework

A collaborative effort between the Buckeye Association of School Administrators and the Ohio Department of Education

Promote Coherence & Eliminate Fragmentation Recognize evident connection of district to all buildings Move AWAY FROM program ownership TO shared/collective ownership for improvement DLT-BLT offers parallel process for aligning and focusing the work

Leadership Development Framework A collaborative effort between the Buckeye Association of School Administrators and the Ohio Department of Education Data & the Decision-Making Process Focused Goal Setting Process Instruction & the Learning Process Community Engagement Process Resource Management Process Board Development & (District/Building) Governance Process

A collaborative effort between the Buckeye Association of School Administrators and the Ohio Department of Education Assessment + PD OLAC Assessment Tool OLAC PD Modules

To learn more about OLAC, contact: Patricia Brenneman

CONSEQUENCES FOR SCHOOLS District Improvement Status YEAR FOUR:  Continue to offer school choice and supplemental services.  District takes corrective action, including one of the following:  Institute new curriculum  Decrease school management authority  Appoint an outside expert  Extend school year or day  Replace the principal and/or other key staff  Secure an external manager  Close the building and reassign students  Redesign the building