A Comprehensive Principal Development Program for Minnesota Presentation to the BOSA Advisory Committee Friday, September 13, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Superintendent Program Review Committee February 26, 2010.
Advertisements

STATE ACTION FOR EDUCATION LEADERSHIP PROJECT SUCCESSION PLANNING Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D Coordinator of Graduate Education Wilmington College SAELP.
STATE ACTION FOR EDUCATION LEADERSHIP PROJECT I & II Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. SAELP Project Director.
Instructional Leadership for the 21 st Century University of South Alabama in collaboration with Baldwin and Mobile County Public Schools.
SCHOOL LEADER PREPARATION: A BLUEPRINT FOR CHANGE Submitted to the Illinois Board of Higher Education by the Commission on School Leader Preparation in.
1 Educator Preparation Advisory Council (EPAC) September, 2013.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
September 20, 2004CTQ National Forum Rhode Island’s Journey Toward Aligning the State Teacher Licensing System: An Example of One State’s Reform.
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
New York State Workforce Investment Board Healthcare Workforce Development Subcommittee Planning Grant Overview.
Welcome! Day with GaPSC West Georgia RESA February 7, 2013.
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
1 Presentation to USED Review Panel August 10, 2010 North Carolina Race to the Top Proposal R e d a c t e d.
NTEP – Network for Transforming Teacher Preparation A presentation to the State Board TAC on Tiered Licensure and Career Ladders April 6, 2014.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Succession Planning Hosted By: John Nori NASSP Consultant.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Enterprise IT Decision Making
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.
Promotion and Tenure Lois J. Geist, M.D. Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs and Development.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
Progress on Coordinating CBP and Federal Leadership Goals, Outcomes, and Actions Principals’ Staff Committee Meeting 2/16/12 Carin Bisland, Associate Director.
Click to edit Master subtitle style New Evaluation Assessment for Principals and School Leaders Jan Hammond Jan Hammond
Implementation of the Student Success Task Force Recommendations Wheeler North, Treasurer, ASCCC Michelle Pilati, President, ASCCC.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Presentation to North Carolina State Board of Education Global Education Task Force March 14, 2012  Adam Hartzell, Executive Director  Matt Friedrick,
CCC: Where Teaching and Learning Transform Lives, Putting Together the Self- Study Puzzle Corning Community College August 24, 2012.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Building World-Class Schools for Iowa Iowa Department of Education.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Loudon County Schools External Review Exit Report February 19-21, 2013.
Tennessee Learning Centered Leadership System FAQ.
CCSSO Task Force Recommendations on Educator Preparation Idaho State Department of Education December 14, 2013 Webinar.
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
Master Teacher Program Fall House Bill 1 Changes to Master Teacher Program –Eliminates EMIS report until 2011 Form I deleted Removes December timeline.
Continuous Quality Improvement Basics Created by Michigan’s Campaign to End Homelessness Statewide Training Workgroup 2010.
Vermont’s Core Teaching & Leadership Standards. 13-member, teacher majority, policy-making board appointed by the Governor What is the VSBPE?
Huntsville City Schools AdvancEd Survey District Accreditation Cathy C. McNeal, Ed.D. January 8, 2013.
The Eugene T. Moore School of Education Working together to promote the growth, education, and social development of children and youth David E. Barrett.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
AdvancED Accreditation External Review October 23-26, 2016
Illinois CEEDAR Partnership
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: June 2012.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Professional Review Process for Heads / Principals
District Accreditation
87th General Assembly Regular Session 2009
District of Innovation Update: International School Development
August 1, 2016 Erica McCray, CEEDAR Center
RECOGNIZING educator EXCELLENCE
Educator preparation policy as a lever for improving teacher and leader preparation: Keeping promises in Tennessee Collaboration for Effective Educator.
Annual Plan Earlier this week, the SNA Board reviewed the progress we have made to date on the new Strategic Plan that was introduced last year.
SOL Innovation Committee
Online Teaching Conference
Five Required Elements
By Pam Rumage and Carmen Carr White Station Middle School
HARNESSING VOICES OF SUPPORT FOR PROGRAM REVIEW
Margaret Boorady Mary Jo Conrad Casandra Wright
Licensure Overview and Master Teacher Program
Office for Exceptional Children
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Presentation for Position of Assistant/Associate Professor Educational Leadership Jinger A. Gustafson, Ed.D.
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System
Size, Scope, and Quality Definition Perkins V Town Hall Meeting
Presentation transcript:

A Comprehensive Principal Development Program for Minnesota Presentation to the BOSA Advisory Committee Friday, September 13, 2013

FOCUS ON WHAT IS POSSIBLE We have at our fingertips an infinite capacity to light a spark of possibility. Passion, rather than fear, is the igniting force. -Rosamund and Benjamin Zander

Welcome Janet Mohr, BOSA Executive Director

Opening Remarks Mary Mackbee, BOSA Board Chair

Who is in the room? Janet Mohr (possible intro protocol???) Select someone to interview Ask the following questions... Who are you? What inspires you to lead? Something many people do not know about you? You will each have the opportunity to introduce the person you interview.

The purpose of this work. Jean M. Haar, Ph. D., Dean, College of Education

Investing in Leadership Development Jerry Timian, St. Paul Foundation

Where we have been. -- Dr. Candace F. Raskin Chair, Department of Educational Leadership, Professor Chair of the Initial BOSA Workgroup In 2010 the BOSA formed a work group comprised of representation from the BOSA board, administrative licensing institutions and the Minnesota Department of Education.

Charge of the Workgroup...this work group was to review the research and examples of effective practices around principal preparation and prepare a report with recommendations to the BOSA board.

Findings The findings of this work group focused building a comprehensive program for Minnesota focusing on four critical areas of principal development found most consistent with leadership research and exemplary models used in other states. 1. Recruitment of Potential School Leaders 2. Pre-service Preparation Programs 3. Licensing and Certification 4. Continuing Professional Development

BOSA Workgroup Recommendations Recruitment of Potential School Leaders Recommendation: Create and initiate innovative recruitment programs to enhance the number and quality of candidates. Recommendation: Align the recruitment process with admission processes at accredited, pre-service program institutions.

BOSA Workgroup Recommendations BOSA Workgroup Recommendations Pre-service Preparation Programs Recommendation: Align ISLLC standards with the MN Principal competencies to provide a guide to review the preparation and professional practice for school leaders. Recommendation: Redesign pre-service preparation programs to provide skill development through authentic leadership experiences during the program of study. Recommendation: Monitor the current status of school leadership through BOSA to provide recommendations for policy changes that ensure sustainable quality leadership at all school levels.

BOSA Workgroup Recommendations BOSA Workgroup Recommendations Licensing and Certification Recommendation: Create performance-based tools to assess licensure candidates’ demonstration of state competencies. Recommendation: Create a tiered system for licensing that begins at entry level competency and moves toward exemplary demonstration of leadership ability.

BOSA Workgroup Recommendations BOSA Workgroup Recommendations Continuing Professional Development Recommendation: Provide structured continuous professional development aligned with a tiered licensing system for principals. Recommendation: Establish sustainable appropriations for funding from the state, private funding sources and professional leadership associations to assist with policy implementations related to professional development. Recommendation: Adopt and implement the newly developed evaluation process for principals.

Study by National Researchers – Pathways to Performance In 2012 St. Paul Foundation funded a study by national researchers. The research study focused on Recruitment & Section, Preparation, Licensure, and Professional Development for School Principals in Minnesota. The study resulted in recommendations to the BOSA board on the current state of principal preparation in Minnesota and recommendations for change in practice across four areas: Recruitment and selection Pre-service preparation programs Licensing and certification Continuing professional development Pathways to Performance Link to full report Pathways to Performance

Comparison of Pathway Recommendations and BOSA Work Group Recommendations Areas of focus for Development and Implementation Pathways for Performance Report Recommendations BOSA Work Group Executive Summary Recommendations the development of a recruitment process XX the redesign of program evaluation of preparation programs XX the redesign of Rule 3512 to meet expectations of a comprehensive, statewide licensure system XX the development or refinement of policies to support the licensure system XX

Comparison of Pathway Recommendations and BOSA Work Group Recommendations Areas of focus for Development and Implementation Pathways for Performance Report Recommendations BOSA Work Group Executive Summary Recommendations the development and implementation of high- quality performance-based tools X the implementation of a tiered system for licensing XX the connection of principal evaluation results with the tiered systems for licensure, continuing professional development, and program evaluation of preparation programs XX

Comparison of Pathway Recommendations and BOSA Work Group Recommendations Areas of focus for Development and Implementation Pathways for Performance Report Recommendations BOSA Work Group Executive Summary Recommendations the collaboration of BOSA and other stakeholders in the development of structured, continuous professional development XX

How we have been moving the work forward. Jim Rhodes, BOSA Board Member Representing: School Board Members Louise Sundin, BOSA Board Member Representing: Public

The work ahead...

Structure to Complete the Work BOSA BOARDAdvisory CommitteeWorkgroup

Purposes BOSA Board Provides direction and oversight??? Advisory Committee Provides feedback and advice Represents the voices of the stakeholders???? Workgroup Create a plan of action to move the executive recommendations forward to rule making through the lens of the feedback and advice from the Advisory Committee???? NOTE _ this needs major work!

At your table... have a discussion around the following questions: Who is not in the room that should be in the room? What you like best about what was shared today? What is most concerning about what was shared today? Advice in moving the work forward? Each group will share out major themes from their table’s discussion. NOTE – these are just some ideas to help us get started on Friday

Next meeting – insert date

Thank you!

FOCUS ON WHAT IS POSSIBLE We have at our fingertips an infinite capacity to light a spark of possibility. Passion, rather than fear, is the igniting force. -Rosamund and Benjamin Zander