Recycled Water Salinity Reduction Policy Utilities Advisory Commission December 2, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE EXPANDING ROLE of RECYCLED WATER The Need, Benefits and Cost Effectiveness Make Recycled Water an Increasingly Valued Resource Harry Ehrlich, SDA Principal.
Advertisements

PROPOSITION 218 IMPACTS ON UTILITY USER FEES Case Study City of Dixon Sewer Rate Repeal of 2007.
Catherine Elvert City of Palo Alto Utilities Communications Manager.
Page 1 Northern California Salinity Coalition Paul Piraino, General Manager Alameda County Water District.
Eric Hansen, P.E. Capital Planning Program CPUC Recycled Water Order Instituting Rulemaking (R ) San Francisco January 20, 2012 Workshop 3: Understanding.
BAWSCA’s Strategy In 2009, BAWSCA embarked on the Long- Term Reliable Water Supply Strategy to: o Determine the Water Supply Problem When, where, and how.
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Katherine Antos Chesapeake Bay Program Office Jenny Molloy Water Protection Division DC Draft Phase II WIP.
Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan North Bay Watershed Association Meeting November 3, 2006 Working together to enhance sustainable water.
1 Andree Johnson Water Resources Specialist Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency March 18, 2015 “A multicounty agency authorized to plan for and.
Regional Grant Funding Coordination for Implementation of Watershed Management Plans Project Clean Water Summit July 15, 2004 David W. Gibson SDRWQCB
DRA Perspective on What Recycled Water Applications from Investor- Owned Utilities Should Contain and How They Should be Evaluated CPUC Water Recycling.
Planning and Community Development Department Housing Element City Council February 03, 2014.
Eric Bergh Manager of Resources October 28 th, 2009 Climate Change and Water Supply An Urban Water Agency’s Perspective.
Watershed Council BAIRWMP Update 1/25/2011 Watershed Council BAIRWMP Update 1/25/2011 Prop 84 Planning Grant Proposal IRWMP Implementation Grant Proposal.
Orange County Board of County Commissioners Update on USEPA Rulemaking for Numeric Nutrient Criteria Utilities Department January 26, 2010 Utilities Department.
1 Update on New All-Payer Model Implementation Health Services Cost Review Commission.
Current Water Conservation (Task 3.1) Alan H. Plummer, Jr., P.E., BCEE.
Maximizing Water Supply Sustainability for the Goleta Valley Ryan Drake Water Supply and Conservation Manager 2015 Central Coast Sustainability Summit.
SantaBarbaraCA.gov/Water PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT WATER RESOURCES DIVISION EMBEDDED ENERGY OF “NEW” WATER Joshua Haggmark, Water Resources Manager UCSB.
Solar Power Project at the Sacramento Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant August 26, 2015.
Conservation Cal Water’s Approach with the California Public Utilities Commission Darin Duncan, Bear Gulch District Manager Low-Income Oversight Board.
WELCOME! 2015 Urban Water Management Plan Workshop.
1 Adrianne Carr Senior Water Resources Specialist Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency January 21, 2014 “A multicounty agency authorized to plan.
City of San Diego’s Recycled Water Study Item W15a October 10, 2012 Presentation to the California Coastal Commission.
SB 536 Study and Report WateReuse Florida November 9, 2015 Janet G. Llewellyn Office of Water Policy Florida Department of Environmental Protection.
Santa Rosa Plain Groundwater Management Planning Update Fall 2013.
Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) City of Patterson’s April 19, 2016.
Alameda Creek Watershed San Francisco Public Utilities Commission October 27, 2009.
Silicon Valley Advanced Water Purification Center And Future of Purified Water Use Tour Guides: Miguel Silva Tour Coordinators: Amy Fry, Michelle Pelayo-Osorio.
1 The Future of Organics Management in Palo Alto City of Palo Alto Public Works Operations March 8, 2010.
Kansas City Power & Light and KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations – Suggestions for Chapter 22 Revisions Missouri Public Service Commission Meeting Aug 31,
Central Valley Salinity/Nutrient Management Planning Through CV- SALTS Multi-State Salinity Coalition Annual Summit 2/19/2010.
1 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Water Use Efficiency Master Plan Elizabeth Lovsted, PE Senior Civil Engineer January 16, 2016.
Update on the resolution related to a rule to be proposed to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality related to the beneficial reuse of wastewater.
Planning Commission Ian Macek May 26, 2016 Freight Master Plan.
2035 General Plan Update Joint Study Session on Draft Conservation Element Planning Commission and Parks & Recreation Commission December 1, 2015.
1 Impacts of Drought Facilities Managers Meeting February 11, 2015.
Central Valley Salinity/Nutrient Management Planning Through CV- SALTS Why you need to be involved CV-SALTS and CVSC /25/09.
S ACRAMENTO W ATER R ECYCLING C OALITION SRCSD Goethe Rd 9-11 am Slide 1 May 4, 2011.
What is OneWater? “One Water is an integrated planning and implementation approach to managing finite water resources for long-term resiliency and reliability,
Bay Area Regional Reliability North Bay Watershed Association
Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA)
San Mateo County’s San Mateo Plain Groundwater Assessment Study
LEE FARM ADDITION – GDP AMENDMENT
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY
Recycled Water Project – Sharon Heights GCC
SAN DIEGO HOUSING FEDERATION WEAVING TOGETHER A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH TO WELLNESS October 13, 2016.
Policy Principles for the Allocation of Recycled Water
“Is the Bay Area Ready for Potable Reuse?1”
Breaking barriers between city & water leaders
State GHG.
PUBLIC HEARING: ESTABLISH A 20% WATER CONSERVATION TARGET AND IMPLEMENT LEVEL 1 WATER SUPPLY SHORTAGE PLAN March 27, 2017 Item 9.
GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN FOR (Permittee)
Central Valley Salinity and Nutrient Management Planning Problem, Solutions and Plan Groundwater Resources Association March C V S C.
Reuse and Conservation Strategies
Adapting to Change: Utility Systems and Declining Flows
Principal Planner, Sustainability San Mateo County Transit District
Special MRC – Fuel Security
Brackish Water Desalination Project
Staff Advisory Team Meeting #8 December 13, 2018
Stakeholder Information Gathering Meeting August 30, 2018
CP-TXT Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Amendment
City of Sunrise Wastewater Reuse Program
Stakeholder Information Gathering Meeting September 18, 2018
Central Valley Salinity Policy Group
Water Conservation Regulations: Guide or Be Guided
Status after Second Year of Work Implementing the Recommendations of the Santa Cruz Water Supply Advisory Committee Joint Meeting Santa Cruz City Council.
California Water Commission
Chino Basin Water Bank Development
Resource Management and Climate Protection Committee Meeting:
Presentation transcript:

Recycled Water Salinity Reduction Policy Utilities Advisory Commission December 2, 2009

2 Presentation Outline  Brief Review of the Palo Alto Recycled Water Project (Phase 3)  Current TDS Levels  Proposed Salinity Reduction Policy  Schedule  Questions

3 Palo Alto’s Recycled Water Project Is Phase 3 of Program Expansion RWQCP Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 1

4 Phase 3 Project Target Market  Initially serve approximately 900 acre-feet per year (AFY), mostly in Stanford Research Park Area  Predominantly used for landscape irrigation

5 Salinity Reduction Policy: The Issue and the Need  Recycled water quality is a concern for current and potential future users of recycled water.  Salinity is one of the key attributes of recycled water of concern to users, especially with respect to its use for landscape irrigation.  Use of water by humans and businesses will add some salt, but the recycled water from the Palo Alto Regional Water Quality Control Plant appears to have higher salinity than expected.

6 TDS level comparison Salinity Reduction Policy goal

7 Current Partner TDS levels

8 Salinity Reduction Policy: What it does  In response to comments and concerns related to the proposed Recycled Water project, the Regional Water Quality Control Plant (RWQCP) and the Utilities Department have prepared a policy document to address the issue of recycled water quality  The Policy outlines the current and future efforts the RWQCP and the RWQCP partners will take to reduce the TDS concentrations to a level one would expect from a closed system.  The Policy establishes a TDS goal of 600 PPM. This goal was developed using the following assumptions:  The source water for the different agencies has very low TDS levels (~100 PPM in aggregate)  Normal, unavoidable, human activities will contribute an additional PPM to the total TDS levels  A buffer of PPM is needed since we will not be able to completely eliminate saline groundwater infiltration.

9 Salinity Reduction Policy: What it does not do  It does not have a carrot/stick approach towards meeting the goal. However, that could be a future feature.  It does not provide, nor is it based on, an assessment of what number represents a suitable TDS level for irrigation purposes. This issue will be addressed in the near future during the environmental review phase.  It does not establish a firm “delivery guarantee” for future recycled water users.

10 Implementation of the Recycled Water Salinity Reduction Policy:  The RWQCP will function as a clearinghouse for data analysis and tracking.  The RWQCP will identify issues and work with the RWQCP partners to identify and address problems that are contributing to the salinity issue.  Utilities will coordinate the new Wastewater Management Plan with the RWQCP’s efforts.  Public Works will issue a biannual progress report on the effort.

11 Future Schedule  December 2 – Utilities Advisory Commission consider recommendation on proposed Recycled Water Salinity Reduction Policy.  January – City Council will consider UAC recommendation on Salinity Reduction Policy  December to March: Utilities Staff will revisit environmental document. RWQCP will work with other RWQCP partners to submit the policy to their respective governing bodies for approval.

12 QUESTIONS?

13 BACK UP SLIDES

14 Primary Benefits To Customers and the City To Other Stakeholders  Provides reliable, locally controlled supply to offset water restrictions during droughts  Offsets need to purchase approximately 900 AFY of potable water during normal years  Reduces potable per capita consumption by 6-7%  Improves supply reliability and diversity  Advances the City’s green initiative  Contributes to Santa Clara Valley Water District meeting recycled water goal  Reduces San Francisco Public Utilities Commission reliance on imported water  Meets environmental goals of SFPUC WSIP delivery limitations  Reduces effluent discharge to the South Bay  Critical recycled water crossing U.S. Highway 101  Provides future interconnection opportunities to neighboring communities