Dial-in: 1-877-512-6886 Pass code: 16 16 32 2775 SPDG Directors’ Webinar What Have We Learned About Teacher Learning? Findings from Randomized Control.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

The Need To Improve STEM Learning Successful K-12 STEM is essential for scientific discovery, economic growth and functioning democracy Too.
Has NCLB Improved Teacher and Teaching Quality for Disadvantaged Students? Laura M. Desimone Thomas M. Smith Vanderbilt University David Frisvold University.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Your Local School District District Team Orientation Date Time.
National Association for Sport and Physical Education (NASPE) PE Coordinator’s Mini-Conference Wednesday, March 14, 2012 Framework for Effective Teaching.
Braiding Initiatives Steve Goodman, Michigan’s Integrated Behavior and Learning Initiative (MiBLSi) April 16, :00PM – 3:30PM
Measure growth Track readiness Evaluate Programs Make Comparisons Assess Iowa Core Monitor Trends Determine Proficiency Inform Instruction.
Closing the Achievement Gap in Minnesota: Making a Difference through Leadership April 24, 2013.
Promising Practices in Coaching OSEP Project Director’s Conference State Deaf Blind Projects Meeting July 24, 2008.
Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)
How to Develop a Project Evaluation Plan Pat Gonzalez Office of Special Education Programs
Theories of Action: What are they, why are they important, and how are they created? January 2015 Office of Student and School Success, OSPI Travis Campbell,
Examining the Alignment of Instructional Content to the Iowa Core Community School District, /5/10v. 2.
Aligning Observations and In-service Professional Development Prek-3 rd Jason Downer May 9, 2012.
1 Ohio’s Entry Year Teacher Program Review Ohio Confederation of Teacher Education Organizations Fall Conference: October 23, 2008 Presenter: Lori Lofton.
What is Effective Professional Development? Dr. Robert Mayes Science and Mathematics Teaching Center University of Wyoming.
Experiences and requirements in teacher professional development: Understanding teacher change Sylvia Linan-Thompson, Ph.D. The University of Texas at.
Response to Intervention
Examining the Induction of Middle School Mathematics Teachers Kristin L. McGraner Research Associate Peabody College, Vanderbilt University Supported by.
Monica Ballay Data Triangulation: Measuring Implementation of SPDG Focus Areas.
The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education, #H323A However, these contents do not necessarily.
Research Indicators for Sustaining and Institutionalizing Change CaMSP Network Meeting April 4 & 5, 2011 Sacramento, CA Mikala L. Rahn, PhD Public Works,
© 2009 American Institutes for Research ® State-wide Systems of Support: Integrating High School Redesign Efforts Joseph Harris, Project Director Jenny.
Data Sources Artifacts: Lesson plans and/or curriculum units which evidence planned use of diagnostic tools, pre- assessment activities, activating strategies,
Measuring Educator Effectiveness: Implications for Improving Teacher Preparation Programs Lynn Holdheide, Deputy Director Office of Special Education Program’s.
Overview of Title I Part A Prepared by: Title I Staff - Office of Superintendent of Instruction OSPI Dr. Bill Wadlington, Superintendent/Principal and.
Forum on Educational Accountability Gene Wilhoit Council of Chief State School Officers January 7, 2010.
Promoting a Culture of Evidence Through Program Evaluation Patti Bourexis, Ph.D. Principal Researcher The Study Group Inc. OSEP Project Directors’ Conference.
Amy Alexander. Analyzing Effectiveness Participants’ Reactions Participants’ Learning Organization Support and Change Participants’ Use of New Knowledge.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Family, School & Community Partnerships (FSCP) “…parents are a child’s first teachers…” Adams, et al (2003)
Regional Chief Instructional Leader Meetings. Today We will… List, categorize, and prioritize county professional development offerings Learn about the.
Mission Possible: Improving Academic and Behavioral Results for Children with Disabilities through Sustained Research Based Professional Development Deborah.
A Professional Development Series from the CDC’s Division of Population Health School Health Branch Professional Development 101: The Basics – Part 1.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Fidelity: Maximizing the Effectiveness of Tier 2 September 24, 2013 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development.
325K: COMBINED PRIORITY FOR PERSONNEL PREPARATION Webinar on the Annual Performance Report for Continuation Funding Office of Special Education Programs.
325D: PREPARATION OF LEADERSHIP PERSONNEL Webinar on Project Objective and Performance Measures for the Annual Performance Report for Continuation Funding.
Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.
Dial-in: Passcode: RTI/Multi-Tiered Models of Intervention PLC Movement Between Tiers of Intervention & Implications for Special.
Grant Activities, Needs Assessments And other SPDG application Issues to Consider.
Victorian Curriculum: Focus on Economics and Business (Primary)
Dial-in: Pass code: SPDG Directors’ Webinar Implementation Driver Series: Organizational – Data Decision Support Systems Facilitators.
Assessing High Quality Professional Development BY: MONICA BALLAY |
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
Board on science education
Victorian Curriculum: Focus on Economics and Business (Secondary)
Linking Communication Protocols
Personalizing Your PD.
A Policy-oriented Board of Trustees
Educator preparation policy as a lever for improving teacher and leader preparation: Keeping promises in Tennessee Collaboration for Effective Educator.
The Year of Core Instruction
Professional Development
The Formative Assessment Process
GSF Results and Financial Monitoring Workshop
RESEARCH IMPLEMENTATION PRACTICE
CCRS Implementation
PBIS PRACTICES.
Results of Survey on Level Organization June 2012
Victorian Curriculum: Focus on Economics and Business (Primary)
Introductions Introduction
Introduction Introduction
Implementing Race to the Top
Parent-Teacher Partnerships for Student Success
Learning-oriented Organizational Improvement Processes
NASDSE 74th Annual Conference October 16, 2011
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Facilitators: Jennifer Coffey, OSEP Project Officer
APR Informational Webinar
Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession EHHS Conceptual Framework
Presentation transcript:

Dial-in: Pass code: SPDG Directors’ Webinar What Have We Learned About Teacher Learning? Findings from Randomized Control Trials Presenter Laura M. Desimone University of Pennsylvania Facilitators: Jennifer Coffey, OSEP Project Officer John Lind, SIGnetwork Coordinator 1

Roll Call

*6 / #6

5 Resources Event Materials, Recording nts/1255 Tips on Webinar design and delivery In SIGnetwork Website Resource Library on the Evidence-Based Professional Development professional-development professional-development 4 th link down

Introductions 6 Laura M. Desimone University of Pennsylvan ia

What Have We Learned About Teacher Learning? Findings from Randomized Control Trials Laura M. Desimone University of Pennsylvania

Why Should Policymakers Care About Teacher Learning?  Teacher Quality: not all teachers are effective in fostering student learning  Reforms: Most reforms rely on teacher learning and improved instruction to increase student learning.  Money: We spend over 1.5 billion on teacher professional development at the federal, state and local levels.

Core Model of Professional Development Effects on Teachers and Students

Conceptual Grounding: What Makes Professional Development Effective?  subject-matter focus  active learning  collective participation  coherence  sustained

Randomized Control Trials: What Are We Learning?

Effects Depend on the Target of the Intervention 1.What is the target of teacher change? a)Instructional Procedures b)Content Knowledge c)Curriculum Use d)Decision-making e)A Combination of these

Implementation Matters 1.Importance of implementation a)The level and quality of implementation is linked to effects. b)Implementation often varies by teacher characteristics. c)Dips in implementation occur, especially at start-up. d)There is considerable variation in how we measure implementation.

Which Teachers Learn More/Implement Better? Experience matters, but in different ways for different interventions Content knowledge: the Matthew Effect

Implementation Dip What is an appropriate trajectory of teacher change? How long should it take, and what should the trend look like?

How Do We Measure Implementation? Observations Checklists Self-report surveys

Are Results Related to the Theory of Change or the Theory of Instruction?  Theory of Change: Does the PD change teachers in targeted ways (e.g., knowledge, pedagogy)?  Theory of Instruction: When teachers change in targeted ways, does student learning improve?

Is the PD High Quality?  By design, often yes. Most follow the tenets of “high-quality” PD: sustained ( hrs, school year follow-up), active learning, collective participation, focused on content.  In implementation, no.  Most notable variation is in coherence, in terms of integration with the curriculum, and other reforms and PDs.

Effects on Student Achievement  Few main effects on student achievement (e.g., Heller, 2002); small effects .2 to.3 ES (e.g., Greenleaf et al., 2011; Penuel, Gallagher, & Moorthy, 2011).  Effects on aligned not standardized tests (Simmons et al., 2010)  Interactions with teacher and student characteristics o students with higher pre-tests scores (e.g., Phelan et al., 2011) o teacher experience (Borman, Gamoran, & Bowdon, 2008) o teacher prior content knowledge (Santagata et al., 2011)

How Do We Measure Outcomes?

Policy/Accountability Issues 1.Is the PD voluntary or mandatory? 2.Is it specific? 3.Is it supported by the school or district? Who initiated it? 4.How coherence/aligned is it with other policies/interventions? 5.Is there any monitoring or accountability of use of what was taught in the PD?

Conceptual Framework: Policy Attributes Theory

Issues to Consider In Designing & Interpreting Results of PD Studies Alignment with curricula and other teacher learning opportunities Implementation: quality and thresholds Teacher adaptation and individual teacher needs Effects of intervention research on professional community, teacher adaptation Role of school and district in monitoring and support Timeline, trajectory Appropriate outcomes

Discussion, Questions, Comments

Contact: Laura M. Desimone