R. Tschirhart Fermilab NuFact Meeting William & Mary July 25 th 2012 The Project X Research Program: Muons.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Project X Proton Driver David Neuffer September 2011.
Advertisements

ISS meeting, (1) R. Garoby (for the SPL study group) SPL-based Proton Driver for Facilities SPL-based Proton Driver for Facilities at CERN:
U.S. Department of Energy Brookhaven Science Associates BNL’s Role in High Energy Physics Thomas B.W. Kirk Associate Director for High Energy and Nuclear.
Muon Collider 2011 Workshop Jun 27-July 1 in Telluride, CO Gollwitzer & Nagaitsev presented Attending: Ankenbrandt, Lebedev, Pasquinelli, Popovic, and.
Task Force on Project X for Muon Collider Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab.
Project X – MAP Task Force Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab Project X Collaboration Meeting Oct 25, 2011.
Nufact09-IIT 107/24/2009 Project X and a Muon Facility at Fermilab Milorad Popovic FNAL.
Project X Update Steve Holmes SPAFOA Meeting November 13, 2012
Project X Research Program R. Tschirhart Representing the Collaboration Coordination Committee for Project-X Physics July 29 th, 2011.
Project X: Staging and Development Strategy Steve Holmes Fermilab PAC June 20, 2012.
R. Tschirhart Fermilab Oct 15 th 2012 PX Stage 1 Physics Case: Preparations for Snowmass / Minnesota.
Greetings to Veljko from Fermilab December 9, 2010.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy AGS Upgrade and Super Neutrino Beam DOE Annual HEP Program Review April 27-28, 2005 Derek I. Lowenstein.
Fermilab, Proton Driver, Muon Beams, Recycler David Neuffer Fermilab NufACT05.
1 Muon Physics Project X Workshop Fermilab 17 November 2007.
Proton Driver at Fermilab Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab IDS-NF 7 th Plenary Meeting Oct 17-19,2011.
F Project X Overview Dave McGinnis October 12, 2007.
Project X: A Multi-MW Proton Source at Fermilab Manfred Wendt & Steve Holmes SPL/ESS Collaboration Meeting Lund June 30, 2010.
Steve Holmes and Brendan Casey DPF Project X Forum August 10, 2011 Project X: A 5 MW Proton Accelerator Accelerator and Particle Physics.
Staging Opportunities for Project X Steve Holmes on behalf of the PX Team Accelerator Physics and Technology Seminar May 8, 2012.
High Power Proton Facilities Sergei Nagaitsev APS April 2015 meeting 11 April 2015.
An Integrated Intensity Frontier Strategy Steve Holmes & Bob Tschirhart LBNE Reconfiguration Workshop April 25, 2012.
Project-X Physics Opportunities R. Tschirhart Fermilab March 18 th, 2010.
Project X Injector Experiment (PXIE) Sergei Nagaitsev Dec 19, 2011.
Mu2e, August 15, 2007 E Prebys 1 The Steering Group and mu2e Eric Prebys.
Fermilab Proton Driver Project Weiren Chou for Bill Foster Fermilab, U.S.A. October 20, 2004 Presentation at the Proton Driver Session ICFA-HB2004, Bensheim,
Andreas Jansson, Neutrino Workshop, ANL, March 3-4, 2004 Possible beta beam scenario(s) in the US Andreas Jansson Fermilab.
PIP-II: Why a new accelerator? Paul Derwent Fermilab Community Advisory Board 23 July 2015.
Proton Source & Site Layout Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Muon Accelerator Program Review Fermilab, August.
Fermilab Perspective: Where are We Going with Project-X, and How Can it Benefit Nuclear Energy? Stuart Henderson PASI Meeting April 5, 2013.
Fermilab: Prospects and Plans Giorgio Apollinari Fermilab New Opportunities in Physics May 10-13, 2009.
News Y2K June 25, Summary of June 12 Face-to-Face Meeting.
Fermilab: Present and Future Young-Kee Kim Data Preservation Workshop May 16, 2011.
Proton Driver / Project X Keith Gollwitzer Fermilab August 30, 2012.
F A Fermilab Roadmap Dave McGinnis May 28, f Fermilab Roadmap - McGinnis Timelines  Divide the road map into three parallel paths  ILC - Energy.
Status of Project X Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP Winter Meeting - March 1, 2011.
August 2011 R. Tschirhart - DPF - Providence RI Project-X DPF, August 10 th 2011 R.Tschirhart R.TschirhartFermilab Project-X DPF, August 10 th 2011 R.Tschirhart.
Proton Driver Design Keith Gollwitzer Fermilab February 19, 2014.
NuFACT06 Muon Source at Fermilab David Neuffer Fermilab.
Proton Drivers & Muon Sources at Fermilab David Neuffer Fermilab.
Steering Group Meeting 10:30 – 12:30 am CDT Monday, July 23, 2007 Y2K.
Protons for Neutrinos: Mid-Term and Project-X Bob Zwaska Fermilab Intensity Frontier Neutrino Working Group Meeting October 24, 2011.
March 2012 R. Tschirhart PX Kaon Targetry Design Study March 2012 R. Tschirhart Fermilab PX Kaon Targetry Design Study March.
Project-X Research Program R. Tschirhart Project X Research Program Scientist Fermilab Junne 20 th 2012.
Project X: Accelerators Sergei Nagaitsev September 2, 2011.
Project X: Technology, Perspectives, and Applications Steve Holmes on behalf of the Project X Team IEEE-Nuclear Science Symposium Anaheim, CA November.
Proton Driver Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP Collaboration Meeting June 20, 2013.
Fermilab SRF Linac Development Steve Holmes Workshop on High Intensity Proton Accelerators October 19, 2009.
Proton Source Reference Notes for mu2e at Fermilab 1 Section 1: Compilation of parameters describing the existing Fermilab accelerator complex and the.
U.S. Plans for High Power Proton Drivers Steve Holmes Fermilab Workshop on Physics with a Multi-MW Proton Source CERN May 25, 2004.
Project X Research Program R. Tschirhart Project X Machine Advisory Committee March 18-19, 2013.
Intensity Frontier Physics with a Mega-Watt Proton Source R. Tschirhart Fermilab Science & Technology Review November
F Sergei Nagaitsev (FNAL) Aug Project X ICD2 Briefing.
The Fermilab Roadmap, Project X, and Muon Facilities Steve Holmes NFMCC Meeting March 17, 2008.
Opportunities from the Intensity Frontier to the Energy Frontier J.P.Delahaye/SLAC.
The High Intensity Horizon at Fermilab R. Tschirhart Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory IPAC 2012, New Orleans, USA. May 23 rd, 2012.
Project X as a Muon Facility Platform Keith Gollwitzer Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee November 7-9, 2011.
Project X/ILC/SRF Integrated Plan Steve Holmes Fermilab DOE Annual Science & Technology Review July 12-14, 2010.
1 Intensity Frontier Instrumentation R.Tschirhart, S. Kettell Fermilab.
Project X Sergei Nagaitsev FNAL March 7, Project X collaboration Multi-institutional collaboration to execute the RD&D Program. –Organized as a.
The High Intensity Horizon at Fermilab R. Tschirhart Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory IPAC 2012, New Orleans, USA. May 23 rd, 2012.
Particle Physics Sector Young-Kee Kim / Greg Bock Leadership Team Strategic Planning Winter Workshop January 29, 2013.
Steve Holmes DNP Meeting/Santa Fe November 6, 2010 Project X: A Multi-MW Proton Source at Fermilab.
A New Sensitive Search for Muon to Electron Conversion Mu2e Experiment at Fermilab Mu2e Collaboration: Boston U, BNL, UC Berkeley & LBNL, UC Irvine, CUNY,
UK Neutrino Factory Conceptual Design
A Muon-based Accelerator Staging Scenario (MASS)
Energy (ILC) and Intensity (Project X) SRF Cavity Needs
Short-Baseline Plans at Fermilab Steve Geer European Strategy for Neutrino Oscillation Physics – II May 14-16, 2012.
Future physics at nuSTORM
Progress towards Pulsed Multi-MW CERN Proton Drivers
Presentation transcript:

R. Tschirhart Fermilab NuFact Meeting William & Mary July 25 th 2012 The Project X Research Program: Muons

Evolution of the existing Fermilab accelerator complex with the revolution in Super-Conducting RF Technology. R. Tschirhart, NuFact Meeting, July 25th William & Mary 2 Project-X:

Origins… The Origin of Mass: How do massless chiral fermions become matter particles? (buzzword: “Higgs”) The Origin of Matter: Why are there so many different kinds of matter particles with different properties? (buzzword: “Flavor”) The Origin of the Universe: Where did matter come from in the first place and why didn’t it all annihilate with antimatter? (buzzwords: “Baryogenesis”, “Leptogenesis”) -Joe Lykken Project-Y: R. Tschirhart, NuFact Meeting, July 25th William & Mary 3

Direct Challenges from the Energy Frontier to Models Beyond the Standard Model New Physics R. Tschirhart, NuFact Meeting, July 25th William & Mary 4 Courtesy Andy Parker, ICHEP-2012 Y. Grossman, Project X Physics Study June 2012

The Project-X Research Program Neutrino experiments A high-power proton source with proton energies between 1 and 120 GeV would produce intense neutrino sources and beams illuminating near detectors on the Fermilab site and massive detectors at distant laboratories. Kaon, muon, nuclei & neutron precision experiments These could include world leading experiments searching for muon-to-electron conversion, nuclear and neutron electron dipole moments (edms), nucleon instability and world-leading precision measurements of ultra-rare kaon decays. Platform for evolution to a Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider Neutrino Factory and Muon-Collider concepts depend critically on developing high intensity proton source technologies. Nuclear Energy Applications Accelerator, spallation, target and transmutation technology demonstration which could investigate and develop accelerator technologies important to the design of future nuclear waste transmutation systems and future thorium fuel-cycle power systems. R. Tschirhart, NuFact Meeting, July 25th William & Mary 5 Detailed discussion on Project X websiteProject X website

6 ( Attendees Six very active working groups: Charged leptons Heavy Quarks Hidden Sector Neutrinos Nucleons/Nuclei/Atoms Proton Decay Project X potential discussed in each group R. Tschirhart, NuFact Meeting, July 25th William & Mary

7 The Project X Physics Study Followed this Success… R. Tschirhart, NuFact Meeting, July 25th William & Mary June 2012 Physics Study: June 14 th -22 nd Summer 2012 through Spring 2013: Continue to evolve existing white papers into a comprehensive staged program with compelling physics at each stage. October 11 th -13 th 2012 (CPM2012): US particle physics town meeting at Fermilab preparing for “Snowmass”, summer “Snowmass”, summer 2013 (CSS2013): July 29 th – August 10 th Event to develop US particle physics strategies. Harry Weerts & Joanne Hewett are Intensity Frontier conveners.

R. Tschirhart, NuFact Meeting, July 25th William & Mary 8 Conveners for PXPS Experimental Concepts and Sensitivities Neutrinos: Andre de Gouvea (Northwestern University), Patrick Huber (Virginia Tech), Geoff Mills (LANL) Ko Nishikawa (University of Chicago/FNAL), Steve Geer (FNAL) Muon Experiments: Bob Bernstein (Fermilab), Graham Kribs, (University of Oregon) Kaon Experiments: Kevin Pitts (University of Illinois UC), Vincenzo Cirigliano (LANL) EDMs: Tim Chupp (University of Michigan), Susan Gardner (University of Kentucky), Zheng-Tian Lu (ANL) n-nbar oscillations: Chris Quigg (FNAL), Albert Young (North Carolina State University) Hadron physics: Stephen Godfrey (Carleton University), Paul Reimer (ANL) 2

R. Tschirhart, NuFact Meeting, July 25th William & Mary 9 Conveners for PXPS Enabling Technologies and Techniques High rate Precision Photon Calorimetry: David Hitlin (Caltech), Milind Diwan (BNL) Very Low-Mass High-Rate Charged Particle Tracking: Ron Lipton (FNAL), Jack Ritchie (University of Texas, Austin) Time-of-Flight System Performance below 10 psec: Mike Albrow (FNAL), Bob Wagner (ANL) High Precision Measurement of Neutrino Interactions: Kevin McFarland (Rochester University), Jonghee Yoo (FNAL), Rex Tayloe (University of Indiana) Large Area Cost Effective (LACE) Detector Technologies: Mayly Sanchez (Iowa State University), Yury Kamyshkov (University of Tennessee) Lattice QCD: Ruth Van de Water (BNL), Tom Blum (University of Connecticut) 3

Project-X Accelerator Parameters (see PXPS website) CW Linac Particle TypeH - Beam Kinetic Energy GeV Average Beam Current1mA Linac pulse rateCW Beam 3 GeV3000kW Beam Power to 3 GeV program2870kW RCS/Pulsed Linac Particle Typeprotons/H - Beam Kinetic Energy8.0GeV Pulse rate10Hz Pulse Width0.002/4.3msec Cycles to MI6 Particles per cycle to Recycler2.6  Beam Power to 8 GeV program170kW Main Injector/Recycler Beam Kinetic Energy (maximum)120GeV Cycle time1.3sec Particles per cycle1.6  Beam Power at 120 GeV2450kW simultaneous 10 R. Tschirhart, NuFact Meeting, July 25th William & Mary

R. Tschirhart- IPAC Meeting New Orleans- May 23rd, Project X SRF Linac Technology Map SectionFreqEnergy (MeV)Cav/mag/CMType HWR (  G =0.1) /6/1HWR, solenoid SSR1 (  G =0.22) /18/ 2SSR, solenoid SSR2 (  G =0.47) /20/4SSR, solenoid LB 650 (  G =0.61) /14/75-cell elliptical, doublet HB 650 (  G =0.9) /19/195-cell elliptical, doublet ILC 1.3 (  G =1.0) /28 /289-cell elliptical, quad  =0.11  =0.22  =0.4  =0.61  = MHz MeV  = GHz 3-8 GeV 650 MHz GeV CW Pulsed MHz MeV

Operating Scenario for High Power Campus 1  sec period at 3 GeV Muon pulses (12e7) MHz, 80 nsec700 kW Kaon pulses (12e7) 27 MHz1540 kW Nuclear pulses (12e7) 13.5 MHz770 kW Separation scheme Ion source and RFQ operate at 4.4 mA; 77% of bunches are 2.1 MeV  maintain 1 mA over 1  sec Transverse rf splitter 1  sec 12 R. Tschirhart- IPAC Meeting New Orleans- May 23rd, 2012

Example Research Program, definitive space of accelerator parameters on PXPS Indico site * Operating point in range depends on MI energy for neutrinos. ** Operating point in range depends on MI injector slow-spill duty factor (df) for kaon program. 11 Project X Campaign R. Tschirhart, NuFact Meeting, July 25th William & Mary 13 Program: Onset of NOvA operations in 2013 Stage-1: 1 GeV CW Linac driving Booster & Muon, n/edm programs Stage-2: Upgrade to 3 GeV CW Linac Stage-3: Project X RDR Stage-4: Beyond RDR: 8 GeV power upgrade to 4MW MI neutrinos kW** kW** 1200 kW2450 kW kW 8 GeV Neutrinos15 kW +0-50kW**0-42 kW* kW**0-84 kW*0-172 kW*3000 kW 8 GeV Muon program e.g, (g-2), Mu2e-1 20 kW0-20 kW* kW* 1000 kW 1-3 GeV Muon program, e.g. Mu2e kW1000 kW Kaon Program 0-30 kW** (<30% df from MI) 0-75 kW** (<45% df from MI) 1100 kW1870 kW Nuclear edm ISOL program none0-900 kW kW Ultra-cold neutron program none kW kW Nuclear technology applications none0-900 kW kW # Programs: Total max power: 735 kW 2222 kW 4284 kW 6492 kW 11870kW

Stage 1: CW Linac (1 GeV, 1 mA) feeds Booster allowing 60-70% more beam at 8 and 120 GeV. 900 kW of CW beam remains at 1 GeV, and can be used in combination with existing AP0, former anti-proton rings, and new Muon Campus Kaducak & Polly concept studies at PXPS R. Tschirhart, NuFact Meeting, July 25th William & Mary 14

Stage 1a: A compressor ring allows non-CW experiments to be mounted in the existing 1 GeV experimental areas. R. Tschirhart, NuFact Meeting, July 25th William & Mary Kaducak & Polly concept studies at PXPS 15

Stage 2: CW linac for 1 to 3 GeV constructed to feed new 3 MW experimental campus. Reuses first 180˚ of 1 GeV bunching ring for transport. R. Tschirhart, NuFact Meeting, July 25th William & Mary Kaducak & Polly concept studies at PXPS 16

R. Tschirhart, NuFact Meeting, July 25th William & Mary Kaducak & Polly concept studies at PXPS Stage 2a: A compressor ring allows non-CW experiments to be mounted in the 3 GeV experimental areas. 17

Stage 3: Pulsed linac constructed to feed Recycler. Reuses first 180˚ of 3 GeV bunching ring for transport. R. Tschirhart, NuFact Meeting, July 25th William & Mary Kaducak & Polly concept studies at PXPS 18

Science Enabled with Stage-1 Promotes the Main Injector to a Mega-Watt class machine for neutrinos, and increases the potential beam power for possible slow-spill experiments (e.g. ORKA). Potentially unshackles the   e (Mu2e) experiment from the Booster complex: Potentially increases sensitivity of Mu2e by x10 - x100 with 1-GeV CW drive beam, consideration of a   3e program. World class ultra-cold neutron and ISOL-edm programs optimized for particle physics: e.g. edms & neutron anti-neutron oscillations. Increases the available integrated 8 GeV power for other experiments (e.g. short-baseline neutrinos) from the Booster complex by liberating Mu2e. Broad World-class Program in Neutrinos and Rare Processes R. Tschirhart, NuFact Meeting, July 25th William & Mary 19

Science Enabled with Stage-2 World leading kaon physics program: Megawatt power (x10 over competing facilities) can drive multiple experiments. World class muon physics program: Mu2e descendant migrates to a higher power campus. Megawatt power for conversion experiments (x10 over competing   e facilities), opportunities for major next steps in other channels (e.g.   3e, others). Maintains Main Injector beam power at lower energies (e.g. 60 GeV) enhancing the neutrino spectrum for long baseline experiments. R. Tschirhart, NuFact Meeting, July 25th William & Mary 20

Science Enabled with Stage-3 (RDR) Main Injector power upgrade to >2 Mega Watts for GeV beam, doubling power to long baseline Main Injector Neutrinos and Main Injector near-detector neutrino physics. 8 GeV beam power for experiments is doubled to now x10 the MiniBooNE era, which will support a new generation of short-baseline neutrino physics. R. Tschirhart, NuFact Meeting, July 25th William & Mary 21

Science Enabled with Stage-4 (Beyond RDR) 8 GeV and 4000kW at 60 GeV for the ultimate super beams. Double super-beam technique can tune illumination of the first and second maxima of long-baseline experiments of very massive next generation long-baseline detectors. Driver for an extremely powerful muon storage ring neutrino source, ultimately leading to a neutrino factory as motivated by the physics. R. Tschirhart, NuFact Meeting, July 25th William & Mary 22

R. Tschirhart, NuFact Meeting, July 25th William & Mary 23 Muon Physics:  Next generation muon-to-electron conversion experiment, new techniques for higher sensitivity and/or other nuclei.  Next generation (g-2)  if motivated by next round, theory, LHC. New techniques proposed to JPARC that are beam-power hungry…   edm    3e    e     e +    A   + A’ ;   A  e + A’ ;   e - (A)  e - e - (A)  Systematic study of radiative muon capture on nuclei. Mu2e upgrade is a candidate Day-1 experiment A Partial Menu of World Class Science Enabled by Project-X

R. Tschirhart, NuFact Meeting, July 25th William & Mary 24

What is the optimum proton beam energy to drive a MELC/MECO/Comet-Mu2E experiment? R. Tschirhart, NuFact Meeting, July 25th William & Mary 25 S. Striganov et al PXPS, work in progress Yield / Watt

Issues That a Next-Generation Conversion Experiment must face… Target systems. High-Z stationary targets do not scale well with power. Radiation damage: Production Solenoid, Readout systems (e.g. SiPMs). Readout speed, rate robustness. Spectrometer resolution…much better than 100 keV/c?? Spectrometer calibration: Internal (Michel edge,  e2)? External (electron injection)? Background Rejection! R. Tschirhart, NuFact Meeting, July 25th William & Mary 26

R. Tschirhart, NuFact Meeting, July 25th William & Mary 27 V. Lebedev, Fermilab AAC 2011

R. Tschirhart, NuFact Meeting, July 25th William & Mary 28 V. Lebedev, Fermilab AAC 2011

Opportunities with Project –X to meet these Challenges Much better proton pulse timing. ~10 nsec as compared to 200 nsec (Mu2e, COMET) for the same power level, <100 nsec at 1 MWatt!. Radiative Pion Capture background much reduced. No anti-proton background. High power can mean fewer stopping target foils, possibly colder beams. Can realize optimum cold-muon-yield/driver-power R. Tschirhart, NuFact Meeting, July 25th William & Mary 29

R. Tschirhart, NuFact Meeting, July 25th William & Mary % X 0 per layer, 100 psec track timing… Dirk Wiedner, Mu3e Initiative at PSI

R. Tschirhart, NuFact Meeting, July 25th William & Mary 31 R. Lipton, Tracking Summary PXPS Project-X era muon experiments must journey far beyond the state of the art in tracking…

R. Tschirhart, NuFact Meeting, July 25th William & Mary 32 Frtiz Dejongh, PXPS

R. Tschirhart, NuFact Meeting, July 25th William & Mary 33 CERN NA62 “Giga-tracker” at PXPS

Timing depends on: Bob Velghe, PXPS CERN NA62 “Giga-tracker” at PXPS 34 R. Tschirhart, NuFact Meeting, July 25th William & Mary CERN NA62 “Giga-tracker” at PXPS

Summary  Project-X is a staged evolution of the best assets of the Fermilab accelerator complex with the revolution in super-conducting RF technology.  Each Stage of Project-X is an opportunity to drive several next generation muon experiments forward.  Project X opportunities will be based on the successes of the current generation now being planned and designed. Programs in the design phase now should be cognizant of potential Project-X gains. R. Tschirhart, NuFact Meeting, July 25th William & Mary 35