Modeling the Optimization of a Toll Booth Plaza By Liam Connell, Erin Hoover and Zach Schutzman Figure 1. Plot of k values and outputs from Erlang’s Formula.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Part 3 Probabilistic Decision Models
Advertisements

Waiting Line Management
LESSONs NINE and TEN QUEUING MODELS.
Queuing Models.
(Monté Carlo) Simulation
QUEUING MODELS Based on slides for Hilier, Hiller, and Lieberman, Introduction to Management Science, Irwin McGraw-Hill.
D Waiting-Line Models PowerPoint presentation to accompany
Nur Aini Masruroh Queuing Theory. Outlines IntroductionBirth-death processSingle server modelMulti server model.
Queuing Analysis Based on noted from Appendix A of Stallings Operating System text 6/10/20151.
Queuing Models Basic Concepts
Queuing Systems Chapter 17.
Building and Running a FTIM n 1. Define the system of interest. Identify the DVs, IRVs, DRVs, and Objective. n 2. Develop an objective function of these.
Queues / Lines You manage a call center which can answer an average of 20 calls an hour. Your call center gets 17.5 calls in an average hour. On average.
1 Performance Evaluation of Computer Networks Objectives  Introduction to Queuing Theory  Little’s Theorem  Standard Notation of Queuing Systems  Poisson.
Queuing and Transportation
1 Queuing Theory 2 Queuing theory is the study of waiting in lines or queues. Server Pool of potential customers Rear of queue Front of queue Line (or.
Lec13, Ch.6, pp : Gap acceptance and Queuing Theory (Objectives)
CE 4640: Transportation Design Prof. Tapan Datta, Ph.D., P.E. Fall 2002.
1 Validation and Verification of Simulation Models.
Queuing Analysis Based on noted from Appendix A of Stallings Operating System text 6/28/20151.
Queueing Theory Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado Boulder, CO
7/3/2015© 2007 Raymond P. Jefferis III1 Queuing Systems.
To accompany Quantitative Analysis for Management, 9e by Render/Stair/Hanna 14-1 © 2003 by Prentice Hall, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ Chapter 14.
Queuing Theory. Queuing theory is the study of waiting in lines or queues. Server Pool of potential customers Rear of queue Front of queue Line (or queue)
QUEUING MODELS Queuing theory is the analysis of waiting lines It can be used to: –Determine the # checkout stands to have open at a store –Determine the.
Lecture 14 – Queuing Systems
Monté Carlo Simulation MGS 3100 – Chapter 9. Simulation Defined A computer-based model used to run experiments on a real system.  Typically done on a.
4-1 Continuous Random Variables 4-2 Probability Distributions and Probability Density Functions Figure 4-1 Density function of a loading on a long,
Chapter 5 Several Discrete Distributions General Objectives: Discrete random variables are used in many practical applications. These random variables.
Introduction to Management Science
Simulation Examples ~ By Hand ~ Using Excel
Management of Waiting Lines McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Introduction to Operations Research
Lecture 14 – Queuing Networks Topics Description of Jackson networks Equations for computing internal arrival rates Examples: computation center, job shop.
Structure of a Waiting Line System Queuing theory is the study of waiting lines Four characteristics of a queuing system: –The manner in which customers.
18 Management of Waiting Lines.
1 Systems Analysis Methods Dr. Jerrell T. Stracener, SAE Fellow SMU EMIS 5300/7300 NTU SY-521-N NTU SY-521-N SMU EMIS 5300/7300 Queuing Modeling and Analysis.
Waiting Lines and Queuing Models. Queuing Theory  The study of the behavior of waiting lines Importance to business There is a tradeoff between faster.
Queuing Theory. Introduction Queuing is the study of waiting lines, or queues. The objective of queuing analysis is to design systems that enable organizations.
Traffic Flow Fundamentals
Simulation is the process of studying the behavior of a real system by using a model that replicates the system under different scenarios. A simulation.
1 ISE 195 Introduction to Industrial & Systems Engineering.
Chapter 20 Queuing Theory to accompany Operations Research: Applications and Algorithms 4th edition by Wayne L. Winston Copyright (c) 2004 Brooks/Cole,
CSCI1600: Embedded and Real Time Software Lecture 19: Queuing Theory Steven Reiss, Fall 2015.
Waiting Lines and Queuing Theory Models
Stevenson and Ozgur First Edition Introduction to Management Science with Spreadsheets McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies,
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. Chapter 17 Queueing Theory.
Management of Waiting Lines Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent.
Abu Bashar Queuing Theory. What is queuing ?? Queues or waiting lines arise when the demand for a service facility exceeds the capacity of that facility,
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 18 Management of Waiting Lines.
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.D – 1 Operations Management Module D – Waiting-Line Models © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer/Render.
4-1 Continuous Random Variables 4-2 Probability Distributions and Probability Density Functions Figure 4-1 Density function of a loading on a long,
Managing Waiting Lines & Queuing Systems
WAITING LINES AND SIMULATION
Lecture 14 – Queuing Networks
Prepared by Lloyd R. Jaisingh
Models of Traffic Flow 1.
2.7: Simulation.
Chapter 10 Verification and Validation of Simulation Models
Solutions Queueing Theory 1
Exponential and Poisson Distributions
Simulation Modeling.
COMP60611 Fundamentals of Parallel and Distributed Systems
Solutions Queueing Theory 1
Queuing Analysis Two analytical techniques can be employed to study queuing processes: Shock wave analysis Demand-capacity process is deterministic Suited.
Solutions Queueing Theory 1
Lecture 14 – Queuing Networks
COMP60621 Designing for Parallelism
Determining When a Second Cart Should Be Added to El Toro
Adaptive Traffic Control
Presentation transcript:

Modeling the Optimization of a Toll Booth Plaza By Liam Connell, Erin Hoover and Zach Schutzman Figure 1. Plot of k values and outputs from Erlang’s Formula Figure 2. Selection of queuing simulation in Excel for the Delaware Memorial Bridge. Introduction Assumptions Methods Conclusion Many highways across the globe require tolls at certain intervals to pay for necessary infrastructure and road repair. Whenever building a toll booth plaza, a main concern is optimizing the number of toll booths so that it is as convenient as possible for the driver without wasting money on unnecessary booths. It is then desirable to minimize annoyance by limiting the amount of traffic disruption caused by the toll plazas by optimizing the number of toll booths. In our model, we define optimal as the number of toll booths that gives the proportion of people waiting longer than a specified time is less than a certain percentage, which are both defined and calculated in the model. Important Assumptions made in our model: 1.The number of toll booths allowed ranges from a minimum equal to the number of lanes to an infinite maximum. The Infinite Toll Plaza is ruled out as a solution based on its inefficiency rather than the impossibility of constructing such a plaza. 2.We assume that the toll plaza is the only cause for traffic congestion. Reduced speed from weather effects, road construction, car accidents, and bad driving are not considered in the choice of the number of tolls. All drivers operate as if they had full knowledge of the choices of every other driver on the road. 3.Every toll is a standard cash toll in the middle of a freeway. Options like EZ Pass, high-speed tolls, or the Massachusetts Turnpike system of tolls at on- and off-ramps are not considered in the main analysis. 4.The arrival rate of cars at the plaza follows a random Poisson distribution, and the interarrival time follows an exponential distribution. 5.The rule governing for which toll a driver queues is that if all lines contain the same number of cars, a line will be chosen at random. If not all lines have the same number of cars, a line will be chosen at random from among those with the shortest lines. The Basic idea of our model is then to use Erlang’s formula, based on the assumptions of arrival and interarrival time distributions, and Mathematica to optimize a plaza by finding the number of booths needed to create a negligible chance of large lines forming. We then use this number to test the data from real life situations and to verify our model. Figure 1 is the graphical representation of our model. The x axis of Figure 1 is the number of cars in the system not currently being served. In other words, it is all the cars in all the lines. The y axis is the percent chance that there will be this number of people in the lines. Imagine we are working at a Maine Tollbooth. Our citizens are easygoing, so we can allow up to 10 lines of 3 or more per day on average. Assuming that the traffic intensity 10.7 and the service time is 15 seconds, that makes the arrival rate 42.8 cars per minute, or 61,632 cars per day. If we only want 10 occurrences of a long line, we need the probability of it occurring to be roughly 0.016%. We choose the number of tollbooths that gives the closest statistic: 14 tollbooths, with a chance of occurrence of 0.014% or 8.63 per day. This is just one scenario which exemplifies how to calculate the optimal number of toll booths based upon our model. By using the probabilities of the formation of a line of certain length, service rate, and arrival rate we can determine the optimal number of toll booths for a plaza which minimizes the wait time and makes the experience easier for a driver. We can then use this number of toll booth to further examine the applicability of our model to real life situations and verify our model using previously collected data. Our model fits the reality of the situation, based upon the realistic results of 28 minute wait time at a bridge toll booth during rush hour, however it shows that more toll booths may be required in some circumstances to make the experience better for the customers. Our model’s greatest strength is its flexibility. For any given threshold line length and probability, we can find the optimal number of tolls in a plaza for that freeway’s traffic volume. The model allows for quick adjustment of any of the parameters to determine the effect of possibly increasing or decreasing the number of tolls, or relaxing or strengthening the line criteria. The other major strength of our model is how easily the queuing portion generalizes to other cases. If we substitute cash registers and exits for tolls and merging, we can use our model to determine the optimal number of checkout counters at a shop. Similarly, we could model security lines at an airport, entrance lines at a concert, or service calls at an IT help center. The weaknesses of our model largely stem from the lack of data on toll plazas available. We made a lot of assumptions and estimations about arrival rates and service rates which may or may not hold in the real-life scenarios. We also made several simplifications, such as assuming that the mean service rate held across all vehicles and booths and that there are no other sources of traffic congestion aside from the toll itself. Testing with real-life Data Once the optimal number of toll booths is determined for a certain waiting line, we can use a queueing simulation in Excel and real data to test if our model is appropriate. A queue in Excel is created based on the distribution of the arrival and departure, mean service, and mean arrival rates as well as queuing theory in Excel. To verify our model, we used data from the Delaware Memorial Bridge for 2 toll booths under rush hour traffic conditions. We then calculate the arrival rate to be approximately 14 cars per minute with a service rate of 4 cars per minute. Putting these values into the queue, we can determine the average wait time for n cars. We then run multiple simulations to get the average wait time for multiple trials, which we determined to be approximately 28 minutes for our parameters (1000 cars, 2 toll booths). Figure 2 shows a selection of the queue we ran for the Delaware Memorial Bridge, showing data for 30 cars. This figure also shows the data and set up necessary to run a queue in Excel. The waiting time of 28 minutes for the Delaware Memorial Bridge, while realistic, is not optimal. A 28 minute wait time is frustrating and inconvenient for many drivers, so the number of toll booths at the Delaware Memorial Bridge need to be increased to better service their customers.