Water Volume, Tractor Speed, and Nozzle Type Effects on Spray Coverage Eric P. Prostko, Extension Weed Specialist Paul E. Sumner, Extension Ag-Engineer Paul E. Sumner, Extension Ag-Engineer The University of Georgia Peanut Achievement Club
Factors That Influence Postemergence Herbicide Performance weed size rate environment –moisture –temperature –humidity application –water volume (GPA) –tractor speed –nozzle type
Current Application Trends low water volumes –10 GPA or less faster tractor speeds nozzle types –Air Induction (AI) –Turbo-Jet (TJ) –Hollow-Cone (HC) Why?? –RR crops –More acres –Labor issues
U.S. Acres Planted to Herbicide Resistant Varieties Source: NASS Includes stacked
3.5, 5.0, 7.0 MPH 10, 15, 20 GPA XR-Flat Fan (XR-FF) and Hollow Cone (HC) Nozzles 9 replications Kromekote water sensitive cards
Examples of the nozzles used in these tests. Flat Fan Hollow Cone (Whirl-Jet)
RESULTS
Nozzle Type and GPA Effects - I 3.5 MPH Tractor Speed LSD 0.10 = 3
Nozzle Type and GPA Effects - II 5.0 MPH Tractor Speed LSD 0.10 = 3
Nozzle Type and GPA Effects - III 7.0 MPH Tractor Speed LSD 0.10 = 3
10 GPA - 7 MPH – HC (12% coverage) 20 GPA – 3.5 MPH – XR (FF) (45% coverage)
Summary 3-way interaction between tractor speed, GPA, and nozzle type HC nozzles provided less coverage than XR-FF nozzles Tractor speed –FF and 20 GPA = 3.5 mph > 5.0 mph = 7.0 mph –HC and 10 GPA = 3.5 mph > 5.0 mph = 7.0 mph –HC and 15 GPA = 3.5 mph > 7.0 mph increases in GPA improved coverage –20 GPA > 15 GPA > 10 GPA best coverage (45%) –3.5 MPH/20 GPA/XR-FF least coverage (12%) –7.0 MPH/10 GPA/HC
Why is this important? Application techniques for glyphosate (systemic) are not adequate for other types of herbicides such as paraquat (contact)!
Peanut Herbicides (POST) HerbicideActivity 2,4-DBsystemic Basagrancontact Cadresystemic Classicsystemic Cobracontact Gramoxonecontact Poastsystemic Pursuitsystemic Selectsystemic Stormcontact Ultra Blazer contact