Chalmers University of Technology Suggestions for new BioRID certification procedures By Johan Davidsson, Chalmers University of Technology GTR7-02-11.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation of the new certification test procedures Christian Gehre
Advertisements

MOCT / KOTSA(KATRI) New Car Assessment Program in Korea July
Newtons Second Law: Rear End Collisions. Learning Objective Apply Newtons 1 st and 2 nd Law to automobile crashes Process Skill: Rewrite/Follow step-by-step.
1 KOREA GTR No.7 2 nd Phase Research Results Dec. 8, 2009 Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, Korea Automobile Testing and Research Institute.
Dr Astrid Linder Research Director, Traffic Safety
Biorid Task List discussions June 14, 2011 Mike Beebe Paul Depinet Alex Schmitt GTR
The pulse wave.
1 Toyota Side Impact Protection for Out-of-Position Occupants Washington, DC October 25, 2001.
GTR Head restraints ES Page 1 HR-7-8 GTR Head restraints Dynamic test procedure Trigger-point in dynamic test procedure.
Chapter 6 Momentum and Collisions 1. Momentum and Impulse 2. Conservation of Momentum 3. 1D Collisions 4. 2D Collisions.
GTR-7 IWG Meeting 3 – Summary of Decisions and Actions Page  1  Harmonised drawings -Most drawings and tolerance agreed. Completion expected June  Upright.
Chapter 13 VibrationsandWaves. Hooke’s Law F s = - k x F s = - k x F s is the spring force F s is the spring force k is the spring constant k is the spring.
Utac Comparison tests on full crash test facility and hyge sled test facility in the frame of Regulation ECE R16.
2014 KNCAP Updated Status Korea Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport Submitted by the expert from Republic of Korea Informal document GRSP
Head Restraint GTR Status to AC th Session of WP.29 March 2007 Informal document No. WP , March 2007, agenda item II
A force is defined as a push or a pull that acts on an object.
1 Frontal Accident Research Data in Japan Frontal Accident Research Data in Japan JASIC 29 January 2014.
FORCE. Force: a vector with the units - Newton (N). "An object at rest tends to stay at rest and an object in motion tends to stay in motion; A force.
Euro NCAP 28 june 2005 Whiplash injury epidemiology and effectiveness of whiplash prevention systems. Maria Krafft Folksam Sweden.
GRSP December 2004 The Safety of Wheelchair Occupants in Road Transport Vehicles Donald Macdonald Head of Engineering and Research Mobility & Inclusion.
Telemetry in Motor Racing Ideas in Context. What is telemetry? Telemetry is a technology that allows remote measurement and reporting of information.technology.
EEVC WG20 European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee 12 th December, 2006 Slide 1 EEVC WG20 and WG12 Rear Impact Test Procedure Development Programme Presented.
How does NHTSA perform the frontal crash rating and how are vehicles rated? Vehicles are crashed into a fixed barrier at 35 miles per hour (mph), which.
Head Restraint for Race Car Drivers Aim Jirut and Asif Lala Advised by: Dr. Jackson Roberts.
Global Harmonisation OICA Priorities UN/ECE/WP.29/AC3 13 November Informal document No. WP th WP.29, November 2008, agenda item.
ANCHORAGE STRENGTH REQUIREMENTS George Mouchahoir Office of Performance Standards National Highway Traffic Safety Administration May, 2002.
1 Research on Chest Injury Criteria JASIC 54 th GRSP December, 2013 Submitted by the expert from Japan Informal document GRSP (54 th GRSP,
Simple Harmonic Motion
{ SHM Simple Harmonic Motion. Simply put, simple harmonic motion is a motion ‘back and forth’ away from and back to equilibrium In SHM, the motion is.
Classical and Finite Difference Method to Estimate pile Capacity Compared With Pile Load Test Results Yogesh Prashar, P.E., GE Force Pulse Conference,
Introduction to Revision of GTR 7
Short Report Status of GTR No. 7/BioRID TEG
WorldSID 50 th Update Klaus Bortenschlager PDB - Partnership for Dummy Technology and Biomechanics on behalf of the WorldSID Task Group 44 th GRSP Session.
Head Restraints Working Group Meeting Paris, France February 1-2, 2005 U.S. FMVSS No. 202 Final Rule Head Restraint IWG Document:HR-1-8.
3 rd Meeting of the IWG GTR No. 7 Draft Status Report of the BioRID TEG Bernd Lorenz (BASt) Chairman Geneva,17 th May 2010 GTR
Draft Status Report of the BioRID TEG Bernd Lorenz (BASt) Chairman 51 st GRSP Geneva, 21 st May 2012 Informal document GRSP (51st GRSP, 21–25 May.
Japanese Proposal for the New Regulation JASIC / Japan GRSP Inf. Group on Child Restraint Systems CRS April 11th, 2012 Informal document GRSP
BioRIDII New Sled Evaluation Data Observations from Ford Safety Lab Tests TEGID-07.
Simple harmonic motion. Vibration… Equilibrium … Restoring force… Displacement…
Proposal of the Informal Working Group on Head Restraints GTR Phase 2 JAPAN Informal document No. GRSP (43rd GRSP, May 2008, agenda item.
ES-2 Back Plate/Seat Interaction George Mouchahoir May, 2002.
Clinical Implications from Rear Impact Investigations of a Wheelchair & Occupant Presenter: John Tiernan CEng 1 Co-Authors: Jennifer Walsh 2, Ciaran Simms.
Evaluation of ES-2 by the Occupant Safety Research Partnership of USCAR presented by Annette L. Irwin representing the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers.
Quiz Video Warm up Video 1 Video 2.
Simple Harmonic Motion Wenny Maulina Simple harmonic motion  Simple harmonic motion (SHM) Solution: What is SHM? A simple harmonic motion is the motion.
Date of download: 6/8/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Optimal Restraint for the Thoracic Compression of the SID-IIs Crash Dummy Using.
Meeting Review – GTR #7 Phase II 44 th Session of GRSP December 2008 Informal Document No. GRSP (44th session, December 2008, agenda.
Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Vehicle Crash Testing Adam Hedges.
QuickCheck 14.4 A block oscillates on a very long horizontal spring. The graph shows the block’s kinetic energy as a function of position. What is the.
Mary pulls on a lawnmower parallel to the ground
THE PHYSICS OF CAR SAFETY
Design of a Biofidelic, Instrumented 2. 5 Kg Infant Dummy N
Vertical fall on the back
Measurement Capabilities of Biofidelic 3.4 Kg Infant Dummy
BioRIDII Repeatability on Production Seat
14 G 35 ft/sec 60°Pitch Three Place Passenger Seat Two Occupants
Submitted by the expert from Republic of Korea
BioRID vs. HIII Develop new “side-by-side” buck
Aim: How do we apply conservation of energy to solving problems?
Dynamic criteria Biorid
Q-Dummy Behaviours following used types of pulses
Ch. 6 slides.ppt Forces2.ppt.
Introduction to Revision of GTR 7
Chapter 13 Vibrations and Waves.
How does NHTSA perform the frontal crash rating and how are vehicles rated? Vehicles are crashed into a fixed barrier at 35 miles per hour (mph), which.
Proposed actions for gtr development
GRSP Inf. Group on Child Restraint Systems CRS-31-08
Test Procedure for Pedestrian Dummy to calculate HIT
OICA 31st session of GRSP May 2002
Presentation transcript:

Chalmers University of Technology Suggestions for new BioRID certification procedures By Johan Davidsson, Chalmers University of Technology GTR

Chalmers University of Technology Background A certification procedure should exclude crash test dummies that does not perform as intended in seat performance evaluation tests. Therefore, dummies should preferably be certified in conditions similar to those used in these seat evaluation tests. The certification sled pulse should be close to the horizontal acceleration of the BioRID lower torso. These conditions varies with impact conditions and the seat tested.

Chalmers University of Technology Background… Analysed nine BioRID IIg sled test: –Using new productions seats considered either soft or stiff. –Using the Euro-NCAP 16 kph high and Euro- NCAP 24 kph sled pulses. –Analysis of peak and duration of T8, L1 and Pelvis x-accelerations (local coordinate system).

Chalmers University of Technology Results of data analysis PulseSeatPeak acceleration (g) Duration (ms) Summarized BioRID IIg values T8L1Pelvis Peak acc. (g)Duration (ms) 16 highSoft highSoft highSoft highStiff highStiff highStiff Soft Stiff Stiff

Chalmers University of Technology New versus Old certification sled characteristics New Sled Δv = 16 kph Sled acc. duration 90 ms Peak acceleration 10 g Existing Sled Δv = 9 kph Sled acc. duration 30 ms Peak acceleration 17 g

Chalmers University of Technology Calibration sled pulse (g) Time (ms)

Chalmers University of Technology Additional Will require larger pendulum mass and length of sled track. Head restraint to reduce excessive wear and compression of the rubber blocks in the neck region Parallel to the existing low speed certification procedure for an interim period