And Then There’s Us….Phase II. ■Assumes that the state will become responsible for costs associated with health care programs (including Children’s Services.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Example of Possible Early Learning System Design Jim Adams, Chair Jackson County Commission on Children & Families.
Advertisements

JUVENILE JUSTICE TREATMENT CONTINUUM Joining with Youth and Families in Equality, Respect, and Belief in the Potential to Change.
REALIGNMENT 101. The Road to Realignment 1978 Proposition 13  1% property tax rate (average was 2.5%)  Loss of $6.8 billion  State assumes allocation.
Youth & Family Services
October 31, 2008 Charlie Crist, Governor Jim DeBeaugrine, Agency Director LEGISLATIVE BUDGET REQUEST FISCAL YEAR
Office of Infrastructure Investment 1 Jeffrey A. Simon Director of Infrastructure Investment.
Medicaid Information Technology Architecture (MITA) Where Louisiana Medicaid is Today and Where it Will To Be in the Future April 17, 2012.
Sandy Rybaltowski Special Education Policy April 2008 REPORT ON PRESCHOOL EDUCATION.
OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 2007.
COLLABORATIVE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN IV-A, IV-E AND IV-D Patterson Poulson Angela Bellamy Leslie McGrew ERICSA 50 th Annual Training Conference & Exposition.
Background KICH was initially established after representatives from Kentucky Housing Corporation (KHC) participated in a Homeless Policy Academy in 2002,
Anticipated Phase 2 Realignment November 28, 2012 Long Beach, CA CSAC Health & Human Services Policy Committee CSAC Annual Meeting.
Collaboration and data in a County Initiative : Cuyahoga County – Invest in Children Claudia Coulton & Rob Fischer, Ph.D. Center on Urban Poverty & Community.
WV Birth to Three NECTAC Medicaid Conference Call December, 2006 Presented by Pamela Roush, Director WV Birth to Three.
Compliance Issues for Medical Research at Healthcare Systems Jerry Castellano, Pharm.D., CIP Corporate Director Institutional Review Board Christiana Care.
Title IV-E Roundtable University Partnership Budgeting
Governor’s Action Group for Safe Children Recommendations from The Final Report.
Lead Agency Department of Health & Senior Services Cumulative Enrollment SFY ,829 NJEIS Budget SFY $69,000,000 Average Cum Cost Per Child.
Strategic Planning and the Importance of Collaboration: A conversation... Barrett Johnson, L.C.S.W. | CalSWEC Lisa Molinar, M.A. | Shared Vision Consultants.
Fiscal Monitoring and Oversight Tecumseh Local School District January 8, 2013 Roger Hardin, Assistant Director Finance Program Services (614)
1 Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission April 30, 2014 Data and Infrastructure Workgroup Initial Discussion Data Needed for Care Coordination.
Department of Human Services
The Good News The number of California Children in foster care has been reduced by 46% since 1998.
Integrating Administrative Records into the Federal Statistical System 2.0 Shelly Wilkie Martinez Statistical and Science Policy U. S. Office of Management.
2005 OSEP National Early Childhood Conference February 7, :00-12:30 “To Fee or Not to Fee: That is the Question” NEW JERSEY.
Statewide Compilation of Common Themes from Regional Group Reports A Conversation: Virginia’s Social Services System Roles · Responsibilities · Funding.
Agency for Persons with Disabilities Update Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Health and Human Services November 6, 2013 Barbara Palmer Director Rick.
Agency for Persons with Disabilities Update House Health Care Appropriations Subcommittee September 24, 2013 Barbara Palmer Director Rick Scott Governor.
California State Association of Counties May 2010 Governor’s May Revision The Not-so-Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.
Meeting of the Finance Committee New Internal Financial Model November 8, 2012.
Work Group 3 Seamless System of Placement Options: Community Partnership Governor’s Action Group for Safe Children Work Group 3 Seamless System of Placement.
Agency for Persons with Disabilities Update House Health Care Appropriations Subcommittee February 18, 2014 Barbara Palmer Director Rick Scott Governor.
Excellence for Each Student Utah State Board of Education Strategic Plan.
2012 SEN Funding Update An unofficial guide for Norfolk governors at NGN / GS conference 12 May 2012 By Alex Robinson, Governor, Millfield Primary School.
University Budget Process Stability of revenue sources compared to most businesses Role of financial statement- financial accounting at one point Operational.
The California State Budget Senator Carol Liu, Chair Senate Budget & Fiscal Review Subcommittee on Education.
WHO WE ARE Spark Ventures exists to form partnerships with high-impact organizations around the world that help vulnerable children achieve their potential.
New Director Orientation Child Support Directors Association CSDA.
California Disproportionality Project Stuart Oppenheim, Executive Director, CFPIC Stuart Oppenheim, Executive Director, CFPIC Lisa Molinar, Lisa Molinar,Director,
Perspectives on a Performance-Based Federal-aid Highway Program Jeffrey F. Paniati Executive Director, Federal Highway Administration January 12, 2010.
A Collaborative Approach to Early Care and Education BRAIDED FUNDING.
2017 LGA MAA/TCM Conference
Idaho Infant Toddler Program and the
Old Saybrook Public Schools Budget Presentation
Promoting Education Stability For Foster Youth Through Legislation in
Chart of Accounts Overview
Future Models of Service Delivery
Special Needs Strategy Update January 2017
CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION FOR IDEPENDENT LIVING CENTERS STATEWIDE MEETING
Module 3: Local Partnership Systems & Accountability Overview
What we need support with….
Are we ready to move to the Design Phase?
The Office of Residential Child Care (ORCC) and Office of Provider Management (OPM) Standardization Project Presenters: LaMarva E. Ivory, ORCC Director.
Data System Features that Enhance General Supervision
Overview of Data from the Statewide FGDM Evaluation
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
DCFS FY2010 BUDGET OVERVIEW Challenges & Opportunities
Office of the State Engineer-Interstate Stream Commission Litigation & Adjudication Program Business Application Modernization Roadmap (Project Initiation,
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services December 19, 2014
Oakwood Integrated Primary School
Core Values.
Cooperative Federalism 2
Workshop Session I.
Key Stakeholders are aware of the Coalitions activities
Barry Anderson OECD 1st MENA SBO Meeting Cairo November 24-25, 2008
FEEDBACK ON THE MOMBASA COUNTY FISCAL STRATEGY PAPER 2018
Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission April 30, 2014
Colorado Special Education Advisory Committee (CSEAC) 2012 Fall Special Education Directors’ Meeting October 12, 2012.
FIRST PLACEMENT IS THE RIGHT PLACEMENT
CSAC Institute: Realignment 301 ALAMEDA COUNTY December 13, 2012
Presentation transcript:

And Then There’s Us….Phase II. ■Assumes that the state will become responsible for costs associated with health care programs (including Children’s Services and IHSS). ■The counties will assume responsibility for CalWORKs, child care, food stamp administration, and child support. ■Public health programs will remain at the local level.

What does this mean for child support? Phase II discussions related to Child Support have not begun. In the meantime, to prepare for the transition, CSDA has: ■Developed a Realignment Committee with a series of subcommittees that have been tasked with identifying key issues in the areas of finance, courts, operations, etc. ■Participated in CSAC Realignment discussions ■Met regularly with Diane Cummins, the Governor’s realignment lead to communicate our concerns and receive update.

What does this mean for child support? CSDA is tracking the issues that need to be addressed in order to move forward with realignment. Issues include: ■Funding: How would the Child Support Program be funded? Would it receive a share from a single pot of money? Could it rely on a stable source of funding each year? ■Automation: Who will be responsible for the governance of the system? Or the contracts? Are there potential liabilities?

What does this mean for child support? ■Operations: How will local agencies continue their efforts to work collaboratively do deliver a consistent service? Will state controlled programs (COAP) be integrated into the local agency operations, and if so, how? ■Governance/ Program Accountability: What will the level of oversight be? Who will be responsible for monitoring statewide performance? Audits? Data reliability? Will local agencies be held to program requirements that are in excess of federal requirements? ■Relationship with Courts: Will local agencies have appropriate access to their courts?

Many Challenges Remain ■Development of a revenue allocation approach (e.g. deciding how many “pots” of money there will be) ■Maximizing program flexibility ■Building in program accountability ■Achieving general consensus (close consultation with counties is critical)