The NOνA data driven trigger Matthew Tamsett for the NOνA collaboration NOνA Neutrino 2014, XXVI International Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Expected Sensitivity of the NO A  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays (Caltech) for the NO A Collaboration April 14, 2013 APS DPF Denver Kirk Bays, APS DPF.
Advertisements

MINOS sensitivity to dm2 and sin2 as a function of pots. MINOS sensitivity to theta13 as a function of pots Precision Neutrino Oscillation Physics with.
Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?
An accelerator beam of muon neutrinos is manufactured at the Fermi Laboratory in Illinois, USA. The neutrino beam spectrum is sampled by two detectors:
Searching for Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations at MINOS Andy Blake Cambridge University April 2004.
Liquid Scintillation Detectors for High Energy Neutrinos John G. Learned Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Hawaii See: arXiv:
First Observations of Separated Atmospheric  and  Events in the MINOS Detector. A. S. T. Blake* (for the MINOS collaboration) *Cavendish Laboratory,
NuMI Offaxis Near Detector and Backgrounds Stanley Wojcicki Stanford University Cambridge Offaxis workshop January 12, 2004.
GLAST LAT Project Test Beam Meeting, June 6, 2006 S. Funk 1/6 PS Positron Simulations Stefan Funk June 6, 2006.
Fermilab Scientific Computing Division Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA. The Power of Data Driven Triggering DAQ Topology.
Fermilab Fermilab Scientific Computing Division & Computing Enabling Technologies Department, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois,
10/24/2005Zelimir Djurcic-PANIC05-Santa Fe Zelimir Djurcic Physics Department Columbia University Backgrounds in Backgrounds in neutrino appearance signal.
LBNE R&D Briefing May 12, 2014 LBNE R&D Briefing May 12, 2014 LArIAT and LBNE Jim Stewart LArIAT EPAG Chair BNL LBNE LARIAT-EPAG J. Stewart BNL T. Junk.
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
Expected Sensitivity of the NO A  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays (Caltech) for the NO A Collaboration April 14, 2013 APS DPF Denver Kirk Bays, APS DPF.
PERFORMANCE OF THE MACRO LIMITED STREAMER TUBES IN DRIFT MODE FOR MEASUREMENTS OF MUON ENERGY - Use of the MACRO limited streamer tubes in drift mode -Use.
Monte Carlo Comparison of RPCs and Liquid Scintillator R. Ray 5/14/04  RPCs with 1-dimensional readout (generated by RR) and liquid scintillator with.
Performance of the NOA Data Acquisition and Data Driven Trigger Systems for the full 14 kT Far Detector A. Norman Fermilab, Scientific Computing Division.
Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.
Long Baseline Experiments at Fermilab Maury Goodman.
21-Aug-06DoE Site Review / Harvard(1) Front End Electronics for the NOvA Neutrino Detector John Oliver Long baseline neutrino experiment Fermilab (Chicago)
The NOvA Experiment Ji Liu On behalf of the NOvA collaboration College of William and Mary APS April Meeting April 1, 2012.
NA62 Trigger Algorithm Trigger and DAQ meeting, 8th September 2011 Cristiano Santoni Mauro Piccini (INFN – Sezione di Perugia) NA62 collaboration meeting,
July 19, 2006VLCW-06 Vancouver1 Scint/MAPMT Muon Prototype Operation Robert Abrams Indiana University.
Latest Results from the MINOS Experiment Justin Evans, University College London for the MINOS Collaboration NOW th September 2008.
C.Vigorito, University & INFN Torino, Italy 30 th International Cosmic Ray Conference Merida, Mexico Search for neutrino bursts from Gravitational stellar.
NuMI Off-Axis Experiment Alfons Weber University of Oxford & Rutherford Appleton Laboratory EPS2003, Aachen July 19, 2003.
Gary Feldman MINOS in Cambridge 24 March NO A Update MINOS Collaboration Meeting Cambridge, England 24 March 2009 Gary Feldman.
Search for Electron Neutrino Appearance in MINOS Mhair Orchanian California Institute of Technology On behalf of the MINOS Collaboration DPF 2011 Meeting.
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting Rutherford Appleton Lab Tuesday 25 th April 2006 M. Ellis.
W-DHCAL Analysis Overview José Repond Argonne National Laboratory.
E. W. Grashorn and A. Habig, UMD, for the MINOS Collaboration The Detectors of The Main Injector Neutrino Oscillation Search (MINOS) Experiment The MINOS.
Harvard Neutrino Group DoE Review August 21, 2006.
A different cc/nc oscillation analysis Peter Litchfield  The Idea:  Translate near detector events to the far detector event-by-event, incorporating.
Search for active neutrino disappearance using neutral-current interactions in the MINOS long-baseline experiment 2008/07/31 Tomonori Kusano Tohoku University.
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
Status of the NOνA Experiment Satish Desai - University of Minnesota For the NOνA Collaboration APS Meeting - April 2013 Denver, Colorado.
Status of the NO A Experiment Kirk Bays (Caltech) on behalf of the NO A collaboration Lake Louise Winter Institute Saturday, Feb 22, 2014.
The NO A Near Detector: An overview Jose A. Sepulveda-Quiroz For the NO A Collaboration Iowa State University and Argonne National Laboratory APS April.
Observation Gamma rays from neutral current quasi-elastic in the T2K experiment Huang Kunxian for half of T2K collaboration Mar. 24, Univ.
 CC QE results from the NOvA prototype detector Jarek Nowak and Minerba Betancourt.
Event Display The DAQ system architecture The NOA Data Acquisition system with the full 14 kt far detector P.F. Ding, D. Kalra, A. Norman and J. Tripathi.
Monitoring and Commissioning the NOνA Far Detector M. Baird 1, J. Bian 2, J. Coelho 4, G. Davies 3, M. Messier 1, M. Muether 5, J. Musser 1 and D. Rocco.
Focal Plane Scanner Jie Pan * + for the scanner working group Laura Cobus*, Anna Micherdzinska* Jeff Martin*, Peiqing Wang + * University of Winnipeg /
New Results from MINOS Matthew Strait University of Minnesota for the MINOS collaboration Phenomenology 2010 Symposium 11 May 2010.
The XXII International Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics in Santa Fe, New Mexico, June 13-19, 2006 The T2K 2KM Water Cherenkov Detector M.
DOE review slide 1 MINOS Software and Data Analysis Peter Litchfield, U. of Minnesota DOE Review, 28 th August 2003  Progress on Offline Software  Detector.
Neutral Current Interactions in MINOS Alexandre Sousa, University of Oxford for the MINOS Collaboration Neutrino Events in MINOS Neutrino interactions.
The MiniBooNE Little Muon Counter Detector
LAr TPC: Status and progress in data analysis efforts
Muons in IceCube PRELIMINARY
Neutrino factory near detector simulation
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
Beam Gas Vertex – Beam monitor
Commissioning of the ALICE HLT, TPC and PHOS systems
MICE Collaboration Meeting
ProtoDUNE SP DAQ assumptions, interfaces & constraints
IC40 Physics Run Preparations
Detector Configuration for Simulation (i)
Chris Smith California Institute of Technology EPS Conference 2003
Data Analysis in Particle Physics
Special edition: Farewell for Stephen Bailey
Special edition: Farewell for Eunil Won
Tracker Software Status
Plans for checking hadronic energy
6. Preliminary Results from MINOS
Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE Collaboration
High Energy Neutrino Detectors Day 2
ICRC2011, 32ND INTERNATIONAL COSMIC RAY CONFERENCE, BEIJING 2011
Installation, Commissioning and Startup of ATLAS & CMS Experiments
Presentation transcript:

The NOνA data driven trigger Matthew Tamsett for the NOνA collaboration NOνA Neutrino 2014, XXVI International Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics June 2-7, 2014, Boston, U.S.A. Data acquisitionData driven trigger Exotica Real-time tracking facebook.com/novaexperiment NOνA is a second generation long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiment situated in the Fermilab NuMI beam line. NOνA consists of a 300-ton near detector and a 14-kiloton far detector (FD) separated by 810 km. It is designed to measure the ν e and ν µ content of the NuMI beam before and after oscillation with the aim of making high precision measurements of the neutrino mixing parameters and determining the neutrino mass hierarchy. Far detector assembly status as of 12 th May The NOνA detectors are made up of alternating perpendicular planes of PVC extrusions each filled with liquid scintillator, read out by looped wavelength shifting fibres and instrumented with avalanche photo diodes. The system’s highly asynchronous operation allows for the delayed extraction of data corresponding to a beam spill time window and also allows for the use of external input sources, such as the supernovae early warning system, to trigger data long after its initial collection. This flexibility allows NOνA to collect enhanced samples of important backgrounds, good calibration data and even to search for new exotic particles. NOνA uses a novel data acquisition system based on a continuous deadtime-less readout of the front-end electronics, extended buffering of the data stream and asynchronous software triggering. In this system each of the detector cells (more than 340,000 at the FD) is constantly sampled and buffered for real time analysis by the “data-driven trigger” (DDT) system. The decision to record or discard time windows in the data streams can thus be based on complex event topologies. The DDT analyses all the data collected by the NOνA detectors in real time using hundred of parallel instances of highly optimised analysis software running within the ARTDAQ framework. It has been in operation continuously as part of both the prototype near detector and the FD for several months and has exhibited well understood, stable, rates as well as algorithm execution times that fit within the stringent criteria needed to operate in real time. The current selection of triggers includes algorithms designed to identify muon tracks useful for calibration, contained tracks collinear with the beam line, high energy deposits, as well as both fast and slow monopoles. It is trivially extendable to support many more signatures. The modular software design means common components are only executed once, making optimum use of the computing resources. The ability to run pattern recognition & tracking algorithms on all data enables NOνA to quickly and efficiently identify useful event topologies. Examples of such topologies that include tracks are: straight, muon-like tracks used in the calibration of the detector and contained tracks, collinear with the beam line, similar in topology to that expected from neutrino beam originated events. The efficient identification of the signatures of neutrino beam-like tracks enables the monitoring of the beam spill timing peak to be performed independently of any external information. The figure to the right shows just such a peak as identified in 32 hours of near-detector prototype data. The DDT has no knowledge of the beam spill timing. This system also enables the collection of cosmic originated events that appear to mimic the signatures of the beam. An example being shown in the right-hand event display above. By picking these events out from the entire live-stream rather than relying on periodic pulser or off-time beam windows, NOνA is able to enhance the statistics in this important region by several orders of magnitude. Moreover, by only recording the information pertaining to these events, it is able to do this in a way that significantly reduces the disk space requirements. NOνA’s above ground location and constantly live DDT combine to enable searches for rare and exotic phenomena including hypothetical magnetic monopoles, the cores of high energy cosmic ray air showers, WIMP annihilation signatures, and even supernovae neutrinos. The flexibility of the system enables combinations of algorithms to be run simultaneously, each optimised for a different signature or phase space. An example is illustrated above. Here two algorithms optimised for different classes of monopoles combine to provide efficient coverage of a wide region of phase space in a manner that keeps background rates under control. A track contained in X, Y & Z. An example of an interesting event identified by the DDT: a very high energy EM-like shower. Top view Side view A large number of parallel muon-like tracks. A schematic overview of the data acquisition system. The rates of all triggers. Execution time for various DDT algorithms. Track length as measured in FD data and Monte Carlo simulation. Timing distribution for candidate beam events over a 32 hour period. Cosine of the angle between tracks & the beam direction for tracks collected with the DDT & with the periodic pulser. Simulated efficiency of two magnetic monopole DDTs. Top view Side view Limit on average time: 0.95 s Known time offset for beam events: 213 µs Track An event display of a track contained in the X (horizontal) & Y (vertical) dimensions, collinear with the beam direction, identified by the DDT in the 6-block FD. Top view Side view Beam direction Track Detector boundary Top view Side view Detector boundary Detector top