A RHIC Low-Energy Test Run With Protons Todd Satogata (W. Fischer, T. Roser, J. DeLong, M. Brennan, D. Bruno, and others) April 11, 2006 Driven by discussions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy Todd Satogata 1 Fri May RHIC FY03 Deuteron-Gold Performance n RHIC Deuteron-Gold Performance.
Advertisements

Note: most of the slides shown here are picked from CERN accelerator workshops. Please refer to those workshop for further understanding of the accelerator.
Ion Accelerator Complex for MEIC January 28, 2010.
1 RHIC Run-7 Au-Au Operation A. Drees APEX workshop, Nov 2 nd 2006 Run organization Previous run and expectation for Run7 Start-Up plan Problem areas.
Experience and Projections for Low-Energy RHIC Operations Todd Satogata, Collider-Accelerator Department Workshop on Future Prospects in High Energy QCD.
Thomas Roser Muon collaboration meeting February 8-10, 2002 AGS beam intensity upgrades What has been achieved Sextupole power supply upgrades Bunch manipulation.
Winter Workshop, San Diego Mar 16, 2006Angelika Drees Short- and Long-term Future of RHIC Introduction Luminosity, Luminosity Limitations Runs so far and.
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, MW AGS proton driver (M.J. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas,
RUN 11 RHIC MACHINE/EXPERIMENTS MEETING 5 Apr 2011 Agenda: Open.
Thomas Roser RHIC Open Planning Meeting December 3-4, 2003 RHIC II machine plans Electron cooling at RHIC Luminosity upgrade parameters.
1 Near-term machine performance — The next 5 years, before e-cooling — Wolfram Fischer Run Coordinator for RHIC Run-4 Open Meeting on RHIC Planning Berkner.
Run 13 RHIC Machine/Experiments Meeting 4 Jun 2013 Agenda: Status Reports Hydrogen Jet issue (Eyser)
Copyright, 1996 © Dale Carnegie & Associates, Inc. Intra-beam Scattering -- a RHIC Perspective J. Wei, W. Fischer Collider-Accelerator Department EIC Workshop,
Overview Run-6 - RHIC Vadim Ptitsyn C-AD, BNL. V.Ptitsyn RHIC Spin Workshop 2006 RHIC Run-6 Timeline  1 Feb – Start of the Run-6. Start of the cooldown.
EDM2001 Workshop May 14-15, 2001 AGS Intensity Upgrade (J.M. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, S.Y. Zhang) Proton.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
Run 14 RHIC Machine/Experiments Meeting 1 July 2014 Agenda: Run 14 Schedule (Pile) Machine Status (Robert-Demolaize) STAR and PHENIX Status (Experiments)
RHIC Run14 Time Meeting. Run14 Status – Apr. 29 Operations running well, 11 full stores over the past 7 days; setting STAR ZDC rates to 50 khz is now.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
RHIC Status: Startup Run 12 V. Schoefer RHIC Spin Collaboration Meeting 1/13/12.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
1 Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility M. Palmer & D.Rubin November 8, 2005.
RHIC Run14 Time Meeting. Run14 Status – Apr. 15 Operations running well, 12 stores over the past 7 days with 1 lost to another “super quench”. Testing.
ERHIC Conceptual Design V.Ptitsyn, J.Beebe-Wang, I.Ben-Zvi, A.Fedotov, W.Fischer, Y.Hao, V.N. Litvinenko, C.Montag, E.Pozdeyev, T.Roser, D.Trbojevic.
RHIC Run14 Time Meeting. Run14 Status – Apr. 22 Operations running well, 12 stores over the past 7 days with 1 “super store” of 17 hours. Repositioned.
October 4-5, Overview of ARRA funded AIPs at C-AD Wolfram Fischer October 4, 2010.
RUN 11 RHIC MACHINE/EXPERIMENTS MEETING 12 Apr 2011 Agenda: Open.
Run 12 RHIC Machine/Experiments Meeting 28 Feb 2012 Agenda: Discussion - when to end the 200 GeV pp run… presently scheduled to end early Friday morning,
RUN 11 RHIC MACHINE/EXPERIMENTS MEETING 14 Mar 2011 Agenda: Status – cryo/budget Experiment priorities.
Damping Ring Parameters and Interface to Sources S. Guiducci BTR, LNF 7 July 2011.
Run 12 RHIC Machine/Experiments Meeting 17 Apr 2012 Agenda: Status reports Polarization issues update (E. Aschenauer) Other business With 17 April update.
NICA start-up scenario + questions of instabilities A.Sidorin For NiCA team NICA Machine Advisory Committee at JINR (Dubna) October 19-20, 2015.
Preliminary MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme Jiquan Guo for the MEIC design study team Oct. 5,
Vladimir Litvinenko, APEX Workshop 11/02/20006 IBS suppression lattice Mei Bai, Joanne Beebe-Wang, Peter Cameron, Roger Connolly, Angelika Drees, Alexei.
Prospects for RHIC Low-Energy Operations Todd Satogata (W. Fischer, T. Roser, A. Fedotov, N. Tsoupas, M. Brennan, C. Montag, and others) “Can We Discover.
Beam-beam compensation at RHIC LARP Proposal Tanaji Sen, Wolfram Fischer Thanks to Jean-Pierre Koutchouk, Frank Zimmermann.
Nuclear Phase Transition Diagram Mar RHIC Monday Meeting T. Satogata DOE NSAC Long Range Plan … a whole page! (one out of 14)
RHIC Run14 Time Meeting. Run14 Status – May 27 Operations running well, 11 full stores over the past 7 days. Getting high intensity again from injectors,
Run 12 RHIC Machine/Experiments Meeting 24 Apr 2012 Agenda: Status reports Other business.
RHIC Low-Energy Au Test Run Summary Todd Satogata L. Ahrens, M. Bai, J.M. Brennan, D. Bruno, J. Butler, B. Christie, A. Drees, A. Fedotov, W. Fischer,
Robert R. Wilson Prize Talk John Peoples April APS Meeting: February 14,
1 RHIC II – Ion Operation Wolfram Fischer RHIC II Workshop, BNL – Working Group: Equation of State 27 April 2005.
1 Machine issues for RHIC II Wolfram Fischer PANIC Satellite Meeting – New Frontiers at RHIC 30 October 2005.
RHIC Status April 8, 2011 RSC Meeting Haixin Huang.
Run 10 Start-up Status
Experience and Projections for Low-Energy RHIC Operations Todd Satogata, Collider-Accelerator Department June 9, 2006 Motivated by discussions at the “Can.
Run 10 plan based on 25 Nov Revised Plan and  s=200 extended by 1 week Dec. 1, Begin cool down to 4.5K Dec. 4, Cooldown to 4.5K complete in both rings!
EC plans in connection with eRHIC Wolfram Fischer ILCDR08 – Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 10 July 2008.
Optimization of the Collider rings’ optics
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Large Booster and Collider Ring
CEPC-SppC Accelerator CDR Copmpletion at the end of 2017
FFAG Accelerator Proton Driver for Neutrino Factory
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
The Proposed Conversion of CESR to an ILC Damping Ring Test Facility
Energy Calibration of the SPS with Proton and Lead Ion Beams
Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility
Another Immortal Fill….
MEIC New Baseline: Part 10
Main Design Parameters RHIC Magnets for MEIC Ion Collider Ring
Alternative Ion Injector Design
MEIC New Baseline: Part 7
MEIC New Baseline: Performance and Accelerator R&D
More on MEIC Beam Synchronization
HE-JLEIC: Do We Have a Baseline?
JLEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting
Crab Crossing Named #1 common technical risk (p. 6 of the report)
Some Thoughts on the JLEIC Ion Injector
Optimization of JLEIC Integrated Luminosity Without On-Energy Cooling*
JLEIC Ion Beam Formation options for 200 GeV
Presentation transcript:

A RHIC Low-Energy Test Run With Protons Todd Satogata (W. Fischer, T. Roser, J. DeLong, M. Brennan, D. Bruno, and others) April 11, 2006 Driven by discussions at the “Can We Discover the QCD Critical Point at RHIC?” Workshop Scope Parameters Schedule

April 11, 2006T. Satogata - RHIC Low-Energy Test Run2 ScopeScope  Significant interest in RHIC heavy ion collisions with c.m. energy in the range  s= 5-50 AGeV  Corresponds to Au beam  =2.68 to 26.8  Nominal Au injection is  =10.52, already below design  =12.6  Recommended energies from Krishna Rajagopal’s talk:  s NN = 5, 6.27, 7.62, 8.77, 12.3, 18, 28 AGeV  PHENIX RBUP requested low-energy proton collisions  s = 22.5 GeV equivalent to Au  s NN = 9.18 AGeV  Open machine issues  How does machine field quality degrade at lower energies?  Can we correct optics with current power supply configuration?  Are any power supply regulation/hardware changes required?  How do we test changes necessary for RHIC RF?

April 11, 2006T. Satogata - RHIC Low-Energy Test Run3 Proton/Gold parameters at same rigidity ProtonsGold (eq)  s [GeV] Beam energy [GeV] Beam kinetic energy [GeV] Relativistic  Relativistic  Momentum [GeV/c] B  [T-m]37.40 Injection current scaling Main dipole current [A]217.7 Main quad current [A]202.6 Revolution frequency [Hz] RF frequency [MHz, h=360]  Gold energy for same rigidity is near middle of Krishna’s list  Tests magnets and power supplies at less than half of normal injection current  Reasonably balance for initial testing, performance extrapolation  Does NOT require change to RHIC harmonic number or substantial reconfiguration of RHIC RF  h=366 gives RHIC RF frequency of MHz RHIC RF frequency range is MHz

April 11, 2006T. Satogata - RHIC Low-Energy Test Run4 Testing RHIC RF, h=363 ProtonsGold (eq)  s [GeV] Beam energy [GeV] Beam kinetic energy [GeV] Relativistic  Relativistic  Momentum [GeV/c] B  [T-m]24.82 Injection current scaling0.255 Main dipole current [A]144.5 Main quad current [A]134.5 Revolution frequency [Hz] RF frequency [MHz, h=363]  Alternate RHIC RF harmonic numbers are required for low- energy ion collisions  Must be divisible by 3 to have collisions at both experiments  Only code changes, no hardware changes  h=363 is testable with proton beam at energy/rigidity that are still within low-energy range of interest  But aggressive rigidity  RF personnel state that cogging and harmonic number changes can be completely tested during shutdown without beam time RHIC RF frequency range is MHz

April 11, 2006T. Satogata - RHIC Low-Energy Test Run5 Suggested low energy collision setup schedule  Scale existing injection optics (  *=10m) to B  =37.40  Zero out transition jump quadrupoles to improve optics  Assume AGS setup has been completed on separate user  Hysteresis cycles (1h)  Tune ATR, establish injection, circulating beam (3h)  Establish RF capture, instrumentation setup, tune for lifetime (4h)  Tune scans (1-2h)  Power supply stability evaluation (parasitic)  Optics measurements (1h) and correction/verification (3h)  Steer to optimize collisions (3-4h) using experiment BBCs  Lifetime objective is > 30min (longer than fill time)  Contingency (~6h)

April 11, 2006T. Satogata - RHIC Low-Energy Test Run6 SummarySummary  There is substantial interest in RHIC operations at low energies (  s NN = 5-50 AGeV)  A low-energy proton test run of ~24h (with contingency) provides important information on program feasibility   s = 22.5 GeV provides best balance of objectives with reasonable likelihood of success  Low-current field quality measurements and optics correction are the most important objectives.  Other objectives include power supply stability evaluation, working point evaluation, and collision steering  Ready for testing within three weeks after go-ahead  RHIC RF harmonic number changes will be tested without beam during summer shutdown  Testing RF changes with protons requires significantly lower energy (  s = 15 GeV, corresponding to  s NN = 6.25 AGeV)

April 11, 2006T. Satogata - RHIC Low-Energy Test Run7 ==============================

April 11, 2006T. Satogata - RHIC Low-Energy Test Run GeV/u Au collisions  2 days of 9.8 GeV/u collisions  0.4  b -1 integrated luminosity   *=3m by necessity  minute stores  56 Au bunches, 0.6x10 9 /bunch  Hz ZDC rates  IBS and aperture dominated beam and luminosity lifetime  Another run at this energy may improve this by factor of 2-5  x10 9 /bunch  Raise  * to improve lifetime  RHIC is best used as a storage ring collider below beam energies of ~12 GeV/u

April 11, 2006T. Satogata - RHIC Low-Energy Test Run9 Beam Studies for Low-Energy Injection  ~1 day of studies required in run before low-energy operations  Initial studies  Trivially scale nominal injection to lower energies  Provides reality check of power supplies, optics  Test injection, establish circulating beam, optimize lifetime  Initial global optics measurements, field quality, tune scan, energy resolution/momentum aperture  IBS growth time study require 3-6 hours extra time All but IBS growth evaluation can be done with Run6 p  Later studies  IBS modification lattice development  Field quality and detailed optics measurement/correction

April 11, 2006T. Satogata - RHIC Low-Energy Test Run10 Initial Machine Projections  Scaling laws apply above injection energies  When aperture dominated:  Peak luminosity   2  No clear scaling laws apply below injection energies  Injected beam already fills aperture  Magnetic field quality degrades very quickly  Power supply regulation  Strawman model  Peak luminosity   3-4 Expected full-vertex minbias rate [Hz]

April 11, 2006T. Satogata - RHIC Low-Energy Test Run11 Initial Machine Projections ModeBeam Energy [GeV/u] N bunches Ions/bunch [  9 ]  * [m] Emittance [  m] L peak [cm -2 s -1 ] Au-Au  Au-Au  Au-Au  Au-Au  Au-Au   Assumes expected luminosity scaling as  3 below 9.8 GeV/u   */aperture and integrated luminosity tradeoffs must be studied  Projections do not include potential improvements  Electron and stochastic cooling (peak and integrated luminosity)  Lattice modifications to mitigate IBS (integrated luminosity)  Total bunch intensity from vacuum improvements (peak luminosity)  Small set of specific energies (and species?) should be a workshop deliverable for planning

April 11, 2006T. Satogata - RHIC Low-Energy Test Run12 Low-Energy Magnetic Field Quality  Magnet currents scale with rigidity B  which scale with   Field quality deteriorates rapidly at very low currents  Currently have no magnet measurements at very low currents, few at low energy  Must extrapolate field behavior for simulations  Low-current magnet measurements are a priority Total Energy  BB Dipole Current 9.8 GeV/u A 2.5 GeV/u A

April 11, 2006T. Satogata - RHIC Low-Energy Test Run13 Power Supply Regulation Issues  Several power supply issues  Chromaticity sextupoles  Main power supplies  Sextupoles: A -> A  CMOS regulation, works to 0.01 A  Study option of using only some sextupoles with higher current  Aperture and lifetime concerns  Correction of large main dipole b 2  Main dipoles: 430 A -> 110 A  Requires testing to check regulation  Will test during Run6 maintenance  Pulsed injection/extraction kickers  May have low-voltage limitations