Oil and Gas Sector E&P Reporting Protocol For Western Regional Air Partnership May 4, 2009 Presented by: Science Applications International Corporation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 1 Releases of mercury from the oil and gas industry UNEP(DTIE)/Hg/INC.3/5 – A request from INC 2 –
Advertisements

Make Commitment Milestone 1 Inventory Emissions Milestone 2 Set Target/Goal Milestone 3 Establish Local Action Plan Milestone 5 Monitor/Evaluate Progress.
Task Force on National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Revisiting the Use of Managed Land as a Proxy for Estimating National Anthropogenic Emissions and Removals.
Carl Wirdak Occidental Petroleum Corporation GEMI Survey Climate Change – Where Do We Stand? March 2003.
Development of Oil and Gas Exploration and Production and Natural Gas Gathering and Processing Greenhouse Gas Accounting Protocols Key Enforcement and.
IAC Student Meeting February 19, 2004 Using DOE BestPractices Steam Tools And Resources Dr. Anthony L. Wright Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Defining the Upstream Oil and Gas Sector: Exploration, Production, and Natural Gas Gathering and Processing Western Climate Initiative – Oil & Gas Collaborative.
WESTAR Oil & Gas Conference October 2008 Lori Bocchino Wyoming Oil & Gas Permitting and New Rule/Policy Revisions.
Western States Air Quality Study Modeling and Analysis of Oil & Gas Emissions Data University of North Carolina (UNC-IE) ENVIRON International Corporation.
Economic Best Management Practices for Small and Medium Sized Producers Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Small and Medium Sized Producer Technology.
Greenhouse Gas Reduction and Waste Management Chuck White Director of Regulatory Affairs -- WM West Western Regional Air Partnership Denver, Colorado –
1 Air Quality: Potential Impacts of Shale Development in Ohio Kevin Crist, PhD Director & Professor, Center for Air Quality Department of Chemical and.
Scoping Meeting GHG Accounting Issues Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Natural Gas Gathering & Processing October 25, 2007 Santa Fe, New Mexico.
Oil and Gas Sector E&P Reporting Protocol For Western Regional Air Partnership Task 1 Presentation – Santa Fe Meeting February 12, 2009 Presented by: Science.
Western Sources and Trends: What do we know about emission sources across the West? WRAP Ozone & NOx in the West meeting November 11, 2009 Santa Fe, NM.
WORLD ENERGY OUTLOOK OIL & GAS SUPPLY MOEB/D Existing New Actual
Oil and Gas Workgroup Summary October 21-23, 2009 Denver.
Western Air Quality Study (WAQS) Intermountain Data Warehouse (IWDW) WAQS 2011b Emissions Projections University of North Carolina (UNC-IE) Ramboll-Environ.
Industrial Generation Performance Targets/Goals: » A set of starter methods that are characterized » A grid showing applicability, cost, uncertainty »
Introduction to The Climate Registry Gary Gero Washington Department of Ecology November 5, 2007.
Update from the International Blue Carbon Policy Working Group 1 st workshop July, 2011 J. Tamelander.
Overview of the M2M Partnership and Canadian Activities in the Oil & Gas Subcommittee Michael Layer June 18, 2010 Natural Resources Canada Regina, SK.
(Thanks to Amnon Bar-Ilan for the origin of most of the Slides)
Task 2 Report Background on Scope + Path Forward May 4, 2009 O&G GHG Technical WorkGroup.
Non-EGU Point and Area Sources: Review of 2018 Base Case Emissions Projections Stationary Sources Joint Forum Meeting February 1, 2006.
WRAP Workshop Emissions and AQ Modeling – July 29, 2008 IPAMS-WRAP Phase III Oil and Gas Emissions Inventory Development Project Amnon Bar-Ilan, Ron Friesen,
SSJF/EF/TDDWG Point and Area EI Project: Review of 2018 Base Case Emissions Projections Emissions Forum Meeting February 7, 2006.
1 WRAP Oil & Gas Phase II Work Plan: 2002 and 2018 Area Source Inventory Improvements and Area Source Controls Evaluation WRAP Stationary Sources Forum.
1 California Air Resources Board New Mexico Environment Department The Climate Registry Western Regional Air Partnership Santa Fe, New Mexico February.
3rd Stage Review: Lead Reviewers Experience Outline: –Objectives –Overview of technical findings –Lessons Learned/Confirmed –Value of 3 rd Stage –Lead.
1 Task 2 – High Tier Source Categories  Overall goal of Task 2 is to identify high-tier source categories and present detailed methodologies to estimate.
Potential Topics for a Comment Letter for Steering Committee Review TWG agreed to engage in a discussion at the Denver meeting in order to identify “topic.
 Welcome & introduction  Health & safety  Mobile ‘phones  Agenda.
Ontario SMART GREEN Program. Program Overview  SMART Green is a program funded by the Ontario Government to drive competiveness, energy efficiency and.
ENERGY STAR OVERVIEW November Overview What is ENERGY STAR? History Accomplishments Key Strategies –Labeling –Superior Energy Management Building.
Solar Power Applications
Engineering for the Student
NSPS OOOOa Overview Photo from
EnMS Management Review
Market Operations Engagement Group EVSE Working Group – Principles
Enhanced Oil Recovery Market Future Market Insights
Creating Carbon Footprints, for Organisations, Communities and Nations
Squamish Neighbourhood Energy Utility: Final Feasibility Presentation
Oil & Gas Growth Projections, Decline Curves, and Emissions Estimates
Technical data‘s of lubrication pumps of oil loaded gas compressors medium : lubrication oil with flare gas Low pressure compressors on oil platform 6.
Karen Turner, Gioele Figus, Patrizio Lecca, Kim Swales
Petroleum Engineering
Equipment Monitoring Market
WESTAR Spring 2008 Park City, UT
Methane Emission Standards for Crude Oil and Natural Gas Facilities
POPULATION PROJECTIONS
Baseline setting and monitoring under JI compared to the CDM approach
Uses of Ocean Waves and more
Oil and Gas Sector E&P Reporting Protocol
Oil and Gas Sector E&P Reporting Protocol
Updated Oil & Gas Emissions Projections for 2023 and Aug. 11, 2016
Barents 2020 Phase 4 - Working Group RN04
CWG on Strategic and Financial Plans - Review of the Strategic Targets CWG-SFP-2/INF-03 Document CWG-SFP-2/INF/3-E 10 August 2017 English only.
Updated Oil & Gas Emissions Projections for 2023 and 2028
Patrick Cummins January 30, 2019.
WRAP Technical Planning Meeting Salt Lake City, UT December 5, 2018
Oil and Gas Sector E&P Reporting Protocol
Oil and Gas Sector E&P Reporting Protocol
Gpsc Resource team modalities
TWG and Verification Advisory Group Comments on the First Draft of the Oil and Gas Production Sector Addendum to the General Verification Protocol Oral.
Closing Out on the Task 2 Report
Energy Sources Project due 1/14
Fugitives Wellhead Compression Gathering
“Finishing” Task 2 – Discussion of the Way(s) Forward
Oil and Gas Emission Inventories and Applications for Estimating Impacts to Health and Welfare Tom Moore, WESTAR-WRAP John Grant and Amnon Bar-Ilan, Ramboll.
Presentation transcript:

Oil and Gas Sector E&P Reporting Protocol For Western Regional Air Partnership May 4, 2009 Presented by: Science Applications International Corporation and Environ International Corporation

2 Task 2: Summary of Comments  We Would Like to Thank Everyone for Their Comments Nearly 200 comments received (states, producers, enviros, others) in very short turnaround Comments demonstrate importance of GHG emissions Comments very helpful in nature Opportunity to discuss comments and concerns as well as path moving forward later in the agenda  Types of Comments Received Insufficient data concerns Relative source rankings Geographic domain used for rankings Sources not included Comments related to methodology and measurement methods Other comments (technical, editorial, organizational, data sources)

3 Task 2: Summary of Comments  Examples of Comments Related to Insufficient Data Concerns Offshore analysis used only 2 of 27 platforms which may not be representative Several data gaps exist for equipment types and activity data for several production basins Variability exists across and within basins making it possible to only identify top 3 to 4 sources  Examples of Comments Related to Relative Source Rankings Relative rankings of some sources such as completion venting, well blow-down and pneumatics do not appear correct Different approaches were taken, some by basin and production characteristics, others by conventional oil and conventional gas data or production type Since emission sources represent an average or blended contribution to GHG, this might skew the data

4 Task 2: Summary of Comments  Examples of Comments Related to Geographic Domain For GHG emissions, it is not the basin that drives emissions but rather operations design and deployment GHG emissions might have broad similarities based on resource physical properties, its quality, the age of the operating equipment, and local requirements, rather than the mere geographical location. Production types, reservoir properties, maturity and depths vary widely within a basin, therefore a subdivision of basins is needed  Examples of Comments Related to Sources Not Included Oil and gas well truck loading (and mobile sources in general) Casing gas venting and casing gas migration emissions Cogeneration units (particularly for California) Enhanced oil recovery (particularly for California) Indirect emissions from generation of heat and steam Vented emissions from drilling rigs

5 Task 2: Summary of Comments  Examples of Comments Related to Methodology and Measurement Methods Several technical comments related to specific methodologies More detail requested on specific methodologies and data sources for each basin Several questions and comments related to turbines, well completions, well venting, pneumatic devices and pumps, flares and fugitives  Several Other comments Technical comments (very helpful) Clarifying questions and comments Organizational and/or editorial comments Documentation on assumptions