CCAMP - 69th IETF GMPLS Asymmetric Bandwidth Bidirectional LSPs draft-berger-ccamp-asymm-bw-bidir-lsps-00.txt Lou Berger Attila Takacs Diego Caviglia Don.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
71st IETF Philadelphia, March 2008 ERO Extensions for Path Key draft-bradford-ccamp-path-key-ero-01.txt Richard Bradford : JP Vasseur.
Advertisements

1 GMPLS RSVP-TE Recovery Extension for data plane initiated reversion and protection timer signalling draft-takacs-ccamp-revertive-ps-04.txt draft-takacs-ccamp-revertive-ps-04.txt.
1 Extensions to Resource Reservation Protocol For Fast Reroute of Traffic Engineering GMPLS LSPs draft-tsaad-ccamp-rsvpte-bidir-lsp-fastreroute-05 Author.
CCAMP - 69th IETF1 Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) Support For Metro Ethernet Forum and G.8011 User-Network Interface (UNI) draft-berger-ccamp-gmpls-mef-uni-00.txt.
IETF 64 – Vancouver, November 2005 GMPLS Signaling Extensions for the Transfer of Ownership of Label Switched Paths Between the Management and Control.
Controlled Load Service QoS Model Cornelia Kappler Xiaoming Fu Bernd Schloer.
CS Summer 2003 Lecture 9. CS Summer 2003 FILTERSPEC Object FILTERSPEC Object defines filters for selecting a subset of data packets in a session.
61st IETF Washington DC November 2004 Detecting P2MP Data Plane Failures draft-yasukawa-mpls-p2mp-lsp-ping-00.txt Seisho Yasukawa -
CCAMP - 70th IETF1 Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) Support For Metro Ethernet Forum and G.8011 User-Network Interface (UNI) draft-berger-ccamp-gmpls-mef-uni-01.txt.
MPLS-TP - 79th IETF1 MPLS-TP Control Plane Framework draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-cp- framework-03.txt Contributors: Loa Andersson Lou Berger Luyuan Fang Nabil.
MPLS-TP - 78th IETF1 MPLS-TP Control Plane Framework draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-cp- framework-02.txt Contributors: Loa Andersson Lou Berger Luyuan Fang Nabil.
Signaling & Routing Extension for Links with Variable Discrete Bandwidth draft-long-ccamp-rsvp-te-availability-03 draft-long-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-02.
1 Fabio Mustacchio - IPS-MOME 2005 – Warsaw, March 15th 2005 Overview of RSVP-TE Network Simulator: Design and Implementation D.Adami, C.Callegari, S.Giordano,
Draft-shiomoto-ccamp-switch-programming-00 74th IETF San Francisco March Advice on When It is Safe to Start Sending Data on Label Switched Paths.
64th IETF Vancouver Nov Graceful Shutdown in MPLS Traffic Engineering Networks draft-ali-ccamp-mpls-graceful-shutdown-02.txt Zafar Ali
Label Switched Path (LSP) Data Path Delay Metrics in Generalized MPLS/ MPLS-TE Networks Draft-ietf-ccamp-dpm-01.txt Authors Presenter: Weiqiang Sun
69th IETF Chicago July 2007 An analysis of scaling issues in MPLS-TE backbone networks Seisho Yasukawa, Adrian Farrel, and Olufemi Komolafe draft-yasukawa-mpls-scaling-analysis-04.txt.
IETF 66 L1VPN Basic Mode Draft draft-ietf-l1vpn-basic-mode-00.txt Don Fedyk (Editor) Yakov Rekhter (Editor)
Generic Aggregation of Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP) for IPv4 and IPv6 Reservation over PCN domains Georgios Karagiannis, Anurag Bhargava draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-pcn-01.
Research Unit in Networking - University of Liège A Distributed Algorithm for Weighted Max-Min Fairness in MPLS Networks Fabian Skivée
1 CCAMP Working Group Status Chairs: Lou Berger Deborah Brungard Secretary: Dan King 80th IETF CCAMP WG.
MPLS-TP - 77th IETF1 MPLS-TP Control Plane Framework draft-abfb-mpls-tp-control-plane- framework-02.txt Contributors: Loa Andersson Lou Berger Luyuan Fang.
Draft-torvi-mpls-rsvp-ingress-protection-00IETF 84 MPLS: 30 July Ingress Protection for RSVP-TE p2p and p2mp LSPs draft-torvi-mpls-rsvp-ingress-protection-00.
79th IETF CCAMP WG1 CCAMP Working Group Status Chairs: Lou Berger Deborah Brungard.
CCAMP - 71th IETF1 Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) Support For Metro Ethernet Forum and G.8011 Ethernet Service Switching draft-berger-ccamp-gmpls-ether-svcs-01.txt.
70th IETF Vancouver, December 2007 CCAMP Working Group Status Chairs: Deborah Brungard : Adrian Farrel :
1 RSVP-TE Signaling For GMPLS Restoration LSP draft-gandhi-ccamp-gmpls-restoration-lsp-03 Author list: Rakesh Gandhi Zafar Ali
Generalized MPLS RSVP-TE Signaling for Layer-2 LSPs D.Papadimitriou D.Brungard A.Ayyangar
Draft-li-mpls-proxy-te-lsp-01IETF 90 MPLS1 Proxy MPLS Traffic Engineering Label Switched Path(LSP) draft-li-mpls-proxy-te-lsp-01 Zhenbin Li, Xinzong Zeng.
Copyright © 2004 Juniper Networks, Inc. Proprietary and Confidentialwww.juniper.net 1 MPLS Upstream Label Assignment for RSVP- TE and LDP draft-raggarwa-mpls-rsvp-ldp-upstream-
Establishing P2MP MPLS TE LSPs draft-raggarwa-mpls-p2mp-te-02.txt Rahul Aggarwal Juniper Networks.
1 RSVP-TE Extensions For Fast Reroute of Bidirectional Co-routed LSPs draft-tsaad-mpls-rsvpte-bidir-lsp-fastreroute-00.txt Author list: Mike Taillon
PC-S(P)C Requirements and Solution Status CCAMP WG, IETF 71 th Philadelphia Diego Caviglia, Dino Bramanti, Dan Li.
RSVP-TE Extensions to Realize Dynamic Binding of Associated Bidirectional LSP CCAMP/MPLS WG, IETF 79th, Beijing, China draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-01.
70th IETF Vancouver, December 2007 CCAMP Working Group Online Agenda and Slides at: Charter page:
6. Hierarchy bis - Signaled FAs CCAMP, IETF64 Kohei Shiomoto:
1 RSVP-TE Signaling For GMPLS Restoration LSP draft-gandhi-ccamp-gmpls-restoration-lsp-04 Author list: Rakesh Gandhi - Presenter Zafar.
RSVP Setup Protection draft-shen-mpls-rsvp-setup-protection-03
Zhenbin Li, Li Zhang(Huawei Technologies)
Inter domain signaling protocol
Service Provider Requirements for Ethernet Control with GMPLS
CCAMP Working Group Status
Author list: Rakesh Gandhi Zafar Ali
Draft Titles draft-jaihyung-ccamp-arpsignal-00
Tomohiro Otani Kenji Kumaki Satoru Okamoto Wataru Imajuku
Architecture for Scheduled Use of Resources draft-zhuang-teas-scheduled-resources-00 Yan Zhuang Qin Wu
Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) Support For Metro Ethernet Forum and G
MPLS LSP Instant Install draft-saad-mpls-lsp-instant-install-00
RSVP Setup Protection draft-shen-mpls-rsvp-setup-protection-02
RSVP and Integrated Services in the Internet: A Tutorial
An analysis of scaling issues in MPLS-TE backbone networks
IETF 96 (MPLS WG) Abhishek Deshmukh Kireeti Kompella (presenting)
Francois Le Faucheur Cisco
GMPLS Signaling Extensions for the Evolving G.709 OTN Control
PLR Designation in RSVP-TE FRR
Extensions to Resource Reservation Protocol For Fast Reroute of Traffic Engineering GMPLS LSPs draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-lsp-fastreroute-06 Authors: Mike Taillon.
TEAS Working Group IETF 99 - Prague Online Agenda and Slide:
Authors Mach Chen Andrew G. Malis
WG Document Status Compiled By: Matt Hartley, Lou Berger, Vishnu Pavan Beeram IETF 99 - TEAS Working Group.
WG Document Status Compiled By: Lou Berger, Vishnu Pavan Beeram
IETF 98 (MPLS WG) Abhishek Deshmukh (presenting) Kireeti Kompella
OSPF WG Status IETF 98, Chicago
BFD Directed Return Path draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed-07
OAM Configuration Framework and Technology Specific Extensions
Anup K.Talukdar B.R.Badrinath Arup Acharya
Signaling Extensions for Wavelength Switched Networks
Zhaohui (Jeffrey) Zhang
DetNet Data Plane Solutions draft-ietf-detnet-dp-sol-ip-02  draft-ietf-detnet-dp-sol-mpls-02  Bala’zs Varga, Jouni Korhonen, Janos Farkas, Lou Berger,
Giovanni Martinelli, Julien Meuric, Pierre Peloso
DetNet Architecture Updates
Presentation transcript:

CCAMP - 69th IETF GMPLS Asymmetric Bandwidth Bidirectional LSPs draft-berger-ccamp-asymm-bw-bidir-lsps-00.txt Lou Berger Attila Takacs Diego Caviglia Don Fedyk Julien Meuric

CCAMP - 69th IETF Background Asymmetric LSP Bandwidth is actually an old discussion (role reversal time!) From: Adrian Farrel To: Subject: Asymmetrical Bi-directional LSPs Date: Wed, 27 Sep :33: Conclusion at that time: no real need for such LSPs Trigger for draft Raised in PBB-TE context Discussed in draft-takacs-asym-bw-lsp-00.txt

CCAMP - 69th IETF Draft Objective  As this conversation keeps resurfacing, we propose that the WG determine and document: 1.The preferred way to provide this function 2.Should this be a standard or experimental function

CCAMP - 69th IETF Proposed Solutions Draft covers two approaches: Both versions use a single bidirectional LSP 1.Technology specific Uses ADSPEC to carry traffic parameters for upstream data Requires MEF Ethernet Traffic Parameters 2.Generic Defines new upstream traffic parameter related object classes to match old downstream objects  Propose that WG select and pursue one approach OldNew SENDER_TSPECUPSTREAM_TSPEC ADSPECUPSTREAM_ADSPEC FLOWSPECUPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC

CCAMP - 69th IETF Some Context RFC2205 (RSVP) and RFC3209 (RSVP-TE) Data flow – Ingress  Egress SENDER_TSPEC – Ingress desired transmission characteristics FLOWSPEC – Egress desired receive/downstream QoS ADSPEC – What is being provided by network* RFC3473 (GMPLS-RSVP-TE) Data flow – Ingress  Egress SENDER_TSPEC – Desired QoS for both upstream and downstream FLOWSPEC – Confirmation of allocated resources ADSPEC – Unmodified in general – note none for upstream, unused for some specific technologies |---| Path |---| | I | >| E | | n | -SENDER_TSPEC | g | | g | -ADSPEC | r | | r | | e | | e | Resv | s | | s |< | s | | s | -FLOWSPEC | | |---| Data Flow > |---| Path |---| | I | >| E | | n | -SENDER_TSPEC | g | | g | -ADSPEC | r | | r | | e | | e | Resv | s | | s |< | s | | s | -FLOWSPEC | | |---| Data Flow

CCAMP - 69th IETF Option 1: Technology Specific Per technology solution Draft defines Ethernet specific solution ADSPEC carries upstream traffic parameters Draft requires MEF Ethernet Traffic Parameters Solution only compatible with technologies that don't require/use ADSPEC SENDER_TSPEC and FLOWSPEC per RFC2205/3209 |---| Path |---| | I | >| E | | n | -SENDER_TSPEC | g | | g | -ADSPEC | r | | r | | e | | e | Resv | s | | s |< | s | | s | -FLOWSPEC | | |---|

CCAMP - 69th IETF Option 2: Generic New upstream objects to match RFC2205 downstream objects UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC – Ingress desired receive/upstream QoS UPSTREAM_TSPEC – Egress desired transmission characteristics UPSTREAM_ADSPEC – What is being provided by network* Draft missed handling of UPSTREAM_TSPEC / UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC mismatches Next rev will state to use MBB |---| Path |---| | I | >| E | | n | -SENDER_TSPEC | g | | g | -ADSPEC | r | | r | -UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC | e | | e | | s | | s | Resv | s | | s |< | | | | -FLOWSPEC | | | | -UPSTREAM_TSPEC | | |---| -UPSTREAM_ADSPEC |---|

CCAMP - 69th IETF Alternatives Summary Opt. 1: Tech. Specific Pros: Simple to implement, i.e., no message format changes Cons: Need change per technology Precludes original use of ADPSEC Only works with technologies that don’t require ADSPEC Opt. 2: Generic Pros: Works with any technology Fixes omission of Upstream ADSPEC introduced in RFC3473 Cons: Three new object classes

CCAMP - 69th IETF Next Steps Answer major questions: Technical direction: Per technology solutions (Ethernet today) Generalized solution Process direction: If required functionality  Standard If not  Experimental General draft update Other comments?