HBT results from a rescattering model Tom Humanic Ohio State University WPCF 2005 August 17, 2005.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Review on initial conditions that allow for a successful description of the RHIC data on spectra, V2, (as)HBT, etc… Tom Humanic Ohio State University WPCF.

Advertisements

K*(892) Resonance Production in Au+Au and Cu+Cu Collisions at  s NN = 200 GeV & 62.4 GeV Motivation Analysis and Results Summary 1 Sadhana Dash Institute.

2010/10/18ATHIC2010, Oct 18-20, Wuhan1 Systematic study of particle spectra in heavy-ion collisions using Tsallis statistics Ming Shao, Zebo Tang, Yi Li,

In relativistic heavy ion collisions a high energy density matter Quark-Gluon Plasma (QGP) may be formed. Various signals have been proposed which probe.

Julia VelkovskaMoriond QCD, March 27, 2015 Geometry and Collective Behavior in Small Systems from PHENIX Julia Velkovska for the PHENIX Collaboration Moriond.

A probe for hot & dense nuclear matter. Lake Louise Winter Institute 21 February, 2000 Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez.

CERN May Heavy Ion Collisions at the LHC Last Call for Predictions Initial conditions and space-time scales in relativistic heavy ion collisions.

STAR Patricia Fachini 1 Brookhaven National Laboratory Motivation Data Analysis Results Conclusions Resonance Production in Au+Au and p+p Collisions at.

Quark recombination in high energy collisions for different energies Steven Rose Worcester Polytechnic Institute Mentor: Dr. Rainer Fries Texas A&M University.

1 Baryonic Resonance Why resonances and why  * ? How do we search for them ? What did we learn so far? What else can we do in the.

We distinguish two hadronization mechanisms:  Fragmentation Fragmentation builds on the idea of a single quark in the vacuum, it doesn’t consider many.

STAR Looking Through the “Veil of Hadronization”: Pion Entropy & PSD at RHIC John G. Cramer Department of Physics University of Washington, Seattle, WA,

5-12 April 2008 Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics STAR Particle production at RHIC Aneta Iordanova for the STAR collaboration.

Hadronic Resonances in Heavy-Ion Collisions at ALICE A.G. Knospe for the ALICE Collaboration The University of Texas at Austin 25 July 2013.

Particle Spectra at AGS, SPS and RHIC Dieter Röhrich Fysisk institutt, Universitetet i Bergen Similarities and differences Rapidity distributions –net.

Masashi Kaneta, LBNL Masashi Kaneta for the STAR collaboration Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. First results from STAR experiment at RHIC - Soft hadron.

Collective Flow in Heavy-Ion Collisions Kirill Filimonov (LBNL)

Spectra Physics at RHIC : Highlights from 200 GeV data Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez ISMD ‘02, Alushta, Ukraine Sep 9, 2002.

Flow fluctuation and event plane correlation from E-by-E Hydrodynamics and Transport Model LongGang Pang 1, Victor Roy 1,, Guang-You Qin 1, & Xin-Nian.

1 2-particle correlation at RHIC Fabrice Retière, LBNL for the STAR collaboration.

STRING PERCOLATION AND THE GLASMA C.Pajares Dept Particle Physics and IGFAE University Santiago de Compostela CERN The first heavy ion collisions at the.

Jaipur February 2008 Quark Matter 2008 Initial conditions and space-time scales in relativistic heavy ion collisions Yu. Sinyukov, BITP, Kiev (with participation.

Higher moments of net-charge multiplicity distributions at RHIC energies in STAR Nihar R. Sahoo, VECC, India (for the STAR collaboration) 1 Nihar R. Sahoo,

HIGHLIGHTS IN 2011 AT STAR & ALICE In-Kwon Yoo. Outline  STAR BES Results  BES runs and STAR general  Charged Meson   and   Freeze-out Conditions.

STAR Tom Humanic The Ohio State University FNAL --Feb 2003 Physics at RHIC Results from the RHIC STAR Experiment.

Predictions for two-pion correlations for sqrt(s)=14 TeV proton-proton collisions Tom Humanic Ohio State University.

1 Jeffery T. Mitchell – Quark Matter /17/12 The RHIC Beam Energy Scan Program: Results from the PHENIX Experiment Jeffery T. Mitchell Brookhaven.

Does HBT interferometry probe thermalization? Clément Gombeaud, Tuomas Lappi and J-Y Ollitrault IPhT Saclay WPCF 2009, CERN, October 16, 2009.

Presentation for NFR - October 19, Trine S.Tveter Recent results from RHIC Systems studied so far at RHIC: - s NN 1/2 = 

Results from an Integrated Boltzmann+Hydrodynamics Approach WPCF 2008, Krakau, Jan Steinheimer-Froschauer, Universität Frankfurt.

OPEN HEAVY FLAVORS 1. Heavy Flavor 2 Heavy quarks produced in the early stages of the collisions (high Q2)  effective probe of the high-density medium.

Two freeze-out model for the hadrons produced in the Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions. New Frontiers in QCD 28 Oct, 2011, Yonsei Univ., Seoul, Korea Suk.

Heavy-Ion Physics - Hydrodynamic Approach Introduction Hydrodynamic aspect Observables explained Recombination model Summary 전남대 이강석 HIM

School of Collective Dynamics in High-Energy CollisionsLevente Molnar, Purdue University 1 Effect of resonance decays on the extracted kinetic freeze-out.

Jeffery T. Mitchell (BNL) – Quark Matter The Evolution of Correlation Functions from Low to High p T : From HBT to Jets Quark Matter 2005 Jeffery.

R. Lednicky: Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia I.P. Lokhtin, A.M. Snigirev, L.V. Malinina: Moscow State University, Institute of Nuclear.

News from ALICE Jan PLUTA Heavy Ion Reaction Group (HIRG) Warsaw University of Technology February 22, XIII GDRE Workshop, SUBATECH, Nantes.

Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook, ISMD, Kromĕříž, Roy A. Lacey What do we learn from Correlation measurements at RHIC.

Budapest, 4-9 August 2005Quark Matter 2005 HBT search for new states of matter in A+A collisions Yu. Sinyukov, BITP, Kiev Based on the paper S.V. Akkelin,

Christina Markert Hot Quarks, Sardinia, Mai Christina Markert Kent State University Motivation Resonance in hadronic phase Time R AA and R dAu Elliptic.

Charged and Neutral Kaon correlations in Au-Au Collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 200 GeV using the solenoidal tracker at RHIC (STAR) Selemon Bekele The Ohio State.

Hadronic resonance production in Pb+Pb collisions from the ALICE experiment Anders Knospe on behalf of the ALICE Collaboration The University of Texas.

PhD student at the International PhD Studies Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN Department of Theory of Structure of Matter.

1 Probing dense matter at extremely high temperature Rudolph C. Hwa University of Oregon Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China April 20, 2009.

Measurement of Azimuthal Anisotropy for High p T Charged Hadrons at RHIC-PHENIX The azimuthal anisotropy of particle production in non-central collisions.

JET Collaboration Meeting June 17-18, 2014, UC-Davis1/25 Flow and “Temperature” of the Parton Phase from AMPT Zi-Wei Lin Department of Physics East Carolina.

24 June 2007 Strangeness in Quark Matter 2007 STAR 2S0Q0M72S0Q0M7 Strangeness and bulk freezeout properties at RHIC Aneta Iordanova.

Japanese Physics Society meeting, Hokkaido Univ. 23/Sep/2007, JPS meeting, Sapporo, JapanShinIchi Esumi, Inst. of Physics, Univ. of Tsukuba1 Collective.

Intermediate pT results in STAR Camelia Mironov Kent State University 2004 RHIC & AGS Annual Users' Meeting Workshop on Strangeness and Exotica at RHIC.

Helen Caines Yale University Strasbourg - May 2006 Strangeness and entropy.

24/6/2007 P.Ganoti, 1 Study of Λ(1520) production in pp TeV with the ALICE detector Paraskevi Ganoti University.

Hadron Spectra and Yields Experimental Overview Julia Velkovska INT/RHIC Winter Workshop, Dec 13-15, 2002.

Soft physics in PbPb at the LHC Hadron Collider Physics 2011 P. Kuijer ALICECMSATLAS Necessarily incomplete.

1 Strange Resonance Production in p+p and Au+Au Collisions at RHIC energies. Christina Markert, Yale University for the STAR Collaboration QM2004,

High Energy Physics in the LHC Era th International Workshop Vicki Greene for the PHENIX Collaboration Vanderbilt University 7 January 2016 Measurements.

Anisotropic flow of charged and strange particles in PbAu collisions at 158 AGeV measured in CERES experiment J. Milošević 1),2) 1)University of Belgrade.

Adam Kisiel – CERN Hirschegg 2010 – 19 Jan Femtoscopy in relativistic heavy-ion collisions as a probe of system collectivity Adam Kisiel CERN.

Experiment Review in small system collectivity and thermalization in pp, pA/dA/HeA collisions Shengli Huang.

Review of ALICE Experiments

Femtoscopic signatures of collective behavior as a probe of the thermal nature of relativistic heavy ion collisions Thomas J. Humanic, Ohio State University.

Strangeness Production in Heavy-Ion Collisions at STAR

Collective Dynamics at RHIC

STAR and RHIC; past, present and future.

Maya Shimomura University of Tsukuba

The Study of Elliptic Flow for PID Hadron at RHIC-PHENIX

Outline Background Global Observables in Heavy Ion Collisions

Panos Christakoglou1 for the ALICE Collaboration 1Nikhef

Effect of equilibrium phase transition on multiphase transport in relativistic heavy ion collisions 喻梅凌华中师范大学粒子物理研究所 2019/2/24 第十届全国粒子物理大会桂林.

System Size and Energy Dependence of -meson Production at RHIC

Dipartimento Interateneo di Fisica, Bari (Italy)

Presentation transcript:

HBT results from a rescattering model Tom Humanic Ohio State University WPCF 2005 August 17, 2005

Tom Humanic OSU2 Outline Hadronic rescattering model Comparison with RHIC data Subdivision test of rescattering model Asymmetric HBT from rescattering HBT calculation for LHC Pb+Pb collisions Conclusions

August 17, 2005Tom Humanic OSU3 time Evolution of a heavy-ion collision Before collision (heavy nuclei) After collision: QM formation?? Hadronization Strong hadronic rescattering “Freezeout” (hadrons freely stream to detectors) In order to study QM/hadronization stage of collision from freezeout hadrons, need to understand rescattering stage first!

August 17, 2005Tom Humanic OSU4 Hadronic rescattering model (T. J. Humanic, Phys.Rev.C 57, 866, (1998)) 1) Assume a simple hadronization picture to set the initial geometry and momenta. 2) Put in hadrons whose multiplicities are consistent with RHIC experiments or LHC predictions. Conserve energy. 3) Let hadrons undergo strong binary collisions until the system gets so dilute (since it is expanding) that all collisions cease. 4) Record the time, mass, position, and momentum of each hadron when it no longer scatters.  freezout condition. 5) Calculate hadronic observables  p T distributions, elliptic flow, HBT, … 1/m T dN/dm T = m T exp(-m T /T) T = 300 MeV (RHIC Au+Au) 500 MeV (LHC Pb+Pb)  parameters: initial temperature (T), hadronization proper time (  ) (cylindrical) (thermal)   K, N,  ’…..   (i,j) from Prakash, etc.. r z =  sinh y ; t =  cosh y  = 1 fm/c z rapidity width (  y )

August 17, 2005Tom Humanic OSU5 Comparison of the Rescattering model with RHIC data for p T distributions As seen above, the qualitative shapes are the same for p T < 3 GeV/c !

August 17, 2005Tom Humanic OSU6 Comparison of Recattering model with RHIC data for m T distributions The slopes are seen to agree !

August 17, 2005Tom Humanic OSU7 Elliptic Flow vs. p T from rescattering model compared with STAR flattening at high pT as in data

August 17, 2005Tom Humanic OSU8 STAR  HBT vs Rescattering Model Rescattering qualitatively describes the centrality and momentum dependences of the pion HBT data.

August 17, 2005Tom Humanic OSU9 Time evolution of elliptic flow, HBT, and radial flow from rescattering for RHIC Au+Au with b = 8 fm, -1 < y < 1, and 125 < p T < 225 MeV/c Defining t S = stablization time t S (V 2 ) < t S (HBT) < t S (slope)

August 17, 2005Tom Humanic OSU10 Criticisms of rescattering calculation Criticism 1: The initial state for the calculation is too hot and too dense to be considering hadrons thus the results are meaningless…. Response: The rescattering calculation should be viewed as a limiting case study of how far one can get with such an extreme and simple model – maybe we can learn something about the true initial state from this, e.g. hadron-like objects existing in the QGP??... short QGP lifetime??.... Criticism 2: The calculation results may have reasonable agreement with data but that is only a fluke because the calculation is dominated by computational artifacts which strongly influence the results. Response: The rescattering model has been tested for Boltzmann- transport-equation-like behavior and the influence of superluminal artifacts using the Subdivision method  see next slide

August 17, 2005Tom Humanic OSU11 Subdivision test of rescattering calculation    and    = subdivision Expect no change in observables under this transformation for a Boltzmann Eq.  no effects from superluminal artifacts

August 17, 2005Tom Humanic OSU12 Asymmetric HBT for rescattering vs. STAR data Central collisions

August 17, 2005Tom Humanic OSU13 Asymmetric HBT for rescattering vs. STAR data Mid-central collisions

August 17, 2005Tom Humanic OSU14 Asymmetric HBT for rescattering vs. STAR data Semi-peripheral collisions

August 17, 2005Tom Humanic OSU15 Conclusion for “soft” (i.e. p T < 3 GeV/c) RHIC physics: Hadronic rescattering with a short hadronization time (  = 1 fm/c) describes dynamic features reasonably well….  Now apply the rescattering model to LHC Pb+Pb collisions

August 17, 2005Tom Humanic OSU16 Details the of LHC rescattering calculations Adjust the initial particle multiplicities to give a central (b=0 fm) charged particle dN/dy at y=0 of Adjust the initial hadron gas temperature and rapidity width to give the correct LHC Pb+Pb energy: use T=500 MeV. Do calculations for b = 8 fm impact parameter so elliptic flow can also be studied (and the code runs faster). Use same hadronization time as for RHIC,  = 1 fm/c Compare the LHC rescattering results with RHIC rescattering results.

August 17, 2005Tom Humanic OSU17 Pion freezeout time and z-position for LHC vs. RHIC Pion freezeout times are about twice as long at LHC compared to RHIC

August 17, 2005Tom Humanic OSU18

August 17, 2005Tom Humanic OSU19 m T distributions for LHC vs. RHIC Radial flow appears to be larger for LHC compared to RHIC

August 17, 2005Tom Humanic OSU20 Elliptic flow for LHC vs. RHIC Pion elliptic flow at LHC and RHIC are about the same

August 17, 2005Tom Humanic OSU21 Projected 3D two-pion C 2 for LHC Pb+Pb from rescattering for b=8 fm centrality and p T bin MeV/c

August 17, 2005Tom Humanic OSU22 Transverse radius parameters for LHC vs. RHIC Transverse radius parameters are somewhat larger and show a stronger p T dependence for LHC compared with RHIC

August 17, 2005Tom Humanic OSU23 R Long and parameters for LHC vs. RHIC R Long for LHC is almost twice as large as for RHIC reflecting longer freezeout times; behaves about the same at LHC and RHIC

August 17, 2005Tom Humanic OSU24 Conclusions from Rescattering Rescattering model results in reasonable agreement with RHIC data t C (V 2 ) < t C (HBT) < t C (slope param.) Subdivision test shows no effects of artifacts in rescatt results Asymmetric HBT from rescattering in qualitative agreement with data Radial flow at the LHC appears greater than for RHIC. Pion elliptic flow at LHC and RHIC are about the same Transverse radius parameters are somewhat larger and show a stronger p T dependence for LHC compared with RHIC. R Long for LHC is almost twice as large as for RHIC reflecting longer freezeout times; behaves about the same at LHC and RHIC.