WP 12.3 Moderator & Reflector Systems D. Lyngh, M. Kickulies, J. Ringnér, J. Jurns, M. Andersson, M. Pucilowski, T. Hedlund, A. Olsson TAC11 Lund, 1 st.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mercury Chamber Update V. Graves NF-IDS Meeting October 4, 2011.
Advertisements

Mike Fitton Engineering Analysis Group Design and Computational Fluid Dynamic analysis of the T2K Target Neutrino Beams and Instrumentation 6th September.
KT McDonald Target Studies Meeting June 14, Mechanical Issues for the Target System K. McDonald Princeton U. (June 14, 2011) Target Studies Meeting.
UCN Phase 2 Design Status September 10, Design Components Bulk Shielding Target Crypt Cryogenic Insert Target Insert UCN Port Beam Window Cooling.
ESS Cryogenic System Process Design Philipp Arnold Section Leader Cryogenics CEC – ICMC 2015 June 29, 2015.
Large-capacity Helium refrigeration : from state-of-the-art towards FCC reference solutions Francois Millet – March 2015.
ISIS Second Target Station
Thermal Hydraulic Simulation of a SuperCritical-Water-Cooled Reactor Core Using Flownex F.A.Mngomezulu, P.G.Rousseau, V.Naicker School of Mechanical and.
Introduction and Charge to the Review of ESS Target building and Instrument Hall design requirements Roland Garoby November 2014, Lund
Target Project Progress and Plans Eric Pitcher TAC-10 November 5, 2014.
Hydrogen system R&D. R&D programme – general points Hydrogen absorber system incorporates 2 novel aspects Hydrogen storage using a hydride bed Hydrogen.
The ESS Cryogenics System J. G. Weisend II, P. Arnold, J Fydrych, W. Hees, J. Jurns, A. Lundmark, X. T. Su, X.L. Wang June 2015.
BL1U at TRIUMF UCN Beamline Spallation Target & Remote-Handling System (Aug/2010) L.Lee.
Development of a Positron Production Target for the ILC Positron Source Capture Optics Positron beam pipe/ NC rf cavity Target wheel Vacuum feedthrough.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft TIK 3.1 Moderator & Reflector System TAC Meeting 15. October 2015 | Yannick Beßler (FZJ), Daniel Lyngh (ESSS)
PSB dump: proposal of a new design EN – STI technical meeting on Booster dumps Friday 11 May 2012 BE Auditorium Prevessin Alba SARRIÓ MARTÍNEZ.
Cold Magnetic Shield Update
Response to TAC8 and Annual Review Recommendations John Haines Head of Target Division April 2, 2014.
Beam line Experiment area SC magnet Pion production target
WP 12.3 Moderator & Reflector Systems D. Lyngh, M. Kickulies, J. Ringnér, J. Jurns, Y. Bessler (FZJ), M. Klaus (TUD), H. Quack (TUD) TAC12 Presenters:
The CNGS Target Station By L.Bruno, S.Péraire, P.Sala SL/BT Targets & Dumps Section.
Progress on Remote Handling Systems TAC 12 Magnus Göhran – WPM 15 th October 2015.
TIK 3.1 Moderator & Reflector System
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Twister 15. Januar Shaft Moderators & Reflectors Radial Bearing Axial Bearing Target Rotation and lifting device.
Shrikant_Pattalwar TTC 2015 Dec 1, 2015 SLAC 1 Horizontal Tests in a Vertical Cryostat Shrikant Pattalwar STFC Daresbury Laboratory UK.
Monolith design update – Emphasis on Neutron beam extraction design
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft ESS cold and thermal Moderators Moderator & Reflector System Project Introduction Meeting | Yannick Beßler,
TC Straw man for ATLAS ID for SLHC This layout is a result of the discussions in the GENOA ID upgrade workshop. Aim is to evolve this to include list of.
IKON ESS Flat moderators at ESS IKON6, Lund, Sweden Luca Zanini – 26 February 2014 ESS
SPL cryomodule specification meeting, CERN 19th October 2010 SPL cryomodule specification: Goals of the meeting SPL cryomodule specification: Goals of.
Target Project Progress and Plans Eric Pitcher Deputy Head of Target Division 11th TAC Meeting April 1,
General overview of WU : Cryogenic Distribution for Elliptical Linac Jarosław Fydrych Cryodistribution Project Engineer Preliminary Design Review,
CW Cryomodules for Project X Yuriy Orlov, Tom Nicol, and Tom Peterson Cryomodules for Project X, 14 June 2013Page 1.
HL-LHC-UK Thermal Shield Update Niklas Templeton 07/03/2016.
CSNS cryogenic system Institute of High Energy Physics Guoping Wang June 21, 2016.
Update on the ESS monolith design Rikard Linander Monolith and Handling Group ESS Target Division TAC 10, Lund, Nov 5,
Cryogenics for SuperB IR Magnets J. G. Weisend II SLAC National Accelerator Lab.
Target Systems and Monolith Design Update Rikard Linander Group Leader Monolith and Handling April 2, 2014.
1 Target Introduction Chris Densham STFC/RAL Mu2e Target, Remote Handling, and Heat & Radiation Shield Review Nov
Positron Source for Linear Collider Wanming Liu 04/11/2013.
Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility LBNF News and brief overview of Beamline plans for the next few months Vaia Papadimitriou Beamline Technical Board Meeting.
ILC : Type IV Cryomodule Design Meeting Main cryogenic issues, L. Tavian, AT-ACR C ryostat issues, V.Parma, AT-CRI CERN, January 2006.
The ESS Target Station Eric Pitcher Head of Target Division February 19, 2016.
LCLS-II Prototype Cryomodule Darryl Orris 21 January 2015 Final Design Review: Instrumentation.
The ESS Target Station F. Mezei ESS target division NPPatLPS, 2013.
Slides for TAC meeting Oct/2015 Marcelo juni Ferreira Vacuum section leader October,
Straw man layout for ATLAS ID for SLHC
WP High Beta Cavities Delivery
Study and Development of Large Cryogenic Systems in China
Progress with System Integration of the CBM Silicon Tracking Detector
Cryomodule test stand at ESS site
Making Difficult Decisions in a Transparent Way –
Roadmap for triplet cryostats
IT-4189 Supply and installation of a cryogenic distribution system
BDS Cryogenic System RDR Status and EDR Plans
News and brief overview of Beamline plans for the next few months
Target and Horn status report
From Design to Installation courtesy R. Folch S. Atieh TS / MME
M. Calviani, A. Ferrari (EN/STI), P. Sala (INFN)
ATLAS ITk CO₂ Cooling pipe routing Common Mechanics meeting
ESS Target Cryogenic System European Cryogenic Days CERN
2K CB FDR Overview:  Agenda, Charge, Review Process
Optimum cryomodule length at the ESS
5K Shield Study & HL Measurements
Experimental equipment Edgar L. Black February 17, 2019
Target collaboratin Board Meeting
APTM and GRID interface requirement PBIP and PBW
Test Beamline System Requirements and Charge to PDR Committee
UPPSALA UNIVERSITY_GERSEMI PROJECT
Overview of the TARGET Monolith Rough Vacuum
Presentation transcript:

WP 12.3 Moderator & Reflector Systems D. Lyngh, M. Kickulies, J. Ringnér, J. Jurns, M. Andersson, M. Pucilowski, T. Hedlund, A. Olsson TAC11 Lund, 1 st of April 2015 Presenter: Daniel Lyngh, Lead Engineer

Outline Schedule & Cost Update – Recent Progress – Schedule (PDR & CDR) Technical Developments – Twister Foundation Pillar and Rotation Pipes Development – Butterfly Increased Heat Deposition, Flow Pattern – Questions Double or split plug design Beam through twister shaft 2Daniel Lyngh, TAC11,

Recent Progress Moderator & Reflector Plugs (MR Plugs) – Preliminary Design Ongoing – PDRs planned for June -15 – Detail Engineering, Make Phase and Testing issued for In- Kind Contribution (startup June) – TC-8 Twister Handling – Approved – TC-12 2x Butterfly Moderators - Approved Cryogenic Cooling System – Preliminary Design Ongoing – PDRs planned for June -15 3

Schedule MR Plugs Cold Moderators Thermal Moderators Reflectors Handling System Structure & Shielding Liquid Hydrogen System Concept Phase Final DesignMake Phase PDRPDR PDRPDR PDRPDR PDRPDR 2019 Q1 Q Q1 Q2 Q3 Q Q1 Q2 Q3 Q Q1 Q2 Q3 Q Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PDRPDR PDRPDR PDRPDR PDRPDR PDRPDR PDRPDR PDRPDR PDRPDR PDRPDR PDRPDR SAT PDRPDR PDRPDR Cryogenic Cooling System He Cryoplant PDRPDR PDRPDR PDRPDR PDRPDR PDRPDR PDRPDR PDRPDR PDRPDR PDRPDR PDRPDR PDRPDR PDRPDR PDRPDR PDRPDR PDRPDR PDRPDR PDRPDR PDRPDR PDRPDR PDRPDR PDRPDR PDRPDR PDRPDR PDRPDR PDRPDR PDRPDR DeliveryCDR PDRPDR PDRPDR PDR PDRPDR PDRPDR PDRPDR PDRPDR Site Inst. & Testing Site Work 2014 Q3 Q4

Technical Developments Twister Handling Developed design of twister moderator handling system – Water Cooling of Shafts – Piping Arrangement – Proton Beam Path – Double Plug Daniel Lyngh, TAC11,

Overview 66 Proton beam window Moderator and reflector plugs Target wheel Neutron beam windows Neutron beam extraction

Daniel Lyngh, TAC11,

Technical Developments Twister Handling Component Overview Daniel Lyngh, TAC11,

Technical Developments Twister Handling Shaft Cooling Daniel Lyngh, TAC11, Bearing Cavities water

10 Technical Developments Twister Handling Bearings Daniel Lyngh, TAC11,

Technical Developments Twister Handling Piping Arrangement Daniel Lyngh, TAC11, Service Position OperatingP osition

Technical Developments Twister Handling Daniel Lyngh, TAC11,

Twister Option Proton Beam Path 13 Beam Cut-out +Simpler Pipe Design -Penetrates Foundation Pillar +Symmetric Thermal Stresses -Bigger Plugs (+) Beneficial for 1 double plug (1 rotating shaft) +Larger flexibility for beam footprint changes - Complex Pipe Routing for Bottom Plug + Smaller impact on Foundation Pillar design - Asymmetric Thermal Stresses - Asymmetric Proton Radiation - Limited design margins as shaft is restricted between proton beam and neutron extraction path - Asymmetric and therefore more challenging to manufacture Beam Through Foundation Pillar Proton Beam

+ Simplified Piping Arrangement + Simplified Plug Structure & Shielding + Simplified Rotation Device -Bigger Cask and Handling System + Reduced number of moving parts and bearings + Independent Replacement -Complicated Piping arrangement for bottom moderator + Higher future mission flexibility Twister Option Independent or double Plugs Double Integrated Plug 14 Split Independent Plugs

Technical Developments Butterfly Moderator Implementation – 3cm Top Moderator – 6cm Bottom Moderator – Increased Cryoplant size 20->35 Kw – Increased Liquid Hydrogen System – Increased WP Budget (18%) and delayed schedule. Daniel Lyngh, TAC11,

16 Butterfly Moderators TC-12 Instrument Performance [4] K. Andersson, Pancake and Butterfly Moderators, Abstract Three new moderator assemblies are evaluated and compared to the baseline configuration. Two make use of the new “butterfly” concept, resulting in a significantly higher thermal brightness compared to the water wings of the pancake moderator. The third is a variant of the Optimised Thermal configuration, changing one of the viewed sectors from East to South. The preferred solution is to replace the top pancake moderator with a butterfly assembly of the same height. This will have a negligible impact on the cold-neutron instruments, while substantially improving the performance of the bi-spectral instruments. Replacing the bottom “optimised thermal” moderator with a butterfly assembly of the same height, viewable in all instrument sectors, will have little effect on the performance of the individual instruments, but will dramatically increase the flexibility of the instrument layout, allowing all instruments to freely choose the optimum moderator for their needs. Daniel Lyngh, TAC11,

Technical Development Butterfly Moderator Implementation Daniel Lyngh, TAC11, Top Pre Moderator Alternatives: Water Wing Vacuum Gap Water Cross Cold Moderator Water Disc

Technical Development Butterfly Design 18 3 Designs for Hydrogen Flow 1.Parallel Flow with Jet 2.Serial Star Flow 3.Serial Zeus 1 3 2

Technical Development Butterfly Design 19 3 Designs for Hydrogen Flow 1.Parallel Flow with Jet 2.Serial Star Flow 3.Serial Zeus 1 2 3

Technical Development Butterfly Design 20 3 Designs for Hydrogen Flow 1.Parallel Flow with Jet 2.Serial Star Flow 3.Serial Zeus 13 2

Technical Development Butterfly Design 21 60mm Bottom Moderator

Technical Development Butterfly Thermal Moderator 22

Technical Development Butterfly Design 23

Technical Development Butterfly Design 24

Technical Development Butterfly Design 25

Technical Development Butterfly Design 26

Technical Development Butterfly Design 27

Technical Development Butterfly Design 28

Technical Development Butterfly Design 29

Technical Development Butterfly Design 30

Technical Development Butterfly Design 31

Technical Development Butterfly Design 32

Technical Development Butterfly Weld Tests 33

Technical Development Butterfly Weld Tests 34 Ebeam welding eBeam “blindfolded” but clear position guide eBeam 2 lines Filler wire

Summary Changes/Developments: Twister Change Butterfly Change Questions/request for comments: Proton Beam Path Double Plug Upcoming Activities: Weld Tests PDRs in June Daniel Lyngh, TAC11,