Calculations of Beam Intensities Task 11 : Calculations of Beam Intensities - first twelve months -

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Paul Scherrer Institut 5232 Villigen PSI EURISOL Kick-off meeting, L. Zanini EURISOL DS Task 4 L. Zanini PSI Kick-off Meeting CERN,

Advertisements

EURISOL DS NUMBERS: 20: CONTRIBUTORS U-FRANKFURT (G), BUDKER (RU),VNIIFT (RU), PNPI (RU), ORNL (USA), ANL (USA), KAERI (SKR), TRIUMF (CA), JAERI (JP),

M3.1 JYFL fission model Department of Physics, University of Jyväskylä, FIN-40351, Finland V.G. Khlopin Radium Institute, , St. Petersburg, Russia.

EURISOL_DS – Task 11 Subtask 5 Neutron- and proton-induced reactions up to Fermi energy J. Äystö / V. Rubchenya JYFL, Jyväskylä (P9) / KhRI, St.Petersburg.

Yoro TALL Santiago de Compostela (Spain) June 7 – 10, Second IP EUROTRANS Internal Training Course on Nuclear Data for Transmutation: status, needs.

Fragmentation of very neutron-rich projectiles around 132 Sn GSI experiment S294 Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Spain Centre d’Etudes Nucleaires.

Production of rare nuclear species with proton and heavy ion beams in various regimes Martin Veselský Institute of Physics, Slovak Academy of Sciences,

BEAM INTENSITIES WITH EURISOL M. Valentina Ricciardi GSI, Darmstadt, Germany.

Alex C. MUELLER Physics with a multi-MW proton source, CERN, Geneva, May Additional Installations for a Nuclear Physics Facility Alex C. MUELLER.

Estimation of production rates and secondary beam intensities Martin Veselský, Janka Strišovská, Jozef Klimo Institute of Physics, Slovak Academy of Sciences,

Status of EURISOL Yorick BLUMENFELD We acknowledge the financial support of the European Community under the FP6 “Research Infrastructure Action - Structuring.

INTRODUCTION SPALLATION REACTIONS F/B ASYMMETRY FOR Au+p RANKING OF SPALLATION MODELS SUMMARY Title 24/09/2014 Sushil K. Sharma Proton induced spallation.

C. Böckstiegel, S. Steinhäuser, H.-G. Clerc, A. Grewe, A. Heinz, M. de Jong, J. Müller, B. Voss Institut für Kernphysik, TU Darmstadt A. R. Junghans, A.

EURISOL DS Target Meeting, CERN, CHY.KADIMarch 10-11, EURISOL DS PROJECT Task#2: MULTI-MW TARGET 1st year planning Y. Kadi (AB/ATB) European Organization.

Fragmentation of very neutron-rich projectiles around 132 Sn GSI experiment S294 Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Spain Centre d’Etudes Nucleaires.

NA2: Thin actinide targets optimized for high intensity beams Purpose: Optimize the high power capability and durability of thin actinide targets (“thin”

CERN NuPAC meeting Dec 2005 The future of ISOLDE: accelerated radioactive beams Peter Butler 1.HIE-ISOLDE 2.EURISOL.

Radioactive ion beam facilities How does they work ? 2012 Student Practice in JINR Fields of Research 9.oct.2012 I. Sivacekflerovlab.jinr.ru.

Investigation of GeV proton-induced spallation reactions

SPL, a driver for EURISOL? Yorick Blumenfeld* Isolde-CERN * On leave from IPN Orsay We acknowledge the financial support of the European Community under.

CERN, 18 th Feb. 2004EURISOL - Beta Beam Design StudyM. Benedikt 1 Status of the Beta-Beam in the EURISOL Design Study Michael Benedikt, AB Division, CERN.

CRYOMODULES High Beta Low Beta Approved by CERN Research Board in December 2009.

28. November 2005 Fission product yield measurements with JYFLTRAP A novel application of a Penning trap H. Penttilä, J. Äystö, V.-V. Elomaa, T. Eronen,

Status of the EURISOL Design Study Yorick Blumenfeld IPN Orsay.

Radioactive ion beam production at other facilities

Y. Romanets 1, R. Luis 1,J. Bermudez 3, J.C. David 5, D. Ene 5, I. F. Goncalves 1, Y. Kadi 2, C. Kharoua 2, F. Negoita 4, R. Rocca 2, L. Tecchio 3, P.

Aleksandra Kelić for the CHARMS collaboration§ GSI Darmstadt, Germany

European Isotope Separation On-Line Radioactive Nuclear Beam Facility A preliminary design study of the next- generation European ISOL RNB facility GANIL,

F. Negoita, Bucuresti, 28 Feb Participation of NIPNE-Bucharest in SPIRAL2 Project.

UK Research in Nuclear Physics P J Nolan University of Liverpool.

CERN, 15/03/05EURISOL - Beta Beam Task1 EURISOL and the Beta-Beam Task Status and Planning Michael Benedikt Mats Lindroos AB-Department, CERN.

Beam intensities with EURISOL Aleksandra Kelić, GSI-Darmstadt on behalf of the EURISOL DS Task 11 Participants and contributors: ISOLDE-CERN, CEA/Saclay,

Sub-task 4: Spallation and fragmentation reactions M. Valentina Ricciardi (GSI) in place of José Benlliure (USC) Sub-task leader: Universidad de Santiago.

The University of Santiago de Compostela in numbers founded in 1495 one million square metres (82 buildings) 63 official degrees + doctoral programmes.

SECONDARY-BEAM PRODUCTION: PROTONS VERSUS HEAVY IONS A. Kelić, S. Lukić, M. V. Ricciardi, K.-H. Schmidt GSI, Darmstadt, Germany  Present knowledge on.

Calculations of Beam Intensities Kick-off meeting, GSI, Task 11 : Calculations of Beam Intensities Kick-off meeting, GSI,

Antonio C.C. Villari - GANILMoriond-2003 Radioactive beam research notches up 50 years Otto Kofoed-Hansen and Karl Ove Nielsen were the authors of NBI's.

Welcome to the CHARMS See – Tea Saturday, March 05, 2016 Comparison of ISOLDE yields with calculated in- target production rates Strahinja Lukić,

EURO EURO A High Intensity Neutrino Oscillation Facility in Europe Introduction Aims Structure Tasks Link to other activities Future dates.

Subtask 6 Heavy-ion reactions in the Fermi- energy domain Participants: IoP Task leader: Martin Veselsky

BENE/EURISOL-DS Joint Meeting, CERN, SwitzerlandFebruary 22, Progress in the Liquid Mercury Multi-MW Target Design Studies Y. Kadi On behalf of.

Wolfgang Vinzenz FAIR Proton Linac 10 th FAIR MAC November 25 th and 26 th 2013 Proton Linac 1 Status Buncher Design  Rectangular design, longitudinal.

Task 11.4: Spallation and fragmentation reactions David Pérez Loureiro Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Spain Eurisol DS, Task 11 meeting,Helsinki.

A. FaccoEURISOL DS Orsay, 3 Feb 2005 Task 7 Proton Accelerator “The objective of the Proton Accelerator Task is the design a 5 mA CW, 1 GeV proton linac.

3 February 2005, J. Lettry 1 Task #3 100 kW direct targets “Development of targets and ion sources for radionuclide production that can accommodate up.

Eurisol DS, Task 11 meeting, Helsinki September‘07 Task 11.2: Fragmentation of post accelerated ISOL beams David Pérez Loureiro Universidad de Santiago.

EURISOL DS Task 11.2 Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Spain Eurisol DS: task 11 meeting March‘05.

Orsay, 03/Feb/05EURISOL - Beta Beam TaskM. Benedikt 1 The Beta-Beam Task Status and Planning 02/2005 to 01/2006 Michael Benedikt AB-Department, CERN.

March 18, 20051T11 – EURISOL meeting - GSI Aspects of secondary reactions in single- and double-stage targets (ST7) Goal:In-target Yield calculations for.

A. FaccoEURISOL DS Task 7GANIL, 30 Nov 2005 EURISOL DS 2° Meeting Task 7 - Primary Accelerator GANIL, November 30, 2005 Summary of the Task 7 status New.

Ali Ahmad FLUKA code validation of nuclear data required for the spallation target design in Accelerator Driven Subcritical Reactors ThorEA Meeting – Daresbury.

Safety & Radioprotection 8 Jul. 2005, Liverpool, UK WP 5: Safety & Radioprotection Participants:role 1. GANIL, France - sub-task D 2.

ICT Smartcities 2013 FP7-SMARTCITIES-2013 WP6 – Project Management OPTIMising the energy USe in cities with smart decision support system (OPTIMUS) Objective.

EURISOL, TASK#5, Bucuresti, November 1 Preliminary shielding assessment of EURISOL Post Accelerator D. Ene, D. Ridikas. B. Rapp.

EURISOL DS: European Isotope Separation On-Line Radioactive Ion Beam Facility Design Study G. Fortuna, Eurisol Week 2005.

Comprehensive investigation of the decay losses in the ISOL extraction method KP2 Seminar, Strahinja Lukić.

EURISOL: European Collaboration towards the ultimate ISOL facility Yorick Blumenfeld IPN – Orsay We acknowledge the financial support of the European Community.

P1 – GANIL P2 – CNRS/IN2P3 P3 – INFN P4 – CERN P6 – CEA Saclay P7 – NIPNE Bucarest P18 – PSI Switzerland P19 – IPUL Latvia C2 – BINP Novosibirsk C3 – VNIITF.

Finnish participation at ISOLDE

for the EURISOL Steering Committee

SMI-06 Workshop, Groningen,

Sébastien Bousson (CNRS-IN2P3-IPN Orsay)

Targets & conversion to secondary radiation summary

BEAM INTENSITIES WITH EURISOL

Division Accélérateurs

Global view on fission channels

Cross-Section Measurement of Very Light Fission Fragments Produced in Spallation Reactions of 238U at 1 A GeV M. V. Ricciardi1, K. -H. Schmidt1, F. Rejmund1,

A High Intensity Neutrino Oscillation Facility in Europe

A High Intensity Neutrino Oscillation Facility in Europe

Production Cross-Sections of Radionuclides in Proton- and Heavy Ion-Induced Reactions Strahinja Lukić.

Presentation transcript:

Calculations of Beam Intensities Task 11 : Calculations of Beam Intensities - first twelve months -

Task description  Objectives: Estimation of the available secondary-beam intensities, limitations in N-to-Z ratio, choice of the best adapted technical solutions.  7 participants: ISOLDE-CERN (P4), CEA/Saclay (P6), University of Jyväskylä (P8), University of Warsaw (P12), IoP Bratislava (P13), GSI (P15), University Santiago de Compostella (P16)  2 contributors: Khlopin Radium Institute (C4), VINČA-INS Belgrade (C16)  Task leader: Dr. Karl-Heinz Schmidt (GSI)  7 Deliverables

Task break-down  ST1 Benefit of heavy-ion capabilities of the driver accelerator (IoP)  D1  ST2 Fragmentation of post-accelerated ISOL beams (USC)  D2  ST3 Fission models (GSI)  D3  ST4 Spallation and fragmentation reactions (USC)  D4  ST5 Neutron- and proton-induced reactions up to Fermi energy (JYU)  D5  ST6 Heavy-ion reactions in the Fermi-energy domain (IoP)  D1, D7  ST7 Secondary reactions in single- and double-stage targets (CEA)  D6  ST8 Predictions of secondary-beam intensities (GSI)  D7

Synergy with other tasks Synergy with other tasks Input Output Task 11 Task 2 Multi MW targets Task 9 Beam preparation Task 4 Fission target Task 3 Direct targets Task 7 Proton accelerator Task 12 Beta beams Task 10 Physics & Instrument. Task 6 HI accelerator

Working plan Feb Jan. 06 SubtaskWorkParticipantsRespons.ST1 Report on HI capabilities of driver accelerator CEA, IoP, USC, GSI, IoP ST2 Experiment 132 Sn+Be USC, GSI, IoP, VINČA, UW USC ST3 Fission models validation JYU, GSI, USC GSI ST4 Data compilation, models benchmarking GSI, USC, VINČA USC ST5 Data on p-induced fission, code on p- induced reactions, PEE model JYU, KhRI, USC JYU ST6 Data compilation, model calculations, experiment preparations IoP ST7 Code validation, beam and target optimisation, single-stage target calculations CEA, WU CEA ST8 ISOLDE-yield data base, thick-target model, EURISOL ND demand list CERN, JYU, GSI, USC GSI

Milestone Month due ST1Heavy-ion requirement for driver accelerator M1.1Preliminary investigation12 ST2Fragmentation of post accelerated ISOL beams M2.1Preparation of experiment12 ST3Fission models M3.1JYFL fission model results5 M3.2GSI fission model results12 ST4Spallation and fragmentation reactions M4.1Data and benchmarking of model for 238 U12 ST5n- and p-induced reactions up to Fermi energy ST6HI reactions at Fermi energy M6.1Calculations of n-rich nuclei production12 ST7Aspects of secondary reactions M7.1Code validation5 M7.2 Beam and target optimisation12 ST8Predictions of secondary beam intensities M8.1Completion of the ISOLDE yield data base12 Expected results, Feb Jan. 06

ParticipantPosition (MM)Money (K€)Starting dateCERN627Aug. 05 CEA--- JYU1254Feb. 05 UW1.57Aug. 05 IoP--- GSI1254Feb. 05 USC313.5Aug. 05 Human resources, Feb Jan. 06, demand Total: ~ 34.5 man-months MM = Mann-Months

Financial resources, Feb Jan. 06, demand Total: K€ ParticipantPersonnelTravelConsumableTotal/PartCERN27-- CEA-4-4 JYU + KhRI UW IoP GSI VINČA-INS -16- USC Total All numbers are given in K€

Meetings, Feb Jan. 06 It is planned to have a general meeting of all participants and contributors of Task 11 in February 2005 (the date is still not fixed). During this meeting, different working groups will be formed. Two other meetings of all participants and contributors are planned (after 6 months and after 12 months) where the results of the different working groups as well as deliverables and reports will be presented. Moreover, if necessary, the members of different working groups can meet more frequently.