Marília Maciel. Why ICANN? Why a comparative approach? ICANN Global Regional org. org.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Aid Information for the People A Summary Report of Civil Society Consultations on the International Aid Transparency Initiative (IATI) Antonio Tujan, Jr.

Advertisements

Transforming Ideas into Policy Making - Thoughts, values and global governance Minakshi Bhardwaj Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Tsukuba,

Internet Governance: A Progress Report from WGIG Charles Shaban Member of the Working Group on Internet Governance Executive Director, AGIP Regional Office.

Positioning of Forum Approach Implementation of development projects: Institutition building: - Institutional capacity - New institutions Processes : -

LIVEABLE CITIES Liveable Cities and Towns; Contributing to the Thematic Strategy on the Urban Environment (Session B4) Allen Creedy, ethics etc…

EU Governance and EU level Organised Civil Society: Is ‘input legitimacy’ through elite groups a lost cause, and are group oriented attempts at input legitimacy.

Chapter 12 Interest Groups and the European Union

Developmental Local Government and Participatory Governance Commonwealth Foundation 16 May 2013.

INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE. 2 Implemented in 12 countries of Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, through IUCN regional.

Enhanced Cooperation Grace Githaiga Kenya ICT Action Network

The Potential Role of the Internet Governance Forum Presented at the APIA and ISOC-AU Open Forum by Jeremy Malcolm 28 February 2006.

Citizens participation in decision making processes – local context – Technical Assistance for Civil Society Organisations Regional Office This project.

C OUNCIL OF E UROPE F ORUM FOR THE F UTURE OF D EMOCRACY Y EREVAN, A RMENIA, O CTOBER 2010 Theme 2: Institutions and Democratic Governance Democracy.

1 Pierluigi Brombo, Responsible for Justice, freedom and security issues European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) - UE.

The European Civil Society and its dealings with the European Institutions.

How can citizen’s participate? Purpose and levels of participation: approach, methods, techniques, tools. Technical Assistance for Civil Society Organisations.

12 years of Internet Governance Debate Challenges on VP Global Engagement Internet Society

T HE CHALLENGE OF A E UROPEAN PUBLIC SPHERE : D ELIBERATION AND THE ROLE OF ICT S. Dr. Georgios Papanagnou.

The 2 way Transparency Agenda for EU institutions and Associations/Groups Justin Greenwood.

Caribbean Telecommunications Union. 6th Caribbean Internet Forum (CIF), Port of Spain, October Caribbean Telecommunications Union The Internet: Governance.

OpenStand Principles for the modern paradigm for standards development.

ISOC and the Internet Governance Forum from Rio to India Frederic Donck Director of Public Policy “Partnership towards IGF in Asia” Apricot/Apnic February.

HIA Conference, Dublin October 16th, 2007 Health Impact Assessment on EU policies at the EASP.

The Internet Governance Forum APrIGF June, 2011 Chengetai Masango Secretariat of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF)

Time to act on the Future of Europe …

Organizations, Institutions, the Domain Name and addressing system, Internet Governance… D-day 2005 Milan, Italy 24 November 2005 Theresa Swinehart GM,

Speaking for Myself 2009 Child Participation Call – Investing in People.

World summit on the information society 1 Internet Governance and the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) Dr Tim Kelly, Head, Strategy and Policy.

Internet Governance After the 2012 World Conference on International Telecommunication Regulations.

SUSTAINABLE MARKET SOLUTIONS FOR GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS Vested Interests in the Political Economy SUSTRA Workshop, January 2004 Mike Wriglesworth.

Social and Professional Issues in IT Roshan Chitrakar.

World summit on the information society 1 WSIS Outcomes and Next Steps Ambassador Janis Karklins Former President of the WSIS Phase II Preparatory Committee.

Three World’s First World –US and its allies Second World –USSR and its allies Third World –Countries not assigned to 1 st or 2 nd world.

Function of Speaker Tadeusz Makulski Fair Trade Expert Polish Fair Trade Association Making trade work for sustainable development: the case for partnerships.

, 27 July 2005 World Bank Washington DC, 27 July 2005 Markus Kummer Executive Coordinator Secretariat of the Working Group on Internet Governance

The Dutch consultation economy: developments in social dialogue Véronique Timmerhuis.

WORLD SUMMIT ON INFORMATION SOCIETY The Internet Governance Issue in the Tunis Agenda ---- Ridha Guellouz African Preparatory Meeting for the Internet.

Development and Cooperation - EuropeAid Discussion on the post Multiannual Financial Framework Structured Dialogue Budapest, May 18th 2011.

The EU Strategy for the Alpine Region (EUSALP) Dr. Andrea Mairate Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy, European Commission.

PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP WITHIN THE SOCIAL PROTECTION SYSTEMS FRAMEWORK.

USBO Universiteit Utrecht Policymaking in a European Context Future Visions and Competing Powers Wieger Bakker Utrecht School of Governance Bart van Steenbergen.

Cristina Barna Pro Global Science Association YiA, RO-13-E R1.

New approach in EU Accession Negotiations: Rule of Law Brussels, May 2013 Sandra Pernar Government of the Republic of Croatia Office for Cooperation.

A human rights perspective on ICANN’s policies and procedures Purpose of the open community discussion: At the London ICANN 50 meeting in June and at the.

Accountability and Coordination in a Decentralized Context: Institutional, Fiscal and Governance Issues Session I: General Good Principles in Integrated.

The Role of the Economic and Social Council of Bulgaria for the Development of Civil Dialogue and New Forms of Consultations Prof. Lalko Dulevski President.

Presented by Heo, jinsook

Global Internet Governance Global Internet Governance: Where You Fit In by Jeremy Malcolm A presentation to members of the WA Internet Association 15 October.

World summit on the information society 1 WSIS: Building the Information Society: a global challenge in the new Millennium Tim Kelly, Claudia Sarrocco.

Participatory governance of natural resources in the Caribbean

Principles of Good Governance

Anselm Schneider NCCR Trade Regulation/ University of Zurich

Derick W. Brinkerhoff RTI International

Governance and participation. Can anti-poverty ngos make a difference?

GAC in Nomcom Working Group ICANN56 Helsinki , June 2016

Markus Kummer Executive Coordinator

Internet Governance: An Analysis from Developing country’s perspective

An Introduction to ICANN

Why the Multistakeholder Approach Works

High Level Government Meeting Update 25 June 2018.

Translating political objectives into sound policy proposals

Building Knowledge about ESD Indicators

Boosting Social Enterprises in Europe December 3-4, 2015

Part one: Setting the context…

Prof. Lalko Dulevski President of the ESC of Bulgaria

REFIT Platform 20/02/2019 Diversity Europe Group.

Public Policy Management in Nepal: Context and Issues

Public Policy Management in Nepal: Context and Issues

democracy DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY Matt Bennett

Presentation transcript:

Marília Maciel

Why ICANN?

Why a comparative approach? ICANN Global Regional org. org.

Global political scenario Plurality of agents Issues discussed Interweaving of internal and external agendas Policy and regulation outside the realm of the State Global impacts on local Request for more participation

Legitimization in EU Different types of legitimacy - Inside perspective a) Representative legitimacy b) Techno-bureaucratic legitimacy - Outisde perspective Democratic foundation Civil society plays an important role establishing legitimacy

Legitimization in intergovernmental organizations United Nations system Cooperation in economic, social and communication issues The role of civil socity in coferring legitimacy is indirect

A hybrid model IG ICANN Global Model Regional model

Competences of ICANN -Management of the Domain Name System (DNS) - Competition policy - Intellectual Property Policy -Freedom of expression -Privacy Source: DiploFoundation Internet Governance Capacity Building Program

ICANN´s global aptitude Regional org. Intergovernmental org. ICANN

ICANN Structure

Legitimacy: participation Intergovernmetal org. Regional org. ICANN

Decision-making process Consensual and bottom-up Principles: Openess, representation and participation

Openess representation Informative and participation mechanisms

Participation mechanisms Traditional Commitees In EU: European Economic and Social Commitee and Commitee of Regions In ICANN: At-Large Advisory Commitee

At-large structure

Participation mechanisms 1) Traditional Commitees 2) Remote participation mechanisms

Remote participation mechanisms in EU and ICANN Online Platform a) Discussion of policy and norms in question b) Debate forum

The idea that supports participation European Union ICANN Participation is a democratic concept A duble value of citizens´ inputs: a) Embody citizens´ involvement b) Provide the conditions to better outputs Participation is an utilitarian concept Civil society´ inputs: a) Embody involvement b)Don´t necessarily provide the conditions to achieve better outputs (a technical mandate)

Civil Society X Techno-bureaucracy European Union ICANN Complex decision-making process to achieve balance The opinion of consultants and technicians has more weight No consensus about societal inputs Civil society´s inputs do not necessarily transform into outputs Survey about civil society contributions

Civil society X government representation GAC ALAC Narrowed relations with the Board Issues debated a priori Justifications to government representatives Regular Advisory Structure Consequence of inputs uncertain No justification

ICANN Structure

Displacement of legitimacy Civil SocietyGovernments Technical experts

Conclusion Broad range of competences Formal provisions and participatory mechanisms: Legitimization is closer to an integration model ICANN is seeking indirect legitimacy via government intervention. Shared decision-making process between the GAC and the Board Closer to traditional model of legitimization international organization. The role of civil society is currently reduced Search for equilibrium among stakeholders End of JPA: an opportunity?