K-20 Education Network Update for the Network Advisory Committee (NAC) February 21, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
K-20 Washington State K-20 Educational Telecommunications Network Internet2 Fall 2000 Member Meeting.
Advertisements

Ami Layman Assistant Director of Administration Getting Started & Funding Fundamentals.
K-20 Education Network FY 16 & FY 17 Budget. 1 Tail Circuits to E-rate Eligible K-20 Endsites Aggregation Circuits to Node Sites Service Provider Trunks.
E-Rate Central E-Rate Overview and Update September 2014.
Healthcare Connect Fund and Remote Areas Fund Chris Barron Alexicon.
E-Rate 101: Overview of the Program Training for Success Schools and Libraries Division Washington, DC Orlando Boston New Orleans Cleveland.
1. Funding model for telecom services  FTE funding model  Blue Ribbon Committee on IT Excellence Horizontal wiring upgrades 2.
NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION State of Minnesota Technology Summary February 24, 2011.
E-rate Modernization December 2, E-rate Basics Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism (E-rate) – Authorized by the 1996 Telecommunications.
© 2014 Universal Service Administrative Company. All rights reserved. E-rate Program Fall 2014 Applicant Trainings Category Two Budgets.
Changes to Charter School Laws Jason Hancock Deputy Chief of Staff.
Washington State K-20 Educational Telecommunications Network Gathering of State Networks April
Management of the Internet
Welcome Iowa Communications Network Bruce McKee Director of Technology Services North Iowa Area Community College Mike Walters Director of Learning.
Washington, DC I Newark I Minneapolis I Los Angeles I Kansas City I Jacksonville I Portland I Dallas/Fort Worth E-rate Program Eligible Services Fall 2010.
The South Carolina Technical College System System Update and Initiatives January 7, 2010.
The E-rate Program E-rate Modernization Order Fall 2014 Applicant Trainings Washington K-12 Statewide Training, November 10, 2014 Presentation posted at.
Network Background August Topics  Services  Connected Institutions  Architecture  Operations  Finances/Co-pay  Looking Forward  Services.
K-20 Education Network Update for the NWESD Districts May 9, 2013.
Gigabit to the Last Mile in Utah The Status of UEN’s Project to Provide GigE Connections to all Schools, Colleges and Universities in Utah.
AWPHD Legislative Summary House Bill 1196: Increasing the dollar limit for small works roster projects House Bill 1847: Increases bid limits for public.
American Foundry Society – Small Foundry Conference December 3-4, 2008 – Schaumburg, IL Highlight on AFS Energy Management Brian Reinke, President TDI.
Purchasing BIOSIS Electronic Content Presentation to ICOLC4 Meeting Denver, CO October 2, 1998.
State of Connecticut Nutmeg Network Statement of Direction 9/10/
FY2008 Service Center Billing Rate Proposal Training Dates:Monday, February 26, 2007 Friday, March 2, 2007 Presented by: Rick Keller, Director – Cost Accounting.
| University of Missouri Copyright ©2005 MOREnet and The Curators of the University of Missouri MOREnet Impact Assessment Tempe, Arizona February.
University of Minnesota Office of Internal / External Sales Fiscal Year-End Actions for Internal/External Sales Organizations.
DIR Board Meeting | July 17, 2012 Cost-Recovery Fees and Fee Setting Methodology Nick Villalpando Chief Financial Officer.
Presentation to the Information Services Board March 6, 2008 Bill Kehoe, Chief Information Officer Bill Kehoe, Chief Information Officer.
Internal/External Sales Rate Development – Intermediate “Answers to Common Questions”
Proposed Final 2013/14 General Fund Budget Dallastown Area School District.
Category Two Opportunities Techplex. Category OneCategory Two  Eligible Services ◦ Data Transmission Services ◦ Internet Access ◦ Voice Services  Program.
K-20 Co-pay and ISP Basics Valid for Fiscal Years 2010 & 2011 (July 1, 2009 – June 30, 2011)
New Charter School Internet Connectivity and E-Rate Jeannene E-rate Coordinator.
1 Service Center FY2006 Billing Rate Proposal Preparation.
Missouri Research and Education Network (MOREnet) Filling the Space Between Internet2 and the Internet: The Need for a National K-20 Infrastructure Fall.
Information Technology Division Customer Service Support Center.
Proposed Budget and Superintendent’s Message FY Presented to the Board of Education April 14,
Welcome to MiCTA Learn about MiCTA’s National E- Rate Program.
2016 NCCE CONFERENCE Case Studies: Bandwidth Ready for 1-to-1 Deployment How 3 Districts are Meeting the Challenge by Leveraging the K-20 Network Case.
© 2015 CT State Library. All rights reserved. 2 Contacts Maria Bernier E-rate Coordinator CT State Library Scott Taylor.
Enrollment Formula Funding and Outcomes Funding
Welcome to MiCTA Learn about MiCTA’s National E-Rate Program
City Council Meeting October 17, 2016 Item 10
Student Broad-Based Fee Proposal
2016 E-rate Training Preparing for Funding Year 2017
Chapter 1 Computer Technology: Your Need to Know
E-rate Where to Start.
RF Service Centers RF Symposium March 24, 2015.
FY2007 Billing Rate Proposal Preparation (Part I)
Internet Traffic Management and Accounting Workshop
Beginner Eligible Services
Electricity Procurement Options
SPECIAL EDUCATION FUNDING OVERVIEW House Ways and Means Committee
Internal/External Sales Activity related to:
E-Rate 101: Overview of the Program
BUDGET WORKSHOP February 15, 2017.
Spring 2014 Budget Update March 2014.
Technology Subcommittee Update
Department of Licensing HP 3000 Replatforming Project Closeout Report
David Jewell and Kyle Moore
For Patients: Frequently Asked Questions
Proposed K-20 Budget FY 08/09.
For Patients: Frequently Asked Questions
E-Rate 101: Overview of the Program
Staff Advisory Team Meeting #5 October 18, 2018
How Do I Write a Good Technology Plan?
/ Budget Update Town Hall Meeting June 10, 2009
2019 Service Provider Training
Spring Regional Meeting
Presentation transcript:

K-20 Education Network Update for the Network Advisory Committee (NAC) February 21, 2014

K-20 Governance

2 Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO) General operational and technical oversight to the K-20 Educational Network Consortium Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO) General operational and technical oversight to the K-20 Educational Network Consortium General K-20 Operational and Technical Oversight K-20 Educational Network Consortium General K-20 Operational and Technical Oversight K-20 Operations Cooperative (KOCO) K-20 Engineering & Day-to-Day Operations K-20 Operations Cooperative (KOCO) K-20 Engineering & Day-to-Day Operations Engineering Operations Administration Maintenance Provisioning Current Governance

3 K-20 Operations Cooperative  UW KOCO –Monitor Network & Server Status –Troubleshoot Network Problems –Coordinate Problem Resolution –Provide and Analyze Network Performance Data –Provide Technical Support  SBCTC KOCO –Manage Video Switched Network and MCUs –Schedule Multipoint Video Resources –Provide Technical Support

Network Architecture Upgrade

5 450 Sites Connected Independent College/ University (7) Tribal Education Center/ Tribal College (11) Telemedicine Site (5) Public Library (24) Public College/ University (33) Community/Technical College (65) K-12 District/ESD (302) TVW Olympia Washington State Historical Society Over 300 K-12 districts and Educational Service Districts More than 2,000 K-12 schools and 57,000 classrooms Over 1.5 million students KCTS 9 Seattle

6 Statewide Fiber Optic Backbone (2005) Olympia Seattle Spokane YakimaPullman Vancouver School District University or College Library 10 Gbps

7 K Gbps Network: Gen 3 (2013)

Internet Service Provider (ISP) Fees

9  K-20 is statewide INTRA-net  K-20 Network does not directly procure INTER-net access for customers  OSPI contracts for ISP on behalf of connected K-12 sites  No state subsidy for ISP  No legislatively set rate structure –Estimates provided by OSPI at beginning of year –Actual cost determined at end of year, based on actual, total cost of service –Includes E-rate discounts

10 ISP Usage and Cost History for K-12

11 ISP Cost per Megabit Billed to Endsites

K-20 Connectivity Costs

13 K-20 Co-pay Principles  Established by K-20 Network Consortium  All sites must pay the same amount per unit of transport – regardless of institution size, location, or connectivity methodology  Co-pay is amount needed from connected institutions after state subsidy and E-rate reimbursements  Must be in line with options available in competitive marketplace  Much lower than actual cost to provide service

14 Concerns Regarding Co-pay  FY14 & FY15 co-pay structure lowered costs for highest-bandwidth users, but did not address many other concerns: –Calculation difficult to understand –Costs variable throughout year; difficult to plan and budget appropriately –Increased cost for increased use can lead entities to throttle or discourage network use –Doesn’t match the manner in which most vendors charge for services; ripe for misrepresentation and/or unfair comparisons

15 E-rate-Specific Concerns  Concerns were voiced by E-rate eligible sectors (K-12 and libraries) –Currently, all K-20 connected institutions pay the same rates, regardless of E-rate eligibility –Some high-discount sites leaving K-20 for cheaper options that allow for full use of e-rate discount  For co-pay to stay in line with competitive marketplace and meet legislative intent, additional changes to co-pay must be made

16 Co-pay Approach  Total co-pay requirement reduced by $2.5M (from $9.75M to $7.25M)  Allocate the majority of reduction to K-12  Eliminate utilization-based co-pay (95 th percentile)  Freeze all customer co-pay costs at or below FY13 totals  Ensure that costs for highest-bandwidth users are reduced to align with marketplace  Invoice annually, rather than quarterly

17 K-12 Approach for & OSPI proposed to:  Move to a flat-fee model  Lock in rates through June 30, 2015  Guarantee that endsite rates will not increase over FY13 totals  Apply individual district e-rate discount percentages to endsite invoices to more fairly allocate reductions to neediest sites

18 Co-Pay Revenue by Sector

19 New Co-pay Benefits & Summary  No more complex calculations  Costs are fixed through June 30, 2015  Since usage is no longer a factor in total cost, no incentive to throttle or limit usage  Allows for easy comparison with vendor offers  Allows each sector to determine the best way to allocate costs to their institutions –OSPI and WSL can apply individual endsite e-rate discounts to more fairly allocate reductions to neediest sites