Braintree Public Schools Spring 2007 MCAS Tests Braintree High School.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Massachusetts School and District Accountability System 2003 Mid-Cycle AYP Determinations State Report December 4, 2003.

Advertisements

Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?

What You Should Know About the State’s Two Year Old Accountability System.

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Accountability Status Determinations Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education October 2008.

2013 Accountability Report Jurupa Unified School District Board of Education Meeting.

Understanding Massachusetts’ new accountability measures November 2012.

Cambrian School District Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Report.

Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.

HULL HIGH SCHOOL 10 th Grade MCAS Results and Comparisons Spring of 2008 Testing.

School Performance Index School Performance Index (SPI): A Comprehensive Measurement System for All Schools Student Achievement (e.g. PSSA) Student Progress.

District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.

1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.

1 No Child Left Behind Critical Research Findings For School Boards Ronald Dietel UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center.

Academic Achievement Highlights San Francisco Unified School District August 2010.

School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.

2009 MCAS Analysis & Adequate Yearly Progress Report Mendon – Upton Regional School District.

Spring 2015 Smarter Balanced (SBA) and Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) update September

MCAS REPORT Spring 2013 Presented to the Hingham School Committee November 18, 2013 by Ellen Keane, Assistant Superintendent.

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Accountability Status Determinations.

ESEA Waiver and Accountability Status School Committee Presentation September 24, 2013.

Metairie Academy for Advanced Studies WELCOME LEAP Information February 18, 2014.

1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.

November 2006 Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education 1 Where are We? Where do we want to be?

Spring 2012 Testing Results. GRANT API HISTORY

1 Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) Steve Martin, CMT Program Manager Bureau of Research, Evaluation, and Student Assessment Connecticut State Department.

Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)

Melrose High School 2014 MCAS Presentation October 6, 2014.

MCAS 2007 October 24, 2007 A Report to the Sharon School Committee and Dr. Barbara J. Dunham Superintendent of Schools Dr. George S. Anthony Director of.

1 Mitchell D. Chester Commissioner of Elementary and Secondary Education Report on Spring 2009 MCAS Results to the Massachusetts Board of Elementary and.

Parents as Partners: How Parents and Schools Work Together to Close the Achievement Gap.

Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.

Federal and State Student Accountability Data Update Testing Coordinators Meeting Local District 8 09/29/09 1.

University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Challenges for States and Schools in the No.

What You Should Know About the State’s Two Year Old Accountability System.

1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.

1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.

MCAS Progress and Performance Index Report 2013 Cohasset Public Schools.

What is AYP? AYP stands for Adequate Yearly Progress

Spring 2011 MCAS Results.

Spring 2016 PARCC and MCAS Results: Newton Public Schools

Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) State Plan: Update

Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP

Accountability in California Before and After NCLB

Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools

Spring 2016 MCAS Data Overview

Understanding the Next-Generation MCAS

2012 Accountability Determinations

Understanding the Next-Generation MCAS

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

Bridgewater-Raynham Regional School District

Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010

Understanding the Next-Generation MCAS and 2017 Accountability Results

2017 MCAS Reporting Michol Stapel, Associate Commissioner Bob Lee, MCAS Chief Analyst October 23, 2017.

Updates on the Next-Generation MCAS

MCAS Parent Presentation

Understanding the Next-Generation MCAS

Milton Public Schools 2013 Accountability Status

Burlington Public Schools

Danvers Public Schools: Our Story

Understanding the Next-Generation MCAS

2017 MCAS/Student Achievement

Madison Elementary / Middle School and the New Accountability System

CLINTON HIGH SCHOOL 2010 MCAS Presentation October 26, 2010.

NANTUCKET PUBLIC SCHOOLS

AYP and Report Card.

Meeting the challenge Every Classroom Every Student Every Day

Donovan Elementary MCAS

2008 MCAS Results Wednesday, September 17, 2008 Burlington, MA.

Watertown Public Schools School Committee Meeting November 13, 2017

Spring 2019 MCAS Grade 10 Annotated Parent/Guardian Reports

Presentation transcript:

Braintree Public Schools Spring 2007 MCAS Tests Braintree High School

How Results are Reported Grade 10 ScorePerformance Level Description AdvancedStudents at this level demonstrate a comprehensive and in-depth understanding of rigorous subject matter and provide sophisticated solutions to complex problems. ProficientStudents at this level demonstrate a solid understanding of challenging subject matter and solve a wide variety of problems Needs Improvement Students at this level demonstrate a partial understanding of subject matter and solve some simple problems FailingStudents at this level demonstrate a minimal understanding of subject matter and do not solve simple problems.

Proficiency Index measures how close a school or district is to having all students score in the Proficient/Advanced categories Performance Level ScoreProficiency Index Advanced Points Proficient Needs Improvement Points Points Warning/Failing Points Points

Grades & Subjects Tested Spring ‘ High School English Language Arts  Mathematics  Science and Technology/ Engineering  Biology Chemistry Introductory Physics Technology/ Engineering

Percent at Each Performance Level

Grade 10 - ELA YearAPNIFA&P MA A&PNI&F MA NI&FCPI Key: A=Advanced, P=Proficient, NI=Needs Improvement, F=Failing CPI=Composite Performance Index

Grade 10 - Mathematics YearAPNIFA&P MA A&PNI&F MA NI&FCPI Key: A=Advanced, P=Proficient, NI=Needs Improvement, F=Failing CPI=Composite Performance Index

High School – Biology Year APNIFA&P MA A&PNI&F MA NI&FCPI Key: A=Advanced, P=Proficient, NI=Needs Improvement, F=Failing CPI=Composite Performance Index

High School – Chemistry YearAPNIFA&P MA A&PNI&F MA NI&FCPI Key: A=Advanced, P=Proficient, NI=Needs Improvement, F=Failing CPI=Composite Performance Index

High School – Introductory Physics YearAPNIFA&P MA A&PNI&F MA NI&FCPI Key: A=Advanced, P=Proficient, NI=Needs Improvement, F=Failing CPI=Composite Performance Index

High School – Technology/Engineering YearAPNIFA/P MA A/PNI/F MA NI/FCPI Key: A=Advanced, P=Proficient, NI=Needs Improvement, F=Failing CPI=Composite Performance Index

AYP (Adequate Yearly Progress) Determinations Means progress towards 100% of students achieving proficiency by 2014 Measures progress against specific expectations each year Reported annually

Massachusetts NCLB Performance Targets for ELA and Mathematics Current Targets

2007 AYP Criteria A: Participation95% B: PerformanceCPI ELA: 85.4 Math: 76.5 C: ImprovementMeet or Exceed 2007 Improvement Target (specific to districts, schools & subgroups D: Attendance or Graduation Rate 92% or higher (or 1% improvement over 2006) 55% or higher

Two Ways to Make AYP Participation ++ PerformanceImprovement ++ Attendance Rate For Grades 1-8 or Graduation Rate For High School == AYP

Braintree Public Schools ELA 2007 Performance Rating Very High Performance Data State Target: 85.4 CPI: 91.8 Accountability Status No Status Improvement Rating On Target Improvement Data Baseline CPI: 90.2 Gain Target: 1.2 On Target Range:

Braintree Public Schools Mathematics 2007 Performance Rating High Performance Data State Target: 76.5 CPI: 85.3 Accountability Status No Status Improvement Rating Above Target Improvement Data Baseline CPI: 78.5 Gain Target: 2.7 On Target Range:

Strategies for Improvement Next Steps Analyze and use data Item analysis Group analysis Examine/align curriculum Support sub-groups with Special Ed and ELL staff Provide test-taking strategies Academic support grant for High School Title I support Individual student success plan (ISSP)