CONTEXT Major International Evaluations Niels Dabelstein
Aboutthis bookAboutthis book Preview this bookPreview this book Shake Hands with the Devil By Roméo DallaireShake Hands with the Devil By Roméo Dallaire This is a preview. The total pages displayed will be limited. LL Loading... Loading... Speaking Truth to Power Award
Joint Committee Evaluation Standards, 2010 Utility – ensure relevance & use Feasibility – realistic, prudent, diplomatic & frugal Propriety – ethical, legal, respectful Accuracy – technically adequate to determine merit or worth Accountability – Evaluating evaluations: Meta-evaluation 6
AUDIT STATEMENT in the FINAL REPORT
ILLUMINATIVE TENSIONS & IMPORTANT LESSONS
ILLUSTRATIVE EVALUATION TENSIONS 1. The classic tension between stakeholder involvement and evaluator independence. 2. The tension between strength of evidence and delivering the findings on time. 3. The tensions between country-level ownership and utility versus the need for an international synthesis.
Tension # 2 The tension between strength of evidence and delivering the findings on time.
A Balancing Act: Strength of Evidence vs. Timeliness 13 On Time RIGOR
Tension # 3 The tensions between country-level ownership and utility versus the need for an international synthesis.
ILLUSTRATIVE LESSONS 1.The implications of being driven by attention to use, in this case, at the 4th High Level Forum.
BEING UTILIZATION-FOCUSED
18 “ I can honestly say that not a day goes by when we don’t use those evaluations in one way or another.” Written by Mark M. Rogers and illustrated by Lawson Sworh
ILLUSTRATIVE LESSONS 2. The relevance of the DAC standards for guiding the PDE and for the meta- evaluation. 3. The impacts of being involved in the evaluation process for those countries, donors, and participants involved (process use).
Michael Quinn Patton July 1, 2011 IPDET