SLD: The Big Picture- Exemplary Eligibility Reports Training November 30, 2010 Gina Hopper Carrie Semmelroth Rich Henderson Nancy Thomas Price Teresa Fritsch.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Curriculum Based Measurements

Advertisements

New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.

Overview of Progress Monitoring Training Session Part of a training series developed to accompany the AIMSweb Improvement System. Purpose is to provide.

Teacher In-Service August, Abraham Lincoln.

Issues and Solutions Regarding Dual Discrepancy Rationale for the shift to the DD model : There were a number of problems with using IQ as the predictor.

Inquiry Team Eydie Wilson, Ph.D. Math Coach November 3, 2009.

Using RTI Data to Inform Eligibility

A collaborative project between the Florida Department of Education and the University of South Florida Y3D1 SBLT Tier 3 Problem Identification & Problem.

November 2009 Oregon RTI Project Cadre 5.  Participants will understand both general IDEA evaluation requirements and evaluation requirements for Specific.

SLD Body of Evidence and Eligibility Denver Public Schools, 2011.

SAISD Board Report Office of Research and Evaluation

Novice Webinar 2 Overview of the Four Types and Purposes of Assessment.

SLD Eligibility Peer Review April 2011 Dr. Evelyn S. Johnson Associate Professor, BSU uL.

The Criteria for Determining SLD When Using an RTI-based Process Part I In the previous session you were presented the main components of RtI, given a.

Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility. What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive.

What To Do When A Student Does Not Respond To An Academic Intervention Brian Lloyd Ed. S., NCSP May 2 nd, 2013.

Pattern of Strengths and Weaknesses Methodology

Educational Assessment of Children

Considerations in Determining Primary Disability Speech Language Impairment or Specific Learning Disability.

PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation Level 2 at Middle School Curriculum Based Assessment.

KEDC Special Education Regional Training Sheila Anderson, Psy.S

SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITY (SLD). ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITY Documented evidence which indicates that general education interventions.

MI draft of IDEIA 2004 (Nov 2009) WHAT HAS CHANGED? How LD is identified:  Discrepancy model strongly discouraged  Response To Instruction/Intervention.

0 From TN Department of Education Presentation RTII: Response to Instruction and Intervention.

EC CHAIRPERSON/PSYCHOLOGIST MEETING Helpful Tips re: Interventions.

Specific Learning Disability Peer Review 2013 Lee Pesky Center Dr. Evelyn Johnson SESTA Gina Hopper

PROGRESS MONITORING FOR DATA-BASED DECISIONS June 27, 2007 FSSM Summer Institute.

Nativity Catholic School IOWA Testing. 70 years of educational research and test development Form E Big Picture student’s classroom work homework projects.

Conducting Re-evaluations Within Tennessee’s RTI² Framework Director of Special Education Eligibility, Theresa Nicholls | Fall 2015.

Using Data for Decisions Points to Ponder. Different Types of Assessments Measure of Academic Progress (MAP) Guided Reading (Leveled Reading) Statewide.

Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities

Jackson Elementary School Title I Information

From Screening to Verification: The RTI Process at Westside Jolene Johnson, Ed.S. Monica McKevitt, Ed.S.

Student Achievement Manager Intervention Plans. Creating a Student Intervention Plan Intervention Plans: Encompass all components of an intervention –

 Kingsport City Schools.  The RTI² framework is aligned with the special population department’s beliefs and allows for an integrated, seamless problem-solving.

Standards-Based Assessment Overview K-8 Fairfield Public Schools Fall /30/2015.

Feedback Results from Teacher PSW Worksheet(s) SUBJECT AREA:  Basic Reading  Math Calculation  Oral Expression  Reading Fluency  Math Problem Solving.

Parent Leadership Team Meeting Intro to RtI.  RtI Overview  Problem Solving Process  What papers do I fill out?  A3 documenting the story.

Webinar 1: Overview. 1. Overview  Link to SLD Rule  Multi-tiered Systems of Support (MTSS)  Systems of Assessment 2. Introduction to Tiers  Tier 1:

Special Education Referral and Evaluation Report Oregon RTI Project Sustaining Districts Trainings

Responsiveness to Instruction RtI Tier III. Before beginning Tier III Review Tier I & Tier II for … oClear beginning & ending dates oIntervention design.

Dr. Sarah McPherson New York Institute of Technology Adapted from Lora Parks-Recore CEWW Special Education Training and Resource Center SETRC 1 Response.

Charlevoix-Emmet ISD Eligibility Guidelines

Response to Intervention within IDEIA 2004: Get Ready South Carolina Bradley S. Witzel, PhD Department of Curriculum and Instruction Richard W. Riley College.

Slide 1 1. Profile Summary Report: Presentation Packet 2. Item Response Summary Report 3. Profile Summary Report Three reports to analyze student performance.

Assessment Parents Due Process Title 6 and ELL Using Assessment to Identify Evaluating Formally –IQ –Achievement Evaluating Informally –tying into instruction.

Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD) Eligibility Implementing Wisconsin’s SLD Rule December

MTSS/CPST/RTI. District Priority Good News Griffin’s on Top of It!

 Three Criteria: Inadequate classroom achievement (after intervention) Insufficient progress Consideration of exclusionary factors  Sources of Data.

Specific Learning Disability Proposed regulations.

WISCONSIN’S NEW RULE FOR SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITIES Effective December 1, 2010.

Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.

1 Average Range Fall. 2 Average Range Winter 3 Average Range Spring.

Referral Made Like any other disability determination under IDEA, can’t be based on any single criterion – meaning a single test, assessment, observation,

Somers Public Schools Building and Departmental Goals

Revisiting SPL/IIT/SAT/SLD AND OTHER ALPHABETIC ANOMOLIES!

Specific Learning Disability Criteria Implementation Update Richard Henderson Idaho State Department of Education Division of Federal Programs Division.

Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.

Response to Intervention

Refining & Aligning: Recommendations for preparation policy to support rti2 and Special Education in Tennessee Kim Paulsen, vanderbilt university Blake.

Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities

Specific Learning Disability Peer Review 2012

ORAL WRITTEN LANGUAGE SCALE 2

Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities

Using Strategies, Protocols, and Tools to Analyze Data A Presentation of the National Reading Technical Assistance Center (NRTAC) Speaker’s notes Additional.

Implications of RtI Implementation for NYS Schools

Special Education teacher progress monitoring refresher training

Assessment and Evaluation

Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities

Response to Intervention

Presentation transcript:

SLD: The Big Picture- Exemplary Eligibility Reports Training November 30, 2010 Gina Hopper Carrie Semmelroth Rich Henderson Nancy Thomas Price Teresa Fritsch Evelyn Johnson

Idaho 2010 SLD Research Project Overview Project length: June-October eligibility reports from all four June 2010 peer review sites Two data coders, 86% inter-rater reliability Will continue with eligibility report data to be gathered Spring 2011

Data Analysis: Frequency Areas Evaluation purpose, Eligibility decision, Regional distribution, Grade level, Native Language Areas of Concern –Basic Reading, Reading Fluency, Reading Comprehension, Oral Expression, Written Expression, Listening Comprehension, Math Problem Solving, Math Calculation

Area of Concern by Grade

Data Analysis: Eligibility Report Filters Filter TypeExplanation Filter 1 SLD eligibility and one area of concern (Basic Reading, Math Problem Solving, etc) Filter 2 Appropriate core assessment, percent of peers >=70%, and student did not meet target Filter 3 Appropriate intervention area (Progress Monitoring) At least one attached PM graph with: aimline, trendline, decision points, student’s ROI, and national or local norm(s) for grade level peers Filter 4 SLD not due to lack of instruction, appropriate location for observation Filter 5 At least one appropriate academic achievement test in area of concern with score <90 Filter 6 At least one appropriate psychological processing test score in area of concern with score <90

Percentage of Files after Filters Area of ConcernBegin. Amt.End Amt.Remaining %age Reading Fluency % Basic Reading % Reading Comprehension % Oral Expression2500% Written Expression8967% Listening Comprehension 3733% Math Calculation781215% Math Problem Solving8189%

Summary of Findings Top three areas of concern are reading 72% of eligibility determinations are in grades 1-6 Gender differences appear to be less pronounced in the SLD eligibility determination process Additional training/development needed in areas of progress monitoring

Questions/Comments? Dr. Evelyn Johnson (208) Carrie Semmelroth (208)