November 12-13, 2007 Super-B Factory: Accelerator Costing, PEP-II Hardware and Schedule J. Seeman SLAC International Review Committee meeting November.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Wednesday July 19 GDE Plenary Global Design Effort 1 Instrumentation Technical System Review Marc Ross.
Advertisements

1 The project of Super-ct-factory with Crab Waist in Novosibirsk E.Levichev Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk Tau-08 Satellite Meeting,
Lattice Status SuperB Project Workshop SLAC, October 6-9, 2009 Yuri Nosochkov for the SuperB Lattice Team Major recent updates by P. Raimondi and S. Sinyatkin.
SuperB Damping Rings M. Biagini, LNF-INFN P. Raimondi, SLAC/INFN A. Wolski, Cockroft Institute, UK SuperB III Workshop, SLAC, June 2006.
Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Status on an IR Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B Factory.
SLAC Accelerator Department Super-B-Factory John T. Seeman Assistant Director of the Technical Division Head of the Accelerator Department Caltech Meeting.
PEP-II B Factory Machine Status and Upgrades John T. Seeman for the PEP-II Staff SLAC DOE Site Review April 9, 2003.
July 24, 2008Super-B Mini-MAC MeetingPage 1 Super-B Overview John Seeman Accelerator Systems Division SLAC.
Super-B Accelerator R&D J. Seeman With contributions from the Super-B Staff September 17, 2009.
1 Super-B Factory Scenarios John Seeman Assistant Director PPA Directorate SLAC SLUO Meeting September 11, 2006.
Linear Super-B Factory Progress John T. Seeman FPCP Workshop Vancouver BC April 9, 2006.
June 2-4, 2004 DOE HEP Program Review 1 M. Sullivan for the PEP-II Team DOE High Energy Physics Program Review June 2-4, 2004 PEP-II Status and Plans.
Accelerator Systems Division FACET Project Management John Seeman for the FACET Study Group PPA Directorate Stanford Linear Accelerator Center DOE FACET.
Page 1 PEP-II D&D Planning & Costing Exercises John Seeman Accelerator Systems Division SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
PEP-II and BaBar DND Review M. Sullivan Mar 23-24, 2009Page 1 PEP-II Overview and MMS Status Michael Sullivan SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
Issues for Optimization of a Super-B Factory John T. Seeman SBF Workshop SLAC June 14, 2006.
SLAC Accelerator Department The PEP-II Accelerator John T. Seeman Assistant Director of the Technical Division Head of the Accelerator Department SLUO.
PEP-II Overview & Ramp Down Plan J. Seeman DOE PEP-II Ramp Down-D&D Review August 6-7, 2007.
SLAC Accelerator Department The PEP-II Accelerator Status and General Plans John T. Seeman Assistant Director of the Technical Division Head of the Accelerator.
Future Very High Luminosity Options for PEP-II John T. Seeman For the PEP-II Team e+e- Factories Workshop October 13-16, 2003.
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
SuperB Design Progress Paris, Jan 27, 2007 P. Raimondi for the SuperB Team.
R&D, Collaborations and Closeout Fulvia Pilat MEIC Collaboration Meeting March
J. Turner 02/07/05 SLAC PEPII Accelerator Physics LER WIGGLER PLAN J. Turner, M. Donald, M. Sullivan, U. Wienands, J. Yocky Motivation and Concerns Details.
1 Flux concentrator for SuperKEKB Kamitani Takuya IWLC October.20.
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 PEP-II in Run 7 and Transition Planning John T. Seeman Assistant Director PPA/LCLS.
New Ideas for Super B Factories for Flavour Physics Steve Playfer University of Edinburgh, Future Directions, BEACH 2006 Lancaster, July 2006.
ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2004 PEP-II IR M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region of PEP-II M. Sullivan for the ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2005.
1 BINP Tau-Charm Project 3 February 2010, KEK, Tsukuba E.Levichev For the BINP C-Tau team.
B Factory D&D Review: March 23, 2009 Page 1 Overview of re-use requests and related issues D. MacFarlane Deputy Director, PPA.
D&D Review 6 August PEP-II Minimal Maintenance State Upkeep Stan Ecklund (J. Seeman, S. DeBarger, D. Kharakh, M. Zurawel)
2 nd workshop on SuperB 17.03,2006 LNF Marcello A Giorgi1 Marcello A. Giorgi Università di Pisa and INFN Pisa Closeout Remarks 2nd Workshop on SuperB FRASCATI.
SLAC Accelerator Development Program: SuperB Mike Sullivan OHEP Accelerator Development Review January 24-26, 2011.
9 October 2003S. DeBarger PEP-II Vacuum Status PEP-II Machine Advisory Committee.
Introduction of Accelerators for Circular Colliders 高亮度 TAU-CHARM 工厂 & 先进光源, 2014/09.
S UPER B site status report S. Tomassini INFN-LNF On behalf of SuperB Collaboration SuperB general meeting– Frascati – December 1-5, 2009.
TDR and R&D Plans J. Seeman and M. Biagini For Super-B Staff.
SuperB Accelerator Overview & Status M. E. Biagini, LNF-INFN for the SuperB Accelerator Team SuperB Meeting Elba, May 31 th, 2008.
Mini MAC II PEP-II hardware M. Sullivan Apr 23-24, 2009Page 1 PEP-II Hardware Status M. Sullivan SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Mini-MAC II Frascati,
SUPERB site status report for layout v12
Update on B and Phi Factories
(Potential) Site and Utilities
John T. Seeman DOE PEP-II Operations Review April 26, 2006
Accelerator R&D for the Super-B Factory
SuperB Injection, RF stations, Vibration and Operations
Large Booster and Collider Ring
DR Magnets & Power Supply System ILC-ADI Meeting March 14, 2012
Michael Sullivan and John Seeman SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
The PEP-II Interaction e+e- Factories Workshop
Overview of SRF system of Ring and Linac (1)
Injector –Linac Status & Schedule E. Bong LCLS FAC October 12, 2006
Super-B Overview John Seeman Accelerator Systems Division
Electron Source Configuration
SuperB RF and Other Components
SuperB Accelerator Overview and Status
XII SuperB Project Workshop LAPP, Annecy, France, March 16-19, 2010
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
SuperB CDR Machine P. Raimondi for the SuperB Team Paris, May 9, 2007.
J. Seeman Assistant Director for PPA/LCLS
AC Power for a Super-B Factory
Summary of Washington DOE Review
Super-B Accelerator Overview
SuperB IRC Meeting Frascati, Nov. 13th 2007
Super-B Factory in a “4400m” Tunnel
Polarization at the Super-B Factory
Cost Algorithm for a Super-B Factory
M. E. Biagini, LNF-INFN SuperB IRC Meeting Frascati, Nov , 2007
J. Seeman Perugia Super-B Meeting June 2009
Transfer Line for EIC.
CDR2 – Injection System Injection system overview (Seeman) (2 pages)
Presentation transcript:

November 12-13, 2007 Super-B Factory: Accelerator Costing, PEP-II Hardware and Schedule J. Seeman SLAC International Review Committee meeting November 12-13, 2007

Topics Accelerator Cost –Methodology –Listed activities PEP-II Components –Types of items –Availability Construction Schedule –Planning

November 12-13, 2007 Tor Vergata Site (from F. Forti)

November 12-13, 2007 Ring Layout (from F. Forti) SuperB Ring (about 1800m) SPARX Roman Villa 100m SuperB Injector (about 400m) SuperB Main Building

November 12-13, 2007 Super-B Parameters

November 12-13, 2007 KEKBSuperB current1.7 A2.3 A betay6 mm0.3 mm betax300 mm20 mm sigmax~80  m~6  m sigma y~3  m0,035  m Sigma z6 mm L Beams are focused in the vertical plane 100 times more than in the present factories, thanks to: - small emittances - small beta functions - large crossing angle - Crab waist Tune shifts and longitudinal overlap greatly reduced SuperB Beams distributions at the IP KEKB Beams distributions at the IP Higher Luminosity from smaller beam sizes

November 12-13, 2007 Accelerator status SBF accelerator layout has converged and been defined. Site constraints suggest 1650 m + polarization component length for a total of 1800 m. A luminosity of 1x10 36 with longitudinal polarization of one beam at the interaction point is the primary goal. Overall parameters have a x4 luminosity growth potential to the 4x10 36 level. Many of the systems use existing components or component designs. Interaction region has new features. Most of the future design work will be concentrated there.

November 12-13, 2007 Costing Methodology Identified all needed accelerator components. Bottoms up cost evaluation from existing designs for new components. Scaled costs of shipping components from PEP-II accelerator from present experience. Reuse and refurbishment costs escalated from construction costs in 1995 to 2007 Euros. Detailed work breakdown structure used. The cost estimate for the Conceptual Design Report CDR has not yet received a level of scrutiny needed for the Technical Design Report TDR.

November 12-13, 2007 Cost Breakdown Items EDIA –Engineering, Design, Inspection, Acceptance Labor –Person hours which could (likely) be done at an existing laboratory M&S –Work and parts that could be purchased from industry or a laboratory as needed. Replacement value: Reuse/Refurbishment –Replacement costs of PEP-II components if built in 2007

November 12-13, 2007 “Accelerator Components” Project management Magnets –(dipoles, quadrupoles, sextupoles, kickers) Mechanical supports Interaction region Water systems Vacuum systems RF system (klystron, cavities, waveguide, controls) Controls and instrumentation Polarization manipulation Injection –(source, linac, damping rings, septa, injection lines)

November 12-13, 2007 Activities Estimated for each Component Engineering, design and prototyping Remove and refurbish Construction Shipping Power supplies Water cooling connection Supports Alignment Installation

November 12-13, 2007

Interaction Region +

November 12-13, 2007 Summary of Expected Accelerator Costs (2250 m) WBSAcceleratorEDIALaborM&SRep. Value (mm) (kEuro) 1.Totals Project Managem’t Magnets/supports Vacuum RF system IR Controls/Diag Injection

November 12-13, 2007 Summary of Costs of Tunnels and Utilities (2250 m) WBSSite/UtilitiesEDIALaborM&SRep. Value (mm) (kEuro) 2Totals Site Utilities Tunnel & Support buildings (See F. Forti’s talk)

November 12-13, 2007 Polarization Components in the Estimate The following items are included in the Super-B cost estimate: –Polarization magnets in the IR –Polarization vacuum chambers –Polarization diagnostics –Injector polarization manipulation hardware –Refurbished polarized gun from SLAC The total effort is about: –Labor = 140 man-months –New M&S = 5 MEuros –Replacement value of reused parts = 2 MEuros

November 12-13, 2007 Savings for Ring Size Reduction from 2250m (CDR) to 1800 m (Tor Vergata site) Costs are lower with reduce ring sizes. Costs do not scale directly as the ring “Arcs” are the same length, just the straight sections are shorter and fewer. Injector is the same cost. Power related costs are the same as the power remains roughly the same. Initial look at cost savings for accelerator and site/utilities: –Labor: -400 man months –M&S: -35 MEuros –Replacement : -3 MEuros

November 12-13, 2007 Available Components from the PEP-II B Factory at SLAC Located at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center

November 12-13, 2007 PEP-II Components and Beam Lines HER = 2200 m LER = 2200 m HER injection line = 2300 m LER injection line = 2900 m Damping rings = 2 x 33 m Total length of beam line = 9600 m –(  6.0 miles)

November 12-13, 2007 PEP-II Arc Section Usable PEP-II components for Super-B Magnets (Over 1500) Vacuum chambers (4400 m) RF systems (15 stations, 28 cavities) Power supplies Bunch-by-bunch feedback systems Diagnostics Instruments Injection septa and kickers Supports

November 12-13, 2007 Dipoles Summary L mag (m) PEP HER-194 PEP LER194- SBF HER-130 SBF LER22418 SBF Total Needed (112 in Arcs+18 in FF) “PEP-II HER” dipoles are used in SuperB HER 18 dipoles are used in FF for SuperB LER 224 “PEP-II LER” dipoles are used in SuperB LER  need to build 30 new ones SuperB magnet list M. Biagini

November 12-13, 2007 Quadrupoles Summary L mag (m) PEP HER PEP LER SBF HER SBF LER SBF Total Needed M. Biagini

November 12-13, 2007 B-Factory RF Klystrons C. Pearson

November 12-13, 2007 PEP-II RF Cavities

November 12-13, 2007 PEP-II injection system in Linac Linac LER injection line HER Injection Line

November 12-13, 2007 Availability of PEP-II Components PEP-II will shut down September Many of the parts will be available for other projects. SLAC staff is in the middle of a study for long range science projects (~20 years). There are several future possibilities for PEP-II components and tunnel: –Contribute components to Super-B. –Install new LCLS undulator in the PEP-II tunnel. –Make a moderate ring light source (use one ring only-HER). –Make a state-of-the-art light source (one ring with mostly new parts). No decisions on light sources will be made soon.

November 12-13, 2007 Schedule Inputs (CDR) for Super-B Accelerator Included calendar time to: Do initial engineering. Prepare site, bore tunnels, build buildings. Ship components from SLAC to Italy. Install components for two rings. Construction time for injector. Commission the injector and two rings. Both KEKB and PEP-II were built in 4 years. SBF schedule came in at about five years with the new tunnel and injector.

November 12-13, 2007 SBF CDR Schedule of events

November 12-13, 2007 Condensed Summary of Yearly Activities Year 0: –Agency work –Engineering –Environmental studies Year 1: –Start boring tunnels –Start erecting buildings –Start building IR hall –Refurbish components –Start constructing new accelerator components Year 2: –Finish over half of civil construction –Construct new components –Ship refurbished components –Buy power supplies and controls Year 3: –Ship refurbished components –Finish constructing parts –Start installation Year 4: –Finish installation –Start and finish linac commissioning –Start commissioning rings

November 12-13, 2007 Conclusions Super-B Accelerator layout has been defined and an initial cost estimate made. –All components have been included. Accelerator costs have been estimated using past experience. –Escalation (then year costs) and contingency have not been added. A reasonable schedule has been made which is consistent with the construction times of PEP-II and KEKB.