IPv4 Transfer Statistics Analytic View Alain Durand, May 25 th 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Internet Number Resource Status Report As of 30 June 2005.
Advertisements

IPv4 Address Transfer proposal APNIC prop-050-v002 Geoff Huston.
Internet Number Resource Status Report As of 31 March 2005.
June 2013 Internet Number Resource Report. June 2013 Internet Number Resource Report INTERNET NUMBER RESOURCE STATUS REPORT As of 30 June 2013 Prepared.
December 2013 Internet Number Resource Report. December 2013 Internet Number Resource Report INTERNET NUMBER RESOURCE STATUS REPORT As of 31 December.
March 2014 Internet Number Resource Report. March 2014 Internet Number Resource Report INTERNET NUMBER RESOURCE STATUS REPORT As of 31 March 2014 Prepared.
1 Overview of policy proposals Policy SIG Wednesday 26 August 2009 Beijing, China.
What fuels a market? The interaction of demand and supply! IPv4 exhaustion has had its impacts on supply. But can we quantify demand?
Allocations vs Announcements A comparison of RIR IPv4 Allocation Records with Global Routing Announcements Geoff Huston May 2004 (Activity supported by.
Update on RIPE NCC Inter- RIR Transfer proposal Adam Gosling APNIC 38 Policy SIG Meeting 18 September 2014.
IPv4 Address Lifetime Expectancy Geoff Huston Research activity supported by APNIC The Regional Internet Registries s do not make forecasts or predictions.
Providing A Subset of Whois Data Via DNS Shuang Zhu Xing Li CERNET Center.
Regional PDP Report Einar Bohlin Senior Policy Analyst.
Mirjam Kühne 1 RIPE 33, May 1999 Introduction to the RIPE NCC presented by Mirjam Kühne.
A proposal to lower the IPv4 minimum allocation size and initial criteria in the AP region prop-014-v001 Policy SIG APNIC17/APRICOT 2004 Feb
Prop-080: Removal of IPv4 Prefix Exchange Policy Guangliang Pan Resource Services Manager, APNIC.
Erik Bais, May 13 th 2015 PP – unassigned yet General Transfer Policy Presenter : Erik Bais –
17 March 2002IEPG - Minneapolis RIR Update A Joint Presentation Prepared By APNIC, ARIN, RIPE NCC.
IPv6. Why IPv6? Running out of IPv4 addresses Internet Assigned Numbers Authority allocated the last 5 /8 blocks on 3 Feb 2011 Internet Assigned Numbers.
30 April 2003 ITU SG2, Geneva, Switzerland Axel Pawlik, RIPE NCC Information Document 21-E ITU-T Study Group 2 May 2003 Question:1/2 Source:TSB Title:The.
Engineering Update Key Projects –IPV6 Registration function is completed, tested, and ready for production IPV6 WHOIS completed, tested, and ready for.
Allocation of IPv4 Blocks to Regional Internet Registries (Global Proposal) Draft Policy
Prop-077: Proposal to supplement transfer policy of historical IPv4 addresses Wendy Zhao Wei, Jane Zhang & Terence Zhang Yinghao.
Whois & Data Accuracy Across the RIRs. Terms ISP – An Internet Service Provider is allocated address space by an RIR for the purpose of providing connectivity.
September, 2003 Bill Woodcock Packet Clearing House
Regional Internet Registries An Overview
INTERNET NUMBER RESOURCE STATUS REPORT Regional Internet Registries
ARIN XXVIII 13 October 2011 Philadelphia Geoff Huston, APNIC
RIR Co-ordination and Joint Statistics
The Status of APNIC’s IPv4 Resources: Exhaustion & Transfers
Addressing 2015 Geoff Huston APNIC.
Proposer name APNIC XX Open Policy Meeting Locations Date
Nurani Nimpuno Registration Services Manager RIPE NCC
Addressing 2016 Geoff Huston APNIC.
Internet Governance Hui
IP Addresses in 2016 Geoff Huston APNIC.
INTERNET NUMBER RESOURCE STATUS REPORT Regional Internet Registries
July 2016 Internet Number Resource Report.
IPv6 Allocation Status Report
INTERNET NUMBER RESOURCE STATUS REPORT Regional Internet Registries
IPv6 Address Allocation APNIC
INTERNET NUMBER RESOURCE STATUS REPORT Regional Internet Registries
Draft Policy ARIN Cathy Aronson
ARIN Update John Curran President and CEO.
Joint IPv6 Forum/IPv6 SIG APNIC 15, Taipei, Taiwan 26 February 2003
1.
INTERNET NUMBER RESOURCE STATUS REPORT Regional Internet Registries
IPv4 space advances from brokers – what you need to know
July 2016 Internet Number Resource Report.
INTERNET NUMBER RESOURCE STATUS REPORT Regional Internet Registries
INTERNET NUMBER RESOURCE STATUS REPORT
July 2016 Internet Number Resource Report.
INTERNET NUMBER RESOURCE STATUS REPORT Regional Internet Registries
Permitted Uses of space reserved under NRPM 4.10
INTERNET NUMBER RESOURCE STATUS REPORT Regional Internet Registries
IPv6 Allocation Service in JPNIC
July 2016 Internet Number Resource Report.
INTERNET NUMBER RESOURCE STATUS REPORT
ARIN Inter-RIR Transfers
Unadvertised Addresses in APNIC’s Registry
IPv6 distribution and policy update
July 2016 Internet Number Resource Report.
IPv6 Allocation Status Update
INTERNET NUMBER RESOURCE STATUS REPORT Regional Internet Registries
IPv6 Allocation Status Report
IPv4 Address Lifetime Expectancy
July 2016 Internet Number Resource Report.
IPv6 technical SIG 27 February 2008 APNIC 25, Taipei Anna Mulingbayan
Internet Number Resource Status Report Regional Internet Registries
INTERNET NUMBER RESOURCE STATUS REPORT Regional Internet Registries
Presentation transcript:

IPv4 Transfer Statistics Analytic View Alain Durand, May 25 th 2016

| 2 Questions For This Study A.IPv4 Transfer Market Health 1)What is the concentration of address holders ? 2)Is the transfer market dominated by a few buyers? 3)Is there a regional direction of transfer? 4)What is the size distribution of transferred blocks? 5)How are things changing over time? B.Impact on the routing table Do transfers impact the size of the routing table? C.Registry Accuracy Does the WHOIS database accurately reflect who controls resources?

| 3 A.1) Share of the Top 10 Address Holders per Region: 01/01/2016: ARIN, APNIC & RIPE Total: 1.7 billion Top 10: 32% Total: 863 million Top 10: 32% Total: 802 million Top 10: 20% ARINRIPEAPNIC Source: delegated-extended files from ARIN, APNIC & RIPE Top 10 Others

| 4 Total: 180 million Top 10: 44% Total: 87 million Top 10: 44% LACNICAFRINIC A.1) Share of the Top 10 Address Holders per Region: 01/01/2016: LACNIC & AFRINIC Source: delegated-extended files from LACNI & AFRINIC

| 5 A.2) IPv4 Address Transfer Recipients: 2014/2015 Total: 38.9 million Top 10: ??% Total: 10.2 million Top 10: 61% Total: 18.3 million Top 10: 42% RIPEAPNIC Source: ARIN, APNIC, RIPE: APNIC & RIPE transfer stats files RIPE does not report on “legacy” transfers ARIN statistics do not provide any data about the identity of transferors and transferees. ? ARIN ?

| 6 A.2) IPv4 Address Transfer Recipients: 2014/2015 Total: 38.9 million Top 10: 83% Total: 10.2 million Top 10: 61% Total: 18.3 million Top 10: 42% ARINRIPEAPNIC Source: ARIN, APNIC, RIPE: APNIC & RIPE transfer stats files Source: : variations of delegated-arin-extended RIPE does not report on “legacy” transfers Reversed Engineered ?

| 7 A.3) IN-Region vs OUT-of-Region to Source: ARIN, APNIC, RIPE: APNIC & RIPE transfer stats files Addresses are flowing from ARIN to the other regions. ARIN 38.9 million ARIN 38.9 million APNIC 10.2 million RIPE 18.3 million RIPE 18.3 million 4.6 million 2.2 million 0.01 million From 11/23/2015 to 12/31/2015

| 8 A.3) How “Old” Were ARIN Addresses Transferred to APNIC? to Legacy addresses transferred to ARIN in prior to being re-transferred to APNIC to a subsidiary 4% Legacy addresses 79% ARIN addresses 17% ARIN creation

| 9 A.4) Distribution of Address Block Size in Transfers to Source: ARIN, APNIC, RIPE: APNIC & RIPE transfer stats files Larger transfers Smaller transfers

| 10 A.5) Evolution Over Time to Source: ARIN, APNIC, RIPE: APNIC & RIPE transfer stats files

| 11 B) Growth of RIRs IPv4-Delegated Table Source: delegated files Why is this important to track over time? The global BGP table derives from the RIR table and contains about 600,000 entries on Jan 1 st 2016, roughly 4 times the number of entries in the RIR table (due to factors including internal de-aggregation and traffic engineering). Any increase in the RIR table could then create a significant surge in the BGP table. ARIN..APNIC..RIPE..LACNIC..AFRINIC..Total.. 1/ ,739 19,806 44,130 3,714 1, ,315 1/ ,410 21,144 48,643 4,001 2, ,343 1/ ,047 22,742 50,004 7,800 2, ,975 1/ ,438 26,773 51,319 9,373 2, ,485 1/ ,852 31,616 56,105 10,798 2, ,228 4 Years later:+30%+60%+27%+191%+48%+40% Counting increases of IPv4 assigned or allocated entries over the last 4 years

| 12 RIR Contributions to IPv4-Delegated Table Growth Year over Year Relative ContributionAbsolute Contribution Source: delegated files

| 13 C) Need-Based Policies and Private Contracts The effect of need-based policies is to limit the size of the address block being transferred to the actual assessed need of the recipient. They do not prevent private contracts between parties such as Letter of Authorizations and Options. Such contracts and are not recorded publicly, thus it is impossible to measure the number of IPv4 addresses under those contracts and evaluate the concentration of this derivative market.

| 14 Note about Statistics Collection ARIN, APNIC & RIPE report different data about transfers. This makes data analysis across regions difficult. Origi n Org Id Dest. Org Id Origina l Block Transferred Block Previous Registration Date New Registration Date Country of Origin Country of Destinatio n Format ARIN ✔✔ WEB APNIC ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ TXT RIPE ✔✔✔✔ JSON Note: RIPE does not report transfers of legacy blocks