Migration of intermediate offset data from two-boat-survey Zongcai Feng Nov 3, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Survey Planning & Illumination with NORSAR-3D
Advertisements

Velocity Analysis Introduction to Seismic ImagingERTH 4470/5470 Yilmaz, ch
Multiple Removal with Local Plane Waves
3D Super-virtual Refraction Interferometry Kai Lu King Abdullah University of Science and Technology.
Reverse Time Migration of Multiples for OBS Data Dongliang Zhang KAUST.
Predictive Deconvolution in Practice
Surface Wave Prediction and Subtraction by Interferometry + Deconvolution Yanwei Xue Feb. 7, 2008.
Interferometric Interpolation of 3D OBS Data Weiping Cao, University of Utah Oct
SOES6004 Data acquisition and geometry
Occurs when wave encounters sharp discontinuities in the medium important in defining faults generally considered as noise in seismic sections seismic.
Primary-Only Imaging Condition Yue Wang. Outline Objective Objective POIC Methodology POIC Methodology Synthetic Data Tests Synthetic Data Tests 5-layer.
Solving Illumination Problems Solving Illumination Problems in Imaging:Efficient RTM & in Imaging:Efficient RTM & Migration Deconvolution Migration Deconvolution.
Interferometric Prediction and Least Squares Subtraction of Surface Waves Shuqian Dong and Ruiqing He University of Utah.
Joint Migration of Primary and Multiple Reflections in RVSP Data Jianhua Yu, Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Overview of Utah Tomography and Modeling/Migration (UTAM) Chaiwoot B., T. Crosby, G. Jiang, R. He, G. Schuster, Chaiwoot B., T. Crosby, G. Jiang, R. He,
Migration and Attenuation of Surface-Related and Interbed Multiple Reflections Zhiyong Jiang University of Utah April 21, 2006.
1 Interferometric Interpolation and Extrapolation of Sparse OBS and SSP Data Shuqian Dong and G.T.Schuster.
Kirchhoff vs Crosscorrelation
Autocorrelogram Migration of Drill-Bit Data Jianhua Yu, Lew Katz, Fred Followill, and Gerard T. Schuster.
Depth (m) Time (s) Raw Seismograms Four-Layer Sand Channel Model Midpoint (m)
Interferometric Multiple Migration of UPRC Data
4C Mahogony Data Processing and Imaging by LSMF Method Jianhua Yu and Yue Wang.
Demonstration of Super-Resolution and Super-Stacking Properties of Time Reversal Mirrors in Locating Seismic Sources Weiping Cao, Gerard T. Schuster, Ge.
Multisource Least-squares Reverse Time Migration Wei Dai.
1 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. VSP modeling, velocity analysis, and imaging in complex structures Yue Du With Mark Willis, Robert Stewart May.
Seeing the Invisible with Seismic Interferometry: Datuming and Migration Gerard T. Schuster, Jianhua Yu, Xiao Xiang and Jianming Sheng University of Utah.
1 OBS->OBS Extrapolation Interferometry Shuqian Dong and Sherif Hanafy Coarse OBS Virtual SWP.
Impact of MD on AVO Inversion
Multiples Waveform Inversion
Moveout Correction and Migration of Surface-related Resonant Multiples Bowen Guo*,1, Yunsong Huang 2 and Gerard Schuster 1 1 King Abdullah University of.
Multisource Least-squares Migration of Marine Data Xin Wang & Gerard Schuster Nov 7, 2012.
Reflection seismograms
Interferometric Interpolation of 3D SSP Data Sherif M. Hanafy Weiping Cao Gerard T. Schuster October 2009.
Reverse Time Migration of Prism Waves for Salt Flank Delineation
Fast Least Squares Migration with a Deblurring Filter Naoshi Aoki Feb. 5,
LEAST SQUARES DATUMING AND SURFACE WAVES PREDICTION WITH INTERFEROMETRY Yanwei Xue Department of Geology & Geophysics University of Utah 1.
Super-virtual Interferometric Diffractions as Guide Stars Wei Dai 1, Tong Fei 2, Yi Luo 2 and Gerard T. Schuster 1 1 KAUST 2 Saudi Aramco Feb 9, 2012.
Migration Velocity Analysis of Multi-source Data Xin Wang January 7,
Benefits & Limitations of Least Squares Migration W.Dai,D.Zhang,X.Wang,GTSKAUST RTM Least Squares RTM GOM RTM GOM LSRTM.
Processing Seismic Reflection Data of La Bajada Fault Ryan Lester.
Shuqian Dong and Sherif M. Hanafy February 2009 Interpolation and Extrapolation of 2D OBS Data Using Interferometry.
I. Basic Techniques in Structural Geology Field measurements and mapping Terminology on folds and folds Stereographic projections From maps to cross-sections.
Interpolating and Extrapolating Marine Data with Interferometry
I. Basic Techniques in Structural Geology
Making Marchenko imaging work with field data and the bumpy road to 3D
Zero-Offset Data d = L o ò r ) ( g = d dr r ) ( g = d
Primary-Only Imaging Condition And Interferometric Migration
Modeling of free-surface multiples - 2
4C Mahogony Data Processing and Imaging by LSMF Method
Skeletonized Wave-Equation Surface Wave Dispersion (WD) Inversion
Interferometric Least Squares Migration
MOSRP Multiple Attenuation Review
Modeling of free-surface multiples
Seismic Interferometry
The Wave Equation Modeled
Non-local Means (NLM) Filter for Trim Statics
Wavelet estimation from towed-streamer pressure measurement and its application to free surface multiple attenuation Zhiqiang Guo (UH, PGS) Arthur Weglein.
Overview of Multisource and Multiscale Seismic Inversion
Initial analysis and comparison of the wave equation and asymptotic prediction of a receiver experiment at depth for one-way propagating waves Chao Ma*,
Least-squares Reverse Time Migration with Frequency-selection Encoding for Marine Data Wei Dai, WesternGeco Yunsong Huang and Gerard T. Schuster, King.
Overview of Multisource and Multiscale Seismic Inversion
A first step towards the P wave only modeling plan
Han Yu, Bowen Guo*, Sherif Hanafy, Fan-Chi Lin**, Gerard T. Schuster
Jingfeng Zhang and Arthur B. Weglein
3D Seismic Processing Eric Verschuur AES 1530.
Non-local Means (NLM) Filter for Trim Statics
—Based on 2018 Field School Seismic Data
Processing and Binning Overview
LSMF for Suppressing Multiples
Wave Equation Dispersion Inversion of Guided P-Waves (WDG)
Presentation transcript:

Migration of intermediate offset data from two-boat-survey Zongcai Feng Nov 3, 2015

Outline  Motivation  Extended aperture by two shot boat survey  Interferometric interpolation  Predict intermediate offset using multiples  Theory  Filling the gap of intermediate offset data  Numerical test

Motivation Surface-related multiples are treated as noisy conventionally. RAW Data SRME Data Multiples can provide different illumination area from primary.

Motivation Surface-related multiples are treated as noisy conventionally. RAW Data SRME Data Multiples can provide different illumination area from primary Increase the illumination area (Xin Wang)

Original Two-source-boat Survey (The CLO technique) LL water Near-offset shot Far-offset shot Streamer length: L is 2 L ahead of

Original Two-source-boat Survey (The CLO technique) LL water Near-offset shot Far-offset shot Streamer length: L Is L ahead of The CLO technique. In CLO acquisition, an extra source array system is deployed on a smaller vessel, sailing one spread-length ahead of the main seismic vessel. (Piet Van Mastrigt, 2002) Advantages of CLO are: increased efficiency that results from doubling the streamer count (typically 8-km offsets with 4-km streamers) Offset: 0~L + L~2L

Extended Aperture with Two-source-boat Survey for Primary and Multiples (Schuster and Wang, 2012) L2L water Near-offset shot Far-offset shot Streamer length: L is 2 L ahead of

Extended Aperture with Two-source-boat Survey for Primary and Multiples (Schuster and Wang, 2012) L2L water Near-offset shot Far-offset shot Streamer length: L is 2 L ahead of

Extended Aperture with Two-source-boat Survey for Primary and Multiples (Schuster and Wang, 2012) L2L Near-offset shot Far-offset shot Streamer length: L is 2 L ahead of Rec # Near offset shot Sor # Rec # Far offset shot Sor # Rec # Intermediate offset are missing Sor # water Offset: 0~L Offset: 2L~3L Offset: L~2L?

2L~3L All offset data (wave equation) 0~L L~2L Far Offset Near OffsetInter Offset part Primary Multiple Far offset multiple Inter offset primary predict

Outline  Motivation  Extended aperture by two shot boat survey  Interferometric interpolation  Predict intermediate offset using multiples  Theory  Filling the gap of intermediate offset data  Numerical test

Interferometric interpolation s g water layer x

Predict intermediate offset using multiples (Hanafy and Schuster, 2013) water layer L2L sxg Data based Model based Assume know: water velocity, location and reflectivity of water bottom

Reiceiver side intermediate offset primary water layer L2L s xg

Reiceiver side intermediate offset primary water layer L2L s xg

Source side intermediate offset primary water layer L2L sxg

Source side intermediate offset primary water layer L2L sxg

Stationary Phase Analysis water layer sxg g s'

Stationary Phase Analysis water layer s x g’ g x' g’ s' s’g & s’g’ straight

Stationary Phase Analysis water layer s x g x' g’ s' s’g & s’g’ straight

Intermediate offset aperture analysis L2L sxg Near Offset: 0~L Intermediate Offset: L~2L ? Offset =5L Far Offset: 2L~3L

Intermediate offset aperture analysis L2L sxg Near Offset: 0~L Intermediate Offset: L~2L ? Offset =1.5L Far Offset: 2L~3L For flat ocean bottom, predict Intermediate Offset: L ~ 1.5L For deeper structure, predict Intermediate Offset > L ~ 1.5L e.g: = 1.1L ~ 1.5L or 1.8L~2.2L (1.8L~2.0L )

Outline  Motivation  Extended aperture by two shot boat survey  Interferometric interpolation  Predict intermediate offset using multiples  Theory  Filling the gap of intermediate offset data  Numerical test

Numerical Test water layer L2L sxg

2L~3L All offset data (wave equation) 0~L L~2L Far Offset Near OffsetInter Offset part Primary Multiple Far offset multiple Inter offset primary predict

Far offset data (2L~3L) Primary + Multiple Assume deeper water, primary can be easily mute

Predict Primary Part inter offset data (1.5L~2L) Born modeling for water bottom reflection True Primary For deeper structure, predict Intermediate Offset > L ~ 1.5L Non stationary

water layer L2L sx g Numerical Test

2L~3L 0~L L~2L Far Offset Near OffsetInter Offset part Far offset multiple Inter offset primary predict All offset data (wave equation) Primary Multiple

Primary + Multiple Far offset data (2L~3L) Assume deeper water, primary can be easily mute

Inter offset data (L~2L) Born modeling, Cross correlation, Deconvolution True inter offset data L~2L Pre inter offset data

True inter offset data Inter offset data filter (L~2L) Cross correlation, Slank stack, Filter (angle) P M Pre inter offset data

Source side intermediate offset primary water layer L2L sxg

Intermediate offset data filter Local Slank Stack Filter (angle)

g T Slank Stack Use Local Slank Stack to Calculate Filter F(g)

g T

g T when (g,t) is stationary Use Local Slank Stack to Calculate Filter F(g)

Intermediate offset data By Local Slank Stack Filter

Zoom in Intermediate offset data By Local Slank Stack Filter

Inter offset data zoom in True data Predict data after filtering

Use Local Slank Stack to Calculate Filter F(g) g T Slank Stack Extent slank stack:

g T Use Local Slank Stack to Calculate Filter F(g)

Inter offset data aftering filtering Cross correlation, Local slank stack, Filter (angle) Zoom in new old

Local Slank Stack Compare Zoom

Primar + Multiple Predict intermediate offset data using predicted multiple Multiple x F(t) predict

Predict offset data (L~2L)

Source side intermediate offset primary water layer L2L sxg Intermediate offset multiple

Next step  More complex model + RT to separate multiples  Compare intermediate offset image with near and far offset  Migration  Add noise